Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis

More options …

Introduction to a special issue entitled Perspectives on Implementing Benefit-Cost Analysis in Climate Assessment

Fran Sussman / Anne Grambsch / Jia Li / Christopher P. Weaver
Published Online: 2015-01-13 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jbca-2014-9000

Abstract

Over the past half-century or more, economists have developed a robust literature on the theory and practice of benefit-cost analysis (BCA) as applied to diverse projects and policies. Recent years have seen a growing demand for practical applications of BCA to climate change policy questions. As economists seek to meet this demand, they face challenges that arise from the nature of climate change impacts, such as the long time frame and the potential for non-marginal changes, the importance of intangible effects, and the need to grapple with Knightian uncertainty. As a result of these and other characteristics of climate change, many of the fundamental tenets of BCA are coming under scrutiny and the limits of BCA’s methodological and practical boundaries are being tested. This special issue assembles a set of papers that review the growing body of literature on the economics of climate change. The papers describe the state of the literature valuing climate change impacts, both globally and at more disaggregated levels. The papers also discuss the challenges economists face in applying BCA to support climate change decision making and adaptation planning. This introduction provides background and context on the current use of BCA in climate change analysis, and sets each paper firmly in that context, identifying also areas for future research. While the challenges in conducting BCA and interpreting its results are significant, across the papers it becomes clear that economic analysis in general, and the tools and methods of BCA in particular, have a central role to play in supporting decision-making about how to respond to climate change.

Keywords: benefit-cost analysis; climate change; decision-making; uncertainty; valuation

References

  • Gordon, K. (2014). Risky business: The economic risks of climate change in the United States. Risky Business Project.Google Scholar

  • IPCC. (1995). Climate Change 1995: Economic and social dimensions of climate change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. J. Bruce, H. Lee & E. Haites (Eds.). Cambridge, UK and New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Knight, F. H. (1921). Risk, uncertainty, and profit. Library of Economics and Liberty. Retrieved from http://www.econlib.org/library/Knight/knRUP.html, Boston, MA: Hart, Schaffner & Marx; Houghton Mifflin Co.

  • Lempert, R. J. (2014). Embedding benefit-cost concepts into decision support processes with deep uncertainty. The Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 5(3), 487–514.Google Scholar

  • Li, J., Mullan, M., & Helgeson, J.r. (2014). Improving the practice of economic analysis of climate change adaptation. The Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 5(3), 445–467.Google Scholar

  • Neumann, J. E., & Strzepek, K. (2014). State of the literature on the economic impacts of climate change in the United States. The Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 5(3), 411–443.Google Scholar

  • Stern, N. H. (2007). The economics of climate change: The Stern review. Cambridge, UK; New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Sussman, F., Weaver, C.P., & Grambsch, A. (2014). Challenges in applying the paradigm of welfare economics to climate change. The Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 5(3), 347–376.Google Scholar

  • Toman, M. (2014). The need for multiple types of information to inform climate change assessment. The Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 5(3),469–485.Google Scholar

  • The White House. (2013). The President’s Climate Action Plan. Retrieved from http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/image/president27sclimateactionplan.pdf.

  • U.S. Global Change Research Program. (2014). Climate change impacts in the United States: The third national climate assessment. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.7930/J0Z31WJ2.Crossref

  • Waldhoff, S. T., Martinich, J., Sarofim, M., DeAngelo, B., McFarland, J., Jantarasami, L., … Li, J. (2014). Overview of the special issue: A multi-model framework to achieve consistent evaluation of climate change impacts in the United States. Climatic Change, 1–20. doi:10.1007/s10584-014-1206-0.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Weyant, J. P. (2014). Integrating economic assessments of climate change: State of the literature. The Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 5(3), 377–409.Google Scholar

  • World Bank. (2010). Economics of adaptation to climate change – Synthesis report (No. 70267). The World Bank. Retrieved from http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2010/01/16436675/economics-adaptation-climate-change-synthesis-report, Washington DC.

About the article

Corresponding author: Fran Sussman, ICF International, 1725 Eye Street, N.W., Washington, DC, 20006, USA, Tel.: +202 862 1200, e-mail:


Published Online: 2015-01-13

Published in Print: 2014-12-01


Citation Information: Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages 333–346, ISSN (Online) 2152-2812, ISSN (Print) 2194-5888, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jbca-2014-9000.

Export Citation

©2014 by De Gruyter.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Kim-Huong Nguyen, Karla Seaman, Rosemary Saunders, Elly Williams, Jane Harrup-Gregory, and Tracy Comans
Journal of Interprofessional Care, 2019, Page 1
[2]
Robert J. Lempert
Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 2014, Volume 5, Number 03, Page 487

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in