Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Journal des Économistes et des Études Humaines

Editor-in-Chief: Garello, Pierre

Ed. by Gentier, Antoine

2 Issues per year


SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.102

Online
ISSN
2153-1552
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 19, Issue 1 (Jun 2013)

Issues

Volume 17 (2011)

Volume 16 (2010)

Volume 15 (2009)

The Explanation of the Subprime Crisis According to the Austrian School: A Defense and Illustration

Renaud Fillieule
Published Online: 2013-06-12 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jeeh-2012-0006

Abstract

This paper aims, first of all, at showing that there is a very close correspondence between the series of events of the subprime cycle and the typical process described by the Austrian business cycle theory. It then answers to some of the main criticisms directed against the Austrian explanation of this crisis. It shows, finally, how major aspects of this cycle – housing bubble, governmental policies of credit and housing, financial innovations – can be integrated to or deduced from the Austrian explanatory framework.

Keywords: business cycle; subprime crisis; Austrian School of Economics

References

  • Anderson, Richard G. 2003. “Retail Deposit Sweep Programs: Issues for Measurement, Modeling and Analysis,” Working Paper 2003–026A, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, Research Division. Accessed May 27, 2013. http://research.stlouisfed.org/wp/2003/2003-026.pdf.

  • Anderson, Richard G. and Armesto Michelle T. 2003. “Retail Deposit Sweep Programs Turn 10,” Central Banker, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. Accessed May 27, 2013. http://www.stlouisfed.org/publications/cb/articles/?id=852.

  • Bernanke, Ben S. 2007. “Global Imbalances: Recent developments and Prospects,” speech at the Bundesbank. Accessed September 11, 2007. federalreserve.gov/newsevents/speech/bernanke20070911a.htm.Google Scholar

  • Bernanke, Ben S. 2008. “Fostering Sustainable Homeownership,” speech at the National Community Reinvestment Coalition Annual Meeting, Washington, DC. Accessed March 14, 2008. federalreserve.gov/newsevents/speech/bernanke20080314a.htm.Google Scholar

  • Bernanke, Ben S. 2010. “Monetary Policy and the Housing Bubble,” Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association. Accessed January 3, 2010. federalreserve.gov/newsevents/speech/bernanke20100103a.pdf.Google Scholar

  • Böhm-Bawerk, Eugen von. 1959 [1889]. Positive Theory of Capital, 4e éd. 1921. South Holland, IL: Libertarian Press.Google Scholar

  • Carilli, Anthony M. and Dempster, Gregory M. 2001. “Expectations in Austrian Business Cycle Theory: An Application of the Prisoner’s Dilemma.” The Review of Austrian Economics 14(4):319–30.Google Scholar

  • Chomsisengphet, Souphala and Pennington-Cross Anthony. 2006. “The Evolution of the Subprime Mortgage Market.” Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review 88(1):31–56. Accessed May 27, 2013. research.stlouisfed.org/publications/review/06/01/ChomPennCross.pdf.Google Scholar

  • Demyanyk, Yuliya and Gopalan Yadav K. 2007. “Subprime ARMs: Popular Loans, Poor Performance.” Bridges. Spring 2007. Accessed May 27, 2013. stlouisfed.org/publications/br/articles/?id=542.Google Scholar

  • Federal Reserve Board. 2001.Monetary Policy Report submitted to the Congress on July 18, 2001. Accessed May 27, 2013. federalreserve.gov/boarddocs/hh/2001/july/ReportSection2.htm.Google Scholar

  • Federal Reserve Board. 2004.Monetary Policy Report submitted to the Congress on July 20, 2004. Accessed May 27, 2013. federalreserve.gov/boarddocs/hh/2004/july/ReportSection1.htm.Google Scholar

  • Federal Reserve Board. 2005.Monetary Policy Report submitted to the Congress on July 20, 2005. Accessed May 27, 2013. federalreserve.gov/boarddocs/hh/2005/july/ReportSection1.htm.Google Scholar

  • Federal Reserve Board. 2007. Monetary Policy Report submitted to the Congress on February 14, 2007. Accessed May 27, 2013. federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/mpr_20070214_part1.htm.Google Scholar

  • Friedman, Jeffrey. 2009. “A Crisis of Politics, not Economics: Complexity, Ignorance, and Policy Failure.” Critical Review 21:127–83. Accessed May 27, 2013. criticalreview.com/crf/pdfs/Friedman_intro21_23.pdf.Google Scholar

  • Friedman, Jeffrey and Kraus Wladimir. 2011. Engineering the Financial Crisis. Systemic Risk and the Failure of Regulation. Philadelphia, PA: The University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

