Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Journal of Basic and Clinical Physiology and Pharmacology

Editor-in-Chief: Horowitz, Michal

Editorial Board: Das, Kusal K. / Epstein, Yoram / S. Gershon MD, Elliot / Kodesh , Einat / Kohen, Ron / Lichtstein, David / Maloyan, Alina / Mechoulam, Raphael / Roth, Joachim / Schneider, Suzanne / Shohami, Esther / Sohmer, Haim / Yoshikawa, Toshikazu / Tam, Joseph


CiteScore 2016: 1.01

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.349
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.495

Online
ISSN
2191-0286
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 24, Issue 3

Issues

Aging and speech perception: beyond hearing threshold and cognitive ability

Leah Fostick / Elisheva Ben-Artzi / Harvey Babkoff
Published Online: 2013-08-15 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jbcpp-2013-0048

Abstract

Background: Older adults manifest difficulties in speech perception, especially when speech is accompanied by noise or when speech is rapid. Several explanations have been suggested to account for age-related changes in speech perception, such as changes in hearing sensitivity or a more general decline in cognitive functioning. The purpose of the present study was to directly examine the relative contribution of hearing sensitivity and perceptual and cognitive factors in the understanding of age-related differences in speech perception under difficult conditions.

Methods: Eighty-nine healthy participants with normal hearing thresholds, age 21–82 years, were tested for speech perception under four conditions: quiet, speech noise, white noise, and time-compressed speech at 60% compression rate. As all participants had age-normal hearing, absolute thresholds were tested for click trains, 1 kHz 15-ms duration pure tone, 1 kHz 50-ms duration pure tone, and 1.8 kHz 15-ms duration pure tone, which are relatively short and discriminative for hearing ability. Cognitive ability was examined using the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (Third Edition) matrices and digit span.

Results: When words were presented against a quiet background or against white noise, speech perception was not significantly affected by aging, although in the latter case, increased thresholds predicted poorer speech perception. However, when words were presented against a background of speech noise or when speech was time-compressed at a 60% rate, age significantly predicted a decline in speech perception, even after controlling for hearing thresholds and cognitive functioning.

Conclusions: Hearing threshold for short sounds is the major factor for predicting speech perception in background noise, across age, due to changes in hearing sensitivity or in temporal resolution. For the adult and aging population with preserved cognitive ability, cognitive functioning does not predict decline in speech perception.

Keywords: aging; cognitive ability; hearing thresholds; speech perception

References

  • 1.

    Committee on Hearing, Bioacoustics and Biomechanics (CHABA). Speech understanding and aging. J Acoust Soc Am 1988;83:859–95.Google Scholar

  • 2.

    Snell KB, Frisina DR. Relationships among age-related differences in gap detection and word recognition. J Acoust Soc Am 2000;107:1615–26.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • 3.

    Snell KB, Mapes FM, Hickman ED, Frisina DR. Word recognition in competing babble and the effects of age, temporal processing, and absolute sensitivity. J Acoust Soc Am 2002;112:720–7.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 4.

    Agus TR, Akeroyd MA, Gatehouse S, Warden D. Informational masking in young and elderly listeners for speech masked by simultaneous speech and noise. J Acoust Soc Am 2009;126:1926–40.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 5.

    Wingfield A. Cognitive factors in auditory performance: context, speed of processing, and constraints of memory. J Am Acad Audiol 1996;7:175–82.PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • 6.

    Humes LE, Dubno JR, Gordon-Salant S, Lister JJ, Cacace AT, Cruickshanks KJ, et al. Central presbycusis: a review and evaluation of the evidence. J Am Acad Audiol 2012;23:635–66.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • 7.

    Cienkowski KM. Auditory aging. J Self Help Hard Hear People 2003;24:12–5.Google Scholar

  • 8.

    Dubno JR, Lee FS, Matthews LJ, Mills JH. Age-related and gender-related changes in monaural speech recognition. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1997;40:444–52.Google Scholar

  • 9.

    Halling DC, Humes LE. Factors affecting the recognition of reverberant speech by elderly listeners. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2000;43:414–31.Google Scholar

  • 10.

    Humes LE, Watson BU, Christensen LA, Cokely CG, Halling DC, Lee L. Factors associated with individual differences in clinical measures of speech recognition among the elderly. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1994;37:465–74.Google Scholar

  • 11.

    Schneider BA, Daneman M, Pichora-Fuller MK. Listening in aging adults: from discourse comprehension to psychoacoustics. Can J Exp Psychol 2002;56:139–52.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • 12.

    Wingfield A, Lindfield KC, Goodglass H. Effects of age and hearing sensitivity on the use of prosodic information in spoken word recognition. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2000;43:915–25.Google Scholar

  • 13.

    Drager KD, Reichle JE. Effects of discourse context on the intelligibility of synthesized speech for young adult and older adult listeners: applications for AAC. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2001;44:1052–7.Google Scholar

  • 14.

    Gordon-Salant S, Fitzgibbons PJ. Temporal factors and speech recognition performance in young and elderly listeners. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1993;36:1276–85.Google Scholar

  • 15.

    He NJ, Dubno JR, Mills JH. Frequency and intensity discrimination measured in a maximum-likelihood procedure from young and aged normal-hearing subjects. J Acoust Soc Am 1998;103:553–65.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 16.

    Grossman M, Cooke A, Devita C, Alsop D, Detre J, Chen W, et al. Age-related changes in working memory during sentence comprehension: an fMRI study. Neuroimage 2003;15:302–17.Google Scholar

  • 17.

    Schneider BA, Daneman M, Murphy DR. Speech comprehension difficulties in older adults: cognitive slowing or age-related changes in hearing? Psychol Aging 2005;20:261–71.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 18.

