Modern Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) have been proliferating through the entire business sector over recent decades. This increasing digitalization is having a substantial impact on economic activity and is continuously changing the nature of production processes and our day-to-day working life. Since 2002, the ICT Survey carried out by the Centre for European Economic Research (ZEW) has tracked the diffusion and use of ICT in different industries within the German economy. 1 Further surveys were conducted at irregular intervals in 2004, 2007, 2010 and 2015. 2 The survey was designed by ZEW’s Research Department Information and Communication Technologies. The data was collected via computer-assisted telephone interviews (CATI) by infas Institute for Applied Social Sciences. The central aim of the survey is twofold: Firstly, a representative picture of the use of ICT by German firms is obtained. Secondly, taking account of a large set of further firm characteristics it should allow an analysis of the consequences of employing ICT and ICT-related projects with respect to different measures of firm performance.
Existing alternative related datasets on German firms suffer from various shortcomings which prevent a thorough analysis of ICT in relation to the firms’ characteristics and performance. Overall, there is no readily available dataset for German firms which links information on ICT use with background characteristics and measures of firm performance. While the Federal Statistical Office in Germany started to conduct an administrative ICT survey in 2003 within the framework of the Eurostat Community survey on ICT usage in enterprises (Destatis 2015), 3 one big disadvantage of this data is that it is limited to a narrow set of variables focusing solely on the use of ICT within the firm. Background firm characteristics needed for comprehensive empirical research are beyond the scope of the survey. 4 Furthermore, the administrative survey intentionally excludes firms who took part in the previous year’s survey in order to avoid too much effort on the part of the firms. 5 Thus, it is not possible to build a panel or even to make year-to-year comparisons. The information contained in the ICT survey conducted by the Federal Statistical Office has recently been integrated into the Eurostat-funded ESSLait project. However, the available Micro Moment Database does not contain information at the firm-level but micro-aggregated harmonized industry-level data (Bartelsman et al. 2013). Moreover, surveys of various official statistics have by now been combined into an administrative firm-level longitudinal dataset within the AFiD project (Wagner 2016). However, the administrative ICT survey is not included in the AFiD Modules yet. 6 So far, the ZEW ICT Survey is the only dataset which enables the joint analysis of ICT and multiple background characteristics for German firms in the cross-section and over time.
This paper is organized as follows: Section 2 provides an overview of the survey methodology, including population, sampling frame and data processing. Section 3 summarizes the main contents of the ZEW ICT Survey with a focus on the current wave collected in 2015. Section 4 provides information on data protection and data access at the ZEW Research Data Centre (ZEW-FDZ).
2 Survey design
The population of the ZEW ICT Survey is comprised of all firms based in Germany with at least 5 employees 7 belonging to the manufacturing sector and selected services industries (see below).
As a sampling frame, the ICT Survey uses the data pool of Verband der Vereine Creditreform e.V. (Creditreform), a credit rating agency, which provides one of the largest publicly available databases on firms in Germany. The statistical unit of the Creditreform database is the legally independent firm. 8 The sample is drawn using a stratified sampling design. Stratification cells are defined by firm size in terms of the number of employees, as well as firms’ industry affiliation. Overall five size classes are defined (5–19, 20–49, 50–249, 250–499, ≥500). Moreover, the sample is stratified by 17 industrial sectors constructed from two-digit standard industry codes (NACE Rev. 2). 9 Table 1 provides a breakdown of the industry composition of the 2015 wave of the ICT Survey. The ICT Survey distinguishes 17 basic sectors, most of them composed out of several two-digit industries. However, for the drawing of the gross sample, a further differentiation of 3 sectors (consumer goods, basic materials and furniture, toys, medical equipment) was applied due to the greater heterogeneity of their business activities. We therefore ended up using a 22 sector definition for drawing the sample. Until the wave of 2010, the ZEW ICT Survey was additionally stratified according to location, namely whether the firm was based in East or West Germany. For each wave, the gross sample is made up of panel firms which took part in a previous wave of the survey and supplemented by newly drawn firms due to panel attrition.
