Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

70% off for SBL-members!

Journal of the Bible and its Reception

Managing Editor: MacDonald, Nathan / Marsengill, Katherine

Ed. by Black, Fiona C. / Burnette-Bletsch, Rhonda / Oekland, Jorunn / Kraemer, David / Ocker, Christopher

2 Issues per year

Online
ISSN
2329-4434
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Rachel Weeping: Intertextuality as a Means of Transforming the Readers’ Worldview

Sébastien Doane
  • Corresponding author
  • Université Laval – Théologie et sciences religieuses, Québec, Canada
  • Email:
Published Online: 2017-06-17 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jbr-2017-2000

Abstract

The episode of the Bethlehem massacre (Matt 2:16-18) uses many levels of intertextuality as a rhetorical device, to solicit an emotional response powerful enough to influence the reader’s worldview. What effect do these intertexts have on Matthew’s readers? How is this affective appeal concerning Rachel’s tears intended to impact the reader’s response to Matthew’s story? Rachel weeping is an emotionally charged image that somehow merges two opposites: hope and sorrow. The intertextuality of this figure can influence readers encouraging them to criticize imperial ideologies that have used violence against innocent people in the past, and oppose those which do so currently.

Keywords: Matthew’s Gospel; Rachel; Intertextuality; emotion; Reader-response; injustice; Jeremiah

Works Cited

  • Aichele, George, and Gary Allen Phillips. 1995. “Introduction: Exegesis, Eisegesis, Intergesis. Intertextuality and the Bible. ” Semeia 69–70, 7–18, Atlanta: Scholars Press.Google Scholar

  • Albright, William Foxwell, and C. S. Mann. 1971. Matthew. Garden City: Doubleday.Google Scholar

  • Allison, Dale C. 1993. The New Moses: A Matthean Typology. Minneapolis: Fortress.Google Scholar

  • Atkinson, Basil Ferris Campbell. 1952. The Christian’s Use of the Old Testament. London: InterVarsity Fellowship.Google Scholar

  • Aus, Roger David. 2004. Matthew 1–2 and the Virginal Conception: In Light of Palestinian and Hellenistic Judaic Traditions on the Birth of Israel’s First Redeemer, Moses. Lanham: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Beach, W. 1969. “Advent Amid the Slaughter of the Innocents.” Christianity and Crisis 29: 322–323.Google Scholar

  • Becking, Bob. 1994 “‘A Voice was Heard in Ramah.’ Remarks on Structure and Meaning of Jr 31.15–17.” Biblisches Zeitschrift 38: 238.Google Scholar

  • Betsworth, Sharon, 2010. “The Child and Jesus in the Gospel of Matthew.” Journal of Childhood and Religion: 1–14.Google Scholar

  • Bloch, Renée. 1955. Quelques Aspects de la Figure De Moïse dans la Tradition Rabbinique. Paris: Cahiers Sioniens.Google Scholar

  • Bright, John. 1965. Jeremiah: Introduction, Translation, and Notes. Garden City: Doubleday.Google Scholar

  • Brown, Jeannine K. 2012. “Genesis in Matthew.” In Genesis in the New Testament, edited by Maarten J. J. Menke, and Steve Moyise. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

  • Brown, Raymond E. 1993. The Birth of the Messiah: A Commentary on the Infancy Narratives in the Gospels of Matthew and Luke. New York/London: Doubleday.Google Scholar

  • Campbell, J. B. and Centre for Development and Population Activities. 1996. “Justice for Rachel’s children.” Interfaith Reflections on Women, Poverty and Population: 95–101.Google Scholar

  • Camus, Albert. 1957. The Fall. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar

  • Carter, Warren. 2007. “Matthew’s Gospel: An Anti-Imperial/Imperial Reading.” Currents in Theology and Mission 34: 424–433.Google Scholar

  • Carter, Warren. 2015. “Matthew and Empire.” Union Seminary Quarterly Review 59: 86–91;Google Scholar

  • Chrysostom, John. 1888. “Homilies of St. John Chrysostom, Archbishop of Constantinople on the Gospel according to St. Matthew.” In Saint Chrysostom: Homilies on the Gospel of Saint Matthew, Vol. 10, edited by Philip Schaff, translated by George Prevost and M. B. Riddle. New York: Christian Literature Company.Google Scholar

