Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …
ceased

Journal of Advanced Oxidation Technologies

Online
ISSN
2371-1175
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 20, Issue 1

Issues

Microwave regeneration of biological activated carbon

Daoji Wu
  • Corresponding author
  • School of Municipal and Environmental Engineering, Shandong Jianzhu University, Ji’nan, China
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Shujie Li / Ning Wang
Published Online: 2017-02-10 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jaots-2016-0174

Abstract

Spent biological activated carbon (SAC) in a drinking water treatment plant has been regenerated with microwaves, and the regeneration effects were evaluated through iodine values, surface chemistry, surface structure energy and surface morphology by comparison with unused activated carbon (UAC). On this basis, the performance of regenerated activated carbon (RAC) was investigated by methylene blue adsorption and raw water clarification. The results showed that the iodine value of RAC recovered to 98.1 % of that of UAC, and that the BET surface area of RAC (778 m2/g) was larger than that of SAC (749 m2/g). The pore structure of RAC was more regular than that of UAC, and the removal efficiency of RAC could achieve 90.7 % due to the formation of new micropores. Organic adsorption parameters of RAC fitted the Freundich isotherm better than those of UAC, and the R2 values for CODMn (chemical oxygen demand determined by KMnO4), DOC (dissolved organic carbon) and UV254 (absorbance value of the wastewater containing organic matter at ultraviolet light of 254 nm) were 0.902, 0.921 and 0.940, respectively.

Keywords: biological activated carbon; regeneration; microwave; iodine value

1. Introduction

Activated carbon (AC) can efficiently remove organic pollutants such as taste and odor compounds, algal toxins, synthetic organics, endocrine disruptors, synthetic drug precursors and disinfection by-products. The application of biological activated carbon (BAC) in environment field can trace back to early 1970s when Weber et al. [1] treated the wastewater with microbial degradation method. BAC can remove organic compounds by adsorbing biodegradable organic matter, during which the microbial metabolism is capable of extending the life of AC significantly. In general, regeneration of AC is essential to extend the life of BAC and reduce the cost of treatment. Currently, the most popular method for regeneration is thermal regeneration, but its large carbon loss and heavy energy consumption restrict the regeneration efficiency [2]. Meanwhile, pore structure rupture can lead to the contamination of surface due to the decomposition of substrate. As a potential alterative, microwave regeneration attracts much attention because of its uniform instant heating and controllable temperature. The large temperature gradient inside AC can benefit the regeneration with less energy consumption [3]. Compared with traditional thermal regeneration, the consuming time of microwave regeneration method is short. Many researchers have focused on microwave regeneration of AC. Ondon [4] reported that the regeneration efficiency of AC could reach 98 % even after 10 regeneration cycles, with higher regeneration efficiency and better temperature control. Jie [5] found that both iodine value and methylene index recovered to 90 % of those of UAC after microwave regeneration, and that the CODMn removal was very close to that of new carbon.

This study focused on microwave regeneration of SAC from the BAC pools of a water treatment plant. Orthogonal experiment L9(3 4) (four factors and three levels) was designed to determine the optimum conditions for microwave regeneration. Performance comparison between RAC and UAC was conducted with surface characterization and methylene blue adsorption. Additionally, the removal effects of pollutants in raw water from the plant were investigated through the evaluation indexes including CODMn, UV254 and DOC.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Materials and instruments

Reagents: Methylene blue (AR, Qingdao Ren Xing Experimental Technology Co., Ltd.), KI (AR, test four Hervey, Shanghai Chemical Co., Ltd.), I2 (AR, Tianjin Bodie Chemical Co., Ltd.), NaOH (AR, Shanghai Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. joint trial), Na2CO3 (AR, Tianjin Bodie Chemical Co., Ltd.), HCl (AR, Laiyang Economic Development Zone Fine Chemical Plant), H2SO4 (AR, Laiyang City Kant Chemical Co., Ltd.). The SAC was gathered from the BAC pools after running for 10 months.

