Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

70% off for SBL-members!

Journal of the Bible and its Reception

Managing Editor: Black, Fiona C. / Kraemer, David

Ed. by Oekland, Jorunn / MacDonald, Nathan / Marsengill, Katherine / Ocker, Christopher

Together with Strawbridge, Jennifer R.

Online
ISSN
2329-4434
See all formats and pricing
More options …

“Sword Handling: The Early Christian Reception of Matthew 10:34”

N. Clayton Croy
Published Online: 2019-05-10 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jbr-2019-1005

Abstract

The saying of Jesus in Matt 10:34 that he has “not come to bring peace, but a sword,” seems at odds with the general tenor of his life and teachings. Some proponents of a revolutionary Jesus have seized upon this saying as evidence that he was sympathetic to, and perhaps even supportive of, violent revolution. This article surveys patristic commentary on this verse from the first few centuries to see how this “hard saying” was understood and handled. Although a small number of writers expressed unease about the imagery and the perceived contradiction with other texts of scripture, the general trend was to construe the “sword” metaphorically, usually by appealing to a variety of passages containing the same word. No patristic writer understood the saying as an endorsement of violence, even those whose socio-political context might have justified it. Finally, although some of the hermeneutical strategies of the Fathers may not be embraced by modern exegesis, they often produced readings that were culturally and religiously sensitive as well as rhetorically insightful.

Keywords: zealots; sword, violence; revolution; patristic hermeneutics

Works Cited

  • Allison, Dale C., Jr. 2005. Studies in Matthew: Interpretation Past and Present. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Baker Academic.Google Scholar

  • Ambrose. 1963. Theological and Dogmatic Works. Translated by Roy J. Deferrari. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar

  • Ambrose. 1964. Sancti Ambrosii Opera. Corpus Scriptorum Ecclesiasticorum Latinorum, vol.79, edited by Otto Faller. Vienna, Austria: Hoelder-Pichler-Tempsky.Google Scholar

  • Arens, Eduardo. 1970. The ELTHON – Sayings in the Synoptic Tradition: A Historico-Critical Investigation. Gottingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar

  • Aslan, Reza. 2013. Zealot: The Life and Times of Jesus of Nazareth. London: Westbourne.Google Scholar

  • Augustine. 1956. Sancti Aurelii Augustini Enarrationes in Psalmos, vol. 3, edited by Almut Mutzenbecher. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar

  • Augustine. 1980. Sancti Aurelii Augustini Quaestiones Evangeliorum cum appendice Quaestionum XVI in Matthaeum, edited by Almut Mutzenbecher. Turnholt: Brepols.Google Scholar

  • Augustine. 2007. Expositions of the Psalms, vol. 2, Translated by Maria Boulding. Hyde Park, New York: New City Press.Google Scholar

  • Avalos, Hector. 2015. The Bad Jesus: The Ethics of New Testament Ethics. Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix Press.Google Scholar

  • Bammel, Ernst. 1984. “The Revolutionary Theory from Reimarus to Brandon.” In Jesus and the Politics of his Day, edited by E. Bammel and C. F. D. Moule, 11–68. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Barton, Stephen C. 1994. Discipleship and Family Ties in Mark and Matthew. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Beare, F. W. 1981. The Gospel according to Matthew: A Commentary. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Berger, Klaus. 1996. “Der ‘brutale’ Jesus: Gewaltsames in Wirken und Verkündigung Jesu.” Bibel und Kirche 51: 119–127.Google Scholar

  • Bermejo-Rubio, Fernando. 2014. “Jesus and the Anti-Roman Resistance: A Reassessment of the Arguments.” Journal for the Study of the Historical Jesus 12 (1–2): 1–105.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Betz, Otto. 1957. “Jesu Heiliger Krieg.” Novum Testamentum 2 (2): 116–137.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Black, Matthew. 1984. “Not Peace but a Sword: Matt 10:34ff; Lk 12:51ff.” In Jesus and the Politics of his Day, edited by E. Bammel and C. F. D. Moule, 287–294. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Brandon, S. G. F. 1967. Jesus and the Zealots: A Study of the Political Factor in Primitive Christianity. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar

  • Brown, Dennis. 1992. Vir Trilinguis: A Study in the Biblical Exegesis of Saint Jerome. Kampen: Kok Pharos.Google Scholar

  • Brunner, Frederick Dale. 2004. Matthew: A Commentary. Revised Edition. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Eerdmans.Google Scholar

  • Canellis, Aline. 2016. “Jerome’s hermeneutics: How to exegete the Bible?” In Patristic Theories of Biblical Interpretation: The Latin Fathers, edited by Tarmo Toom, 49–76. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Canivet, P. 1958. Théodoret de Cyr. Thérapeutique des Maladies Helléniques, vol. 2. Paris: Éditions du Cerf.Google Scholar

