Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

70% off for SBL-members!

Journal of the Bible and its Reception

Managing Editor: Kraemer, David / Marsengill, Katherine

Ed. by Black, Fiona C. / Oekland, Jorunn / MacDonald, Nathan / Ocker, Christopher

Together with Strawbridge, Jennifer R.

Online
ISSN
2329-4434
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Mystical Unification or Ethnic Domination? American Biblical Archeologists’ Responses to the Six-Day War

Brooke Sherrard
Published Online: 2016-04-27 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jbr-2016-1002

Abstract

After the Six-Day War, members of the American Schools of Oriental Research experienced conflict over how and whether to maintain the organization’s policy on political neutrality. This article argues that ASOR members who supported Israel framed their views as theological, lauding the war for achieving a mystical unification of Jerusalem, while members who opposed the war’s outcome responded that appeals to theology and neutrality were being deployed to justify one ethnic group’s domination over another. I present two main examples, George Ernest Wright and Paul Lapp, and connect their scholarly views on objectivity versus relativism to their political views on the conflict. Wright, a biblical theologian, argued the Old Testament was an objective record of a religion revealed by God to the Israelites and defended the slaughter of Canaanites in terms that echoed justifications for Palestinian displacement. Conversely Lapp, who read the Old Testament as a polemical text, overtly connected his perspectivalism to his pro-Palestinian politics. In 1968 Wright clashed with ASOR residents, including Lapp, who protested Israeli plans to reroute a parade through recently captured areas of East Jerusalem. A reading of the correspondence record created after the protest analyzes the political implications of these differing scholarly positions.

Keywords: American Schools of Oriental Research; Zionism; objectivity; G. Ernest Wright; Paul Lapp

Works Cited

  • Archives:Google Scholar

  • The American Schools of Oriental Research archive in Boston (ASOR).

  • Harvard Divinity School archive in Cambridge, Mass. (HDS).

  • Published works:Google Scholar

  • Albright, William Foxwell. 1957 [1940]. From the Stone Age to Christianity: Monotheism and the Historical Process. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

  • Asad, Talal. 1993. Genealogies of Religion: Discipline and Reasons of Power in Christianity and Islam. Baltimore, MD.: Johns Hopkins University Press.

  • Avalos, Hector. 2007. The End of Biblical Studies. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar

  • Ben-Yehuda, Nachman. 2007. “Excavating Masada: The Politics-Archaeology Connection at Work.” In Selective Remembrances: Archaeology in the Construction, Commemoration, and Consecration of National Pasts, edited by Philip L. Kohl, Mara Kozelsky, and Nachman Ben-Yehuda, 247–276. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

  • Burrows, Millar. 1949. Palestine is Our Business. Philadelphia, PA: The Westminster Press.Google Scholar

  • Davis, Thomas. 2004. Shifting Sands: The Rise and Fall of Biblical Archaeology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Display ad “Jerusalem Should Remain Unified”. The New York Times, July 12, 1967, p. 12.

  • Elon, Amos. 1971. The Israelis: Founders and Sons. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar

  • Feinman, Peter. 2012. “Canaanites, Catholics, and Chosen Peoples: William Foxwell Albright’s Biblical Archaeology.” Near Eastern Archaeology 75 (3): 148–160.Google Scholar

  • Gottwald, Norman K. 1979. The Tribes of Yahweh: A Sociology of the Religion of Liberated Israel, 1250–1050 B.C.E. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis.Google Scholar

  • Greenberg, Raphael. 2009. “Towards an Inclusive Archaeology in Jerusalem: The Case of Silwan/The City of David.” Public Archaeology 8 (1): 35–50.Google Scholar

  • Hillers, Delbert R. 1985. “Analyzing the Abominable: Our Understanding of Canaanite Religion.” The Jewish Quarterly Review LXXV (3): 253–269.Google Scholar

  • Khalidi, Rashid. 1997. Palestinian Identity: The Construction of Modern National Consciousness. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

  • Killebrew, Ann E. 1999. “From Canaanites to Crusaders: The Presentation of Archaeological Sites in Israel.” Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites 3 (1–2): 17–32.Google Scholar

  • Lapp, Paul W. 1969. Biblical Archaeology and History. New York: The World Publishing Company.Google Scholar

  • Lapp, Paul W. 1970, “Captive Treasures: Who Owns What?” Mid East 10: 35–42.Google Scholar