    Frtusova JB, Winneke AH, Phillips NA. ERP evidence that auditory-visual speech facilitates working memory in younger and older adults. Psychol Aging 2013;28:481–94.PubMedWeb of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 19.

    Pisoni DB, Cleary M. Measures of working memory span and verbal rehearsal speed in deaf children after cochlear implantation. Ear Hear 2003;24:106S–20S.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 20.

    Pisoni DB, Geers AE. Working memory in deaf children with cochlear implants: correlations between digit span and measures of spoken language processing. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2000;185:92–3.Google Scholar

  • 21.

    Humes LE. Factors underlying the speech-recognition performance of elderly hearing-aid wearers. J Acoust Soc Am 2002;112:1112–32.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 22.

    Salthouse TA. The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. Psychol Rev 1996;103:403–28.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 23.

    Benichov J, Cox LC, Tun PA, Wingfield A. Word recognition within a linguistic context: effects of age, hearing acuity, verbal ability, and cognitive function. Ear Hear 2012;33:250–6.PubMedCrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • 24.

    Bunce D, Macready A. Processing speed, executive function, and age differences in remembering and knowing. Q J Exp Psychol A 2005;58:155–68.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • 25.

    Clark CR, Veltmeyer MD, Hamilton RJ, Simms E, Paul R, Hermens D, et al. Spontaneous alpha peak frequency predicts working memory performance across the age span. Int J Psychophysiol 2004;53:1–9.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 26.

    Duverne S, Lemaire P. Age-related differences in arithmetic problem-verification strategies. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2004;59:135–42.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 27.

    Eenshuistra RM, Ridderinkhof KR, van der Molen MW. Age-related changes in antisaccade task performance: inhibitory control or working-memory engagement? Brain Cogn 2004;56:177–88.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • 28.

    Hogan MJ. The cerebellum in thought and action: a fronto-cerebellar aging hypothesis. New Ideas Psychol 2004;22:97–125.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 29.

    Pichora-Fuller MK. Processing speed and timing in aging adults: psychoacoustics, speech perception, and comprehension. Int J Audiol 2003;42(Sup1):S59–S68.Google Scholar

  • 30.

    Shimamura AP. Memory and the prefrontal cortex. Ann NY Acad Sci 1995;769:151–9.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 31.

    Lebo CP, Reddell RC. The presbycusis component in occupational hearing loss. Laryngoscope 1972;82:1399–409.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • 32.

    Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. Mini-mental state: a practical method for grading the state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975;12:189–98.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 33.

    Grimault N, Micheyl C, Carlyon RP, Collet L. Evidence for two pitch encoding mechanisms using a selective auditory training paradigm. Percept Psychophys 2002;64:189–97.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 34.

    Wechsler D. Weschsler Adult Intelligence Scale-III. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation, 1997.Google Scholar

  • 35.

    Verhelst W. Overlap-add methods for time-scaling of speech. Speech Commun 2000;30:207–21.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 36.

    Segal O, Kishon-Rabin L, Hildesheimer M. The effect of linguistic context on speech perception of hearing impaired using hearing aid and cochlear implant. Dash (Dibur VeShmia) 1999;21:85–99.Google Scholar

  • 37.

    Boothroyd A. Auditory perception of speech contrasts by subjects with sensorineural hearing loss. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1984;27:134–44.Google Scholar

  • 38.

    Cohen G. Speech comprehension in the elderly: the effects of cognitive changes. Br J Audiol 1987;21:221–6.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 39.

    Goldman-Eisler F. Psycholinguistics: experiments in spontaneous speech. New York: Academic Press, 1968.Google Scholar

  • 40.

    Huggins AW. Distortion of the temporal pattern of speech: interruption and alternation. J Acoust Soc Am 1964;36:1055–64.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 41.

    McCabe J, Hartman M. Examining the locus of age effects on complex span tasks. Psychol Aging 2003;18:562–72.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • 42.

    Humes LE. Speech understanding in the elderly. J Am Acad Audiol 1996;7:161–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • 43.

    Lindenberger U, Baltes PB. Sensory functioning and intelligence in old age: a strong connection. Psychol Aging 1994;9:339–55.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 44.

    Park D, Lautenschlager G, Hedden T, Davidson NS, Smith AD, Smith PK. Models of visuospatial and verbal memory across the adult life span. Psychol Aging 2002;17:299–320.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 45.

    Salthause TA, Rogan JD, Krill KA. Division of attention: age differences on a visually presented memory task. Mem Cognit 1984;12:612–30.Google Scholar

  • 46.

    Singh-Manoux A, Kivimaki M, Glymour M, Elbaz A, Berr C, Ebmeier KP, et al. Timing of onset of cognitive decline: results from Whitehall II prospective cohort study. BMJ 2012:344.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • 47.

    Schneider BA, Daneman M, Murphy DR, See SK. Listening to discourse in distracting settings: the effects of aging. Psychol Aging 2000;15:110–25.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

About the article

Corresponding author: Leah Fostick, Department of Communication Disorders, Ariel University, Ariel 40700, Israel, Phone: +972-3-9765776


Received: 2013-04-16

Accepted: 2013-07-19

Published Online: 2013-08-15

Published in Print: 2013-09-01


Citation Information: Journal of Basic and Clinical Physiology and Pharmacology, Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages 175–183, ISSN (Online) 2191-0286, ISSN (Print) 0792-6855, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jbcpp-2013-0048.

Export Citation

©2013 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin Boston.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Frédéric Marmel, Medardo A. Rodríguez-Mendoza, and Enrique A. Lopez-Poveda
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 2015, Volume 7

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in