Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Journal of Business Valuation and Economic Loss Analysis

Editor-in-Chief: Ewing, Bradley T. / Hoffman, Jim

1 Issue per year


CiteScore 2017: 0.32

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.160
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.622

Online
ISSN
1932-9156
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Negative Value Indicators in Relative Valuation – An Empirical Perspective

Friedrich Sommer
  • Corresponding author
  • Münster School of Business and Economics, University of Münster, Universitätsstraße 14-16, D-48143 Münster, Germany
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Christian Rose / Arnt Wöhrmann
Published Online: 2014-03-12 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jbvela-2013-0024

Abstract

This study investigates whether firms with negative value indicators (e.g. negative EBIT) should be excluded from peer groups in relative valuation. While this approach is chosen in many empirical studies and recommended by practitioners, valuation textbooks suggest including firms with negative value indicators in the peer groups. Evidence regarding which alternative leads to more accurate firm value estimates is missing. We conduct an empirical study using a sample from the S&P Composite 1,500 Index for the period 1994–2010 to answer this question. We find that, contrary to textbook recommendations, eliminating firms with negative value indicators generally leads to more accurate firm value estimates.

Keywords: relative valuation; comparables; multiples; negative earnings; losses

JEL: G34; G17; M41

References

  • Alford, A. W. 1992. “The Effect of the Set of Comparable Firms on the Accuracy of the Price-Earnings Valuation Method.” Journal of Accounting Research 30:94–108.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Baker, M. R., and R. S. Ruback. 1999. “Estimating Industry Multiples.” Accessed May 16, 2013. http://www.people.hbs.edu/mbaker/cv/papers/EstimatingIndustry.pdf.

  • Beatty, R. P., S. M. Riffe, and R. Thompson. 1999. “The Method of Comparables and Tax Court Valuations of Private Firms: An Empirical Investigation.” Accounting Horizons 13:177–99.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Benninga, S. Z., and O. H. Sarig. 1997. Corporate Finance: A Valuation Approach. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

  • Berkman, H., M. E. Bradbury, and J. Ferguson. 2000. “The Accuracy of Price-Earnings and Discounted Cash Flow Methods of IPO Equity Valuation.” Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting 11:71–83.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bhojraj, S., and C. M. C. Lee. 2002. “Who Is My Peer? A Valuation-Based Approach to the Selection of Comparable Firms.” Journal of Accounting Research 40:407–39.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bhojraj, S., C. M. C. Lee, and D. K. Oler. 2003. “What’s My Line? A Comparison of Industry Classification Schemes for Capital Market Research.” Journal of Accounting Research 41:745–74.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Boatsman, J. R., and E. F. Baskin. 1981. “Asset Valuation with Incomplete Markets.” Accounting Review 56:38–53.Google Scholar

  • Cassia, L., S. Paleari, and S. Vismara. 2004. “The Valuation of Firms Listed on the Nuovo Mercato: The Peer Comparables Approach.” In The Rise and Fall of Europe’s New Stock Markets, edited by G. Giudici and P. Roosenboom, 113–29. Amsterdam [et al.]: Elsevier/JAI.Google Scholar

  • Chan, K. C., and N.-Fu. Chen. 1991. “Structural and Return Characteristics of Small and Large Firms.” Journal of Finance 46:1467–84.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cheng, C. S. A., and R. McNamara. 2000. “The Valuation Accuracy of the Price-Earnings and Price-Book Benchmark Valuation Methods.” Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 15:349–70.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Damodaran, A. 2012. Investment Valuation: Tools and Techniques for Determining the Value of Any Asset, 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar

  • DeAngelo, L. E. 1990. “Equity Valuation and Corporate Control.” Accounting Review 65:93–112.Google Scholar

  • Dechow, P. M., A. P. Hutton, and R. G. Sloan. 1999. “An Empirical Assessment of the Residual Income Valuation Model.” Journal of Accounting and Economics 26:1–34.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Deloof, M., W. De Maeseneire, and K. Inghelbrecht. 2009. “How Do Investment Banks Value Initial Public Offerings (IPOs)?” Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 36:130–60.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dittmann, I., and E. Maug. 2008. “Biases and Error Measures: How to Compare Valuation Methods.” Accessed May 16, 2013. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=947436.