The target size of the 2015 wave’s net sample was 4,500 firms. This number was achieved by applying an adjusted gross sample of slightly more than 30,000 observations, which results in a participation rate of 15 percent. The telephone interviews are preceded by a screening procedure to determine the firms’ eligibility for inclusion in the survey. Depending on the size of the firm, survey respondents are generally the firms’ owner, manager, or the head of the IT department. For the 2015 wave, the average interview length was 25.7 minutes. In each wave of the survey, the questionnaire undergoes a pretest in the field. Findings of the pretest are integrated into the final survey tool.
The right-hand columns of Tables 1 and 2 give an overview of the number of firm observations included in the 2015 ICT Survey, the overall number of companies in Germany and the share of survey observations out of the total number of companies by industry affiliation (Table 1) and by size class 10 (Table 2). The coverage rate increases continuously with firm size, starting at 0.65 percent for the smallest firms (5–19 employees) and ending at 6.56 percent for the large firms with 500 employees or more. Differences in the coverage rate by industries are essentially due to different size structures in the various industries and a predefined upper limit of interviews to be realized per drawing cell (i. e. sector-size class combination).-
After the field phase, a couple of data processing steps are performed on the raw data to ensure high data quality. For example, to verify the firms’ industry affiliation, each firm is assigned manually to an industry at the three-digit NACE Rev. 2 level. 11 This assignment is based on the firms’ statements on their product or service with the largest sales share. The manual assignments to industry codes were carried out twice by different individuals. Cases of disagreement were subsequently checked again. Key variables such as sales, the number of employees and investments, are checked for consistency and plausibility and detected outliers are manually cross-validated based on publicly available data.
3 Contents of the survey
The ZEW ICT Survey regularly includes questions which are intended to describe the general ICT intensity of the firm. Many of these measures are by now also reflected in the Eurostat Community Survey framework and are therefore comparable to measures used in the administrative surveys. Measures for overall ICT intensity range from the percentage of employees working predominantly with computers, which has been employed in numerous econometric studies as a measure of overall ICT intensity, or proxy for ICT capital respectively (e. g. Bloom et al. 2012), to IT expenditure and the number of IT staff employed by the firm.
Figure 1 provides an exemplary analysis of the data contained in the ZEW ICT Survey. Showing in-sample averages over different waves, the figure depicts the digitalization of workplaces in German firms. The data suggest that working with personal computers, which became widespread mainly during the 1980s and 1990s, as well as the use of the internet at the workplace have remained quite stable since 2002. In recent years, however, the data reflects the rapid proliferation of mobile devices like smartphones, tablets and notebooks, which provide internet access via cellular networks and are supplementing traditional work at desktop PCs (Bertschek/Niebel 2016).
Besides measures for general ICT intensity, the ZEW ICT Survey contains data on more specific technologies, which typically serve a particular purpose. Some of these technologies are covered in multiple waves, such as Enterprise Resource Planning software (ERP). The current wave of the survey, for instance, includes information on the use of technologies such as cloud computing and the different types thereof, the use of Big Data Analytics, current and planned ‘Industry 4.0ʹ projects, and the firms’ development of mobile applications. Figure 2 depicts the in-sample shares of firms offering mobile product or service apps and the share of firms which systematically analyze large amounts of data to support business operations (Big Data Analytics) by industry.
The data includes an extensive list of background characteristics of the firms, ranging from basic characteristics, such as the number of employees, or information on the qualifications and age structure of employees, to the use of organizational and human resource practices like incentive pay. The data also contains balance sheet information, such as personnel costs or expenditures on intermediate inputs, which are important for econometric analyses.
The ICT Survey also covers a wide variety of performance measures, which are typically included in all waves of the survey, such as total sales or export status and share. Additionally, items included on innovation and R&D activities follow the Community Innovation Survey (CIS) and the guidelines of the Oslo Manual by the OECD and Eurostat (2005).
Table 3 provides an overview of the items collected in the last wave of the ZEW ICT Survey in 2015.
Finally, each wave of the ZEW ICT Survey includes focus topics that are covered by a more extensive list of questions (Table 4). Focus topics are selected according to their overall relevance at the time the survey is conducted, their suitability for paving the way for further research with the collected data, and following a broad discussion with internal and external experts on the topic of interest. For example, one of the focus topics of the last wave in 2015 was ‘Social Media Marketing’. The respective block of questions covers a comprehensive list of items on the use of different social media channels, from corporate blogs to profiles in online social networks. Further questions deal with the goals and barriers to the firms’ social media activities. Moreover, the focus topic introduces new measures for firms’ background characteristics and performance, such as the amount of sales generated by new customers.
