Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Journal des Économistes et des Études Humaines

Editor-in-Chief: Garello, Pierre

Ed. by Gentier, Antoine


CiteScore 2018: 0.14

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.107
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.013

Online
ISSN
2153-1552
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 22, Issue 1

Issues

Volume 17 (2011)

Volume 16 (2010)

Volume 15 (2009)

Understanding Financial Instability: Minsky Versus the Austrians

Ludwig Van Den Hauwe
Published Online: 2016-06-22 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jeeh-2016-0008

Abstract

Although Minsky’s interpretation of Keynes’s macroeconomics and essential message clashes with authoritative alternative interpretations, it has become increasingly influential during the years following the Global Financial Crisis, even in mainstream circles. This paper offers a critical evaluation of Minsky’s Financial Instability Hypothesis from the perspective of the alternative Austro-Wicksellian paradigm. Although some of the similarities and/or analogies between Minsky’s approach and that of the Austrian School suggest a more than merely superficial affinity between the two theoretical frameworks and although some scope for cross-fertilization between both approaches can be found, both theoretically and empirically, at a fundamental conceptual level both theories remain incompatible and difficult if not impossible to reconcile, in particular in terms of fundamental causality and in terms of policy conclusions and prescriptions. Despite the fact that Minsky’s policy conclusions are multifaceted and somewhat eclectic, they manifest a lack of familiarity with the conclusions of the Austrian analysis of the problems of central planning by Big Players such as Big Bank and Big Government. Both approaches also offer contrasting interpretations of the historical experience of the Global Financial Crisis.

Keywords: Austrian School; Minsky; Keynes; Global Financial Crisis; Financial Fragility; Financial Instability; Heterodox Macroeconomics; Financial Reform; Business Cycle

References

  • Acharya, V. V., and M. Richardson. 2011. “How Securitization Concentrated Risk in the Financial Sector”, in: Friedman. 2011: Chapter 7, 183–99.

  • Altmiks, P., Hg. 2010. Im Schatten Der Finanzkrise—Muss Das Staatliche Zentralbankwesen Abgeschafft Werden?. München: Olzog Verlag.Google Scholar

  • Arnold, L. G. 2002. Business Cycle Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Assenza, T., D. Delli Gatti, and M. Gallegati. 2010. “Financial Instability and Agents’ Heterogeneity: A Post Minskyan Research Agenda”, in: Papadimitriou D.B. and Wray L.R. 2010: 182–205.

  • Backhaus, J. 2005. The Elgar Companion to Law End Economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

  • Backhouse, R. E. 2014. “Hayek and Keynes”, in: R. Garrison and N. Barry. 2014: 94–115.

  • Beckworth, D. 2012. Boom and Bust Banking—the Causes and Cures of the Great Recession. Oakland, CA: The Independent Institute.Google Scholar

  • Bellofiore, R., and P. Ferri. 2001a. Financial Keynesianism and Market Instability—the Economic Legacy of Hyman Minsky. Volume I. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

  • Bellofiore, R., and P. Ferri. 2001b. “Introduction: ‘Things Fall Apart, the Centre Cannot Hold’”, in: Bellofiore and Ferri. 2001a: 1–29 and in: Bellofiore and Ferri. 2001c: 1–29.

  • Bellofiore, R., and P. Ferri. 2001c. Financial Fragility and Investment in the Capitalist Economy—the Economic Legacy of Hyman Minsky. Volume II. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

  • Bhattacharya, S., C. A. E. Goodhart, D. Tsomocos, and A. Vardoulakis. 2011. “Minsky’s Financial Instability Hypothesis and the Leverage Cycle”, LSE Financial Markets Group Paper Series, Special paper 202.

