Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Journal of African Languages and Linguistics

Ed. by Ameka, Felix K. / Amha, Azeb

2 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 0.800

CiteScore 2017: 0.76

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.327
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 1.126

Online
ISSN
1613-3811
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 39, Issue 2

Issues

Markedness and dominance in the ATR harmony system of Diola-Fogny

Roderic F. Casali
  • Corresponding author
  • Linguistics, Canada Institute of Linguistics, Langley Township, Canada; Trinity Western University, Langley Township, Canada
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2018-11-09 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jall-2018-0008

Abstract

Diola-Fogny is a well-known example of a tongue root harmony language with assimilatory dominance of [+ATR] vowels. Less well known, however, are some asymmetries involving the frequency and distribution of [+ATR] and [-ATR] vowels. In addition to being dominant, [+ATR] vowels are subject to restrictions on their occurrence in certain classes of function words and affixes and occur with far lower overall frequency than [-ATR] vowels. In essence, they pattern like a marked sound class. This paper focuses on some implications of these findings for a theoretical topic of interest: markedness relations involving tongue root features. The Diola-Fogny patterns conform quite well to the expectations of a traditional understanding of featural markedness, which equates the dominant value of a feature with the marked one. They are problematic, however, for a widely assumed view of tongue root markedness relations that treats [-ATR] as universally marked in high vowels. Under this view, marked patterning of all [+ATR] vowels (including high [+ATR] [i], [u]) is unexpected. I show that such patterning is intelligible in a framework in which markedness has a representational basis and in which [+ATR] quality is represented by a privative feature [ATR].

Keywords: Diola-Fogny; ATR harmony; [+ATR] dominance; markedness; privative features

References

  • Alderete, John. 2003. Structural disparities in Navajo word domains: A case for LexCat-faithfulness. The Linguistic Review 20. 111–157.Google Scholar

  • Anttila, Arto. 2002. Morphologically conditioned phonological alternations. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 20. 1–42.Google Scholar

  • Aoki, Haruo. 1968. Toward a typology of vowel harmony. International Journal of American Linguistics 34. 142–145.Google Scholar

  • Archangeli, Diana. 2011. Feature specification and underspecification. In Marc van Oostendorp, Colin J. Ewen, Elizabeth Hume & Keren Rice (eds.), The Blackwell companion to phonology, 148–170. Malden, MA and Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Archangeli, Diana & Douglas Pulleyblank. 1989. Yoruba vowel harmony. Linguistic Inquiry 20. 173–217.Google Scholar

  • Archangeli, Diana & Douglas Pulleyblank. 1994. Grounded phonology (Current studies in linguistics 25). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

  • Archangeli, Diana & Douglas Pulleyblank. 2002. Kinande vowel harmony: Domains, grounded conditions and one sided alignment. Phonology 19. 139–188.Google Scholar

  • Baković, Eric. 2000. Harmony, dominance and control. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University dissertation. http://roa.rutgers.edu/files/360-1199/roa-360-bakovic-2.pdf.

  • Baković, Eric & Colin Wilson. 2000. Transparency, locality, and targeted constraints. MS UC San Diego & UCLA. http://roa.rutgers.edu/files/430-1200/roa-437-bakovic-1.pdf.

  • Bassène, Alain-Christian. 2006. Description du jóola banjal (Sénégal). Lyon : Université Lumière Lyon 2 dissertation. http://theses.univ-lyon2.fr/documents/lyon2/2006/bassene_ac/info.

  • Bassene, Mamadou. 2012. Morphophonology of Joola Eegimaa. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota dissertation.Google Scholar

  • Beckman, Jill N. 1997. Postional faithfulness, positional neutralisation and Shona vowel harmony. Phonology 14. 1–46.Google Scholar

  • Beckman, Jill N. 1998. Positional faithfulness. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Amherst Dissertation. http://roa.rutgers.edu/files/234-1297/234-1297-BECKMAN-6-0.PDF.