  • Gabriel, Amadeus. 2012. “The Rise of Credit Rating Agencies. How Interventionism Created Financial Behemoths.” Working paper presented at the Austrian Research Seminar, University of Paris-Assas, June 12, 2012.Google Scholar

  • Garrison, Roger W. 2001. Time and Money. The Macroeconomics of Capital Structure. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Greenspan, Alan. 2009. “The Fed Didn’t Cause the Housing Bubble.” The Wall Street Journal. Accessed March 11, 2009. online.wsj.com/article/SB123672965066989281.html.Google Scholar

  • Greenspan, Alan. 2010. “The Crisis,” 2nd draft. Accessed March 9, 2010. brookings.edu/~/media/Files/Programs/ES/BPEA/2010_spring_bpea_papers/spring2010_greenspan.pdf.Google Scholar

  • Hayek, Friedrich A. 1967 [1935]. Prices and Production, 2e éd. New York, NY: Augustus M. Kelley. Accessed May 27, 2013. mises.org/books/pricesproduction.pdf.Google Scholar

  • Hayek, Friedrich A. 2008 [1929]. “The ‘Paradox’ of Saving.” In Prices and Production and Other Works: F.A. Hayek on Money, the Business Cycle, and the Gold Standard, edited by F. A. Hayek, 131–87. Auburn, AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute. Accessed May 27, 2013. mises.org/books/hayekcollection.pdf.Google Scholar

  • Hayek, Friedrich A. 2009 [1972]. A Tiger by the Tail. The Keynesian Legacy of Inflation, 3rd ed. Auburn, AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute. Accessed May 27, 2013. http://mises.org/books/tiger.pdf.

  • Holmes, Steven A. 1999. “Fannie Mae Eases Credit to Aid Mortgage Lending.” The New York Times, published September 30, 1999. Accessed May 27, 2013. http://www.nytimes.com/1999/09/30/business/fannie-mae-eases-credit-to-aid-mortgage-lending.html.

  • Horwitz, Steven. 2009. “The Microeconomic Foundations of Macroeconomic Disorder: An Austrian Perspective on the Great Recession of 2008.” Mercatus Center. Working paper, June 2009, Accessed May 27, 2013. mercatus.org/sites/default/files/publication/WP0923_The_Microeconomic_Foundations_of_Macroeconomic_Disorder.pdf.Google Scholar

  • Horwitz, Steven and Boettke Peter. 2009. The House that Uncle Sam Built: The Untold Story of the Great Recession of 2008. New York, NY: Foundation for Economic Education. Accessed May 27, 2013. www.fee.org/files/docLib/HouseUncleSamBuiltBooklet.pdf.

  • Huerta de Soto, Jesús. 2006 [1998]. Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles, 2e éd. Auburn, AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute. Accessed May 27, 2013. mises.org/books/desoto.pdf.Google Scholar

  • Hülsmann, Guido Jörg. 2008. The Ethics of Money Production. Auburn, AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute. Accessed May 27, 2013. mises.org/books/moneyproduction.pdf.Google Scholar

  • Hunter, Lewis. 2009. Where Keynes Went Wrong. And Why World Governments Keep Creating Inflation, Bubbles, and Busts. Edinburg, VA: Axios Press.Google Scholar

  • Karlsson, Stefan. 2004. “America’s Unsustainable Boom.” Mises Daily, posted on November 8, 2004. Accessed May 27, 2013. mises.org/daily/1670.Google Scholar

  • Keynes, John Maynard. 1973 [1936]. The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. Cambridge: Macmillan.Google Scholar

  • Krugman, Paul. 2007. “Innovating our Way to Financial Crisis.” The New York Times. published December 3, 2007. Accessed May 27, 2013. nytimes.com/2007/12/03/opinion/03krugman.html.Google Scholar

  • Labonte, Marc. 2005. “Is the U.S. Trade Deficit Caused by a Global Saving Glut?” November 4, 2005. CRS report for Congress, Congressional Research Service, The Library of Congress. Accessed May 27, 2013. digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs7923/m1/1/high_res_d/RL33140_2005Nov04.pdf.Google Scholar

  • Liebowitz, Stan J. 2008. “Anatomy of a Train Wreck. Causes of the Mortgage Meltdown.” Independent Policy Report, posted on October 3, 2008. Accessed May 27, 2013. www.independent.org/pdf/policy_reports/2008-10-03-trainwreck.pdf

  • Lucas, Robert E. 2003. “Macroeconomic Priorities.” Presidential Address, American Economic Association. Accessed January 10, 2003. home.uchicago.edu/~sogrodow/homepage/paddress03.pdf.Google Scholar