  • Bilo, S., and R. E. Wagner. 2015. “Neutral Money: Historical Fact or Analytical Artifact?”. Review of Austrian Economics 28:139–50.Google Scholar

  • Blanchard, O., A. Amighini, and F. Giavazzi. 2010. Macroeconomics—a European Perspective. Essex: Pearson.Google Scholar

  • Bohm-Bawerk, Ev. on. 1959. Capital and Interest. South Holland, IL: Libertarian Press.Google Scholar

  • Booth, P., ed. 2009. Verdict on the Crash: Causes and Policy Implications. London: The Institute of Economic Affairs.Google Scholar

  • Buchanan, J. M., and R. E. Wagner. 1977 [2000]. Demovracy in Deficit—the Political Legacy of Lord Keynes. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar

  • Butos, W. N. 1985. “Hayek and General Equilibrium Analysis.” Southern Economic Journal 52 (2):332–43.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Butos, W. N., and R. Koppl. 1993. “Hayekian Expectations: Theory and Empirical Expectations.” Constitutional Political Economy 4 (3):303–29.Google Scholar

  • Cachanosky, N., and A. W. Salter 2013. “The View from Vienna: An Analysis of the Renewed Interest in the Mises-Hayek Theory of the Business Cycle.” Available at SSRN:http://ssrn.com/abstract=2363560 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2363560Crossref

  • Caldwell, B. 1995. Contra Keynes and Cambridge, the Collected Works of F.A. Hayek Volume 9. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

  • Cantillon, R. 1755 [2001]. Essay on the Nature of Commerce in General. London: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar

  • Cochran, J. P., and F. R. Glahe. 1992. “The Use and Abuse of Equilibrium in Business Cycle Theory—a Praxeological Approach.” Cultural Dynamics 5:356–70.Google Scholar

  • Cochran, J. P., and F. R. Glahe. 1999. The Hayek-Keynes Debate—Lessons for Current Business Cycle Research. Lewiston: The Edwin Mellen Press.Google Scholar

  • Colander, D., M. Goldberg, A. Haas, K. Juselius, A. Kirman, T. Lux, and B. Sloth. 2011. “The Financial Crisis and the Systemic Failure of the Economics Profession”, in: J. Friedman 2011: Chapter 12, 262–78.

  • D’Apice, V., and G. Ferri. 2010. Financial Instability. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar

  • De Antoni, E. 2010. “Minsly’s ‘Financial Instability Hypothesis’: The Not-Too-Keynesian Optimism of a Financial Cassandra”, in: Zambelli. 2010: 462–84.

  • De Grauwe, P. 2012. Lectures in Behavioral Macroeconomics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

  • Dejuán, Ó., E. Febrero, and M. C. Marcuzzo. 2011. The First Great Recession of the 21st Century. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

  • Detzer, D., and H. Herr 2015. “Theories of Financial Crises as Cumulative Processes”, in: Hein et al. 2015, Chapter 3: 115–61.

  • Eggertsson, G. B., and P. Krugman. 2012. “Debt, Deleveraging, and the Liquidity Trap: A Fisher-Minsky-Koo Approach.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 127 (3):1469–513.Crossref

  • Fazzari, S., and D. B. Papadimitriou, eds. 1992. Financial Conditions and Macroeconomic Performance. New York: Sharpe.Google Scholar

  • Fillieule, R. 2010. L’école Autrichienne D’économie—Une Autre Hétérodoxie. France: Septentrion.Google Scholar

  • Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission. 2011. Final Report of the National Commission on the Causes of the Financial and Economic Crises in the United States. New York: PublicAffairs.Google Scholar

  • Fisher, I. Oct. 1933. “The Debt-Deflation Theory of Great Depressions.” Econometrica 1:337–57.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Flanders, J. 2015. “It’s Not a Minsky Moment, It’s a Minsky Era, or: Inevitable Instability”. Econ Journal Watch 12 (1):84–105.Google Scholar

  • Friedman J., ed. 2011. What Caused the Financial Crisis?. Oxford: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

  • Friedman, J., and W. Kraus. 2011. Engineering the Financial Crisis—Systemic Risk and the Failure of Regulation. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

  • Garrison, R. W. 1978. “Austrian Macroeconomics: A Diagrammatical Exposition”, in: Spadaro L.M. (ed.). 1978.

  • Garrison, R. W. 1992. “Is Milton Friedman a Keynesian?”, in: Skousen. 1992: 131–47.

