Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis

More options …

Improving the practice of economic analysis of climate change adaptation

Jia Li
  • Corresponding author
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Climate Change Division, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. (6207-A), Washington, DC, USA
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Michael Mullan
  • The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Environment Directorate, Paris, France
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Jennifer Helgeson
  • The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Environment Directorate, Paris, France
  • London School of Economics and Political Science, Department of Geography and Environment, London, UK; and The Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment, London, UK
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2015-01-13 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jbca-2014-9004

Abstract

The development of national and sectoral climate change adaptation strategies is burgeoning in the US and elsewhere in response to damages from extreme events and projected future risks from climate change. Increasingly, decision makers are requesting information on the economic damages of climate change as well as costs, benefits, and tradeoffs of alternative actions to inform climate adaptation decisions. This paper provides a practical view of the applications of economic analysis to aid climate change adaptation decision making, with a focus on benefit-cost analysis (BCA). We review the recent developments and applications of BCA with implications for climate risk management and adaptation decision making, both in the US and other Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development countries. We found that BCA is still in early stages of development for evaluating adaptation decisions, and to date is mostly being applied to investment project-based appraisals. Moreover, the best practices of economic analysis are not fully reflected in the BCAs of climate adaptation-relevant decisions. The diversity of adaptation measures and decision-making contexts suggest that evaluation of adaptation measures may require multiple analytical methods. The economic tools and information would need to be transparent, accessible, and match with the decision contexts to be effective in enhancing decision making. Based on the current evidence, a set of analytical considerations is proposed for improving economic analysis of climate adaptation that includes the need to better address uncertainty and to understand the cross-sector and general equilibrium effects of sectoral and national adaptation policy.

Keywords: benefit-cost analysis; climate change adaptation; economic analysis

References

About the article

Corresponding author: Jia Li, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Climate Change Division, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. (6207-A), Washington, DC, USA, Tel.: 202-343-9380, e-mail:


Published Online: 2015-01-13

Published in Print: 2014-12-01


Citation Information: Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages 445–467, ISSN (Online) 2152-2812, ISSN (Print) 2194-5888, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jbca-2014-9004.

Export Citation

©2014 by De Gruyter.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Fran Sussman, Anne Grambsch, Jia Li, and Christopher P. Weaver
Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 2014, Volume 5, Number 03, Page 333
[2]
Sam Fankhauser
Annual Review of Resource Economics, 2017, Volume 9, Number 1, Page 209
[3]
C. P. Weaver and C. A. Miller
Environmental Management, 2019, Volume 64, Number 3, Page 245
[4]
Sam Fankhauser
SSRN Electronic Journal , 2016
[5]
Jeremy Martinich and Allison Crimmins
Nature Climate Change, 2019, Volume 9, Number 5, Page 397
[6]
Delavane Diaz and Frances Moore
Nature Climate Change, 2017, Volume 7, Number 11, Page 774
[8]
John Weyant
Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 2014, Volume 5, Number 03, Page 377

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in