  • Berry, Jack. 1957. Vowel harmony in Twi. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 19. 124–130.Google Scholar

  • Bole-Richard, Rémy. 1981. Une autre approche de l’harmonie vocalique: Le mot phonologique en Ega. Cahiers Ivoiriens de Recherche Linguistique, vol. 10. 31–51. Abidjan: Institut de Linguistique Appliquée, Université Nationale de Côte d’Ivoire.Google Scholar

  • Cahill, Michael. 2007. Aspects of the morphology and phonology of Konni. Dallas: SIL International.Google Scholar

  • Calabrese, Andrea. 1995. A constraint-based theory of phonological markedness and simplification procedures. Linguistic Inquiry 26. 373–463.Google Scholar

  • Calabrese, Andrea. 2005. Markedness and economy in a derivational model of phonology (Studies in generative grammar 80). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Casali, Roderic F. 1995. Nawuri phonology (Language monographs 3). Legon: Institute of African Studies, University of Ghana.Google Scholar

  • Casali, Roderic F. 2003. [ATR] value asymmetries and underlying vowel inventory structure in Niger-Congo and Nilo-Saharan. Linguistic Typology 7. 307–382.Google Scholar

  • Casali, Roderic F. 2008. ATR harmony in African languages. Language and Linguistics Compass 2. 496–549.Google Scholar

  • Casali, Roderic F. 2012. [+ATR] dominance in Akan. Journal of West African Languages 39(1). 33–59.Google Scholar

  • Casali, Roderic F. 2014. Assimilation, markedness and inventory structure in tongue root harmony systems. MS: Trinity Western University. http://roa.rutgers.edu/content/article/files/1319_casali_1.pdf.

  • Casali, Roderic F. 2016. Some inventory-related asymmetries in the patterning of tongue root harmony systems. Studies in African Linguistics 45. 95–140. http://sal.research.pdx.edu/PDF/450Casali.pdf.

  • Casali, Roderic F. 2017. High-vowel patterning as an early diagnostic of vowel inventory type. Journal of West African Languages 44(1). 79–112.Google Scholar

  • Causley, Trisha Kathleen. 1999. Complexity and markedness in optimality theory. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto dissertation. http://twpl.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/twpl/article/view/6512/3485.

  • Clements, George N. 1981. Akan vowel harmony: A nonlinear analysis. Harvard Studies in Phonology 2. 108–177.Google Scholar

  • Dawson, Keith. 1975. L’accord vocalique en Tépo. Annales de l’Université d’Abidjan Série H (Linguistique) 8. 15–26.Google Scholar

  • Dolphyne, Florence. 1988. The Akan (Twi-Fante) language: Its sound systems and tonal structure. Accra: Ghana Universities Press.Google Scholar

  • Greenberg, Joseph H. 1957. Essays in linguistics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

  • Haspelmath, Martin. 2006. Against markedness (and what to replace it with). Journal of Linguistics 42. 25–70.Google Scholar

  • Hess, Susan. 1992. Assimilatory effects in a vowel harmony system: An acoustic analysis of advanced tongue root in Akan. Journal of Phonetics 20. 475–492.Google Scholar

  • Hopkins, Bradley L. 1995. Contribution à une etude de la syntaxe diola-fogny (Cahiers de Recherche Linguistique 4). Dakar: Société Internationale de Linguistique.Google Scholar

  • Hyman, Larry. 2002. Is there a right-to-left bias in vowel harmony? Paper presented at the Ninth International Phonology Meeting, Vienna. November 1, 2002. http://linguistics.berkeley.edu/~hyman/Hyman_Vienna_VH_paper_forma.pdf.

  • Hyman, Larry. 2008. Directional asymmetries in the morphology and phonology of words, with special reference to Bantu. Linguistics 46. 309–350.Google Scholar

  • Jacobson, Leon C. 1980. Voice-quality harmony in Western Nilotic languages. In Robert Vago (ed.), Issues in vowel harmony, 183–200. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Kaun, Abigail. 1995. The typology of rounding harmony: An optimality-theoretic approach. Los Angeles, CA: University of California, Los Angeles dissertation.Google Scholar

  • Keating, Patricia A. 1990. The window model of coarticulation: Articulatory evidence. In John Kingston & Mary E. Beckman (eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology I, 451–470. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Kiparsky, Paul. 1985. Some consequences of lexical phonology. Phonology Yearbook 2. 83–138.Google Scholar

  • Kiparsky, Paul. 2006. The amphichronic program vs. evolutionary phonology. Theoretical Linguistics 32(2). 217–236.Google Scholar

  • Krämer, Martin. 2001. Vowel harmony and correspondence theory. Düsseldorf: Heinrich-Heine-Universität dissertation.Google Scholar

  • Kutsch Lojenga, Constance. 1991. Vowel harmony in Alur: On the crossroads of two systems. In Franz Rottland & Lucia N. Omondi (eds.), Proceedings of the third Nilo-Saharan Linguistics Colloquium (Nilo-Saharan, 6), 131–141. Hamburg: H. Buske.Google Scholar

  • Kutsch Lojenga, Constance. 1994. KiBudu: A Bantu language with nine vowels. Africana Linguistica 11. 127–133.Google Scholar

