Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Journal of Apicultural Science

The Journal of Research Institute of Horticulture and Apicultural Research Association

2 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.722
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.944

CiteScore 2016: 0.84

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.414
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.616

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2299-4831
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Honey bee colonies performance enhance by newly modified beehives

Hossam F. Abou-Shaara
  • Corresponding author
  • Baqshan`s Chair for Bee Research, Plant Protection Department, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, P.O. Box. 2460, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Ahmad A. Al-Ghamdi
  • Baqshan`s Chair for Bee Research, Plant Protection Department, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, P.O. Box. 2460, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Abdelsalam A. Mohamed
  • Baqshan`s Chair for Bee Research, Plant Protection Department, Collegeof Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, P.O. Box. 2460,Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2013-12-31 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jas-2013-0016

Abstract

Honey bees have good thermoregulation and rapidly respond to any changes in the microclimatic conditions of their colonies. However, colony losses can occur during very cold or hot months. Honey bee colonies are often kept in modified beehives during such times to save the honey bees lives. In the present study, the abilities of four beehive types to enhance the performance of two honey bee races (Carniolan and Yemeni honey bees) were compared under hot and arid environmental conditions. The results indicated performance differences between the two races and between the selected beehive types. For the Carniolan honey bees, better results were obtained in colonies provided with insulated cover boxes (ICB) than in thermoregulatory beehives (TBH), insulated beehives with a back drawer (IBD), and normal beehives (NB) in that order. In contrast, better Yemeni honey bee results were obtained in the TBH, followed by ICB, NB, and finally IBD. Maintaining honey bees in a suitable beehive type is a promising method for saving honey bees lives and enhancing their performance under harsh environmental conditions.

Keywords: Apis mellifera; harsh environment; honey bees; modified beehive

  • Abou-Shaara H. F. (2011) A simple method for feeding bees. Bees for Development Journal 101: 3.Google Scholar

  • Abou-Shaara H. F. (2012) Notes on water collection by honey bees. Bee World 89(4): 50-51.Google Scholar

  • Abou-Shaara H. F., Al-Ghamdi A. A. (2012) Studies on wings symmetry and honey bee races discrimination by using standard and geometric morphometrics. Biotechnology in Animal Husbandry 28 (3): 575-584. DOI: 10.2298/BAH1203575A Abou-Shaara H. F., Al-Ghamdi A. A., Mohamed A. A. (2012) Tolerance of two honey bee races to various temperature and relative humidity gradients. Environmental and Experimental Biology 10(4): 133-138.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Al-Ghamdi A. (2002) The Effect of Pollen Supplementary Feeding on Some Activities of Honeybee Colonies During Summer Season in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences 9(2): 85-94.Google Scholar

  • Al-Ghamdi A. (2005) Comparative study between subspecies of Apis mellifera for egg hatching and sealed brood percentage, brood nest temperature and relative humidity. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences 8(4): 631-635.Google Scholar

  • Al-Ghamdi A. A. (2012) Local bee hive with system to control the humidity and temperature inside it. European Patent Office. Patent No. EP2474224. Available at: https://register.epo.org/application?number=EP11000096Google Scholar

  • Al-Ghamdi A. A., Abou-Shaara H. F. (2012) Langstroth modification. European Patent Office. Patent No. EP2478764. Available at: https://register.epo.org/application?number=EP11000497Google Scholar

  • Al-Kahtani S. N. (2003) Ecological studies on some activities of honeybee colonies under Al-Hassa District conditions Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. MSc Thesis. King Faisal University. Al-Hassa. Saudi Arabia. 191 pp.Google Scholar

  • Al-Qarni A. S. (2006) Tolerance of summer temperature in imported and indigenous honeybee Apis mellifera L. races in central Saudi Arabia. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences 13(2): 123-127.Google Scholar

  • Altun A. A. (2012) Remote Control of the Temperature- Humidity and Climate in the Beehives with Solar-Powered Thermoelectric System. Journal of Control Enginering and Applied Informatics 14(1): 93-99.Google Scholar

  • Beekman M., Sumpter D. J. T., Seraphides N., Ratnieks F. L. W. (2004) Comparing foraging behaviour of small and large honey-bee colonies by decoding waggle dances made by foragers. Functional Ecology 18: 829-835.Google Scholar

  • Blazyte-Cereskiene L., Vaitkeviciene G., Venskutonyte S., Buda V. (2010) Honey bee foraging in spring oilseed rape crops under high ambient temperature conditions. Zemdirbyste-Agriculture 97(1): 61-70.Google Scholar

  • Cooper P. D., Schaffer W. M. (1985) Temperature regulation of honey bees (Apis mellifera) foraging in the Sonoran desert. Journal of Experimental Biology 114: 1-15.Google Scholar

  • Danka R. G., Sylvester H. A., Boykin D. (2006) Environmental Influences on Flight Activity of USDA- ARS Russian and Italian Stocks of Honey Bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) During Almond Pollination. Journal of Economic Entomology 99(5): 1565-1570.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Doull K. M. (1976) The effects of different humidities on the hatching of the eggs of honeybees. Apidologie 7: 61-66. DOI: 10.1051/apido:19760104CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ellis J. D., Delaplane K. S., Hepburn R., Elzen P. J. (2003) Efficacy of Modified Hive Entrances and a Bottom Screen Device for Controlling Aethina tumida (Coleoptera: Nitidulidae) Infestations in Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae) Colonies. Journal of Economic Entomology 96(6): 1647-1652.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ellis M. B., Nicolson S. W., Crewe R. M. Dietemann V. (2008) Hygropreference and brood care in the honeybee (Apis mellifera). Journal of Insect Physiology 54: 1516-1521. DOI: 10.1051/apido:19760104CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Erdogan Y., Dodologlu A., Emsen B. (2009) Some physiological characteristics of honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) Housed in heated, fan wooden and insulated Beehives. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances 8(8): 1516-1519.Google Scholar

