Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik

Journal of Economics and Statistics

Editor-in-Chief: Winker, Peter

Ed. by Büttner, Thiess / Riphahn, Regina / Smolny, Werner / Wagner, Joachim

IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 0.200
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.309

CiteScore 2018: 0.50

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.154
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.382

See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 237, Issue 5


The Empirics of Hidden Labor Force Dynamics in Germany

Sandro Provenzano
Published Online: 2017-09-26 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jbnst-2017-0110


The unemployment rate is the core indicator when researchers and policy-makers assess the level of underemployment in an economy. However, accumulating evidence suggests that the unemployment rate is biased and underestimates the true level of underemployment. Closing this gap is especially important because the distortion systematically changes along the business cycle and affects the various subgroups of the population differently. Neglecting these effects when setting up policies might flaw its effectiveness and result in unexpected outcomes. Although the existence of these effects is widely agreed upon only little is known about the magnitude of these effects across various subgroups. Using a highly disaggregated dataset from Germany, this study examines the dynamics in labor force participation that go beyond the unemployment rate. Ample evidence is found that the discouraged and the added worker effect significantly affect particular subgroups in the German labor market. In addition, the discouraged and the added worker effect are generally found to be very symmetric in economic upturns and downturns. Moreover, the labor market reforms in Germany between 2003 and 2005 are found to have reduced the discouraged worker effect on average by 25%, leaving the added worker effect unchanged.

Keywords: added worker effect; discouraged worker effect; hidden labor force; Germany; labor force participation; unemployment


  • Armstrong, D. (1999), Hidden Male Unemployment in Northern Ireland. Regional Studies 33.6:499–511.Google Scholar

  • Benati, L. (2001), Some Empirical Evidence on the Discouraged Woker Effect. Economic Letters 70:387–395.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Böhm, K. (2011), Schätzung der Stillen Reserve mit dem Mikrozensuspanel 2001-2004. Eine Machbarkeitsstudie. IAB Forschungsbericht 2.Google Scholar

  • Bundesagentur für Arbeit (2006), Amtliche Nachrichten der Bundesagentur für Arbeit. 54 Jg. Sondernummer August.

  • Darby, J., Hart R., and M. Vecchi (1998), Labour Force Participation and the Business Cycle: A Comparative Analysis of Europe, Japan and the United States. Working Papers from Business School - Economics, University of Glasgow, can be downloaded at: http://www.gla.ac.uk/media/media_219041_en.pdf (last retrieved 23. 07.2016).

  • Department of International Economic and Social Affairs (1984), Handbook of Household Surveys. United Nations Publication, Series F(31).Google Scholar

  • Dixon, R. (1996), Apparent Asymmetries in the Relation Between the Participation Rate and the Employment Rate in Australia. Department of Economics - Working Papers Series from The University of Melbourne, 522.Google Scholar

  • Fuchs, J., Hummer M., Hutter C., Klinger S., Wanger S., Weber E., Weigand R., and G. Zika (2015), Der Arbeitsmarkt bleibt auf Erfolgskurs. IAB-Kurzbericht 7/2015.Google Scholar

  • Fuchs, J. and B. Weber (2005a), Neuschätzung der Stillen Reserve und des Erwerbspersonenpotenzials für Ostdeutschland (einschl. Berlin-Ost) IAB Forschungsbericht 18/2015.Google Scholar

  • Fuchs, J. and B. Weber (2005b), Neuschätzung der Stillen Reserve und des Erwerbspersonenpotenzials für Westdeutschland (inkl. Berlin-West). IAB Forschungsbericht 15/2005.Google Scholar

  • Fuchs, J. and B. Weber (2010), Umfang und Struktur der westdeutschen Stillen Reserve. IAB Forschungsbericht 11/2010.Google Scholar

  • Fuchs, J. and E. Weber (2013), A New Look at the Discouragement and the Addded Worker Hypothesis: Applying a Trend-Cycle Decomposition to Unemployment. Applied Economics Letters 20:1374–1378.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Goecke, H., Pimpertz J., Schäfer H., and C. Schröder (2013), Zehn Jahre Agenda 2010 Eine empirische Bestandsaufnahme ihrer Wirkungen. Institut der deutschen Wirtschaft Köln policy paper 7.Google Scholar

  • Graff, M., Mannino M., and M. Siegenthaler (2013), Die neue Schätzung des schweizerischen Erwerbspersonenpotenzials an der KOF. KOF Analysen 4:45–56.Google Scholar

  • Granger, C. W. J. (1969), Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-spectral Methods. Econometrica 37:424–438.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Holst, E. and J. Schupp (2000), Stille Reserve wichtig für die Arbeitsmarktflexibilität. DIW-Wochenbericht 29/2000:55–84.Google Scholar

  • International Labor Organization (1982), International Labour Organization (ILO) Resolutions Concerning Economically Active Population, Employment, Unemployment and Underemployment. in: 13th International Conference of Labour Statisticians.Google Scholar

  • Lee, G. and J. Parasnis (2014), Discouraged Workers in Developed Countries and Added Workers in Developing Countries? Unemployment Rate and Labour Force Participation. Economic Modelling 41:90–98.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lenten, L. (2001), Does Encouragement Differ from Discouragement? A Study of Asymmetry in the Australian Labour Force. Presented to the School of Economics Seminar University Adelaide. Retrieved on 2016-07-23: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228397800_Does_Encouragement_Differ_ From_Discouragement_A_Study_of_Asymmetry_in_the_Australian_Labour_Force.

  • Long, C. (1953), Impact of Effective Demand on the Labor Supply. The American Economic Review 43 (2):458–467.Google Scholar

  • Mincer, J. (1966), Labor Force Participation and Unemployment: A Review of Recent Evidence 73–112 in: R.A. Gordon, M.S. Gordon (Eds.), Prosperity and Unemployment.Google Scholar

  • O‘Brien, M. (2011), Discouraged Older Male Workers and the Discouraged Worker Effect. Australian Journal of Labour Economics 14 (3):217–235.Google Scholar

  • Ozerkek, Y. (2013), Unemployment and Labor Force Participation: A Panel Cointegration Analysis for European Countries. Applied Econometrics and International Development 13:67–76.Google Scholar

  • Phillips, P. C. B. and J. Y. Park (1988), On the Formulation of Wald Tests of Nonlinear Restrictions. Econometrica 56:1065–1083.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bundesamt Statistisches (2013), Mikrozensus 2012 Stand und Entwicklung der Erwerbstätigkeit in Deutschland. Fachserie 1, 4.1.1.Google Scholar

  • Bundesamt Statistisches (2015), Ungenutztes Arbeitskräftepotenzial im Jahr 2014: 6 Millionen Menschen wollen (mehr) Arbeit. Pressemitteilung 21.Mai 2015-186/15.

  • Strand, K. and T. Dernburg (1964), Cyclical Variation in Civilian Labor-Force Participation. Review of Economics and Statistics 46:378–391.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tella, A. (1964), The Relation of Labor Force to Employment. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 17 (3):63–89.Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2016-08-20

Accepted: 2017-08-27

Revised: 2017-03-27

Published Online: 2017-09-26

Published in Print: 2017-11-27

Citation Information: Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik, Volume 237, Issue 5, Pages 373–406, ISSN (Online) 2366-049X, ISSN (Print) 0021-4027, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jbnst-2017-0110.

Export Citation

© 2017 Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag GmbH, Published by De Gruyter Oldenbourg, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in