  • Garrison, R. W. 2001. Time and Money—the Macroeconomics of Capital Structure. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Garrison, R. W. 2005. “The Austrian School”, in: Snowdon B. and Vane H.R. 2005: 474–516.

  • Garrison, R. W., and N. Barry. 2014. Elgar Companion to Hayekian Economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

  • Gjerstad, S. D., and V. L. Smith. 2014. Rethinking Housing Bubbles—the Role of Household and Bank Balance Sheets in Modeling Economic Cycles. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Gloria-Palermo, S. 1999. The Evolution of Austrian Economics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Godley, W., and M. Lavoie. 2012. Monetary Economics—an Integrated Approach to Credit, Money, Income, Production and Wealth. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

  • Goodspeed, T. B. 2012. Rethinking the Keynesian Revolution. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Gordon, R. J. 2012. Macroeconomics. New York: Pearson.Google Scholar

  • Greenberger, M. 2013. “Derivatives in the Crisis and Financial Reform”, Chapter 23 in: Wolfson and Epstein. 2013: 467–90.

  • Hayek, F. A. 1931–2. “Reflections on the Pure Theory of Money of Mr. J. M. Keynes”, in: Caldwell. 1995: 121–46 and 174–97.

  • Hayek, F. A. 1933 [2008]. Monetary Theory and the Trade Cycle, in: Salerno J. T.. Prices and Production and Other Works F. A. Hayek On Money, the Business Cycle, and the Gold Standard. Auburn: Ludwig von Mises Institute.

  • Hayek, F. A. 1937 [1939]. “Investment that Raises the Demand for Capital”, in: Hayek. 1939: 73–82.

  • Hayek, F. A. 1939. Profits, Interest and Investment. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

  • Hayek, F. A. 1945. “The Use of Knowledge in Society.” American Economic Review 35 (4):519–30, reprinted in: Hayek F.A. 1948 [1980]: 77–91.Google Scholar

  • Hayek, F. A. 1948 [1980]. Individualism and Economic Order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

  • Hayek, F. A. 1969 [1978]. “Three Elucidations of the Ricardo Effect”, in: Hayek. 1978: 165–78.

  • Hayek, F. A. 1978. New Studies in Philosophy, Politics, Economics and the History of Ideas. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

  • Hayek, F. A. 1979. Unemployment and Monetary Policy—Government as Generator of the “Business Cycle.” Cato Paper N° 3. San Francisco, CA: Cato Institute.Google Scholar

  • Hein, E., D. Detzer, and N. Dodig, eds. 2015. The Demise of Finance-Dominated Capitalism—Explaining the Financial and Economic Crises. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

  • Higgs, R. 1997. “Regime Uncertainty: Why the Great Depression Lasted so Long and Why Prosperity Resumed After the War”. Independent Review I (4):561–90.Google Scholar

  • Horwitz, S. 2000. Microfoundations and Macroeconomics—an Austrian Perspective. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Howden, D. 2011. Institutions in Crisis—European Perspectives on the Recession. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

  • Huerta de Soto, J. 2010. Socialism, Economic Calculation and Entrepreneurship. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

  • Huerta de Soto, J. 2011. “A Brief Note on Economic Recessions, Banking Reform, and the Future of Capitalism”, in: Dejuán et al. 2011: 33–41.

  • Huerta de Soto, J. 2012. Money, Bank Credit and Economic Cycles. Auburn: Ludwig von Mises Institute.Google Scholar

  • Ikeda, S. 1997. Dynamics of the Mixed Economy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Jablecki, J., and M. Machaj. 2001. “A Regulated Meltdown: The Basel Rules and Banks’ Leverage”, in: Friedman. 2011: Chapter 8, 200–27.