4 Data protection, provision and access
ZEW makes use of the ICT Survey data for its own research projects, which are funded in part through academic and public funds and partly conducted on behalf of third parties, such as national ministries, EU institutions and private companies. Apart from this, the data from the ZEW ICT Survey is available to interested researchers from outside the ZEW. Interested researchers will be provided with an overview of collected items over all waves of the panel upon request. The data is accessible for scientists based at universities and publicly financed research institutions for non-commercial basic research purposes. Use of the data for commercial or any other business purposes is not permitted. The available data is formally anonymized, i. e. they contain neither names nor addresses, but all other original data gathered in the survey is included. Each wave of the data is usually made available 12 months after the end of the field phase of the survey. To facilitate the external access, ZEW has established a Research Data Centre (ZEW-FDZ), which manages the external usage of ZEW research data. Upon request, scientists have the opportunity to work with the formally anonymized ZEW ICT Survey data within the FDZ premises at ZEW. 12
Bartelsman, E.J., E. Hagsten, M. Polder (2013), Cross-Country Analysis of ICT Impact Using Firm-Level Data: The Micro Moments Database and Research Infrastructure, Eurostat. Google Scholar
Bersch, J., S. Gottschalk, B. Müller, M. Niefert (2014), The Mannheim Enterprise Panel (MUP) and Firm Statistics for Germany, ZEW-Discussion Paper 14-104. Google Scholar
Bertschek, I., T. Niebel (2016), Mobile and More Productive? Firm-Level Evidence on the Productivity Effects of Mobile Internet Use. Telecommunications Policy 40(9): 888–898. Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar
Destatis (2008), Classification of Economic Activities, Edition 2008 (WZ 2008), Wiesbaden. Google Scholar
Destatis (2015), Unternehmen und Arbeitsstätten – Nutzung Von Informations- und Kommunikationstechnologien in Unternehmen, Wiesbaden. Google Scholar
Destatis (2016), Unternehmensregister, Sonderauswertung, Registerstand 29.02.2016, Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
OECD and Eurostat (2005), Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data. Paris, OECD Publishing. Google Scholar
Wagner, J. (2016), Kombinierte Firmenpaneldaten: Datenangebot Und Analysepotenziale. 1–12 in: S. Liebig, W. Matiaske, S. Rosenbohm (Hrsg.), Handbuch Empirische Organisationsforschung. Wiesbaden, Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. Google Scholar
ZEW IKT-Report (2003), Unternehmen in der Internetökonomie, ZEW, Mannheim. Google Scholar
ZEW IKT-Report (2005), Internet bestimmt den Geschäftsalltag, ZEW, Mannheim.Google Scholar
ZEW IKT-Report (2007), Internetwirtschaft weiter auf dem Vormarsch, ZEW, Mannheim.Google Scholar
ZEW IKT-Report (2010), Interaktiv, mobil, international – Unternehmen im Zeitalter von Web 2.0, ZEW, Mannheim.Google Scholar
ZEW IKT-Report (2015), Industrie 4.0: Digitale (R)Evolution der Wirtschaft, ZEW, Mannheim. Google Scholar
See ZEW IKT-Report (2003, 2005, 2007, 2010, 2015) for selected representative results based on the ICT survey data on the diffusion and use of ICT in Germany.
See e. g. Bersch et al. (2014) for further details on the Creditreform database.
The stratification matrix has been changed over time along the industry dimension according to changes in the statistical classification of economic activities in the European Community and subsequently in Germany, as well as changes in objectives in terms of content of the survey.
For Germany, the “Wirtschaftschaftszweigklassifikation 2008” (WZ 2008) is the equivalent of the NACE Rev. 2 classification for the economic activities relevant to us (see Destatis 2008).
Please consult http://kooperationen.zew.de/en/zew-fdz/home.html for further information on data access.
About the article
Published Online: 2018-02-09
Published in Print: 2018-03-26
Citation Information: Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik, Volume 238, Issue 1, Pages 87–99, ISSN (Online) 2366-049X, ISSN (Print) 0021-4027, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jbnst-2016-1005.
© 2018 Bertschek et al. published by De Gruyter. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0