Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Journal of Basic and Clinical Physiology and Pharmacology

Editor-in-Chief: Horowitz, Michal

Editorial Board: Das, Kusal K. / Epstein, Yoram / S. Gershon MD, Elliot / Kodesh , Einat / Kohen, Ron / Lichtstein, David / Maloyan, Alina / Mechoulam, Raphael / Roth, Joachim / Schneider, Suzanne / Shohami, Esther / Sohmer, Haim / Yoshikawa, Toshikazu / Tam, Joseph


CiteScore 2016: 1.01

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.349
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.495

Online
ISSN
2191-0286
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 27, Issue 3

Issues

Targeting the endocannabinoid system to treat anxiety-related disorders

Nachshon Korem / Tomer Mizrachi Zer-Aviv / Eti Ganon-Elazar / Hila Abush / Irit Akirav
Published Online: 2015-09-30 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jbcpp-2015-0058

Abstract

The endocannabinoid system plays an important role in the control of emotions, and its dysregulation has been implicated in several psychiatric disorders. The most common self-reported reason for using cannabis is rooted in its ability to reduce feelings of stress, tension, and anxiety. Nevertheless, there are only few studies in controlled clinical settings that confirm that administration of cannabinoids can benefit patients with a post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). There are considerable encouraging preclinical data to suggest that endocannabinoid-targeted therapeutics for anxiety disorders should continue. In this review, we will describe data supporting a role for the endocannabinoid system in preventing and treating anxiety-like behavior in animal models and PTSD patients. Cannabinoids have shown beneficial outcomes in rat and mouse models of anxiety and PTSD, but they also may have untoward effects that discourage their chronic usage, including anxiogenic effects. Hence, clinical and preclinical research on the endocannabinoid system should further study the effects of cannabinoids on anxiety and help determine whether the benefits of using exogenous cannabinoids outweigh the risks. In general, this review suggests that targeting the endocannabinoid system represents an attractive and novel approach to the treatment of anxiety-related disorders and, in particular, PTSD.

Keywords: anxiety-related disorders; cannabinoids; endocannabinoid system; post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)

Introduction

Cannabis is widely used for medicinal and social purposes and is legal in some countries. The most common self-reported reason for using cannabis is rooted in its ability to reduce feelings of stress, tension, and anxiety.

Studies of the endocannabinoid system support its importance for multiple aspects of brain function including modulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis; regulation of mood, anxiety, and reward; and extinction of fear learning [18]. Hence, the involvement of the endocannabinoid system in mood and anxiety provides new targets for the development of novel therapeutic agents for a wide range of psychiatric disorders [1, 4, 8, 9].

Anxiety disorders are chronic, disabling conditions that impose enormous costs both on individuals and on society [10]. Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is defined under the trauma- and stressor-related disorders and might develop following exposure to an extreme traumatic event [11]. There are four diagnostic clusters of behavioral symptoms: (i) re-experiencing symptoms involve spontaneous, uncontrollable intrusions of the traumatic memory that manifest themselves as nightmares or memory flashbacks. (ii) Avoidance symptoms are best described as an individual’s efforts to distance himself/herself from trauma-related stimuli and can also include emotional and social withdrawal behaviors. (iii) Patients also demonstrate negative alterations in cognitions and mood. (iv) Finally, hyperarousal symptoms include robust physiological reactions such as irritability, hypervigilance, and exaggerated startle [12].

Not all patients respond to the currently available pharmacotherapeutic treatment options [13], and although a number of available drugs (e.g. benzodiazepines, antidepressants, adrenergic antagonists) have been used in clinical settings to explore the possible therapeutic avenues for treating PTSD, they still fall short owing to limited response, high remission rates, and tolerability issues [14].

The endocannabinoid system

Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the psychoactive constituent of marijuana, was identified in 1964 [15]. This discovery encouraged the identification of the endogenous endocannabinoid system, which includes the cannabinoid receptors (CB1 and CB2), endocannabinoids [anandamide (AEA) and 2-arachidonoyl-glycerol (2-AG)], enzymes involved in their synthesis and metabolism [fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) for anandamide and the monoacylglycerol lipase (MAGL) for 2-AG], and an endocannabinoid transporter [1618]. Endocannabinoids act as retrograde messengers and are synthesized on demand post-synaptically from lipid precursors. Anandamide and 2-AG levels in the synapse are regulated by their enzymes (FAAH and MAGL) and the endocannabinoid transporter [17, 19]. Anandamide, 2-AG, FAAH, and the CB1 receptor are expressed in brain areas involved in stress, fear, emotions, and reward including the amygdala, nucleus accumbens, hippocampus, and prefrontal cortex (PFC) [17, 2023].

Endocannabinoids and conditioned fear

CB1 receptor agonists are reported to induce biphasic effects on anxiety that have been demonstrated in animal models (for reviews, see Refs. [8, 24, 25]). In general, an anxiolytic-like effect tends to appear after using low doses of cannabinoid agonists, whereas higher doses produce an anxiogenic response [26, 27]. Haller et al. [28] found that the FAAH inhibitor URB597 (0.1–0.3 mg/kg) did not produce anxiolytic effects when the aversiveness of the testing procedures was minimized (e.g. by handling rats daily or by employing low illumination during testing). In contrast, URB597 had robust anxiolytic effects when the aversiveness of the testing environment was increased.

It has been recently shown [29] that the highly selective CB1 receptor agonist ACEA increased anxiety-like behavior in the elevated plus maze and open field test. Furthermore, although both the low (0.1 mg/kg) and the high (0.5 mg/kg) dose of ACEA facilitated fear extinction, the low dose attenuated, and the high dose potentiated, fear-induced corticosterone release, suggesting that the extent to which cannabinoids are anxiogenic or anxiolytic not only is dose dependent, but also depends on the differences in sensitivities of CB1 receptors in different neuronal systems.

The formation of a fear memory following a traumatic event is an important mechanism for the subsequent development of PTSD. Animal models are powerful tools for elucidating the molecular mechanisms and the pathophysiology of mental disorders and for developing novel pharmacological treatments. A number of animal models have been developed to mimic the traumatic events that induce the symptoms of intense and recurrent fear characteristic of patients with PTSD. One approach has used Pavlovian fear conditioning, in which rodents are trained to associate shock delivery with either a cue or a context, and memory for the association is later tested by measuring freezing behavior upon re-exposure to the conditioned cue in the absence of shock [30].

