Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis

More options …

Appropriate Discounting for Benefit-Cost Analysis

David F Burgess / Richard O Zerbe
Published Online: 2011-04-25 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2202/2152-2812.1065

In order to be sensible about what discount rate to use one must be clear about its purpose. We suggest that its purpose is to help select those projects that will contribute more net benefits than some other discount rate. This approach, which is after all the foundation for benefit-cost analysis, helps to reconcile different suggested procedures for determining the discount rate. We suggest that the social opportunity cost of capital (SOC) is superior to other suggested approaches in its generality and its ease of use. We use the SOC to determine a range of real rates that vary between 6% and 8%. We suggest that approaches based on determination of preferences, which result in hyperbolic discounting, are less appropriate and less useful.

Keywords: discount rate

About the article

Published Online: 2011-04-25


Citation Information: Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, Volume 2, Issue 2, ISSN (Online) 2152-2812, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2202/2152-2812.1065.

Export Citation

©2011 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Erin J. Maher, Tyler W. Corwin, Rhenda Hodnett, and Karen Faulk
Research on Social Work Practice, 2012, Volume 22, Number 6, Page 615
[2]
Jordan T. Crawford, Chin Wei Shan, Erik Budsberg, Hannah Morgan, Renata Bura, and Rick Gustafson
Biotechnology for Biofuels, 2016, Volume 9, Number 1
[3]
Donald F Vitaliano
Eastern Economic Journal, 2016, Volume 42, Number 4, Page 581
[4]
James N. Sanchirico, Daniel K. Lew, Alan C. Haynie, David M. Kling, and David F. Layton
Marine Policy, 2013, Volume 38, Page 523
[5]
Tatiana Kossova and Maria Sheluntcova
International Journal of Project Management, 2016, Volume 34, Number 3, Page 403
[6]
Vilma Kazlauskienė
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2015, Volume 213, Page 461
[7]
Kerry Krutilla and John D. Graham
Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 2012, Volume 31, Number 3, Page 501

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in