Experiment instruments: UV-visible spectrophotometer (TU-1800 Beijing Purkinje General Instrument Co., Ltd.), SHZ-82 bath oscillator (HY-8 Experimental Analysis Instrument Factory Changzhou Bo Yuan), Electric oven thermostat, coagulation Experiment mixer (Shenzhen Hydra Water Industry and Technology Development Co., Ltd.), thermal Field fever scanning electron microscope (SUPRA55 German Zeiss), the specific surface area and pore size analyzer (V-sorb 2800P Gold Egypt Spectrum Technology Co., Ltd.), hand-made microwave regeneration apparatus (shown in Figure 1).

Microwave regeneration apparatus
Figure 1:

Microwave regeneration apparatus

In the microwave regeneration apparatus, a household microwave oven of 700 W is equipped with a quartz reactor mounted inside; gas flow is controlled by a rotameter and the exhaust can be cleaned with solution; N2 gas creates an inert environment for the regeneration of AC by anaerobic reactions.

2.2 Preparation methods

2.2.1 Pretreatment of the microwave-regenerated activated carbon (PRAC)

SAC sample was rinsed with 5 % HCl for 120 min and then washed to be neutral with distilled water to remove extra surface functional groups [6]. Afterwards, the sample was dried for two hours before microwave regeneration.

2.2.2 Microwave regeneration of activated carbon (RAC)

To determine the optimal regeneration conditions, the impacts of regeneration time, microwave power, gas flow rate and carbon content on the regeneration effect were investigated, and iodine value was chosen as the indicator to evaluate the regeneration effect. Furthermore, methylene blue was selected as the adsorbate to compare the performance of RAC and UAC.

2.3 Characterization methods

The determination of iodine values was based on the “Standard Test Method for Determination of Iodine Number of Activated Carbon” ASTM D4607-1994 (2006). The surface topography and the pore structure of AC were observed by thermal field emission scanning electron microscope (SUPRA55, Carl Zeiss AG, Germany) after vacuum coating. The specific surface area, pore volume, average pore size and pore size distribution were detected by the N2 adsorption method with BJH, DFT and DH analysis [7].

2.4 Adsorption test

2.4.1 Methylene blue adsorption test

Methylene blue solution (1.5 g/L) was adsorbed for 180 min by 0.05 g, 0.1 g, 0.15 g, 0.2 g, 0.3 g, 0.6 g and 1 g 100-mesh AC respectively. Specially, 0.3 g AC was used to adsorb methylene blue solution (1.5 g/L) for 5 min, 10 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h, 4 h, 6 h and 9 h respectively. The residual concentration was also determined by spectrophotometry at 665 nm.

2.4.2 Raw water adsorption test

0.05 g, 0.1 g, 0.15 g, 0.2 g, 0.3 g, 0.6 g and 1 g 100-mesh RAC and UAC were used to adsorb 0.45 micron membrane-filtrated raw water for 180 min, respectively. Specially, 0.3 g AC was used to adsorb the membrane-filtrated raw water for 5 min, 10 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h, 4 h, 6 h and 9 h, respectively. The residual concentration was determined by spectrophotometry, and DOC was measured by the TOC analyzer.

3. Results and discussion

3..1 Orthogonal design of microwave regeneration

The microwave regeneration of SAC may be influenced by regeneration time, microwave power, gas flow rate and the mass of AC. These uncorrelated factors were chosen as orthogonal parameters for experiment design, as shown in Table 1 [8].

Table 2 presents the results of orthogonal test. From the value of R, it can be seen that the affecting factors significantly follow the descendent order as: regeneration time, microwave power, gas flow rate and AC mass. According to the average value of factor levels k1, k2 and k3, the preferred conditions are regeneration time of 30 min, microwave power of 500 W, gas flow rate of 0.25 m3/h and AC mass of 10 g.

Table 1:

Orthogonal design for microwave regeneration.

Table 2:

Orthogonal test results and visual analysis.

3..2 Iodine values

According to the adsorption isotherms (Figure 2), the iodine adsorption values of UAC, SAC and RAC are 869 mg/g, 507 mg/g and 853 mg/g respectively when the remaining iodine is 0.02 mol/L. After microwave regeneration, the iodine value recovers to 98.1 % of that of UAC, which indicates that the monolayer adsorption capacity is almost recovered completely.

Iodine value adsorption isotherm.
Figure 2:

Iodine value adsorption isotherm.