  • Kates, S., ed. 2010. Macroeconomic Theory and Its Failings. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

  • Kates, S., ed. 2011. The Global Financial Crisis—What Have We Learnt?. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

  • Kalecki. 1965 [2009]. Theory of Economic Dynamics. New York: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar

  • Keynes, J. M. 1930 [2011]. A Treatise on Money. Mansfield: Martino Publishing.Google Scholar

  • Keynes, J. M. 1936 [1997]. The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money. New York: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar

  • Koo, R. C. 2015. The Escape From Balance Sheet Recession and the QE Trap. Singapore: Wiley.Google Scholar

  • Koppl, R. 2002. Big Players and the Economic Theory of Expectations. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar

  • Koppl, R. 2014. From Crisis to Confidence: Macroeconomics After the Crash. London: IEA.Google Scholar

  • Koppl, R., and W. J. Luther. 2012. “Hayek, Keynes and Modern Macroeconomics.” Review of Austrian Economics 25:223–41.Google Scholar

  • Kregel, J. A. 1992. “Minsky’s “Two-Price” Theory of Financial Instability and Monetary Policy: Discounting versus Open Market Intervention,” in: Fazzari and Papadimitriou. 1992: 85–103.

  • Kregel, J. A. 2008. “Using Minsky’s Cushions of Safety to Analyze the Crisis in the U.S. Subprime Mortgage Market”. International Journal of Political Economy 37 (1):3–23.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kregel, J. A. 2013. “Political Economy Approaches to Financial Crisis: Hyman Minsky’s Financial Fragility Hypothesis”, Chapter 8 in: Wolfson and Epstein. 2013: 159–71.

  • Lachmann, L. 1937 [1994]. “Uncertainty and Liquidity-Preference,” in: Lavoie (ed.). 1994: 29–41.

  • Lachmann, L. 1956 [1978]. Capital and Its Structure. Menlo Park: Institute for Humane Studies.Google Scholar

  • Lavoie, D., ed. 1994. Expectations and the Meaning of Institutions. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Lavoie, M., and M. Seccareccia. 2001. “Minsky’s Financial Fragility Hypothesis: A Missing Macroeconomic Link?”, in: R. Bellofiore and P. Ferri. 2001b: 76–96.

  • Leijonhufvud, A. 1981a. Information and Coordination—Essays in Macroeconomic Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Leijonhufvud, A. 1981b. “The Wicksell Connection: Variations on a Theme”, in: Leijonhufvud. 1981a: 131–202.

  • Leijonhufvud, A. 2009. “Out Of the Corridor: Keynes and the Crisis.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 33:741–57.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Machlup, F. 1976. “Hayek’s Contribution to Economics”, in: Machlup. (ed.). Essays on Hayek, Hillsdale, MI: Hillsdale College Press: 13–59.

  • Mansharamani, V. 2011. Boombustology—Spotting Financial Bubbles Before They Burst. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar

  • Mehrling, P. 1999. “The Vision of Hyman P. Minsky.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 39:129–58.Google Scholar

  • Meltzer, A. H. 1988. Keynes’s Monetary Theory—a Different Interpretation. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Menger, C. 1871 [1994]. Principles of Economics. Grove City: Libertarian Press.Google Scholar

  • Minsky, H. P. 1975 [2008]. John Maynard Keynes. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar

  • Minsky, H. P. 1982. Can “It” Happen Again—Essays on Instability and Finance. New York: Sharpe.Google Scholar

  • Minsky, H. P. 1986 [2008]. Stabilizing an Unstable Economy. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar

  • Minsky, H. P. 1987. “Securitization”. Policy Note 2008/2. Downloaded from Website The Levy Economics Institute of Bard College.

  • Minsky, H. P. 1993. “On the Non-Neutrality of Money.” FRBNY Quarterly Review Spring: 77–82.Google Scholar

  • Minsky, H. P. 1994 [2012]. “Financial Instability Hypothesis”, in: Wray. 2012: 543–48.

  • Minsky, H. P. 2004. Induced Investment and Business Cycles. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

  • Mises, Lv. on. 1949 [1966]. Human Action—a Treatise on Economics, 4th revised edn. New York: FEE.Google Scholar

  • Mishkin, F. S. 2013. The Economics of Money, Banking, and Financial Markets. New York: Pearson.Google Scholar

  • Murphy, D. 2009. Unravelling the Credit Crunch. London: CRC Press.Google Scholar

  • O’Driscoll, G. P. 2011. “Hayek and Keynes: What Have We Learned?”. The Journal of Private Enterprise 27 (1):29–38.Google Scholar

  • O’Driscoll, G. P., and M. J. Rizzo. 1996. The Economics of Time and Ignorance. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Page West, G. III, and R. M. Whaples, eds. 2013. The Economic Crisis in Retrospect—Explanations by Great Economists. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

  • Papadimitriou, D. B. 2004. “Introduction”, in: Minsky. 2004: ix–xvi.

