Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

70% off for SBL-members!

Journal of the Bible and its Reception

Managing Editor: Kraemer, David / Marsengill, Katherine

Ed. by Black, Fiona C. / Oekland, Jorunn / MacDonald, Nathan / Ocker, Christopher

Together with Strawbridge, Jennifer R.

Online
ISSN
2329-4434
See all formats and pricing
More options …

“Behold the Man”? Subverting Imperial Masculinity in the Gospel of John

Jason J. Ripley
Published Online: 2015-11-06 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jbr-2015-0009

Abstract

Modern variations of the “Muscular Christianity” movement emphasize Jesus’ masculinity in various dimensions, inspired in part by the idealized masculinity of Jesus portrayed in the Gospel of John. However, these constructions overlook the Roman context of the Fourth Gospel, and thus miss its critical and subversive engagement with imperial masculinity. I argue that the Gospel of John forges its portrait of Jesus in the rhetorical crucible of honor and virtus, where Roman masculinity was socially constructed and contested. Within the divergent configurations of manliness that emerge in the early imperial period, the glorious death of John’s Jesus appeals to and subverts reigning constructions of imperial masculinity. Through the portrayal of Jesus’ unflappable courage and conquering via his death, the rhetoric of the Fourth Gospel lays claim to the ideal of Roman virtus, especially as set forth in the rhetorized renditions of anti-imperial Stoic martyrs (such as Cato and Seneca). However, by constructing Jesus’ masculinity around his bound, beaten, crucified and penetrated body, the Fourth Gospel critiques and subverts imperial configurations of hegemonic manliness and domination. John’s glorification of the cross provides a paradigm of masculinity that exalts courageous critique and rejection of imperial violence even at the cost of one’s life, thereby inverting the shame of crucifixion and imbuing it with honor and virtus. In so doing, imperial notions of martial masculinity and power are subverted and reconfigured around the cross, thereby opening up new possibilities for the performance of masculinity by ancients and moderns alike.

Keywords: classical rhetoric; Gospel of John; masculinity; Muscular Christianity; noble death; Roman imperialism

Works Cited

  • Alston, Richard. 1998. “Arms and the Man: Soldiers, Masculinity and Power in Republican and Imperial Roman Law.” In When Men were Men: Masculinity, Power and Identity in Classical Antiquity, edited by Lin Foxhall and John Salmon, 205–223. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Bakhtin, Mikhail. 1984. Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics. Trans. C. Emerson. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

  • Barton, Carlin A. 2001. Roman Honor: Fire in the Bones. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

  • Boyle, A. J. 2003. “Introduction: Reading Flavian Rome.” In Flavian Rome: Culture, Image, Text, edited by A. J. Boyle and W. J. Dominik, 1–68. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

  • Brown, Raymond. 1970. The Gospel According to John (XIII–XXI). AB 29A. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar

  • Bush, George W. 2002. “Transcript of President Bush’s Address to the Nation on Sept. 11 Anniversary.” New York Times, September 12.Google Scholar

  • Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Carroll, John T. and Joel B. Green. 1995. The Death of Jesus in Early Christianity. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson.Google Scholar

  • Carter, Warren. 2006. The Roman Empire and the New Testament: An Essential Guide. Nashville: Abingdon.Google Scholar

  • Carter, Warren. 2008. John and Empire: Initial Explorations. New York: T&T Clark.Google Scholar

  • Connolly, Joy. 2007. “Virile Tongues: Rhetoric and Masculinity.” In A Companion to Roman Rhetoric, Blackwell Companions to the Ancient World, edited by William J. Dominik and Jon Hall, 83–97. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Conway, Colleen M. 2008. Behold the Man: Jesus and Greco-Roman Masculinity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Cook, John Granger. 2014. Crucifixion in the Mediterranean World. WUNT 327. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar

  • Crossan, John Dominic. 2008. “Roman Imperial Theology.” In In the Shadow of Empire: Reclaiming the Bible as a History of Faithful Resistance, edited by Richard A. Horsley, 59–73. Louisville: Westminster John Knox.Google Scholar

  • Dear, John. 2011. Lazarus, Come Forth! How Jesus Confronts the Culture of Death and Invites Us into the New Life of Peace. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books.Google Scholar

  • Dube, Musa W. 2006. “Reading for Decolonization (John 4:1-42).” Semeia 75: 37–59.Google Scholar

  • Edward, Catherine. 2007. Death in Ancient Rome. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

  • Elliott, Charlene. 2008. “Purple Pasts: Color Codification in the Ancient World.” Law & Social Inquiry 33 (1): 173–194.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Geiger, Joseph. 1979. “Munatius Rufus and Thrasea Paetus on Cato the Younger.” Athenaeum 57: 48–72.Google Scholar

  • Gergel, Richard A. 1986. “An Allegory of Imperial Victory on a Cuirassed Statue of Domitian.” Record of the Art Museum, Princeton University 45.1: 2–15.Google Scholar

  • Glancy, Jennifer A. 2005. “Torture: Flesh, Truth and the Fourth Gospel.” Biblical Interpretation 13.2: 107–136.Google Scholar

  • Gunderson, Erik. 2000. Staging Masculinity: The Rhetoric of Performance in the Roman World. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

  • Hengel, Martin. 1977. Crucifixion. Philadephia: Fortress Press.Google Scholar

  • Horsley, Richard and Tom Thatcher. 2013. John, Jesus and the Renewal of Israel. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar

  • Hunt, Laura J. 2014. “Ecce homo or Hic vir? Translation and Allusion in John 19:5.” Paper presented at Annual Meeting of the Society of Biblical Literature, San Diego, CA, November 22, 2014.Google Scholar