Considerable data exist on the effects of enhancing endocannabinoid signaling on conditioned fear in animals. For example, the CB1/CB2 receptor agonist WIN55,212-2 (2.5 and 5.0 mg/kg), given systemically 30 min before the conditioning phase, impaired the acquisition of contextual fear conditioning [31]. When WIN55,212-2 (10 or 30 ng) was infused into the hippocampus 1 h before the retention test, it impaired the retrieval of contextual fear memory [32]. Similarly, systemic injections of THC impaired retrieval [6 mg/kg, intraperitoneally (ip)] as well as acquisition (10 mg/kg, ip) in the passive avoidance test in rats [33] and post-training intra-CA1 administration of WIN55,212-2 (0.25, 0.5, and 1 μg) dose dependently decreased memory retrieval in mice [34]. We have shown that intra-basolateral amygdala (BLA) or intra-CA1 WIN55,212-2 (5 μg) had no effect on the acquisition of inhibitory avoidance conditioning in rats [3, 35].

Several studies found that cannabinoid agonists may enhance memory consolidation. Intra-BLA WIN55,212-2 (5–50 ng per side), infused immediately after inhibitory avoidance training, induced dose-dependent enhancement of 48-h retention performance [36], and propofol, which inhibits FAAH, administered intraperitoneally after training, also significantly increased memory consolidation [37]. A similar enhancing effect was found with the administration of URB507 (3, 10, or 30 ng) into the BLA, hippocampus, or medial PFC shortly after inhibitory avoidance training [38].

Recently, Llorente-Berzal et al. [39] compared the contribution of AEA and 2-AG to fear expression. The CB2 agonist JWH133 (3 mg/kg) failed to affect the acute freezing response, whereas the CB1 agonist CP55,940 (50 μg/kg) augmented it. The endocannabinoid uptake inhibitor AM404 (3 mg/kg) reduced the acute freezing response. AEA degradation inhibition by URB597 (1 mg/kg) decreased, whereas 2-AG degradation inhibition by JZL184 (4 and 8 mg/kg) increased the freezing response.

Lemos et al. [40] showed that systemic and intra-prelimbic injection of cannabidiol, a major non-psychotomimetic cannabinoid present in the Cannabis sativa plant, impaired contextual fear retrieval. Fogaça et al. [41] showed that intra-infra limbic (IL) cannabidiol enhanced contextual fear retrieval.

See Table 1 for a general summary of the pharmacological studies examining the effects of exogenous cannabinoids on conditioned fear.

Table 1

The effects of exogenous cannabinoids on conditioned fear.

Endocannabinoids and extinction

One of the hallmark symptoms in PTSD is avoiding activities, places, thoughts, or feelings that remind you of the trauma. Impaired extinction of fear memories is thought to contribute to the development and persistence of the persistent memories of the trauma and avoidance [42, 43].

It has been argued that, in PTSD, conditioned fear fails to extinguish, and reminders of traumatic events can cause pathological conditioned fear responses for decades after danger has passed. Hence, considerable efforts have been aimed at pharmacologically enhancing extinction (reviewed in Ref. [44]).

Enhancing endocannabinoid signaling has been shown to facilitate extinction in various studies [35, 4548]. The facilitating effect on extinction was demonstrated when drugs were aimed at the fear circuit (i.e. BLA, CA1, and PFC). Intra-CA1 WIN55,212-2, AM404, or AEA facilitated the extinction of inhibitory avoidance [35, 49]. A similar effect was observed in the IL; intra-IL WIN55,212-2, AM404, URB597, or cannabidiol also facilitated extinction [50, 51]. A recent study demonstrated that enhanced inhibitory input via activation of CB1 receptor-expressing cholecystokinin-positive interneurons selectively reduced the firing of BLA fear neurons and promoted extinction [52]. Other studies have also stressed the importance of the endocannabinoid system in the BLA in fear extinction (e.g. Refs. [3, 5]).

See Table 2 for a general summary of the pharmacological studies examining the effects of exogenous cannabinoids administered into the brain’s fear circuit on extinction.

Table 2

The effects of exogenous cannabinoids administered into the brain’s fear circuit on extinction.

Targeting the endocannabinoid system could ameliorate stress-related symptoms by treating the cognitive and emotional features of PTSD. The first “cognitive” approach is to enhance extinction learning. There are many compounds that have been suggested as possible enhancers of extinction (for a review, see Ref. [44]). The rationale for using extinction enhancers is that, in exposure-based treatment approaches, patients are asked to repeatedly confront or revisit details of their trauma memory and associated aversive emotions and thoughts in the absence of negative consequences (e.g. actual life threat), with the goal of extinction and new learning. However, because PTSD and trauma-related memories are resistant to extinction, it is to be expected that extinction effects would be variable at best [53]. Hence, cannabinoids may enhance extinction memories. A second approach is to use cannabinoids to treat the “emotional” features of PTSD. Because of the anxiety-relieving effects of cannabinoids, endocannabinoid signaling has a prominent role in the regulation of fear, anxiety, and stress responses (reviewed in Refs. [5457]).

Endocannabinoids and animal PTSD models

Preclinical animal models do not replicate the human condition in its entirety, but seek to mimic symptoms or endophenotypes associated with PTSD. Here we describe several PTSD models in mice and rats that were studied in the context of enhancing endocannabinoid signaling: the model of single-prolonged stress (SPS), the model of exposure to trauma and situational reminders, and the model of exposure to predator stress.

Exposure to SPS involves three different stress paradigms that are not related to conditioned fear: restraint, forced swim, and sedation; after an undisturbed period of 7 days, the rats showed enhanced negative feedback on the HPA axis and an exaggerated acoustic startle response (ASR) [58, 59]. We also found that exposure to SPS enhanced conditioned avoidance and impaired extinction while enhancing ASR, negative feedback on the HPA axis, and anxiety [4]. The cannabinoid CB1/2 receptor agonist WIN55,212-2 (0.5 mg/kg) administered intraperitoneally 2 or 24 h (but not 48 h) after SPS prevented the trauma-induced alterations in inhibitory avoidance conditioning and extinction, ASR potentiation, and HPA axis inhibition. Our findings are of considerable interest since they indicate a relatively broad therapeutic time window in the aftermath of trauma exposure for preventive treatment with cannabinoids. The preventive effects of WIN55,212-2 on extinction were found to be mediated by CB1 and glucocorticoid receptors in the amygdala and hippocampus [60].