  • Fama, E. F. 1970. “Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work.” Journal of Finance 25:383–417.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Feltham, G. A., and J. A. Ohlson. 1995. “Valuation and Clean Surplus Accounting for Operating and Financial Activities.” Contemporary Accounting Research 11:689–731.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fernández, P. 2001. “Valuation Using Multiples: How Do Analysts Reach Their Conclusions?” Accessed May 16, 2013. http://www.iese.edu/research/pdfs/DI-0450-E.pdf.

  • Francis, J., P. Olsson, and D. R. Oswald. 2000. “Comparing the Accuracy and Explainability of Dividend, Free Cash Flow, and Abnormal Earnings Equity Value Estimates.” Journal of Accounting Research 38:45–70.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gilson, S. C. 1995. “Investing in Distressed Situations – A Market Survey.” Financial Analysts Journal 51:8–27.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gilson, S. C., E. S. Hotchkiss, and R. S. Ruback. 2000. “Valuation of Bankrupt Firms.” Review of Financial Studies 13:43–74.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Herrmann, V., and F. Richter. 2003. “Pricing with Performance-Controlled Multiples.” Schmalenbach Business Review 55:194–219.Google Scholar

  • Hickman, K., and G. H. Petry. 1990. “A Comparison of Stock Price Predictions Using Court Accepted Formulas, Dividend Discount, and P/E Models.” Journal of the Financial Management Association 19:76–87.Google Scholar

  • Kaplan, S. N., and R. S. Ruback. 1995. “The Valuation of Cash Flow Forecasts: An Empirical Analysis.” Journal of Finance 50:1059–93.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kaplan, S. N., and R. S. Ruback. 1996. “The Market Pricing of Cash Flow Forecasts: Discounted Cash Flow Vs. the Method of ‘Comparables’.” Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 8:45–60.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kim, M., and J. R. Ritter. 1999. “Valuing IPOs.” Journal of Financial Economics 53:409–37.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • LeClair, M. S. 1990. “Valuing the Closely-Held Corporation: The Validity and Performance of Established Valuation Procedures.” Accounting Horizons 4:31–42.Google Scholar

  • Lie, E., and H. J. Lie. 2002. “Multiples Used to Estimate Corporate Value.” Financial Analysts Journal 58:44–54.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Liu, J., D. Nissim, and J. Thomas. 2002. “Equity Valuation Using Multiples.” Journal of Accounting Research 40:135–72.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Liu, J., D. Nissim, and J. Thomas. 2007. “Is Cash Flow King in Valuations?” Financial Analysts Journal 63:56–68.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Matschke, M. J., G. Brösel, and X. Matschke. 2010. “Fundamentals of Functional Business Valuation.” Journal of Business Valuation and Economic Loss Analysis 5:Article 7.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nissim, D. 2013. “Relative Valuation of U.S. Insurance Companies.” Review of Accounting Studies 18:324–59.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Ohlson, J. A. 1995. “Earnings, Book Values, and Dividends in Equity Valuation.” Contemporary Accounting Research 11:661–87.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ohlson, J. A. 2001. “Earnings, Book Values, and Dividends in Equity Valuation: An Empirical Perspective.” Contemporary Accounting Research 18:107–20.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pereiro, L. E. 2002. Valuation of Companies in Emerging Markets: A Practical Approach. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

  • Schreiner, A. 2007. Equity Valuation Using Multiples: An Empirical Investigation. Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag.Google Scholar

  • Soffer, L. C., and R. J. Soffer. 2003. Financial Statement Analysis: A Valuation Approach. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

  • Sommer, F., and A. Wöhrmann 2011. “Triangulating the Accuracy of Comparable Company Valuations: A Multidimensional Analysis Considering Interactions Effects.” Accessed November 26, 2013. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2360077.

  • Standard & Poor’s. 2011. “S&P Composite 1500 Fact Sheet.” Accessed December 11, 2012. http://www.standardandpoors.com/servlet/BlobServer?blobheadername3=MDT-Type&blobcol=urldata&blobtable=MungoBlobs&blobheadervalue2=inline%3B+filename%3DFactsheet_SP_Composite_1500.pdf&blobheadername2=Content-Disposition&blobheadervalue1=application%2Fpdf&blobkey=id&blobheadername1=content-type&blobwhere=1244024111816&blobheadervalue3=UTF-8.

About the article

Published Online: 2014-03-12

Published in Print: 2014-01-01


Citation Information: Journal of Business Valuation and Economic Loss Analysis, Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages 23–54, ISSN (Online) 1932-9156, ISSN (Print) 2194-5861, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jbvela-2013-0024.

Export Citation

©2014 by De Gruyter.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in