  • Flores J. M., Ruiz J. A., Ruz J. M., Puerta F., Bustos M., Padilla F., Campano F. (1996) Effect of temperature and humidity of sealed brood on chalkbrood development under controlled conditions. Apidologie 27: 185-192. DOI: 10.1051/apido:19960401CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Groh C., Tautz J., Rossler W. (2004) Synaptic organization in the adult honey bee brain is influenced by brood-temperature control during pupal development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 101(12): 4268-4273.Google Scholar

  • Human H., Nicolson S. W., Dietemann V. (2006) Do honeybees, Apis mellifera scutellata, regulate humidity in their nest? Naturwissenschaften 93: 397-401.PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Jeffree E. P. (1958) A shaped wire grid for estimating quantities of brood and pollen in combs. Bee World 58(3): 105-110.Google Scholar

  • Joshi N. C., Joshi P. C. (2010) Foraging Behaviour of Apis spp. on Apple Flowers in a Subtropical Environment. New York Science Journal 3(3): 71-76.Google Scholar

  • Kohno K., Sokabe T., Tominaga M., Kadowaki T. (2010). Honey Bee Thermal/Chemical Sensor, AmHsTRPA, Reveals Neofunctionalization and Loss of Transient Receptor Potential Channel Genes. Journal of Neuroscience 30(37):12219-12229. DOI:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2001-10.2010CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kronenberg F., Heller H. C. (1982) Colonial thermoregulation in honey bees (Apis mellifera). Journal of Comparative Physiology B 148: 65-76.Google Scholar

  • Kuhnholz S., Seeley T. D. (1997) The control of water collection in honey bee colonies. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 41: 407-422.Google Scholar

  • Lorenzon M. C. A., Cidreira R. G., Rodrigues E. H. V., Dornelles M. S., Pereira Jr. G. (2004) Langstroth hive construction with cement-vermiculite. Scientia Agricola 61(6): 573-578.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Meitalovs J., Histjajevs A., Stalidzans E. (2009) Automatic microclimate controlled beehive observation system. Engineering for rural development. In: Proceedings of 8th International Scientific Conference ‘Enginieering for Rural Development’. Jelgava, Latvia, 28-29 May 2009. pp. 265-271.Google Scholar

  • Ohashi M., Okada R., Kimura T., Ikeno H. (2009) Observation system for the control of the hive environment by the honeybee (Apis mellifera). Behavior Research Methods 41(3): 782-786. DOI: 10.3758/ BRM.41.3.782Web of ScienceCrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Ohashi M., Ikeno H., Kimura T., Akamatsu T., Okada R., Ito E. (2008) Control of hive environment by honeybee (Apis mellifera) in Japan. In: Proceedings of Measuring Behavior 2008. 6th International Conference on Methods and Techniques in Behavioral Research. Maastricht, the Netherlands. 26-29 August 2008. p. 243.Google Scholar

  • Omholt S. W., Hagen A., Elmholdt O., Rishovd S. (1995) A laboratory hive for frequent collection of honeybee eggs. Apidologie 26: 297-304. DOI: 10.1051/apido:19950404CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Omran N. S. M. (2011) Wintering of Honeybee Colonies (Apis mellifera L.) by Using a New Technique During Winter Season in Sohag Region. Egyptian Journal of Applied Sciences 7(2): 174-182.Google Scholar

  • Pankiw T., Tarpy D. R., Page R. E. (2002) Genotype and rearing environment affect honeybee perception and foraging behaviour. Animal Behaviour 64: 663-672. DOI:10.1006/anbe.2002.309CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • SAS Institute (2004): The SAS System Version 9.1.3. SAS Institute. Cary. NC.Google Scholar

  • Tan K., Yang S., Wang Z., Radloff S. E., Oldroyd B. P. (2012) Differences in foraging and broodnest temperature in the honey bees Apis cerana and A. mellifera. Apidologie 43(6): 618-623. DOI:10.1007/ s13592-012-0136-y Tautz J., Maier S., Groh C., Rossler W., Brockmann W. (2003) Behavioral performance in adult honey bees is influenced by the temperature experienced during their pupal development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100(12): 7343-7347.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zacepins A., Stalidzans E. (2012) Architecture of automatized control system for honey bee indoor wintering process monitoring and control. In: Proceedings of 13th International Carpathian Control Conference. High Tatras, Slovakia. 28-31 May 2012. pp. 772-775. Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2013-12-31

Published in Print: 2013-12-01


Citation Information: Journal of Apicultural Science, ISSN (Print) 2299-4831, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jas-2013-0016.

Export Citation

This content is open access.

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Erica Gomes de Lima, Simone Cristina Camargo, Pedro da Rosa Santos, Jose Washington Santos Oliveira, and Vagner de Alencar Arnaut de Toledo
Agricultural Sciences, 2016, Volume 07, Number 06, Page 335
[2]
Ahmad A. Al-Ghamdi, Mohammed M. Alsharhi, and Hossam F. Abou-Shaar
Asian Journal of Agricultural Research, 2016, Volume 10, Number 2, Page 87

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in