However, it has become increasingly clear that the consequences of exposure to trauma are affected not only by the aspects of the event itself, but also by the frequency and severity of trauma reminders. Places and situations are the most frequent trauma reminder; hence, specific environments can be particularly distressing [61] and the frequency of exposure to trauma reminders is one the most potent post-trauma mediators of PTSD symptoms [62].

Pynoos et al. [63] developed a model of PTSD in which mice were exposed to a single footshock followed by contextual reminders of the shock. In this paradigm, the animal is re-exposed to situational reminders without any apparent external reinforcement. The contextual reminder was chosen for two reasons: first, to prevent desensitization, which might occur if the mouse entered the shock compartment and did not receive a shock, and, second, to develop an analogue that resembles a common posttraumatic human phenomenon in which traumatized individuals are often confronted with reminders of a traumatic event, but not, except for repeated trauma, with a replication of the traumatic moment. Accordingly, rats reintroduced to the environment where they were initially shocked exhibited increased anxiety-like behaviors in both an elevated plus maze and an open field, as well as heightened startle reflexes, learned helplessness, and impaired social behavior [64, 65].

We have recently [66] exposed rats to a footshock (1.5 mA, 10 s) on day 1 followed by exposure to situational reminders of the shock on days 3 and 5, and tested them 1 week later. Exposure to reminders exacerbated the effects of the shock as rats exposed to shock and reminders, but not to shock alone, showed impaired extinction of the traumatic event, impaired plasticity in the pathway projecting from the hippocampus to the nucleus accumbens, and enhanced latency to startle. WIN55,212-2 administered 2 h after the shock prevented the effects of the shock and reminders on extinction, plasticity, and startle response. WIN55,212-2 also prevented the shock/reminders-induced alterations in CB1 receptors in the PFC and CA1. See Figure 1 for the effects of exposure to shock and reminders on the extinction of the traumatic event itself and for the preventive effects of the cannabinoid agonist WIN55,212-2 on extinction [66].

WIN55,212-2 prevents the effects of shock and situational reminders (SR) on extinction. (A) On Extinction 1, the shock groups (shock-no SR, shock-SR) demonstrated increased latency compared with the no-shock groups. On Extinctions 2–4, the shock-SR group demonstrated increased latency compared with all groups (*p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001). This suggests that exposure to SRs exacerbated the effects of the shock on extinction kinetics. (B) When WIN55,212-2 (WIN) was injected 2 h after the shock, the shock-SR vehicle (Veh) group showed increased latency compared with the shock-no SR WIN group on Extinction 2. On Extinctions 3 and 4, the shock-SR Veh group showed increased latency compared with all groups (*p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001). Hence, WIN55,212-2 prevented the shock/SR-induced impairment in extinction kinetics (data published by Korem and Akirav [66] in Neuropsychopharmacology).
Figure 1:

WIN55,212-2 prevents the effects of shock and situational reminders (SR) on extinction.

(A) On Extinction 1, the shock groups (shock-no SR, shock-SR) demonstrated increased latency compared with the no-shock groups. On Extinctions 2–4, the shock-SR group demonstrated increased latency compared with all groups (*p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001). This suggests that exposure to SRs exacerbated the effects of the shock on extinction kinetics. (B) When WIN55,212-2 (WIN) was injected 2 h after the shock, the shock-SR vehicle (Veh) group showed increased latency compared with the shock-no SR WIN group on Extinction 2. On Extinctions 3 and 4, the shock-SR Veh group showed increased latency compared with all groups (*p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001). Hence, WIN55,212-2 prevented the shock/SR-induced impairment in extinction kinetics (data published by Korem and Akirav [66] in Neuropsychopharmacology).

Using the model of exposure to a predator (cat), Campos et al. [67] showed that cannabidiol treatment (5 mg/kg per day for 7 days) starting 1 h after exposure to a predator prevented the anxiogenic effects in rats. The authors suggested that repeated cannabidiol administration prevented the long-lasting anxiogenic effects observed after predator exposure, probably by facilitating 5HT1A receptor-mediated neurotransmission. The results suggest that cannabidiol has a beneficial potential for PTSD treatment and that 5HT1A receptors could be a therapeutic target in this disorder. The authors also found that, 7 days after the predator threat, the CB1 mRNA expression was down-regulated in the frontal cortex and amygdaloid complex [67]. Mayer et al. [68] used a similar model and failed to find a long-term anxiolytic effect of THC (1, 5, and 10 mg/kg) administered 1 h after predator scent stress.

Hsiao et al. [69] employed repeated combination tests (RCT) as a model for progressive anxiety. RCT induced an anxiogenic effect in the elevated plus maze and the open field tests. RCT also resulted in PTSD-like sleep symptoms by decreasing non-REM (rapid eye movement) sleep during the first hour after RCT and suppressing REM sleep during hours 4–10 after the RCT. Cannabidiol microinjected into the central nucleus of the amygdala had an anxiolytic effect in the elevated plus maze and the open field tests, and efficiently blocked anxiety-induced REM sleep suppression.

Taken together, these preclinical results strongly suggest that exogenous cannabinoids administered in proximity to trauma exposure could prevent the development of PTSD-like symptoms [4, 60, 66, 67, 69].