3..3 Surface topography

Figure 3 shows the SEM images of UAC, SAC and RAC. As can be seen, the pore of RAC is more regular and uniform than those of UAC and SAC. On the surface of RAC, the pores are surrounded with obvious burning marks and more micropores can be observed due to the high temperature of microwave heating. Moreover, the pores of RAC are cleaner than those of SAC, and many microbes can be found in them (Table 3).

SEM images of UAC (a-b), SAC (c-d), and RAC (e-f).
Figure 3:

SEM images of UAC (a-b), SAC (c-d), and RAC (e-f).

Table 3:

Fitting constants of iodine value adsorption isotherm.

3..4 Surface characterization

The specific surface area measurement results are shown in Table 4. Compared with UAC, the BET specific surface area of RAC decreases by 11.69 % after microwave regeneration, and the microporous surface area from t-plot calculation (pore diameter less than 2 nm) decreases by 44.49 %. Accordingly, the microporous volume drops from 0.163 to 0.103. That is to say, some micropores transform into mesopores or macropores after regeneration, which results in the decrease of specific surface area [9].

Table 4:

Pore characteristic parameters of different Acs.

3..5 Boehm titration

Boehm titration is a widely used method to quantify functional groups on the surface of ACs [10]. Oxygen-containing functional groups are the major active adsorption sites on ACs, and they are usually formed during incomplete carbonization or activator bonding on the surface of ACs. The functional groups are mainly comprised of carboxyl, phenolic hydroxyl, carbonyl, lactone, quinone, ether, etc. [11], and their chemical structure is shown in Figure 4.

Surface functional groups.
Figure 4:

Surface functional groups.

As Figs. (figure 4c) and (d) show, the surface of AC can be activated after 5 % HCl pickling for two hours, and carboxyl and phenolic hydroxyl groups present a significant increase. During microwave regeneration, the carboxyl groups decompose into CO2 due to the high temperature. At the same time, the nitrogen environment of microwave regeneration can produce basic functional groups containing nitrogen. After microwave regeneration, acidic groups, phenol hydroxyl groups and carboxyl groups are significantly decreased, whereas basic groups are increased. The decrease of acidic groups and the increase of basic groups can weaken surface hydrophilicity and enhance surface hydrophobicity, which facilitates the adsorption of organic matter on ACs.

3..6 Methylene blue adsorption

Table 5 gives the isothermal fitting results of AC adsorption. As can be seen, the adsorption isotherm of RAC has a higher correlation coefficient than UAC for either Langmuir equation fitting or Freundich equation fitting [12]. Meanwhile, both UAC and RAC prefer Freundich equation fitting rather than Langmuir equation fitting, which means that the adsorption mechanism of ACs in this study is multiplayer adsorption. In the Freundich equation, smaller 1 /n value usually means higher adsorption capacity [12]. Since the 1 /n values of UAC and RAC both range between 0.1 ~ 0.5, both of them can be acceptable as good adsorbents. Besides, the 1 /n value of RAC is smaller than that of UAC, which means the better adsorption capacity of RAC. As shown in Figure 5 and Figure 6, both RAC and UAC can reach the adsorption equilibrium of methylene blue within 3 h, and the removal efficiency of RAC and UAC is 90.7 % and 99.7 %, respectively. These results mean that most adsorption capacity of AC for small organic molecules can be restored by microwave regeneration.

Table 5:

Isothermal fitting results of AC adsorption.

Methylene blue adsorption capacity fitted by (a) Langmuir equation and (b) Freundlich equation.
Figure 5:

Methylene blue adsorption capacity fitted by (a) Langmuir equation and (b) Freundlich equation.

Methylene blue removal efficiency.
Figure 6:

Methylene blue removal efficiency.

3..7 Raw water adsorption

The raw water was taken from the same water treatment plant and the water quality is shown in Table 6 and Table 7. It can be seen that organic matter with molecular weight less than 0.5 kD accounts for 44.26 % of the total organic matter in the water samples. That is to say, small organic compounds are dominated in the raw water.

Table 6:

Average water quality index of test water.

Table 7:

Proportion of organic matter with different molecular weights in the raw water.