  • Minsky, Hyman P. 1986. Stabilizing an Unstable Economy. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

  • Mises, Ludwig von. 1980 [1924]. The Theory of Money and Credit, 2e éd. Indianapolis, IN: LibertyClassics. Accessed May 27, 2013. mises.org/books/tmc.pdf.Google Scholar

  • Mises, Ludwig von. 1998 [1949]. Human Action. A Treatise on Economics. Auburn, AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute. Accessed May 27, 2013. mises.org/Books/HumanActionScholars.pdf.Google Scholar

  • Mises, Ludwig von. 2006 [1928]. “Monetary Stabilization and Cyclical Policy.” In The Causes of the Economic Crisis, and Other Essays Before and After the Great Depression, L. von Mises, 53–153.Google Scholar

  • Mises, Ludwig von. 2006. The Causes of the Economic Crisis, and Other Essays Before and After the Great Depression. Auburn, AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute. Accessed May 27, 2013. mises.org/books/causes.pdf.Google Scholar

  • Murphy, Robert. 2008. “Did the Fed, or Asian Saving, Cause the Housing Bubble.”Mises Daily, posted on November 19, 2008, Accessed May 27, 2013. mises.org/daily/3203.Google Scholar

  • Norberg, Johan. 2009. Financial Fiasco: How America’s Infatuation with Homeownership and Easy Money Created the Economic Crisis. Washington, DC: Cato Institute.Google Scholar

  • Palmer, Tom G. 2009. “Norberg on the financial crisis… Great!,” posted on November 1, 2009. Accessed May 27, 2013. tomgpalmer.com/2009/11/01/norberg-on-the-financial-crisis-great/.Google Scholar

  • Prychitko, David L. 2009. “Competing Explanations of the Minsky Moment: The Financial Instability Hypothesis in Light of Austrian Theory.” The Review of Austrian Economics, published online, October 22, 2009.Google Scholar

  • Ravier, Adrian and Lewin, Peter. 2012. “The Subprime Crisis.” The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 15(1):45–74. Accessed May 27, 2013. http://mises.org/journals/qjae/pdf/qjae15_1_2.pdf.

  • Reisman, George. 2009. “Credit Expansion, Crisis, and the Myth of the Saving Glut,” posted on July 4, 2009. Accessed May 27, 2013. capitalism.net/articles/A_Blog_07_09.html.Google Scholar

  • Retsinas, Nicolas P. 2004. “More Than a Bubble Keeps Housing Prices Sky-High.” The Los Angeles Times, May 20, 2004. Accessed May 27, 2013. articles.latimes.com/2004/may/20/opinion/oe-retsinas20.Google Scholar

  • Rothbard, Murray N. 1983 [1963]. America’s Great Depression. New York, NY: Richardson & Snyder.Google Scholar

  • Rothbard, Murray N. 2009 [1962]. Man, Economy, and State with Power and Market. Auburn, AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute. Accessed May 27, 2013. mises.org/books/mespm.pdf.Google Scholar

  • Salerno, Joseph. 1988. “Comment on Tullock’s ‘Why Austrians Are Wrong about Depressions.’” The Review of Austrian Economics 3:141–45.Google Scholar

  • Salerno, Joseph. 2012. “A Reformulation of Austrian Business Cycle Theory in Light of the Financial Crisis.” The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 15(1):3–44. Accessed May 27, 2013. http://mises.org/journals/qjae/pdf/qjae15_1_1.pdf.

  • Schwartz, Anna J. 2009. “Origins of the Financial Market Crisis of 2008.” Cato Journal 29(1). Accessed May 27, 2013. www.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/serials/files/cato-journal/2009/1/cj29n1-2.pdf.

  • Shiller, Robert J. 2008. The Subprime Solution: How Today’s Global Financial Crisis Happened, and What to Do about It. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

  • Shostak, Frank. 2003. “Housing Bubble: Myth or Reality?” Mises Daily, posted on March 4, 2003. Accessed May 27, 2013. mises.org/daily/1177.Google Scholar

  • Sowell, Thomas. 2009. The Housing Boom and Bust. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar

  • Taylor, John B. 2009. Getting Off Track: How Government Actions and Interventions Caused, Prolonged, and Worsened the Financial Crisis. Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution.Google Scholar

  • Thornton, Mark. 2004. “Housing: Too Good to Be True,” Mises Daily, posted on June 4, 2004. Accessed May 27, 2013. mises.org/daily/1533.Google Scholar

  • Thornton, Mark. 2005. “Skyscrapers and Business Cycles.” The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 8(1):51–74. Accessed May 27, 2013. mises.org/journals/qjae/pdf/qjae8_1_4.pdf.Google Scholar

  • Tullock, Gordon. 1987. “Why the Austrians Are Wrong about Depressions.” The Review of Austrian Economics 2:73–8. Accessed May 27, 2013. http://mises.org/journals/rae/pdf/RAE2_1_4.pdf.