Human studies

Accumulating data from both clinical and preclinical studies suggest that targeting the endocannabinoid system may benefit PTSD. Given the similarities between extinction procedures and exposure-based psychotherapy used for the treatment of fear disorders in humans [70], the endocannabinoid system represents a novel pharmacological target for anxiety disorders related to inappropriate retention of aversive memories [45, 46, 71]. Accordingly, human studies suggest that cannabinoids may be used as an adjunct to extinction-based therapies for anxiety disorders. In support, Rabinak et al. [71] found that healthy subjects who received THC showed enhanced extinction memory and ventromedial PFC and hippocampal activation to a previously extinguished conditioned stimulus during extinction memory recall. Hence, pre-extinction administration of THC modulates prefrontal-limbic circuits during fear extinction in humans and prompts future investigation to test whether cannabinoid agonists can rescue or correct the impaired behavioral and neural function during extinction recall in patients with PTSD. Das et al. [72] employed a Pavlovian fear-conditioning paradigm in order to assess the effects of cannabidiol on extinction and consolidation. Participants received cannabidiol (32 mg) following, before, or after extinction, and were tested 48 h later for recall and after reinstatement. Cannabidiol given post-extinction enhanced the consolidation of extinction learning, suggesting that cannabidiol can enhance extinction and may have potential as an adjunct to extinction-based therapies for anxiety disorders.

Klumpers et al. [73] administered THC (10 mg) to healthy subjects prior to the extinction session of a 3-day conditioning protocol. During the extinction training, THC reduced conditioned skin conductance responses, but not fear-potentiated startle. This effect was not retained at the retention test 2 days later, suggesting that it was dependent on the acute effects of the drug. The authors argued that it could be that CB1 facilitation does not affect conditioned fear extinction lastingly in healthy humans and discussed the lack of specificity of THC as a CB1 agonist.

Gorka et al. [74] examined the effects of THC on functional connectivity between amygdala subregions and the PFC during socio-emotional threat in healthy adults. They found that THC enhanced basolateral and superficial amygdala connectivity to the rostral anterior cingulate/medial PFC, suggesting that THC can potentially reduce threat perception or enhance socio-emotional regulation.

Studies in humans also suggested alterations in the endocannabinoid system in PTSD. Hauer et al. [75] indicated that individuals with PTSD show significant differences in plasma concentrations of endocannabinoids and related N-acyl-ethanolamides when compared to healthy controls and to subjects who did not develop PTSD after trauma exposure. Neumeister et al. [6] reported that PTSD patients demonstrated elevated brain cannabinoid CB1 receptor availability and suggested that abnormal CB1 receptor-mediated anandamide signaling is implicated in the etiology of PTSD.

Two open-label clinical trials demonstrated the potential benefits of cannabis in patients with PTSD. Fraser [76] found that the majority (72%) of patients receiving the synthetic cannabinoid nabilone experienced either a cessation of nightmares or a significant reduction in nightmare intensity. Subjective improvement in sleep time and sleep quality, and a reduction of daytime flashbacks and night sweats were also noted by some patients. Hence, the study supports the potential benefits of nabilone for the management of treatment-resistant nightmares in PTSD. There is also a previous report on the anxiolytic effects of nabilone in 25 outpatients suffering from anxiety [77].

Roitman et al. [78] examined 10 outpatients with chronic PTSD, on stable medication, who received THC twice a day for 3 weeks (5 mg/kg) as an add-on treatment. They found that THC significantly improved global symptom severity, sleep quality, frequency of nightmares, and PTSD hyperarousal symptoms.

The comorbidity between cannabis abuse and PTSD is usually described in the literature as a negative aspect, with the increase in substance abuse after a disaster as a cause for public long-term health consequences. However, another side of the coin needs to be addressed. It is possible that PTSD patients use cannabis as a self-medication. In support of this hypothesis, one study among Vietnam veterans indicated that cannabis use was helpful in managing PTSD symptoms, with particular respect to the hyperarousal state [79]. Furthermore, it has been shown that there is a correlation between post-traumatic stress symptom severity and motivation to use marijuana in order to cope with emotional distress [80].

Although plant-derived cannabinoids provide relief from different PTSD symptoms, self-medication with cannabis may cause significant harm. It has been argued that direct activation of CB1 receptors with plant-derived cannabinoids may lead to a rapid down-regulation of the endocannabinoid signaling system, thus worsening the illness and which can result in tolerance and addiction [8183]. There is substantial evidence that cannabis use can expose people to varying complications (e.g. risk of addiction, cognitive impairment). Thus, it is important to determine the benefit/risk of cannabis with precision and to implement policy measures based on evidence to maximize the benefits and minimize the harm [84].

Future directions

The data reviewed in this paper support the notion that agents that facilitate endocannabinoid signaling may offer therapeutic benefits for PTSD. Cannabinoid receptor agonists and FAAH-selective inhibitors that enhance anandamide or CB1 signaling provide anti-anxiety effects in rodents [25]. There are also data to suggest that enhancing endocannabinoid signaling prevents behavioral and synaptic adaptations to intense stress that underlies the development and worsening of anxiety disorders and PTSD in particular [4, 60, 66, 67]. In contrast, dysregulation of the endocannabinoid system is associated with various pathophysiological states, including psychiatric disorders (for a review, see Ref. [85]).

Nevertheless, there are some inconsistencies regarding the effects of exogenous cannabinoids on anxiety. It has been suggested that many of the psychological effects of cannabis are biphasic, depending principally on the dose level and, to a certain extent, on the personality of the user [86]. Some of the reasons for these dose-dependent patterns are that different receptors are sensitive to the action of cannabinoids, with different activities on anxiety responses, and that activation of CB1 receptors in different brain areas results in different behaviors [87].

Another reason involves the use of different agents to enhance endocannabinoid signaling. It has been suggested that using indirect pathways to enhance the endocannabinoid system (e.g. by blocking its enzymatic hydrolysis) will produce a more circumscribed and beneficial spectrum of biological effects than those caused by direct CB1 receptor activation (using THC for example) [6]. In support, clinical and preclinical studies indicate that cannabidiol has anxiolytic properties [69, 8890] and studies blocking FAAH by the specific inhibitor URB597 demonstrate anxiolytic behaviors in a variety of species using different anxiety paradigms [9194].

Conclusions

The endocannabinoid system is a potential target for preventing and treating anxiety-related disorders, particularly PTSD. Preclinical and clinical data strongly suggest that anxiety is associated with decreased endocannabinoid tone [6, 95] and that CB1 receptors in the fear circuit in the brain are crucially involved in the anxiolytic effects of cannabinoids [6, 48, 60, 66, 86, 96, 97].