  • Ladefoged, Peter, Joseph DeClerk, Mona Lindau & G. Papçun. 1972. An auditory-motor theory of vowel production. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 22. 48–75.Google Scholar

  • Leitch, Myles. 1996. Vowel harmonies of the Congo basin: An optimality theory analysis of variation in the Bantu zone C. Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia dissertation.Google Scholar

  • Mullin, Kevin 2011. Strength in harmony systems: Trigger and directional asymmetries. MS: University of Massachusetts Amherst. http://roa.rutgers.edu/files/1134-0211/1134-MULLIN-0-0.PDF

  • Mutaka, Ngessimo. 1995. Vowel harmony in Kinande. Journal of West African Languages 25(2). 41–55.Google Scholar

  • Orie, O̩lanike̩ O̩la. 2003. Two harmony theories and high vowel patterns in Ebira and Yoruba. The Linguistic Review 20. 1–35.Google Scholar

  • Parker, Kirk. 1985. Baka phonology. Occasional Papers in the Study of Sudanese Languages 4. 63–85.Google Scholar

  • Pater, Joe. 2009. Morpheme-specific phonology: Constraint indexation and inconsistency resolution. In Steve Parker (ed.), Phonological argumentation: Essays on evidence and motivation, 123–154. London: Equinox.Google Scholar

  • Perkell, Joseph. S. 1971. Physiology of speech production: A preliminary study of two suggested revisions of the features specifying vowels. MIT Research Laboratory Quarterly Research Report 102. 123–139.Google Scholar

  • Pierrehumbert, J. 1980. The phonology and phonetics of English intonation. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation.Google Scholar

  • Pulleyblank, Douglas. 2002. Harmony drivers: No disagreement allowed. Berkeley Linguistic Society 28. 249–267.Google Scholar

  • Rice, Keren. 2007. Markedness in phonology. In Paul de Lacy (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of phonology, 79–98. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Rice, Keren & Peter Avery. 1993. Segmental complexity and the structure of inventories. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 12. 131–163. http://twpl.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/twpl/article/view/6346.

  • Ringen, Catherine O. 1975. Vowel harmony: theoretical implications. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University dissertation. (Published by Garland Publishing, New York, 1988.)Google Scholar

  • Sambou, Pierre-Marie. 1983. Lexique diola – Francais (Les langues nationals au Sénegal D.2). Dakar: Centre de Linquistique Appliquée de Dakar.Google Scholar

  • Sapir, David J. 1965. A grammar of Diola-Fogny (West African language monographs 3). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Sapir, David J. 1975. Big and thin: Two Diola-Fogny meta-linguistic terms. Language in Society 4. 1–15.Google Scholar

  • Smolensky, Paul & Géraldine Legendre. 2006. The harmonic mind: From neural computation to optimality-theoretic grammar (Vol. 2: Linguistic and philosophical implications). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

  • Stegen, Oliver. 2000. Rangi vowel system: Five or Seven? Paper presented at the 30th Colloquium on African Languages and Linguistics, University of Leiden, August 28–30, 2000.Google Scholar

  • Steriade, Donca. 1993. Positional neutralization. Paper presented at the 23rd meeting of the North East Linguistic Society.Google Scholar

  • Stewart, John M. 1967. Tongue root position in Akan vowel harmony. Phonetica 16. 185–204.Google Scholar

  • Tabb, Waller C. 2001. LuBwisi phonology survey. MS: SIL International.Google Scholar

  • Tchagbalé, Zakari. 1976. Phonologie et tonologie du tem. Paris: Université de la Sorbonne Nouvelle dissertation.Google Scholar

  • Vaux, Bert. 1996. The status of ATR in feature geometry. Linguistic Inquiry 27. 175–182.Google Scholar

  • Walker, Rachel. 2001. Positional markedness in vowel harmony. In C. Fery, A. D. Green & R. van de Vijver (eds.), Proceedings of HILP 5: Linguistics in Potsdam, vol. 12. 212–232. Potsdam: Univ.-Bibliothek, Publ.-Stelle.Google Scholar

  • Wayment, Adam. 2009. Assimilation as attraction: Computing distance, similarity, and locality in phonology. Baltimiore, MD: John Hopkins University dissertation. http://roa.rutgers.edu/files/1071-0410/1071-WAYMENT-0-0.PDF.

About the article

Published Online: 2018-11-09

Published in Print: 2018-11-06


Citation Information: Journal of African Languages and Linguistics, Volume 39, Issue 2, Pages 201–239, ISSN (Online) 1613-3811, ISSN (Print) 0167-6164, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jall-2018-0008.

Export Citation

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in