Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Journal of Complementary and Integrative Medicine

Editor-in-Chief: Lui, Edmund

Ed. by Ko, Robert / Leung, Kelvin Sze-Yin / Saunders, Paul / Suntres, PH. D., Zacharias


CiteScore 2017: 1.41

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.472
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.564

Online
ISSN
1553-3840
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Exploring the awareness of research among registered massage therapists in Ontario

Amanda J. Baskwill
  • Corresponding author
  • Humber College Institute of Technology and Advanced Learning, Humber College, 205 Humber College Blvd, Toronto, Ontario M9W5L7, Canada
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Kelly Dore
  • McMaster University, Program for Educational Research and Development Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2015-12-08 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jcim-2015-0006

Abstract

Background: An increase in available research has highlighted that knowledge changes over time as theories are challenged and adjusted or dismissed. This is particularly important to healthcare practitioners, including massage therapists, who need to frequently review current research and adjust practice accordingly. However, when research findings related to practice are generated, there is considerable delay in implementation. Few studies measure actual knowledge of current evidence for practice. The objectives of the study reported here were to (a) describe current awareness of evidence for practice among registered massage therapists (RMTs) in Ontario and (b) identify the sources of information RMTs use to inform their awareness of current evidence and the reported importance and frequency of use for each source.

Methods: An online questionnaire-based mixed-methods cross-sectional study was conducted. Ontario RMTs were invited to participate. This report focuses on the quantitative analysis.

Results: In total, 1,762 questionnaires were included. Of seven sources of information provided, respondents rated cumulative professional experience as most important, followed by recent research studies and education. Cumulative professional experience also rated as most frequently used, followed by other RMTs and education.

Conclusions: There was a tendency for respondents to agree with positive statements about MT, or disagree with negative statements, regardless of correctness. The results suggest that RMTs need to improve their awareness of the current evidence for practice. Furthermore, cumulative professional experience was ranked most frequently used. This has the potential to not include the most current research. Improving communication of research findings to RMTs might improve awareness.

Keywords: massage therapy; questionnaire; research awareness; sources of information

References

  • 1. Shroff FM, Sahota IS. How can massage therapy move forward? Registered massage therapists touch on key points shaping their profession in British Columbia, Canada. Home Health Care Manag Pract 2012;24:182–92.Google Scholar

  • 2. Melnyk BM, Fineout-Overholt E, Mays MZ. The evidence-based practice beliefs and implementation scales: psychometric properties of two new instruments. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs 2008;5:208–16.Google Scholar

  • 3. Dryden T, Moyer C. Massage therapy: integrating research and practice. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 2012.Google Scholar

  • 4. Leboeuf-Yde C, Lanlo O, Walker BF. How to proceed when evidence-based practice is required but very little evidence available? Chiropr Man Therap 2013;24:24–9.Google Scholar

  • 5. Suter E, Vanderheyden LC, Trojan LS. How important is research-based practice to chiropractors and massage therapists? J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2007;30:109–15.Google Scholar

  • 6. Dawes M, Summerskill W, Glasziou P, Cartabellotta A, Martin J, Hopayian K, et al. Sicily statement on evidence-based practice. BMC Med Educ 2005;5:1–7.Google Scholar

  • 7. Lizarondo L, Grimmer-Somers K, Kumar S. A systematic review of the individual determinants of research evidence use in allied health. J Multidiscip Healthcare 2011;4:261–72.Google Scholar

  • 8. Brown CE, Wickline MA, Ecoff L, Glaser D. Nursing practice, knowledge, attitudes and perceived barriers to evidence-based practice at an academic medical centre. J Adv Nurs 2008;65:371–81.Google Scholar

  • 9. Gowan-Moody DM, Leis AM, Abonyi S, Epstein M, Premkumar K. Research utilization and evidence –based practice among Saskatchewan massage therapists. J Complement Integr Med 2013;10:1–10.Google Scholar

  • 10. Hadley J, Hassan I, Khan KS. Knowledge and beliefs concerning evidence-based practice amongst complementary and alternative medicine health care practitioners and allied health care professionals: a questionnaire survey. BMC Complement Altern Med 2008;8:45–52.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • 11. McEvoy MP, Williams MT, Olds TS. Evidence based practice profiles: differences among allied health professionals. BMC Med Educ 2010;10:69–76.Google Scholar

  • 12. Madhavji A, Araujo EA, Kim KB, Buschang PH. Attitudes, awareness, and barriers toward evidence-based practice in orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;140:309–16.Google Scholar

  • 13. Majid S, Foo S, Luyt B, Zhang X, Theng YL, Chang YK, et al. Adopting evidence-based practice in clinical decision making: Nurses’ perceptions, knowledge, and barriers. J Med Libr Assoc 2011;99:229–36.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • 14. Rashidbeygi M, Sayehmiri K. Knowledge and attitudes of physicians towards evidence based medicine in Ilam, Iran. Iran Red Crescent Med J 2013;15:798–803.Google Scholar

  • 15. Ulvenes LV, Aasland O, Nylenna M, Kristainasen IS. Norwegian physicians’ knowledge of and opinions about evidence-based medicine: cross-sectional study. PLoS One 2001;4:1–6.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • 16. Eva KW, Regehr G. I’ll never play professional football” and other fallacies of self-assessment. J Contin Educ Health Proof 2008;28:14–19.Google Scholar

  • 17. Baskwill A. Awareness of the Evidence for Practice of RMTs in Ontario (MSc Thesis). 2014. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/15391

  • 18. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use, 4th ed. Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

  • 19. Pravikoff DS, Tanner A, Pierce ST. CE credit: readiness of US nurses for evidence-based practice. Am J Nurs 2005;105:40–52.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

About the article

Received: 2015-02-10

Accepted: 2015-11-19

Published Online: 2015-12-08

Published in Print: 2016-03-01


Citation Information: Journal of Complementary and Integrative Medicine, Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages 41–49, ISSN (Online) 1553-3840, ISSN (Print) 2194-6329, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jcim-2015-0006.

Export Citation

©2016 by De Gruyter.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Ann Blair Kennedy, Jerrilyn Cambron, Jennifer Dexheimer, Jennifer Trilk, and Ruth P. Saunders
Preventive Medicine Reports, 2018

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in