  • Carter, Warren. 1998. “Jesus’ ‘I have come’ Statements in Matthew’s Gospel.” Catholic Biblical Quarterly 60 (1): 44–62.Google Scholar

  • Caspary, Gerard E. 1979. Politics and Exegesis: Origen and the Two Swords. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

  • Crafer, T. W. 1919. The Apocriticus of Macarius Magnes. London: SPCK (Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge).Google Scholar

  • Cyril of Alexandria. 1859. A Commentary upon the Gospel According to S. Luke. Part I. Translated by R. Payne Smith (from an ancient Syriac version). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Cyril of Alexandria. 2007. Commentary on the Twelve Prophets, vol. 3, Trans. (and introduction) by Robert C. Hill. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar

  • Daley, Brian E. 2003. “Is Patristic Exegesis Still Usable? Some Reflections on Early Christian Interpretation of the Psalms.” In The Art of Reading Scripture, edited by Ellen F. Davis and Richard B. Hays, 69–88. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Eerdmans.Google Scholar

  • Danker, Frederick William, and Walter Bauer, eds. 2000. A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature, 3rd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

  • Davies, W. D., and Dale C. Allison, Jr. 1991. A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Gospel According to Saint Matthew. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark.Google Scholar

  • Didymus. 2006. Commentary on Zechariah. Translated by Robert C. Hill. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar

  • Didymus. 2016. Commentary on Genesis. Translated by Robert C. Hill. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar

  • Doutreleau, Louis. 1962. Didyme l’Aveugle. Sur Zacharie. Introduction, Texte Critique, Traduction et Notes. Paris: Éditions du Cerf.Google Scholar

  • Doutreleau, Louis, and P. Nautin. 1976–1978. Didyme l’Aveugle. Sur la Genèse, vols. 1–2. Paris: Éditions du Cerf.Google Scholar

  • Eisler, Robert. 1929–1930. Iesous Basileus ou Basileusas: Die Messianische Unabhängigkeitsbewegung vom auftreten Johannes des Täufers bis zum Untergang Jakobs des Gerechten nach der neuerschlossenen Eroberung von Jerusalem des Flavius Josephus und den christlichen Quellen, vol. 2. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar

  • Eisler, Robert. 1931. The Messiah Jesus and John the Baptist. New York: Dial Press.Google Scholar

  • Eusebius. 2013. Commentary on Isaiah (Ancient Christian Texts). Translated by Jonathan J. Armstrong, edited by Joel C. Elowsky. Downers Grove, Illinois: IVP Academic.Google Scholar

  • George, Augustin. 1972. “La Venue de Jésus, cause de division entre les hommes Lc 12, 49–53.” Assemblées du Seigneur 51: 62–71.Google Scholar

  • Goulet, Richard. 2003. Macarios de Magnésie: Le Monogénès. Vol. II. Paris: Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin.Google Scholar

  • Harnack, Adolf. 1912. “Ich bin gekommen”: Die ausdrücklichen Selbstzeugnisse Jesu über den Zweck seiner Sendung und seines Kommens.” Zeitschrift für Theologie und Kirche 22: 1–30.Google Scholar

  • Hilaire de Poitiers. 1978–1979. Sur Matthieu, vol. 2, Trans. (also Introduction, Critical Text, and Notes) by Jean Doignon. Paris: Éditions du Cerf.Google Scholar

  • Hilary of Poitiers. 2012. Commentary on Matthew. Translated by D. H. Williams. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar

  • Irenaeus. 1992. Against the Heresies. Translated by Dominic J. Unger. Mahwah, New Jersey: Paulist Press.Google Scholar

  • Jerome. 2008. Commentary on Matthew. Translated by Thomas P. Scheck. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar

  • John Chrysostom. 1959. Commentary on Saint John the Apostle and Evangelist: Homilies 4888. Trans. Sister Thomas Aquinas Goggin. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar

  • Kaiser, Walter C., Jr., Peter H. Davids, F. F. Bruce, and Manfred T. Brauch. 1996. Hard Sayings of the Bible. Downers Grove, Illinois: InterVarsity.Google Scholar

  • Kautsky, Karl. 1925. Foundations of Christianity: A Study in Christian Origins. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar

  • Kittel, Gerhard, and Gerhard Friedrich, eds. 1964–1976. Theological Dictionary of the New Testament, vol. 10. Translated by Geoffrey W. Bromiley. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Eerdmans.Google Scholar

  • Lampe, G. W. H., ed. 1961. A Patristic Greek Lexicon. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Lampe, G. W. H. 1984. “The Two Swords (Luke 22:35–38).” In Jesus and the Politics of his Day, edited by E. Bammel and C. F. D. Moule, 335–351. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Louw, Johannes P., and Eugene A. Nida, eds. 1988–1989. Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament Based on Semantic Domains. 2nd ed. New York: United Bible Societies.Google Scholar