  • Lapp, Paul W. 1975. The Tale of the Tell: Archaeological Studies by Paul W. Lapp, edited by Nancy L. Lapp. Pittsburgh Theological Monograph Series 5. Pittsburgh, PA: Pickwick Press.Google Scholar

  • Lemke, Werner E. 1986. “Interpreting Biblical History through the Eyes of Sociology and Politics: The Work of George Mendenhall and Norman Gottwald.” Conservative Judaism 39 (1): 67–80.Google Scholar

  • Long, Burke O. 1997. Planting and Reaping Albright: Politics, Ideology, and Interpreting the Bible. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar

  • McCutcheon, Russell T. 2005. Religion and the Domestication of Dissent; Or, How to Live in a Less than Perfect Nation. Religion in Culture: Studies in Social Contest and Construction. London: Equinox.Google Scholar

  • Mendenhall, George E. 1962. “The Hebrew Conquest of Palestine.” The Biblical Archaeologist 25 (3): 66–87.Google Scholar

  • Mendenhall, George E. 1974. The Tenth Generation: The Origins of the Biblical Tradition. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

  • Moorey, P. R. S. 1991. A Century of Biblical Archaeology. Louisville, KY: Westminster/John Knox Press.Google Scholar

  • Pritchard, James B. 1968. “Minutes of the Meeting of the Board of Trustees, May 3, 1968.” Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research 190: 54–57.Google Scholar

  • Rabinovitch, Abraham. “Tea and Sympathies.” Jerusalem Post, 26 September, 1969.

  • “Rev. William Casey, 75, Professor at BC, Holy Cross.” The Boston Globe, 15 June, 1990.

  • Rogers, Stephanie Stidham. 2011. Inventing the Holy Land: American Protestant Pilgrimage to Palestine, 1865–1941. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar

  • Said, Edward. 1986. “Michael Walzer’s ‘Exodus and Revolution’: A Canaanite Reading.” Grand Street 5 (2): 86–106.Google Scholar

  • Sand, Shlomo. 2009. The Invention of the Jewish People. trans. Yael Lotan. London: Verso.Google Scholar

  • Schwartz, Regina M. 1997. The Curse of Cain: The Violent Legacy of Monotheism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

  • Smith, J. Z. 1990. Drudgery Divine: On the Comparison of Early Christianities and the Religions of Late Antiquity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

  • Thompson, Thomas L. 1999. The Mythic Past: Biblical Archaeology and the Myth of Israel. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

  • Whitelam, Keith W. 1996. The Invention of Ancient Israel: The Silencing of Palestinian History. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Wright, G. Ernest. 1944. The Challenge of Israel’s Faith. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

  • Wright, G. Ernest. 1950. The Old Testament Against its Environment. Studies in Biblical Theology 2. London: SCM Press.Google Scholar

  • Wright, G. Ernest. 1951. “The Study of the Old Testament.” In Protestant Thought in the Twentieth Century: Whence and Whither? edited by Arnold S. Nash. New York: Macmillan Company.Google Scholar

  • Wright, G. Ernest. 1952. God Who Acts: Biblical Theology as Recital. Studies in Biblical Theology 8. London: SCM Press.Google Scholar

  • Wright, G. Ernest. 1954. The Biblical Doctrine of Man in Society. Ecumenical Biblical Studies 2. London: SCM Press.Google Scholar

  • Wright, G. Ernest. 1957. Biblical Archaeology. Philadelphia: The Westminster Press.Google Scholar

  • Wright, G. Ernest. 1971. “What Archaeology Can and Cannot Do.” The Biblical Archaeologist 34 (3): 69–76.Google Scholar

  • Wright, G. Ernest, and Floyd Vivian Filson, eds. 1956. The Westminster Historical Atlas to the Bible, rev. edn. Westminster Aids to the Study of the Scriptures. [1945] Philadelphia: Westminster Press.Google Scholar

  • Yadin, Yigael. 1975. Hazor: The Rediscovery of a Great Citadel of the Bible. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar

  • Yothers, Brian. 2007. The Romance of the Holy Land in American Travel Writing, 1790–1876. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar

  • Zerubavel, Yael. 1995. Recovered Roots: Collective Memory and the Making of Israeli National Tradition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2016-04-27

Published in Print: 2016-05-01


Citation Information: Journal of the Bible and its Reception, Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages 109–133, ISSN (Online) 2329-4434, ISSN (Print) 2329-440X, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jbr-2016-1002.

Export Citation

©2016 by De Gruyter.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in