Cannabis is legal in several states and is prescribed for PTSD patients in others. This calls for extensive clinical research on the effects of cannabinoids in PTSD patients and in determining whether the benefits of using exogenous cannabinoids outweigh the risks.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Israel Science Foundation (grant no. 572/12 to I.A.) (http://www.isf.org.il/).

Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

Research funding: None declared.

Employment or leadership: None declared.

Honorarium: None declared.

Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.

References

  • 1.

    Abush H, Akirav I. Cannabinoids ameliorate impairments induced by chronic stress to synaptic plasticity and short-term memory. Neuropsychopharmacology 2013;38:1521–34. Google Scholar

  • 2.

    Fattore L, Fadda P, Spano MS, Pistis M, Fratta W. Neurobiological mechanisms of cannabinoid addiction. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2008;286:S97–107.Google Scholar

  • 3.

    Ganon-Elazar E, Akirav I. Cannabinoid receptor activation in the basolateral amygdala blocks the effects of stress on the conditioning and extinction of inhibitory avoidance. J Neurosci 2009;29:11078–88. Google Scholar

  • 4.

    Ganon-Elazar E, Akirav I. Cannabinoids prevent the development of behavioral and endocrine alterations in a rat model of intense stress. Neuropsychopharmacology 2012;37:456–66. Google Scholar

  • 5.

    Marsicano G, Wotjak CT, Azad SC, Bisogno T, Rammes G, Cascio MG, et al. The endogenous cannabinoid system controls extinction of aversive memories. Nature 2002;418:530–4. Google Scholar

  • 6.

    Neumeister A, Normandin MD, Pietrzak RH, Piomelli D, Zheng MQ, Gujarro-Anton A, et al. Elevated brain cannabinoid CB1 receptor availability in post-traumatic stress disorder: a positron emission tomography study. Mol Psychiatry 2013;18:1034–40. Google Scholar

  • 7.

    Steiner MA, Wotjak CT. Role of the endocannabinoid system in regulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical axis. Prog Brain Res 2008;170:397–432.Google Scholar

  • 8.

    Viveros MP, Marco EM, File SE. Endocannabinoid system and stress and anxiety responses. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2005;81:331–42. Google Scholar

  • 9.

    Gorzalka BB, Hill MN, Hillard CJ. Regulation of endocannabinoid signaling by stress: implications for stress-related affective disorders. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2008;32:1152–60. Google Scholar

  • 10.

    Kessler RC, Ormel J, Petukhova M, McLaughlin KA, Green JG, Russo LJ, et al. Development of lifetime comorbidity in the World Health Organization world mental health surveys. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2011;68:90–100. Google Scholar

  • 11.

    American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 5th ed. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing, 2013. Google Scholar

  • 12.

    Norrholm SD, Ressler KJ. Genetics of anxiety and trauma-related disorders. Neuroscience 2009;164:272–87. Google Scholar

  • 13.

    Pillay NS, Stein DJ. Emerging anxiolytics. Expert Opin Emerg Drugs 2007;12:541–5. Google Scholar

  • 14.

    Zhang W, Davidson JR. Post-traumatic stress disorder: an evaluation of existing pharmacotherapies and new strategies. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2007;8:1861–70. Google Scholar

  • 15.

    Gaoni Y, Mechoulam R. Isolation, structure, and partial synthesis of an active constituent of hashish. J Am Chem Soc 1964;86:1646–7. Google Scholar

  • 16.

    Devane WA, Hanus L, Breuer A, Pertwee RG, Stevenson LA, Griffin G, et al. Isolation and structure of a brain constituent that binds to the cannabinoid receptor. Science 1992;258:1946–9. Google Scholar

  • 17.

    Freund TF, Katona I, Piomelli D. Role of endogenous cannabinoids in synaptic signaling. Physiol Rev 2003;83:1017–66. Google Scholar

  • 18.

    Kogan NM, Mechoulam R. The chemistry of endocannabinoids. J Endocrinol Invest 2006;29:3–14. Google Scholar

  • 19.

    Di Marzo V. Endocannabinoids: synthesis and degradation. Rev Physiol Biochem Pharmacol 2008;160:1–24. Google Scholar

  • 20.

    Breivogel CS, Sim-Selley LJ. Basic neuroanatomy and neuropharmacology of cannabinoids. Int Rev Psychiatry 2009;21:113–21. Google Scholar

  • 21.

    Herkenham M, Lynn AB, Johnson MR, Melvin LS, de Costa BR, Rice KC. Characterization and localization of cannabinoid receptors in rat brain: a quantitative in vitro autoradiographic study. J Neurosci 1991;11:563–83.Google Scholar

  • 22.

    Pazos MR, Nunez E, Benito C, Tolon RM, Romero J. Functional neuroanatomy of the endocannabinoid system. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2005;81:239–47.Google Scholar

  • 23.

    Svizenska I, Dubovy P, Sulcova A. Cannabinoid receptors 1 and 2 (CB1 and CB2), their distribution, ligands and functional involvement in nervous system structures – a short review. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2008;90:501–11. Google Scholar

  • 24.

    Morena M, Campolongo P. The endocannabinoid system: an emotional buffer in the modulation of memory function. Neurobiol Learn Mem 2014;112:30–43. Google Scholar

  • 25.

    Zanettini C, Panlilio LV, Aliczki M, Goldberg SR, Haller J, Yasar S. Effects of endocannabinoid system modulation on cognitive and emotional behavior. Front Behav Neurosci 2011;5:57. Google Scholar

  • 26.

    Hill MN, Gorzalka BB. The endocannabinoid system and the treatment of mood and anxiety disorders. CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets 2009;8:451–8. Google Scholar

  • 27.

    Lafenętre P, Chaouloff F, Marsicano G. The endocannabinoid system in the processing of anxiety and fear and how CB1 receptors may modulate fear extinction. Pharmacol Res 2007;56:367–81. Google Scholar

  • 28.

    Haller J, Barna I, Barsvari B, Pelczer KG, Yasar S, Panlilio LV, et al. Interactions between environmental aversiveness and the anxiolytic effects of enhanced cannabinoid signaling by FAAH inhibition in rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2009;204:607–16. Google Scholar

  • 29.

    Simone JJ, Green MR, Hodges TE, McCormick CM. Differential effects of CB1 receptor agonism in behavioural tests of unconditioned and conditioned fear in adult male rats. Behav Brain Res 2015;279:9–16. Google Scholar

  • 30.