  • Jantzen, Grace M. 2004. Death and the Displacement of Beauty: Volume One – Foundations of Violence. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Johnston, George. 1987. “Ecce Homo! Irony in the Christology of the Fourth Evangelist.” In The Glory of Christ in the New Testament: Studies in Christology in Memory of George Bradford Caird, edited by L. D. Hurst and N. T. Wright, 125–138. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

  • Keener, Craig S. 2003. The Gospel of John: A Commentary, vol. 2. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson.Google Scholar

  • Ker, James. 2009. The Deaths of Seneca. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Kuefler, Mathew. 2001. The Manly Eunuch: Masculinity, Gender Ambiguity, and Christian Ideology in Late Antiquity. Chicago Series on Sexuality, History, and Society. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

  • Lee, Dorothy. 2002. Flesh and Glory: Symbolism, Gender and Theology in the Gospel of John. New York: Crossroad.Google Scholar

  • Malina, Bruce J. 1993. The New Testament World: Insights from Cultural Anthropology. Revised edition. Louisville: Westminster John Knox.Google Scholar

  • Malina, Bruce J. and Jerome H. Neyrey. 1991. “Honor and Shame in Luke-Acts: Pivotal Values of the Mediterranean World.” In The Social World of Luke-Acts: Models for Interpretation, edited by Jerome H. Neyrey, 25–66. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson.Google Scholar

  • McDonnell, Myles Anthony. 2006. Roman Manliness: Virtus and the Roman Republic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Minchin, James George Cotton. 1901. Our Public Schools: Their Influence on English History. London: Swan Sonnenschein Paternoster Square.Google Scholar

  • Murashko, Alex. 2012. “John Piper: God Gave Christianity a ‘Masculine Feel.’” Christian Post, February 1. Accessed December 12, 2013. http://www.christianpost.com/news/john-piper-god-gave-christianity-a-masculine-feel-68385/.

  • Neyrey, Jerome H. 2001. “The ‘Noble Shepherd’ in John 10: Cultural and Rhetorical Background.” JBL 120 (2): 267–291.Google Scholar

  • Newsom, Jennifer Siebel, director. 2015. The Mask You Live In. Accessed September 23, 2015. http://therepresentationproject.org/films/the-mask-you-live-in/.

  • O’Day, Gail R. 1986. Revelation in the Fourth Gospel. Philadelphia: Fortress Press.Google Scholar

  • O’Day, Gail R. 1992. “John.” In The Women’s Bible Commentary, 2nd ed., edited by Carol A. Newsom and Sharon H. Ringe, 293–304. Louisville: Westminster John Knox.Google Scholar

  • “Perfect Manhood of Jesus.” Accessed April 28, 2015. http://www.newemangelization.com/uncategorized/cardinal-raymond-leo-burke-on-the-catholic-man-crisis-and-what-to-do-about-it/.

  • Powell, Anton. 2008. Virgil the Partisan: A Study in the Re-integration of Classics. Swansea: The Classical Press of Wales.Google Scholar

  • Price, Simon. 1986. Ritual and Power: The Roman Imperial Cult in Asia Minor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Ripley, Jason J. 2012. “Glorious Death, Imperial Rome, and the Gospel of John.” Presentation to the Bible and Empire Section of the Annual Meeting of the Society of Biblical Literature. Chicago, Illinois, November 17.Google Scholar

  • Roller, Matthew B. 2001. Constructing Autocracy: Aristocrats and Emperors in Julio-Claudian Rome.. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

  • Ronconi, Alessandro. 1996. “Exitus Illustrium Virorum.” RAC 6: 1258–1268.Google Scholar

  • Sheppard, Beth M. 2006. “Another Look: Johannine ‘Subordinationist Christology’ and the Roman Family.” In New Currents Through John: A Global Perspective, edited by Francisco Lozada, Jr. and Tom Thatcher, 101–122. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature.Google Scholar

  • Smit, Peter-Ben. 2006. “Jesus and the Ladies: Constructing and Deconstructing Johannine Macho-Christology.” The Bible and Critical Theory 2 (3): 31.1–31.15.Google Scholar

  • Thatcher, Tom. 2009. Greater than Caesar: Christology and Empire in the Fourth Gospel. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.Google Scholar

  • Tombs, David. 1999. “Crucifixion, State Terror, and Sexual Abuse.” Union Seminary Quarterly Review 53: 89–109.Google Scholar

  • van Hooff, Anton J. L. 1990. From Autothanasia to Suicide: Self-Killing in Classical Antiquity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • van Tilborg, Sjef. 1996. Reading John in Ephesus. NovTSup 83. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

  • Walters, Jonathan. 1997. “Invading the Roman Body: Manliness and Impenetrability in Roman Thought.” In Roman Sexualities, edited by Judith P. Hallett and Marilyn B. Skinner, 29–46. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

  • Williams, Craig A. 1999. Roman Homosexuality: Ideologies of Masculinity in Classical Antiquity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Wengst, Klaus. 1987. Pax Romana and the Peace of Jesus Christ. Trans. John Bowden. Philadelphia: Fortress Press.Google Scholar

  • Yarbro Collins, Adela. 1993. “The Genre of the Passion Narrative.” Studia Theologica 47: 3–28.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Corresponding author: Jason J. Ripley, Assistant Professor of Religion, St. Olaf College, Northfield, MN, USA, e-mail:


Published Online: 2015-11-06

Published in Print: 2015-11-01


Citation Information: Journal of the Bible and its Reception, Volume 2, Issue 2, Pages 219–239, ISSN (Online) 2329-4434, ISSN (Print) 2329-440X, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jbr-2015-0009.

Export Citation

©2015 by De Gruyter.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Peter-Ben Smit
Brill Research Perspectives in Biblical Interpretation, 2017, Volume 2, Number 1, Page 1

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in