  • Claasen, Juliana. 2009. “The Image of the Wailing Woman and the Task of the Feminist Theologian: With Special Attention to the Role of Lament in the Book of Matthew.” In Ragbag Theologies: Essays in Honour of Denise Ackermann, a Feminist Theologian of Praxis, edited by M. Pillay, S. Nadar and C. Le Bruyns, 193–204. Stellenbosch: Sun Press.Google Scholar

  • Crossan, John Dominic. 2003. “Virgin Mother or Bastard Child?” Hervormde teologiese studies 59/3: 663–691.Google Scholar

  • Crow, Bernard. 2013. “Fulfillment in Matthew as Eschatological Reversal.” Westminster Theological Journal 75: 111–127.Google Scholar

  • Culler, Jonathan. 1981. The Pursuit of Signs: Semiotics, Literature, Deconstruction. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

  • Davies, W. D., and Dale C. Allison. 1988. A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Gospel According to Saint Matthew. Vol. 1: Introduction and Commentary on Matthew I-VII. Edinburgh: T&T Clark.Google Scholar

  • Emadi, Samuel. 2015. “Intertextuality in New Testament Scholarship: Significance, Criteria, and the Art of Intertextual Reading.” Currents in Biblical Research 14: 8–23.Google Scholar

  • Erickson, Richard J. 1996. “Divine Injustice? Matthew’s Narrative Strategy and the Slaughter of the Innocents (Matthew 2:13–23).” Journal for the Study of the New Testament 19: 5–27.Google Scholar

  • Feske, Millicent C. 2012. “Rachel’s Lament: The Impact of Infertility and Pregnancy Loss upon the Religious Faith of Ordinary Christians.” The Journal of Pastoral Theology 22: 3–17.Google Scholar

  • Fish, Stanley, 1970. “Literature in the Reader: Affective Stylistics.” New Literary History 2(1): 123–162.Google Scholar

  • Foster, Paul. 2015. “Echoes without Resonance: Critiquing Certain Aspects of Recent Scholarly Trends in the Study of the Jewish Scriptures in the New Testament.” Journal for the Study of the New Testament 38: 96–111Google Scholar

  • Forest, J. 1984. “How Far to Bethlehem?” The Otherside 153: 12–13.Google Scholar

  • Gregg, Melissa, and Gregory J. Seigworth. 2010. The Affect Theory Reader. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

  • Green, H. Benedict. 1975. The Gospel according to Matthew. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Gundry, Robert Horton. 1982. Matthew; A Commentary on his Literary and Theological Art Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar

  • Gundry, Robert H. 1967. The Use of the Old Testament in St Matthew’s Gospel with Special Reference to the Messianic Hope. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

  • Huizenga, Leroy A. 2015. “The Old Testament in the New, Intertextuality and Allegory.” Journal for the Study of the New Testament 38: 17–35Google Scholar

  • Hill, David. 1981. The Gospel of Matthew. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar

  • Holladay, William L., and Paul D. Hanson. 1986. A Commentary on the Book of the Prophet Jeremiah. Minneapolis: Augsburg-Fortress.Google Scholar

  • Kamanzi, Michel S. 2004. “Rwanda: Quelle réconciliation?” Études: 584.Google Scholar

  • Klostermann, Erich. 1927. Das Matthäusevangelium. Tübingen: Mohr.Google Scholar

  • Knowles Micheal 1993. Jeremiah in Matthew’s Gospel: The Rejected Prophet Motif in Matthaean Redaction. Sheffield: JSOT.Google Scholar

  • Kozol, Jonathan. 1988. Rachel and Her Children: Homeless Families in America. New York: Crown.Google Scholar

  • Kristeva, Julia. 1969. Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

  • Kuhn, Karl Allen. 2009. The Heart of Biblical Narrative: Rediscovering Biblical Appeal to the Emotions. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.Google Scholar

  • Lagrange, Marie-Joseph. 1948. Évangile selon Saint Matthieu. Paris, Gabalda.Google Scholar

  • Lindars, Barnabas. 1961. New Testament Apologetic. Philadelphia: Westminster Press.Google Scholar

  • Lindars, Barnabas. 1979. “Rachel Weeping for Her Children – Jeremiah 31:15–22.” Journal for the Study of the Old Testament 12: 47–62.Google Scholar

  • Lohmeyer, Ernst, and Werner Schmauch. 1958. Das Evangelium des Matthäus, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar

  • Luz, Ulrich. 2007. Matthew 1–7: A Commentary. Minneapolis: Fortress.Google Scholar

  • Mayordomo-Marín, Moisés. 2011. “Matthew 1–2 and the Problem of Intertextuality.” In Infancy Gospels : Stories and Identities, edited by Claire Clivaz, Andreas Dettwiler, Luc Devillers, and Enrico Norelli, 257–279. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar

  • Mazurel, J. W. 2004. “Citations from the Book of Jeremiah in the New Testament.” In Reading the Book of Jeremiah. A Search for Coherence, edited by Martin Kessler, 181–189. Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns.Google Scholar

  • Meier, John. P. 1990. Matthew. Collegeville: Liturgical Press.Google Scholar

  • Míguez, Néstor O. 2014. “The Holy Innocents.” In Global perspectives on the New Testament, edited by Mark Roncace. Pearson: 7–8: Upper Saddle River.Google Scholar

  • Montgomery, John W. 1981. Slaughter of the Innocents. Westchester: Cornerstone.Google Scholar

  • Nelson, J. R. 1967. “O Little Town of Phuvinh.” Christian Century 84: 1619–1620.Google Scholar

  • Nicol, George G. 1985. “The Slaughter of the Innocents.” Expository Times 97/2: 55–56.Google Scholar

  • Nolan, Brian M. 1979. The Royal Son of God. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar

  • Oldenburg, Douglas W. 2001. “Remembering Rachel’s Tears: Lament.” Church and Society 91/5: 153–159.Google Scholar

  • Park, Eugene Eung Chun. 2013. “Rachel’s Cry for Her Children: Matthew’s Treatment of the Infanticide by Herod,” Catholic Biblical Quarterly 75: 473–485.Google Scholar

  • Perry, Menakhem. 1979. “Literary Dynamics: How the Order of a Text Creates Its Meanings.” Poetics Today 1/2: 35–64.Google Scholar

  • Plummer, Alfred. 1909. An Exegetical Commentary on the Gospel According to St Matthew. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar

  • Schaberg, Jane. 1987. The Illegitimacy of Jesus: A Feminist Theological Interpretation of the Infancy Narratives. San Francisco: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

  • Schaeffer, Francis, and C. Everett Koop. 1983. “The Slaughter of the Innocents.” Fundamentalist Journal 2: 21–22.Google Scholar

  • Schweizer, Eduard. 1975. The Good News according to Matthew. Westminster: John Knox.Google Scholar

  • Sim, David C. 1996. Apocalyptic Eschatology in the Gospel of Matthew. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Soares-Prabhu, George M. 1976. The Formula Quotations in the Infancy Narrative of Matthew: An Enquiry Into the Tradition History of Mt 1–2. Rome: Biblical Institute Press.Google Scholar

  • Stendahl, Krister. 1954. The School of St Matthew and Its Use of the Old Testament. Uppsala: Almquist & Wiksells.Google Scholar

  • Sternberg, Meir. 1992 “Telling in Time (II): Chronology, Teleology, Narrativity.” Poetics Today 13: 531–532.Google Scholar

  • Strickert, Frederick M. 2007. “Rachel on the Way: A Model of Faith in Times of Transition.” Currents in Theology and Mission 34: 444–452.Google Scholar

  • Tasker, R. V. G. 1961. The Gospel According to St. Matthew: An Introduction and Commentary. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar

  • Thieme, K., “Auschwitz und Bethlehem.” Kairos 4: 133–134.Google Scholar

  • Thompson, John A. 1980. The Book of Jeremiah. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar

  • Tillich, Paul. 1948. The Shaking of the Foundations. New York: C. Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar

  • Tupper, E. Frank. 1991. “The Bethlehem Massacre – Christology against Providence.” Review and Expositor 88: 399–418.Google Scholar

  • Vajnar, Jane. 1986. “The Slaughter of the Innocents.” Transformation 3: 19–20.Google Scholar

  • Wainwright, Elaine Mary. 1997. “Rachel Weeping for Her Children: Intertextuality and the Biblical Testaments – a Feminist Approach.” In Feminist Companion to Reading the Bible: Approaches, Methods and Strategies, edited by Athalya Brenner and Carole Fontaine, 452–469. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press.Google Scholar

  • Wimsatt, W. K., and Monroe Beardsley. 1949. “The Affective Fallacy.” Sewanee Review 57/1: 31–55.Google Scholar

  • Zahn Theodor. 1903. Das Evangelium des Matthäus. Leipzig: Diechert.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2017-06-17

Published in Print: 2017-04-25


Citation Information: Journal of the Bible and its Reception, ISSN (Online) 2329-4434, ISSN (Print) 2329-440X, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jbr-2017-2000.

Export Citation

©2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston. Copyright Clearance Center

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in