    Zovkic IB, Sweatt JD. Epigenetic mechanisms in learned fear: implications for PTSD. Neuropsychopharmacology 2013;38: 77–93. Google Scholar

  • 31.

    Pamplona FA, Takahashi RN. WIN 55212-2 impairs contextual fear conditioning through the activation of CB1 cannabinoid receptors. Neurosci Lett 2006;397:88–92. Google Scholar

  • 32.

    Atsak P, Roozendaal B, Campolongo P. Role of the endocannabinoid system in regulating glucocorticoid effects on memory for emotional experiences. Neuroscience 2012;204:104–16. Google Scholar

  • 33.

    Mishima K, Egashira N, Hirosawa N, Fujii M, Matsumoto Y, Iwasaki K, et al. Characteristics of learning and memory impairment induced by delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol in rats. Jpn J Pharmacol 2001;87:297–308. Google Scholar

  • 34.

    Nasehi M, Piri M, Jamali-Raeufy N, Zarrindast MR. Influence of intracerebral administration of NO agents in dorsal hippocampus (CA1) on cannabinoid state-dependent memory in the step-down passive avoidance test. Physiol Behav 2010;100:297–304. Google Scholar

  • 35.

    Abush H, Akirav I. Cannabinoids modulate hippocampal memory and plasticity. Hippocampus 2010;20:1126–38. Google Scholar

  • 36.

    Campolongo P, Roozendaal B, Trezza V, Hauer D, Schelling G, McGaugh JL, et al. Endocannabinoids in the rat basolateral amygdala enhance memory consolidation and enable glucocorticoid modulation of memory. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009;106:4888–93. Google Scholar

  • 37.

    Hauer D, Ratano P, Morena M, Scaccianoce S, Briegel I, Palmery M, et al. Propofol enhances memory formation via an interaction with the endocannabinoid system. Anesthesiology 2011;114:1380–8. Google Scholar

  • 38.

    Morena M, Roozendaal B, Trezza V, Ratano P, Peloso A, Hauer D, et al. Endogenous cannabinoid release within prefrontal-limbic pathways affects memory consolidation of emotional training. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2014;111:18333–8. Google Scholar

  • 39.

    Llorente-Berzal A, Terzian AL, di Marzo V, Micale V, Viveros MP, Wotjak CT. 2-AG promotes the expression of conditioned fear via cannabinoid receptor type 1 on GABAergic neurons. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2015;232:2811–25. Google Scholar

  • 40.

    Lemos JI, Resstel LB, Guimarães FS. Involvement of the prelimbic prefrontal cortex on cannabidiol-induced attenuation of contextual conditioned fear in rats. Behav Brain Res 2010;207:105–11. Google Scholar

  • 41.

    Fogaça MV, Reis F, Campos AC, Guimarães FS. Effects of intra-prelimbic prefrontal cortex injection of cannabidiol on anxiety-like behavior: involvement of 5HT 1A receptors and previous stressful experience. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2014;24:410–9. Google Scholar

  • 42.

    Lissek S, Powers AS, McClure EB, Phelps EA, Woldehawariat G, Grillon C, et al. Classical fear conditioning in the anxiety disorders: a meta-analysis. Behav Res Ther 2005;43:1391–424. Google Scholar

  • 43.

    Milad MR, Wright CI, Orr SP, Pitman RK, Quirk GJ, Rauch SL. Recall of fear extinction in humans activates the ventromedial prefrontal cortex and hippocampus in concert. Biol Psychiatry 2007;62:446–54. Google Scholar

  • 44.

    Singewald N, Schmuckermair C, Whittle N, Holmes A, Ressler KJ. Pharmacology of cognitive enhancers for exposure-based therapy of fear, anxiety and trauma-related disorders. Pharmacol Ther 2014;149:150–90. Google Scholar

  • 45.

    Bitencourt RM, Pamplona FA, Takahashi RN. Facilitation of contextual fear memory extinction and anti-anxiogenic effects of AM404 and cannabidiol in conditioned rats. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2008;18:849–59. Google Scholar

  • 46.

    Chhatwal JP, Myers KM, Ressler KJ, Davis M. Regulation of gephyrin and GABAA receptor binding within the amygdala after fear acquisition and extinction. J Neurosci 2005;25:502–6. Google Scholar

  • 47.

    Pamplona FA, Bitencourt RM, Takahashi RN. Short- and long-term effects of cannabinoids on the extinction of contextual fear memory in rats. Neurobiol Learn Mem 2008;90:290–3.Google Scholar

  • 48.

    Gunduz-Cinar O, Hill MN, McEwen BS, Holmes A. Amygdala FAAH and anandamide: mediating protection and recovery from stress. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2013;34:637–44. Google Scholar

  • 49.

    De Oliveira Alvares L, Genro BP, Diehl F, Molina VA, Quillfeldt JA. Opposite action of hippocampal CB1 receptors in memory reconsolidation and extinction. Neuroscience 2008;154:1648–55. Google Scholar

  • 50.

    Lin HC, Mao SC, Su CL, Gean PW. The role of prefrontal cortex CB1 receptors in the modulation of fear memory. Cereb Cortex 2009;19:165. Google Scholar

  • 51.

    Do Monte FH, Souza RR, Bitencourt RM, Kroon JA, Takahashi RN. Infusion of cannabidiol into infralimbic cortex facilitates fear extinction via CB1 receptors. Behav Brain Res 2013;250:23–7. Google Scholar

  • 52.

    Trouche S, Sasaki JM, Tu T, Reijmers LG. Fear extinction causes target-specific remodeling of perisomatic inhibitory synapses. Neuron 2013;80:1054–65. Google Scholar

  • 53.

    Gray RM, Liotta RF. PTSD: extinction, reconsolidation, and the visual-kinesthetic dissociation protocol. Traumatology 2012;18:3–16. Google Scholar

  • 54.

    Hill MN, Patel S, Campolongo P, Tasker JG, Wotjak CT, Bains JS. Functional interactions between stress and the endocannabinoid system: from synaptic signaling to behavioral output. J Neurosci 2010;30:14980–6. Google Scholar

  • 55.

