1.

Angrist JD, Lavy J. The effect of high school matriculation awards: evidence from randomized trials. NBER Working Paper 9389, 2002. Google Scholar

2.

Green DP, Vavreck L. Analysis of cluster-randomized experiments: a comparison of alternative estimation approaches. Pol Anal 2008;16:138–52. Google Scholar

3.

Arceneaux K, Nickerson D. Modeling uncertainty with clustered data: a comparison of methods. Pol Anal 2009;17:177–90. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

4.

Middleton JA. Bias of the regression estimator for experiments using clustered random assignment. Stat Probability Lett 2008;78:2654–59. CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

5.

Middleton JA, Aronow PM. Unbiased estimation of the average treatment effect in cluster-randomized experiments. Working paper. Yale University, 2011. Google Scholar

6.

Freedman DA. On regression adjustments to experimental data. Adv Appl Math 2008;40:180–93. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

7.

Freedman DA. On regression adjustments in experiments with several treatments. Ann Appl Stat 2008;2:176–96. CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

8.

Schochet PZ. Is regression adjustment supported by the Neyman model for causal inference? J Stat Plann Infer 2010;140:246–59.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

9.

Lin W. Agnostic notes on regression adjustments to experimental data: reexamining freedman’s critique. Ann Appl Stat, 2013;7(1):295-318. Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

10.

Angrist JD. Estimating the labor market impact of voluntary military service using Social Security data on military applicants. Econometrica 1998;66:249–88. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

11.

Humphreys M. Bounds on least squares estimates of causal effects in the presence of heterogeneous assignment probabilities. Working paper. 2009. Available at: http://www.columbia.edu/ mh2245/papers1/monotonicity4.pdf

12.

Rosenbaum PR. Covariance adjustment in randomized experiments and observational studies. Stat Sci 2002;17:286–304. Google Scholar

13.

Samii C, Aronow PM. On equivalencies between design-based and regression-based variance estimators for randomized experiments. Stat Probability Lett 2012;82:365–70. Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

14.

Neyman J. On the two different aspects of the representative method: the method of stratified sampling and the method of purposive selection. J R Stat Soc 1934;97:558–625. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

15.

Rubin D. Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. J Educ Psychol 1974;66:688–701. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

16.

Rubin D. Bayesian inference for causal effects. Ann Stat 1978;6:34–58. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

17.

Godambe VP. A unified theory of sampling from finite populations. J R Stat Soc Ser B Methodol 17, 1995;17(2):269-278. Google Scholar

18.

Basu D. An essay on the logical foundations of survey sampling, part I. In: Godambe V, Sprott D, editor. Foundations of statistical inference. Toronto, ON: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1971;203-242. Google Scholar

19.

Sarndal C-E. Design-based and model-based inference in survey sampling. Scand J Stat 1978;5:27–52. Google Scholar

20.

Horvitz DG, Thompson DJ. A generalization of sampling without replacement from a finite universe. J Am Stat Assoc 1952;47:663–84. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

21.

Des Raj. On a method of using multi-auxiliary information in sample surveys. J Am Stat Assoc 1965;60:270–77. Google Scholar

22.

Hajek J. Comment on “An essay on the logical foundations of survey sampling, Part I.” In: Godambe V, Sprott, D, editors. Foundations of statistical inference. Toronto: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1971;236. Google Scholar

23.

Thompson ME. Theory of sample surveys. London: Chapman and Hall, 1997. Google Scholar

24.

Lohr SL. Sampling: design and analysis. Pacific Grove, CA: Duxbury Press, 1999. Google Scholar

25.

Sarndal C-E, Swensson B, Wretman J. Model assisted survey sampling. New York: Springer, 1992. Google Scholar

26.

Brewer KRW. A class of robust sampling designs for large-scale surveys. J Am Stat Assoc 1979;74:911–5. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

27.

Isaki CT, Fuller WA. Survey design under the regression superpopulation model. J Am Stat Assoc 1982;77:89–96. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

28.

Cochran WG. Sampling techniques, 3rd ed. New York: Wiley, 1977.Google Scholar

29.

Holt D, Smith TMF. Post stratification. J R Stat Soc Ser A 1979;142:33–46. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

30.

Imbens GW, Rubin D. Causal inference in statistics. Unpublished textbook, 2009. Google Scholar

31.

Freedman DA, Pisani R, Purves RA. Statistics, 3rd ed. New York: Norton, 1998. Google Scholar

32.

Morgan SL, Winship C. Counterfactuals and causal inference: methods and principles for social research. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007. Google Scholar

33.

Angrist JD, Pischke J-S. Mostly harmless econometrics: an empiricist’s companion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2009. Google Scholar

34.

Hernan M, Robins J. Causal inference. London: Chapman and Hall, In press. Google Scholar

35.

Rosenbaum PR. Observational studies, 2nd ed. New York: Springer, 2002. Google Scholar

36.

Freedman DA. Randomization does not justify logistic regression. Stat Sci 2008;23:237–49. Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

37.

Miratrix L, Sekhon J, Yu B. Adjusting treatment effect estimates by post-stratication in randomized experiments. J R Stat Soc Ser B Methodol, 2013;75(2):369-396. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

38.

Robins JM. Confidence intervals for causal parameters. Stat Med 1988;7:773–85. PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

39.

Imai K. Variance identification and efficiency analysis in randomized experiments under the matched-pair design. Stat Med 2008;27:4857–73. CrossrefPubMedWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

40.

Hansen B, Bowers J. Attributing effects to a cluster-randomized get-out-the-vote campaign. J Am Stat Assoc 2009;104:873–85. Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

41.

Imai K, King G, Nall C. The essential role of pair matching in cluster-randomized experiments, with application to the Mexican universal health insurance evaluation. Stat Sci 2009;24:29–53. CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

42.

Robins JM. Association, causation, and marginal structural models. Synthese 1999;121:151–79. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

43.

Rosenblum M, van der Laan MJ. Simple, efficient estimators of treatment effects in randomized trials using generalized linear models to leverage baseline variables. Int J Biostat 2010;6:Article 13.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

44.

Williams WH. Generating unbiased ratio and regression estimators. Biometrics 1961;17:267–74. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

45.

Wood J. On the covariance between related Horvitz-Thompson estimators. J Off Stat 2008;24:53–78. Google Scholar

46.

Aronow PM, Samii C. Conservative variance estimation for sampling designs with zero pairwise inclusion probabilities. Surv Methodol, 2013. Google Scholar

47.

Bates D, Maechler M. lme4: linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package, version 0.999375–37, 2010. Google Scholar

48.

Fisher RA. The design of experiments. Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd, 1935. Google Scholar

49.

Neyman JS, Dabrowska DM, Speed TP. On the application of probability theory to agricultural experiments: essay on principles, section 9. Stat Sci [1923] 1990;5:465–80. Google Scholar

## Comments (0)

General note:By using the comment function on degruyter.com you agree to our Privacy Statement. A respectful treatment of one another is important to us. Therefore we would like to draw your attention to our House Rules.