  • Luz, Ulrich. 2001. Matthew 820. Minneapolis: Fortress.Google Scholar

  • Luz, Ulrich. 2005. Studies in Matthew. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Eerdmans.Google Scholar

  • Maccoby, Hyam. 1981. Revolution in Judaea: Jesus and the Jewish Resistance. New York: Taplinger.Google Scholar

  • McKibbens, Thomas R. 1982. “The Exegesis of John Chrysostom: Homilies on the Gospels.” The Expository Times 93 (9): 264–270.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Migne, J.-P. 1857–1866. Patrologiae Cursus Completus. Series Graeca, vol. 162. Paris: Migne.Google Scholar

  • Moorhead, John. 2013. Ambrose: Church and Society in the Late Roman World. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Mounce, Robert H. 1991. Matthew. Peabody, Massachusetts: Hendrickson.Google Scholar

  • O’Malley, Thomas P. 1967. Tertullian and the Bible: Language, Imagery, Exegesis. Utrecht: Dekker & Van de Vegt N.v. Nijmegen.Google Scholar

  • Origen. 1979. Origen: An Exhortation to Martyrdom, Prayer, and Selected Works. Translated by Rowan Greer. Mahwah, New Jersey: Paulist Press.Google Scholar

  • Origen. 1998. Homilies on Jeremiah and I Kings 28. Translated by John Smith. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar

  • Origen. 2001. Commentary on the Gospel According to John, Books 110. Translated by Ronald E. Heine. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar

  • Piñero, Antonio. 2010. “Jesús y la Política de su Tiempo.” In El Discípulo: Jesús, el Hombre que nunca fue Dios, edited by Emilio Ruiz Barrachina, 217–311. Barcelona: Editiones B.Google Scholar

  • Pusey, P. E. 1868. Sancti Patris Nostri Cyrilli Archiepiscopi Alexandrini in xii Prophetas, vol. 2. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

  • Robertson, A. T. 1934. A Grammar of the Greek New Testament in the Light of Historical Research. Nashville: Broadman.Google Scholar

  • Schaff, Philip, ed. 1986. A Select Library of the Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers of the Christian Church. First Series. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Eerdmans.Google Scholar

  • Seiler, Ingrid. 1975. Didymus der Blinde: De Trinitate, Buch 2, Kapitel 17. Meisenheim: Hain.Google Scholar

  • Sim, David C. 2000. “The Sword Motif in Matthew 10:34.” Hervormde Teologiese Studies 56 (1): 84–104.Google Scholar

  • Spiegel, Egon. 1985. “War Jesus gewalttätig? Bemerkungen zur Tempelreinigung.” Theologie und Glaube 75: 239–247.Google Scholar

  • Steinmetz, David C. 1980. “The Superiority of Pre-Critical Exegesis.” Theology Today 37 (1): 27–38.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tannehill, Robert C. 1975. The Sword of His Mouth. Philadelphia: Fortress.Google Scholar

  • Tertullian. 1868. The Five Books of Quintus Sept. Flor. Tertullianus Against Marcion. Translated by Peter Holmes. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark.Google Scholar

  • Theodoret of Cyrus. 2013. A Cure for Pagan Maladies. Translated by Thomas Halton. New York: Newman Press.Google Scholar

  • Toom, Tarmo. 2016. “Augustine’s Hermeneutics: The Science of the Divinely Given Signs.” In Patristic Theories of Biblical Interpretation: The Latin Fathers, edited by Tarmo Toom, 77–108. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Torjesen, Karen Jo. 1986. Hermeneutical Procedure and Theological Method in Origen’s Exegesis. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Votaw, Clyde W. 1896. The Use of the Infinitive in Biblical Greek. Chicago: Votaw.Google Scholar

  • Wallace, Daniel B. 1996. Greek Grammar Beyond the Basics. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Zondervan.Google Scholar

  • Waltke, Bruce K., and M. O’Connor. 1990. An Introduction to Biblical Hebrew Syntax. Winona Lake, Indiana: Eisenbrauns.Google Scholar

  • Weaver, Dorothy Jean. 1990. Matthew’s Missionary Discourse: A Literary Critical Analysis. Sheffield: Journal for the Study of the Old Testament Press.Google Scholar

  • Ziegler, J. 1975. Eusebius Werke, Band 9: Der Jesajakommentar. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2019-05-10

Published in Print: 2019-04-24


Citation Information: Journal of the Bible and its Reception, Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages 135–162, ISSN (Online) 2329-4434, ISSN (Print) 2329-440X, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jbr-2019-1005.

Export Citation

©2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in