  • White, Lawrence J. 2009. “The Credit Agencies and the Subprime Debacle.” Critical Review 21:389–99.Google Scholar

  • Woods, Thomas E. 2009. Meltdown. A Free-Market Look at Why the Stock Market Collapsed, the Economy Tanked, and Government Bailouts Will Make Things Worse. Washington, DC: Regnery.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2013-06-12


“My thesis in this lecture is that macroeconomics in this original sense has succeeded: Its central problem of depression-prevention has been solved, for all practical purposes, and has in fact been solved for many decades” (Lucas 2003).

The author wishes to thank the two anonymous referees of the Journal. Their remarks helped to improve both the substance and the form of the present paper. They of course do not bear any responsibility for its content.

Huerta de Soto (2006 [1998], 511–535) offers a detailed comparison between the Austrian and the monetarist theories of money, capital, and the business cycle.

The so-called “subprime crisis” is not limited to the problem of subprime mortgages, and not even to the housing sector. The name “subprime cycle,” although much too narrow, will be used all along in this paper.

For detailed presentations of the Austrian theory of the business cycle, see von Mises (1980 [1924], 399–404, 2006 [1928], 1998 [1949], 547–583), Hayek (1967 [1935]), Rothbard (2009 [1962], 994–1021), Garrison (2001), and Huerta de Soto (2006 [1998]).

The aggregate M1 (coins, notes, and demand deposits) is not a good indicator of the changes in the money supply because banks are allowed – under the retail deposit sweep programs – to sweep transaction or demand deposits overnight into saving deposits (Anderson and Armesto 2003; Anderson 2003). The author wishes to thank an anonymous referee for these references.

The federal funds rate is the interest rate at which banks lend their balances (i.e. federal funds) at the Federal Reserve to other banks, usually overnight: the banks that have excess reserves of their customers’ money lend these funds to those that have insufficient reserves, in order for each of them to maintain just the required (legal) quantity of reserves. The Federal Reserve manipulates this rate by carrying out open market operations.

Source: http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/categories/22.

The same kind of policy is used today against the consequences of the subprime crisis. Is the Fed currently manufacturing the next big crisis? This is a perfectly legitimate and alarming question from the point of view of the Austrian School.

Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis, U.S. Department of Commerce (http://www.bea.gov/national/index.htm#gdp).

Source: National Bureau of Economic Research (http://www.nber.org/cycles/cyclesmain.html).

According to this index, housing prices had remained stable between 1989 and 1993, and then increased 148% between 1994 and the 2006 peak.

Thornton (2005) shows the close correlation between skyscrapers building and business cycle. This connection is indeed relevant, and it can be remarked that in 2009–2010 the Arab Emirate of Dubai at the same time endured a harsh financial crisis (November 26, 2009) and inaugurated after 8 years of building the highest skyscraper in the world (January 4, 2010).

The Austrian School makes the very important point here that a significant malinvestment can take place while the inflation rate in consumers’ goods is small or nil (this is also what happened in the years preceding the 1929 crash: see Rothbard 1963).

This price index includes all items less food and energy. Bernanke (2010, 8) explains: “Core inflation excludes the prices of food and energy. Because it excludes the most volatile components of the price index, core inflation was often used by the FOMC as an indicator of the underlying trend of inflation.”

“The right remedy for the trade cycle is not to be found in abolishing booms and thus keeping us permanently in a semi-slump; but in abolishing slumps and keeping us permanently in a quasi-boom” (Keynes 1973 [1936], 322).

If the rate of growth of the money supply remains constant, then its effect on prices will eventually be correctly anticipated and a corresponding purchasing power component will be added to the market interest rate. The latter will thus increase, and in order to reduce it again the monetary authorities will have to create greater quantities of money.

“The downturn in home prices began at the regional level in late 2005 when home prices began peaking in the Boston, Detroit, and San Diego markets. At the national level, the peak did not occur until the summer of 2006 as more markets were starting to slide. Beginning in January 2007, national home prices entered their now 2-year decline. On average, U.S. home prices have been in a sharp annual decline since that date, with record low appreciation rates recorded each consecutive reporting month” (“S&P/Case-Shiller Home Price Indices 2008, A Year In Review,” January 13, 2009).