    Lutz B. The endocannabinoid system and extinction learning. Mol Neurobiol 2007;36:92–101.Google Scholar

  • 56.

    Ramikie TS, Patel S. Endocannabinoid signaling in the amygdala: anatomy, synaptic signaling, behavior, and adaptations to stress. Neuroscience 2012;204:38–52.Google Scholar

  • 57.

    Riebe CJ, Pamplona F, Kamprath K, Wotjak CT. Fear relief – toward a new conceptual frame work and what endocannabinoids gotta do with it. Neuroscience 2012;204:159–85. Google Scholar

  • 58.

    Liberzon I, Krstov M, Young EA. Stress-restress: effects on ACTH and fast feedback. Psychoneuroendocrinology 1997;22:443–53. Google Scholar

  • 59.

    Kohda K, Harada K, Kato K, Hoshino A, Motohashi J, Yamaji T, et al. Glucocorticoid receptor activation is involved in producing abnormal phenotypes of single-prolonged stress rats: a putative post-traumatic stress disorder model. Neuroscience 2007;148:22–33. Google Scholar

  • 60.

    Ganon-Elazar E, Akirav I. Cannabinoids and traumatic stress modulation of contextual fear extinction and GR expression in the amygdala-hippocampal-prefrontal circuit. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2013;38:1675–87. Google Scholar

  • 61.

    Scrimin S, Moscardino U, Capello F, Altoè G, Steinberg AM, Pynoos RS. Trauma reminders and PTSD symptoms in children three years after a terrorist attack in Beslan. Soc Sci Med 2011;72:694–700. Google Scholar

  • 62.

    Layne CM, Olsen JA, Baker A, Legerski JP, Isakson B, Pašalić A, et al. Unpacking trauma exposure risk factors and differential pathways of influence: predicting postwar mental distress in Bosnian adolescents. Child Dev 2010;81:1053–76. Google Scholar

  • 63.

    Pynoos RS, Ritzmann RF, Steinberg AM, Goenjian A, Prisecaru I. A behavioral animal model of posttraumatic stress disorder featuring repeated exposure to situational reminders. Biol Psychiatry 1996;39:129–34. Google Scholar

  • 64.

    Louvart H, Maccari S, Ducrocq F, Thomas P, Darnaudéry M. Long-term behavioural alterations in female rats after a single intense footshock followed by situational reminders. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2005;30:316–24. Google Scholar

  • 65.

    Siegmund A, Wotjak CT. A mouse model of posttraumatic stress disorder that distinguishes between conditioned and sensitised fear. J Psychiatr Res 2007;41:848–60. Google Scholar

  • 66.

    Korem N, Akirav I. Cannabinoids prevent the effects of a footshock followed by situational reminders on emotional processing. Neuropsychopharmacology 2014;39:2709–22. Google Scholar

  • 67.

    Campos AC, Ferreira FR, da Silva WA, Guimarães FS. Predator threat stress promotes long lasting anxiety-like behaviors and modulates synaptophysin and CB1 receptors expression in brain areas associated with PTSD symptoms. Neurosci Lett 2013;533:34–8. Google Scholar

  • 68.

    Mayer TA, Matar MA, Kaplan Z, Zohar J, Cohen H. Blunting of the HPA-axis underlies the lack of preventive efficacy of early post-stressor single-dose Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC). Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2014;122:307–18. Google Scholar

  • 69.

    Hsiao Y-T, Yi P-L, Li C-L, Chang F-C. Effect of cannabidiol on sleep disruption induced by the repeated combination tests consisting of open field and elevated plus-maze in rats. Neuropharmacology 2012;62:373–84. Google Scholar

  • 70.

    Myers KM, Davis M. Mechanisms of fear extinction. Mol Psychiatry 2007;12:120–50. Google Scholar

  • 71.

    Rabinak CA, Angstadt M, Lyons M, Mori S, Milad MR, Liberzon I, et al. Cannabinoid modulation of prefrontal–limbic activation during fear extinction learning and recall in humans. Neurobiol Learn Mem 2014;113:125–34. Google Scholar

  • 72.

    Das RK, Kamboj SK, Ramadas M, Yogan K, Gupta V, Redman E, et al. Cannabidiol enhances consolidation of explicit fear extinction in humans. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2013;226:781–92. Google Scholar

  • 73.

    Klumpers F, Denys D, Kenemans JL, Grillon C, van der Aart J, Baas JM. Testing the effects of Δ9-THC and D-cycloserine on extinction of conditioned fear in humans. J Psychopharmacol (Oxf) 2012;26:471–8. Google Scholar

  • 74.

    Gorka SM, Fitzgerald DA, de Wit H, Phan KL. Cannabinoid modulation of amygdala subregion functional connectivity to social signals of threat. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2014;18:pyu104. Google Scholar

  • 75.

    Hauer D, Schelling G, Gola H, Campolongo P, Morath J, Roozendaal B, et al. Plasma concentrations of endocannabinoids and related primary fatty acid amides in patients with post-traumatic stress disorder. PLoS One 2013;8:e62741. Google Scholar

  • 76.

    Fraser GA. The use of a synthetic cannabinoid in the management of treatment‐resistant nightmares in posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). CNS Neurosci Ther 2009;15:84–8. Google Scholar

  • 77.

    Fabre LF, McLendon D. The efficacy and safety of nabilone (a synthetic cannabinoid) in the treatment of anxiety. J Clin Pharmacol 1981;21:377S–82S. Google Scholar

  • 78.

    Roitman P, Mechoulam R, Cooper-Kazaz R, Shalev A. Preliminary, open-label, pilot study of add-on oral Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol in chronic post-traumatic stress disorder. Clin Drug Investig 2014;34:587–91. Google Scholar

  • 79.

    Bonn-Miller MO, Vujanovic AA, Feldner MT, Bernstein A, Zvolensky MJ. Posttraumatic stress symptom severity predicts marijuana use coping motives among traumatic event‐exposed marijuana users. J Trauma Stress 2007;20:577–86. Google Scholar

  • 80.

    Cougle JR, Bonn-Miller MO, Vujanovic AA, Zvolensky MJ, Hawkins KA. Posttraumatic stress disorder and cannabis use in a nationally representative sample. Psychol Addict Behav 2011;25:554–8. Google Scholar

  • 81.

