Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

70% off for SBL-members!

Journal of the Bible and its Reception

Managing Editor: MacDonald, Nathan / Marsengill, Katherine

Ed. by Black, Fiona C. / Burnette-Bletsch, Rhonda / Oekland, Jorunn / Kraemer, David / Ocker, Christopher

2 Issues per year

Online
ISSN
2329-4434
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Divisio Textus and the Interpretive Logic Of Thomas Aquinas’ Lectura Ad Ephesios

Eric Covington
Published Online: 2017-06-23 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jbr-2017-2001

Abstract

Henri de Lubac has proclaimed that medieval exegetical texts contain a “whole mental universe” within their pages. While full of promise, de Lubac’s statement also points to the problem of how modern readers may profitably engage the unfamiliar mental universe of such texts. The distinctive scholastic practice of structuring a composition by divisio textus can function as a helpful guide not only for understanding the structure of medieval texts but also for understanding the interpretive logic employed by medieval commentators. By focusing on Thomas Aquinas’ lectura ad Ephesios, this paper demonstrates how the divisio textus can help identify important aspects of a commentator’s interpretive logic. The article then turns to examine Aquinas’ interpretation of predestination in Eph 1:5–6a to demonstrate the significance of the divisio textus for understanding medieval exegetical and interpretive decisions at both the macro- and micro-level. The article concludes that the divisio textus can be a helpful tool for uncovering the “mental universe” contained within medieval exegetical texts.

Keywords: divisio textus; Thomas Aquinas; Ephesians; teleological ethics; medieval exegesis

Works Cited

  • Aquinas, Thomas. 1952. Super Evangelium S. Ioannis Lectura, edited by P. Raphaelis Cai. Turin: Marietti.Google Scholar

  • Aquinas, Thomas. 1953. Super Ad Ephesios Reportatio. Vol. Super epistolas S. Pauli lectura. Library of Latin Texts - Series A. Turin: Marietti. http://www.brepolis.net.

  • Aquinas, Thomas. 1953. Super Epistulam Ad Romanos, edited by P. Raphaelis Cai, Vol. Super epistolas S. Pauli lectura. Library of Latin Texts – Series A. Turin: Marietti. http://www.brepolis.net.

  • Aquinas, Thomas. 1966. Commentary on Saint Paul’s Epistle to the Ephesians. Translated by Matthew L. Lamb. Albany, NY: Magi Books.Google Scholar

  • Aquinas, Thomas. 1969. Purpose and Happiness (1a2œ. 1–5). Edited and Translated by Thomas Gilby, Summa Theologiae: Latin text and English Translation, Introductions, Notes, Appendices and Glossaries 16. London: Eyre and Spottiswoode.Google Scholar

  • Aquinas, Thomas. 2012. Commentary on the Letters of Saint Paul to the Galatians and Ephesians, edited by John Mortensen and Enrique Alarcón, translated by Matthew L. Lamb and Fabian R. Larcher. Lander, WY: Aquinas Institute for the Study of Sacred Doctrine.Google Scholar

  • Baglow, Christopher T. 2002. “Modus et Forma”: A New Approach to the Exegesis of Saint Thomas Aquinas with an Application to the Lectura super Epistolam ad Ephesios. Analecta biblica, 149. Roma: Pontificio Istituto Biblico.Google Scholar

  • Barth, Markus. 1974. Ephesians. 2 vols. The Anchor Bible 34–34A. Garden City, N.Y: Doubleday.Google Scholar

  • Blažek, Pavel. 2007. Die mittelalterliche Rezeption der aristotelischen Philosophie der Ehe: Von Robert Grosseteste bis Bartholomäus von Brügge, 1246/1247–1309. Studies in Medieval and Reformation Traditions, 117. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

  • Blanchette, Oliva. 1994. “The Logic of Perfection in Aquinas.” In Thomas Aquinas and His Legacy, edited by David M. Gallagher, 107–30. Washington DC: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar

  • Bonaventure. 1895. Commentarius in Evangelium S. Ioannis, edited by PP. Collegii a S. Bonaventura, Opera Omnia 6. Quaracchi: Collegium S. Bonaventurae.Google Scholar

  • Boyle, John F. 2003. “The Theological Character of the Scholastic ‘Division of the Text’ with Particular Reference to the Commentaries of Saint Thomas Aquinas.” In With Reverence for the Word: Medieval Scriptural Exegesis in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, edited by Jane Dammen McAuliffe, Barry D. Walfish, and Joseph W. Goering, 276–83. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Boyle, John F. 2005. “Authorial Intention and the Divisio Textus.” In Reading John with St. Thomas Aquinas: Theological Exegesis and Speculative Theology, edited by Michael Dauphinais and Matthew Levering, 3–8. Washington, D.C.: The Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar

  • Bradley, Denis J. M. 1997. Aquinas on the Twofold Human Good: Reason and Human Happiness in Aquinas’s Moral Science. Washington, D.C: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar

  • Burgoyne, Jonathan. 2003. “Reading to Pieces: Divisio Textus and the Structure of El Conde Lucanor.” La Corónica: A Journal of Medieval Hispanic Languages, Literatures, and Cultures 32: 231–255.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Copeland, Rita. 1995. Rhetoric, Hermeneutics, and Translation in the Middle Ages: Academic Traditions and Vernacular Texts. Cambridge Studies in Medieval Literature 11. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Dahan, Gilbert. 2011. “‘Deux Peuples En Un Corps’. Commentaires Médiévaux d’Éphésiens 2, 14–18.” Revue d’Etudes Augustiniennes et Patristiques 57: 71–88.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • de Lubac, Henri. 1998. Medieval Exegesis: The Four Senses of Scripture. Translated by Mark Sebanc and E. M. Macierowski, 3 vols,. Ressourcement: Retrieval & Renewal in Catholic Thought. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.Google Scholar

  • Fowl, Stephen E. 2012. Ephesians: A Commentary. New Testament Library. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox.Google Scholar

  • Garrigou-Lagrange, Reginald. 1939. Predestination: The Meaning of Predestination in Scripture and the Church. Translated by Dom Bede Rose. St. Louis: B. Herder Book Co.Google Scholar

  • Gradl, Stefan. 2004. Deus Beatitudo Hominis: Eine Evangelische Annäherung an Die Glückslehre Des Thomas von Aquin. Publications of the Thomas Instituut te Utrecht v. 10. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar

  • Harkins, Franklin T. 2013. “Docuit Excellentissimae Divinitatis Mysteria: St. Paul in Thomas Aquinas.” In A Companion to St. Paul in the Middle Ages, edited by Steven R. Cartwright, 235–263. Brill’s Companions to the Christian Tradition 39. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

  • Hazard, Mark. 2002. The Literal Sense and the Gospel of John in Late Medieval Commentary and Literature. Studies in Medieval History and Culture 12. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Jeal, Roy R. 2000. Integrating Theology and Ethics in Ephesians: The Ethos of Communication. Studies in Bible and Early Christianity 43. Lewiston, NY: E. Mellen Press.Google Scholar

  • Kent, Bonnie. 2002. “Habits and Virtues (Ia IIae, Qq. 49–70).” In The Ethics of Aquinas, edited by Stephen J. Pope, 116–30. Moral Tradition Series. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar

  • Kerr, Fergus. 2009. Thomas Aquinas a Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Kerr, Gaven. 2012. “A Thomistic Metaphysics of Creation.” Religious Studies: An International Journal for the Philosophy of Religion 48: 337–356.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kretzmann, Norman. 2001. The Metaphysics of Theism: Aquinas’s Natural Theology in Summa Contra Gentiles I. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Magnus, Albertus. 1890. Enarrationes in Marcum, edited by Auguste Borgnet. Opera omnia: ex editione lugdunensi religiose castigate, 21. Paris: Apud Ludovicum Vivès.Google Scholar

  • McInerny, Ralph M. 1997. Ethica Thomistica: The Moral Philosophy of Thomas Aquinas. Rev. ed. Washington, D.C: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar

  • Persson, Per Erik. 1970. Sacra Doctrina: Reason and Revelation in Aquinas. Translated by Ross Mackenzie. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Ryan, Peter F. 2001. “Must the Acting Person Have a Single Ultimate End?” Gregorianum 82: 325–356.Google Scholar

  • Sellin, Gerhard. 2008. Der Brief an die Epheser. Meyers Kritisch-exegetischer Kommentar über das Neue Testament 8. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar

  • Williams, Thomas. 2012. “Human Freedom and Agency.” In The Oxford Handbook of Aquinas, edited by Brian Davies and Eleonore Stump, 199–208. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2017-06-23

Published in Print: 2017-04-25


Citation Information: Journal of the Bible and its Reception, ISSN (Online) 2329-4434, ISSN (Print) 2329-440X, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jbr-2017-2001.

Export Citation

©2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston. Copyright Clearance Center

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in