This result is corroborated by the data on commercial and industrial loans: the total value of loans shows no sign of decrease until 2008 (see Fred® Economic Data: Total Value of Loans for All C&I Loans, Domestic Banks). Similarly, during the year 1999 the federal funds rate increased from 4.7 to 5.5% while total loans kept on increasing too: the upsurge in the fed funds rate did not immediately stop monetary creation.

It should also be reminded that in the Austrian perspective, voluntary savings cannot trigger a malinvestment and thus cannot lead to a crisis: see the classic criticism of the “paradox of saving” by Hayek (2008 [1929]).

Explanations relying on the greed of bankers and on the deregulation of financial markets will be left aside. They are criticized in a detailed and convincing way by Friedman (2009) (see also Norberg 2009, 49–54, and Horwitz and Boettke 2009, 11–12). See, however, the point made in note 36 below.

This is one of the points made by Prychitko (2009) in his Austrian criticism of Minsky’s theory: see note 37 below.

The classic critique is found in Tullock (1987), and some of the Austrian answers in Salerno (1988) and in Carilli and Dempster (2001).

The annual value of the new subprime mortgages in the U.S. has grown from $65 billion in 1995 to $332 billion in 2003 and to $600 billion in 2006 (Chomsisengphet and Pennington-Cross 2006, 37, Bernanke 2008). The subprime mortgage market that represented 4.5% only of the new mortgages in 1994, reached 20% in 2006 (Bernanke 2008). The aggregation of all these subprime mortgages then amounted to approximately $1,300 billion.

According to the official site: “The Community Reinvestment Act is intended to encourage depository institutions to help meet the credit needs of the communities in which they operate, including low- and moderate-income neighborhoods, consistent with safe and sound banking operations” (source: ffiec.gov/CRA/history.htm).

Source:Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Reg BB Community Reinvestment (federalreserve.gov/bankinforeg/reglisting.htm#BB).

Code of Federal Regulations, title 12, part 228, § 11.

Code of Federal Regulations, title 12, Appendix A, ratings. The five ratings for each bank, each type of banking activity, and in each community are: outstanding, high satisfactory, low satisfactory, needs to improve, and substantial non-compliance.

The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 (Public Law 106-102) repealed and replaced the Glass-Steagall Act of 1933, and permitted from then on to create new kinds of financial institutions called financial holding companies– combining a commercial bank, an investment bank, a securities firm, and an insurance company. However, these consolidations were only allowed on the condition that the bank had received a satisfactory rating on the CRA tests: “An election by a bank holding company to become a financial holding company… shall not be effective if… not all of the subsidiary insured depository institutions of the bank holding company [have] achieved a rating of ‘satisfactory record of meeting community credit needs’, or better” (Public Law 106-102, 113 stat, 1350).

See the amazingly prescient paper by Holmes (1999).

Notice that, from the Austrian point of view, the problem is not to bring a “response” to the housing bubble, but rather to avoid its existence in the first place.

The credit-default swaps and the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision will not be evoked here.

The alt-A loans have a medium risk, intermediate between the (low) risk of prime loans and the (high) risk of subprime loans.

Different kinds of securities are taken into account in these amounts: MBS (mortgage-backed securities), CMOs (collateralized mortgage obligations: MBS in which the mortgages are first packaged and then divided in tranches of different qualities that are sold separately) and CMBS (commercial mortgage-backed securities: MBS on commercial property). These securities are issued by the three GSEs (Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and Ginnie Mae) and by other financial institutions. Source: Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (sifma.org/uploadedFiles/Research/Statistics/SIFMA_USBondMarketOutstanding.pdf).

On the important role of rating agencies, that cannot be analyzed any further here, see White (2009) and Gabriel (2012).

Friedman and Kraus (2011) show that a “proximate cause” of the financial crisis of Q4 2007 was the so-called “Recourse Rule” enacted by U.S. financial regulators and requiring American banks to have five times more capital for business and consumer loans than for AAA-rated MBS. This regulation “appears to have encouraged U.S. banks to accumulate nearly a half-trillion dollars of triple-A MBS” (2011, 2).

Prychitko (2009) identifies two weak points in Minsky’s theory from an Austrian point of view: first, it does not offer any theory of stabilization and stability, and second it rests on a psychological variable, namely optimism. According to Minsky, optimism creates the boom, while for Austrians it is the boom – caused by the credit expansion – that generates and amplifies optimism.


Citation Information: Journal des ?conomistes et des ?tudes Humaines, ISSN (Online) 2153-1552, ISSN (Print) 2194-5799, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jeeh-2012-0006.

Export Citation

©2013 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin / Boston. Copyright Clearance Center

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in