Figure 7 shows the adsorption isotherms of CODMn, DOC and UV254 for UAC and RAC, and Table 8 gives the fitting constants of Freundich equation. Based on the 1/n value, the adsorption capacity of RAC for UV254 is the most significant and the removal efficiency is the highest. In fact, UV254 is a substitution parameter of total organic carbon (TOC), dissolved organic carbon (DOC), trihalomethanes formation potential (THMFP) and other indicators [13]. Hence, the low 1 /n value indicates the good adsorption effect of RAC on such water quality. As Figure 8 shows, the removal rate of organic compounds by both UAC and RAC is fast and the equilibrium state can be achieved within two hours. Notably, the removal effects of RAC on CODMn, UV254 and DOC are more significant than those of UAC. These results agree well with the above analysis of isotherm fitting.

Table 8:

Fitting constants of Freundich equation.

Adsorption isotherm of (a) COD Mn, (b) DOC and (c) UV254.
Figure 7:

Adsorption isotherm of (a) COD Mn, (b) DOC and (c) UV254.

Raw water adsorption rate (a) RAC removal of CODMn; (b) RAC removal of DOC; (c) RAC removal of UV254.
Figure 8:

Raw water adsorption rate (a) RAC removal of CODMn; (b) RAC removal of DOC; (c) RAC removal of UV254.

Acknowledgments

(1) Orthogonal experiments suggested the optimum microwave regeneration conditions were regeneration time of 30 min, microwave power of 500 W, air flow rate of 0.25 m3/h, and AC mass of 10 g. The significant order of these factors was regeneration time > microwave power > gas flow rate > AC mass. The iodine value of RAC was 853 mg/g.

(2) After regeneration, the number of acidic functional groups in the chemical adsorption was decreased while that of basic functional groups was increased, which made RAC more hydrophilic and more favorable for the adsorption of organic matter. Meanwhile, the increasing pore number and pore size benefited the adsorption capacity of organic matter.

(3) According to the Freundich isotherm, RAC had better removal efficiency than UAC, so that it was qualified for the drinking water treatment.

References

  • 1. Nai-Chuang FU, Liu J. Leather Chem. 2014. . Google Scholar

  • 2. Zhou Q, Shen J, Huang M,et al. Chem Bioeng. 2013. . Google Scholar

  • 3. Mao H, Zhou D, Hashisho Z,et al. J Ind Eng Chem. 2015;21(1):516–525. Google Scholar

  • 4. Ondon BS, Sun B, Yan ZY,et al. Appl Water Sci. 2014;4(4):333–339. Google Scholar

  • 5. Jie Z, Liqing S, Hui Z,et al. Water Wastewater Eng. 2008;1:011. Google Scholar

  • 6. Er-Deng DU, Zhang YX, Shen YH. Water Purif Technol. 2008. . Google Scholar

  • 7. Chao Z, Gao C, Xuesheng LU,et al. Ion Exch Adsorpt. 2006;22(2):187–192. Google Scholar

  • 8. Xia H, Wu J, Xia Y,et al. J Porous Mater. 2014;22:137–146. Google Scholar

  • 9. Liu R, Zhang Y, Wen C,et al. Exp Technol Manage. 2010. . Google Scholar

  • 10. Boehm HP. Adv Catal. 1966;16:179–274. Google Scholar

  • 11. Tojo T, Sakurai K, Muramatsu H,et al. RSC Adv. 2014;4:62678–62683. Google Scholar

  • 12. Wang J, Chen X, Xiao J. Water treatment chemicals. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press; 2008:238–239. Google Scholar

  • 13. Edzwald JK. Coagulation in drinking water treatment: particles, organics and coagulants. Control of organic material by coagulation and floc-separation process, water science & technology. Oxford: Pergamon Press; 1993:21–35. Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2015-11-25

Revised: 2016-01-13

Accepted: 2016-01-30

Published Online: 2017-02-10

Published in Print: 2017-01-01


Citation Information: Journal of Advanced Oxidation Technologies, Volume 20, Issue 1, 20160174, ISSN (Online) 2371-1175, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jaots-2016-0174.

Export Citation

© 2017 by Walter De Gruyter GmbH.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in