Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis

More options …

Toward Standardization of Benefit-Cost Analysis of Early Childhood Interventions

Lynn A. Karoly
Published Online: 2012-01-25 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/2152-2812.1085

A growing body of benefit-cost analyses (BCAs) of early childhood programs has been prompted by the increased demand for results-based accountability when allocating public and private sector resources. While the BCAs of early childhood programs serve to make such investments more compelling, there are limitations in the current state of the art, including a lack of standardization in the BCA methods used, from discount rates to shadow prices. The objective of this paper is to delineate a set of standards for conducting BCAs of early childhood programs. The paper reviews the existing evidence of the economic returns from early childhood programs that serve children and families in the first five years of life, discusses the challenges that arise in applying the BCA methodology such programs, highlights the variation in current methods used, and proposes a set of standards for applying the BCA methodology to early childhood programs. The recommendations concern issues such as the discount rate to use and the age to which costs and benefits should be discounted; stakeholder disaggregation; outcomes to value, the associated values, and projections of future outcomes; accounting for uncertainty; sensitivity analysis; and reporting of results. The proposed standards can guide the choices that analysts need to make about the methods to use when performing BCAs for one or more early childhood programs and they can support greater transparency in the results the analysts provide. The standards can also support consumers of the BCA results in their need to understand the methods employed and the comparability across different studies.

Keywords: benefit-cost analysis; early childhood interventions

About the article

Published Online: 2012-01-25

Citation Information: Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, Volume 3, Issue 1, ISSN (Online) 2152-2812, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/2152-2812.1085.

Export Citation

©2012 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Ismaila Ramon, Sajal K. Chattopadhyay, W. Steven Barnett, and Robert A. Hahn
Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, 2018, Volume 24, Number 1, Page e8
A. Brooks Bowden and Clive Belfield
Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 2015, Volume 6, Number 03, Page 572
Kathryn Newcomer and Clinton T. Brass
American Journal of Evaluation, 2016, Volume 37, Number 1, Page 80
Semra Ozdemir, F. Reed Johnson, and Dale Whittington
Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 2016, Volume 7, Number 03, Page 373
Katherine Long, Joshua L. Brown, Stephanie M. Jones, J. Lawrence Aber, and Brian T. Yates
Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 2015, Volume 6, Number 03, Page 545
Margaret R. Kuklinski
Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 2015, Volume 6, Number 03, Page 455
Damon E. Jones, Lynn A. Karoly, D. Max Crowley, and Mark T. Greenberg
Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 2015, Volume 6, Number 03, Page 471
Clive Belfield, A. Brooks Bowden, Alli Klapp, Henry Levin, Robert Shand, and Sabine Zander
Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 2015, Volume 6, Number 03, Page 508
Brandon C. Welsh, David P. Farrington, and B. Raffan Gowar
Crime and Justice, 2015, Volume 44, Number 1, Page 447
Margaret R. Kuklinski, Abigail A. Fagan, J. David Hawkins, John S. Briney, and Richard F. Catalano
Journal of Experimental Criminology, 2015, Volume 11, Number 2, Page 165
Pia S. Schober and C. Katharina Spiess
Child Indicators Research, 2013, Volume 6, Number 4, Page 709

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in