Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Journal of African Languages and Linguistics

Ed. by Ameka, Felix K. / Amha, Azeb

2 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 0.800

CiteScore 2017: 0.76

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.327
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 1.126

Online
ISSN
1613-3811
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 39, Issue 2

Issues

The use of the ablative clitic in locative phrases in Iraqw, a Cushitic language of Tanzania

Anne Kruijt
Published Online: 2018-11-08 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jall-2018-0009

Abstract

This paper examines the use of the ablative case clitic in locative phrases in Iraqw, a South Cushitic language of Tanzania. In the typological classification of locative marker syncretisms, Iraqw has been classified as a language with a Source=Location≠ Goal pattern. This pattern is extremely rare in languages of the world and has been argued to be unattainable. The Iraqw ablative case clitic has been reported as both source and location marker. New data shows that the directional case clitic, a goal marker, appears on locative constructions as well, but that it is used to express purpose rather than location. The data also shows that the ablative case clitic is found mainly in locational clauses with a main verb with a durative aspect. Based on this, I argue that in locative constructions, the ablative clitic expresses duration rather than location and I propose the reanalysis of the ablative marker in locative phrases as a durational marker. The notion of location does not need to be expressed overtly, but is a zero-marker. Therefore, the rare Source=Location≠ Goal pattern is no longer valid for Iraqw, and instead I propose the pattern Source≠ Location≠ Goal, which is common in languages of the world.

Keywords: Iraqw; source; ablative case; location; spatial domain

References

  • Andersen, Torben. 2002. Case inflection and nominal head marking in Dinka. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 23. 1–30.Google Scholar

  • Andrews, Avery. 1985. The major functions of the noun phrase. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, vol I, 62–154. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar

  • Berger, Paul & Roland Kiessling (eds.). 1998. Iraqw texts (Archiv Afrikanistischer Manuskripte: Herausgegeben von Gudrun Miehe und Hilke Meyer-Bahlhurg, band 4). Köln: Rüdiger Köppe Verlag.Google Scholar

  • The Bible Society of Tanzania. 1995. Iimu/uungw (The book of Genesis). Dodoma: The Bible Society of Tanzania.Google Scholar

  • Blake, Barry J. 1977. Case marking in Australian languages. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar

  • Blake, Barry J. 1994. Case. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Creissels, Denis. 2006. Encoding the distinction between location, source and destination: A typological study. In Maya Hickmann & Stéphane Robert (eds.), Space in languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories, 19–28. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Den Dikken, Marcel. 2010. On the functional structure of locative and directional PPs. In Guglielmo Cinque & Luigi Rizzi (eds.), The Cartography of Syntactic Structure, vol. 6, 74–126. Oxford: University Press.Google Scholar

  • Dryer, Matthew S. 2013. Position of Case Affixes. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. http://wals.info/chapter/51 (accessed 03 October 2018).

  • Gehrke, Berit. 2007. Goals and sources in event structures. Linguistics in the Netherlands 24(1). 86–98.Google Scholar

  • Haspelmath, Martin. 2009. Terminology of Case. In Andrej L. Malchukov & Andrew Spencer (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Case, 505–517. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva. 2002. World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar

  • Jackendoff, Ray. 1983. Semantics and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

  • Koopman, Hilda. 2000. Prepositions, postpositions, circumpositions, and particles. In Hilda Koopman (ed.), The syntax of specifiers and heads, 204–260. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Kruijt, Anne 2017. Straight from the source: The semantics and functions of the ablative case clitic of Iraqw. Leiden: Leiden University Master Thesis. https://openaccess.leidenuniv.nl/handle/1887/51473

  • Lakusta, Laura & Barbara Landau. 2005. Starting at the end: The importance of goals in spatial language. Cognition 96. 1–33.Google Scholar

  • Mous, Maarten. 1992. A grammar of Iraqw. Leiden: Leiden University dissertation.Google Scholar

  • Mous, Maarten. 2015. Copulas in Iraqw, a Cushitic language from Tanzania. Lingue e linguaggio XIV(2). 179–195.Google Scholar

  • Mous, Maarten, Martha Qorro & Roland Kießling. 2002. Iraqw-English Dictionary. Köln: Rüdiger Köppe Verlag.Google Scholar

  • Mous, Maarten & Safari Sanka. 2008. Géeso Duqang na hadithi nyingine [Géeso Duqang and other stories]. Nairobi: Kijabe Press.Google Scholar

  • Nam, Seungho. 2004. Goal and source: Asymmetry in their syntax and semantics. Workshop on Event Structure. Leipzig, Germany.Google Scholar

  • Narrog, Heiko. 2010. A diachronic dimension in maps of case functions. Linguistic discovery 8(1). 233–254.Google Scholar

  • Noonan, Michael. 2008. Patterns of development, patterns of syncretism of relational morphology in the Bodic languages. In Jóhanna Bardal & Shobhana Cheliah (eds.), The role of semantics and pragmatics in the development of case, 261–282. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Nordbustad, Frøydis. 1988. Iraqw grammar: An analytical study of the Iraqw language (Language and Dialect Studies in East Africa, 8). Berlin: Dietrich Reimer.Google Scholar

  • Pantcheva, Marina. 2010. The syntactic structure of locations, goals, and sources. Linguistics 48(5). 1043–1081.Google Scholar

  • Riemsdijk, Henk van & Riny Huybregts. 2002. Location and locality. In Marc van Oostendorp & Elene Anagnostopoulou (eds.), Progress in Grammar: Articles at the 20th Anniversary of the Comparison of Grammatical Models Group in Tilburg, 1–23. Amsterdam: Meertens Instituut.Google Scholar

  • Svenonius, Peter. 2010. Spatial P in English. In Guglielmo Cinque & Luigi Rizzi (eds.), The cartography of syntactic structure, vol. 6, 127–160. Oxford: University Press.Google Scholar

  • Woodward, Amanda L. 1998. Infants selectively encode the goal object of an actor’s reach. Cognition 69. 1–34.Google Scholar

  • Zwarts, Joost. 2005. Prepositional aspect and the algebra of paths. Linguistics and Philosophy 28. 739–779.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2018-11-08

Published in Print: 2018-11-06


Citation Information: Journal of African Languages and Linguistics, Volume 39, Issue 2, Pages 241–265, ISSN (Online) 1613-3811, ISSN (Print) 0167-6164, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jall-2018-0009.

Export Citation

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in