    Hirvonen J, Goodwin RS, Li C-T, Terry GE, Zoghbi SS, Morse C, et al. Reversible and regionally selective downregulation of brain cannabinoid CB1 receptors in chronic daily cannabis smokers. Mol Psychiatry 2012;17:642–9. Google Scholar

  • 82.

    Klugmann M, Klippenstein V, Leweke FM, Spanagel R, Schneider M. Cannabinoid exposure in pubertal rats increases spontaneous ethanol consumption and NMDA receptor associated protein levels. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2011;14:505–17.Google Scholar

  • 83.

    Neumeister A. The endocannabinoid system provides an avenue for evidence-based treatment development for PTSD. Depress Anxiety 2013;30:93–6. Google Scholar

  • 84.

    Le Foll B, Tyndale RF. Cannabinoids: friend or foe? Clin Pharmacol Ther 2015;97:528–31. Google Scholar

  • 85.

    Valverde O, Karsak M, Zimmer A. Analysis of the endocannabinoid system by using CB1 cannabinoid receptor knockout mice. In: Pertwee RR, editor. Cannabinoids. Handbook of experimental pharmacology, Vol. 168. Heidelberg: Springer, 2005:117–45. Google Scholar

  • 86.

    Mechoulam R, Parker LA. The endocannabinoid system and the brain. Annu Rev Psychol 2013;64:21–47. Google Scholar

  • 87.

    Parolaro D, Realini N, Vigano D, Guidali C, Rubino T. The endocannabinoid system and psychiatric disorders. Exp Neurol 2010;224:3–14. Google Scholar

  • 88.

    Campos AC, Guimaraes FS. Evidence for a potential role for TRPV1 receptors in the dorsolateral periaqueductal gray in the attenuation of the anxiolytic effects of cannabinoids. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2009;33:1517–21. Google Scholar

  • 89.

    Zuardi AW, Cosme RA, Graeff FG, Guimaraes FS. Effects of ipsapirone and cannabidiol on human experimental anxiety. J Psychopharmacol (Oxf) 1993;7:82–8.Google Scholar

  • 90.

    Fusar-Poli P, Allen P, Bhattacharyya S, Crippa JA, Mechelli A, Borgwardt S, et al. Modulation of effective connectivity during emotional processing by Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2010;13:421–32. Google Scholar

  • 91.

    Scherma M, Medalie J, Fratta W, Vadivel SK, Makriyannis A, Piomelli D, et al. The endogenous cannabinoid anandamide has effects on motivation and anxiety that are revealed by fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) inhibition. Neuropharmacology 2008;54:129–40. Google Scholar

  • 92.

    Moreira FA, Kaiser N, Monory K, Lutz B. Reduced anxiety-like behaviour induced by genetic and pharmacological inhibition of the endocannabinoid-degrading enzyme fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) is mediated by CB1 receptors. Neuropharmacology 2008;54:141–50.Google Scholar

  • 93.

    Patel S, Hillard CJ. Pharmacological evaluation of cannabinoid receptor ligands in a mouse model of anxiety: further evidence for an anxiolytic role for endogenous cannabinoid signaling. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2006;318:304–11.Google Scholar

  • 94.

    Rubino T, Realini N, Guidali C, Braida D, Capurro V, Castiglioni C, et al. Chronic Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol during adolescence provokes sex-dependent changes in the emotional profile in adult rats: behavioral and biochemical correlates. Neuropsychopharmacology 2008;33:2760–71. Google Scholar

  • 95.

    Ashton CH, Moore PB. Endocannabinoid system dysfunction in mood and related disorders. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2011;124:250–61. Google Scholar

  • 96.

    Pertwee RG. Targeting the endocannabinoid system with cannabinoid receptor agonists: pharmacological strategies and therapeutic possibilities. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 2012;367:3353–63. Google Scholar

  • 97.

    Rabinak CA, Phan KL. Cannabinoid modulation of fear extinction brain circuits: a novel target to advance anxiety treatment. Curr Pharm Des 2014;20:2212–7. Google Scholar

About the article

Corresponding author: Irit Akirav, PhD, Department of Psychology, University of Haifa, Haifa 3498838, Israel, Phone: +972 4 8288268, Fax: +972 4 8263157, E-mail:

aNachshon Korem and Tomer Mizrachi Zer-Aviv: These authors contributed equally to this work.


Received: 2015-05-27

Accepted: 2015-08-05

Published Online: 2015-09-30

Published in Print: 2016-05-01


Citation Information: Journal of Basic and Clinical Physiology and Pharmacology, Volume 27, Issue 3, Pages 193–202, ISSN (Online) 2191-0286, ISSN (Print) 0792-6855, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jbcpp-2015-0058.

Export Citation

©2016 by De Gruyter.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Joseph V. Pergolizzi Jr., Jo A. Lequang, Robert Taylor Jr., Robert B. Raffa, and Daniel Colucci
Minerva Anestesiologica, 2018, Volume 84, Number 8
[2]
Armin Shirzadian, Sattar Ostadhadi, Mahsa Hassanipour, Hamed Shafaroodi, Mina Khoshnoodi, Arya Haj-Mirzaian, Mohammad Sharifzadeh, Shayan Amiri, Mehdi Ghasemi, and Ahmad Reza Dehpour
Epilepsy & Behavior, 2018, Volume 87, Page 25
[3]
Nicola Maggio, Efrat Shavit Stein, and Menahem Segal
Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, 2018, Volume 11
[4]
Howard Meng, Bradley Johnston, Marina Englesakis, Dwight E. Moulin, and Anuj Bhatia
Anesthesia & Analgesia, 2017, Volume 125, Number 5, Page 1638
[5]
Eileen Thomas and Dan J. Stein
Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology, 2017, Volume 10, Number 2, Page 167
[6]
Mercedes Garcia-Gil and Elisabetta Albi
Neurochemical Research, 2017, Volume 42, Number 2, Page 321
[7]
Mason M. Silveira, Jonathon C. Arnold, Steven R. Laviolette, Cecilia J. Hillard, Marta Celorrio, María S. Aymerich, and Wendy K. Adams
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 2017, Volume 76, Page 380

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in