  • Papadimitriou, D. B., and L. Randall Wray. 2010. The Elgar Companion to Hyman Minsky. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

  • Polleit, T., and M. von Prollius. 2010. Geldreform—Vom Schlechten Staatsgeld Zum Guten Marktgeld. Grevenbroich: Lichtschlag Medien.Google Scholar

  • Posner, R. A. 2011. “The Causes of the Financial Crisis”, in: Friedman. 2011: 279–94.

  • Prychitko, D. L. 2010. “Competing Explanations of the Minsky Moment: The Financial Instability Hypothesis in Light of Austrian Theory”. Review of Austrian Economics 23:199–221.Google Scholar

  • Rabin, A. A. 2004. Monetary Theory. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

  • Ravier, A. O. 2013. “Dynamic Monetary Theory and the Phillips Curve with a Positive Slope.” Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 16 (2):165–86.Google Scholar

  • Rodriguez, A., J. Turmo, and O. Vara. 2014. Financial Crisis and the Failure of Economic Theory. London: Pickering & Chatto..Google Scholar

  • Rosser, J. B., M. V. Rosser, and M. Gallegati. 2012. “A Minsky-Kindleberger Perspective on the Financial Crisis.” Journal of Economic Issues XLVI (2):449–58.Google Scholar

  • Rothbard, M. N. 1962 [2004]. Man, Economy, State. Auburn: Ludwig von Mises Institute.Google Scholar

  • Salin, P. 2010. Revenir Au Capitalisme—Pour Éviter Les Crisis. Paris: Odile Jacob.Google Scholar

  • Selgin, G. A. 1988. The Theory of Free Banking—Money Supply Under Competitive Note Issue. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

  • Selgin, G. 1997. Less Than Zero—the Case for a Falling Price Level in a Growing Economy. London: IEA.Google Scholar

  • Simpson, D. 2013. The Rediscovery of Classical Economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

  • Sinn, H.-W. 2010. Casino Capitalism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Skousen, M., ed. 1992. Dissent on Keynes—a Critical Appraisal of Keynesian Economics. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar

  • Skousen, M. 2015. “Linking Austrian and Keynesian Economics: A Variation on a Theme”. The Journal of Private Enterprise 30 (4):97–112.Google Scholar

  • Smith, V. L. 1991. Papers in Experimental Economics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Smith, V. L., G. L. Suchanek, and A. W. Williams. 1988. “Bubbles, Crashes, and Endogenous Expectations in Experimental Spot Asset Markets”, in: Smith, V.L. 1991: 339–71.

  • Smithin, J. 2013. Essays in the Fundamental Theory of Monetary Economics and Macroeconomics. Singapore: World Scientific.Google Scholar

  • Snowdon, B., and H. R. Vane. 2005. Modern Macroeconomics—Its Origins, Development and Current State. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

  • Sorensen, P. B., and H. J. Whitta-Jacobsen. 2010. Introducing Advanced Macroeconomics—Growth and Business Cycles. London: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

  • Spadaro, L. M. 1978. New Directions in Austrian Economics. San Francisco, CA: Institute for Humane Studies.Google Scholar

  • Sraffa, P. 1932 [1995]. “Dr. Hayek on Money and Capital”, in: Caldwell. 1995: 198–209.

  • Taylor, J. B. 2009. Getting Off Track—How Government Actions and Interventions Caused, Prolonged, and Worsened the Financial Crisis. Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press.Google Scholar

  • Taylor, J. B. 2011. “Monetary Policy, Economic Policy and the Financial Crisis: An Empirical Analysis of What Went Wrong”, in: Friedman. 2011: 150–71.

  • Tymoigne, E., and L. Randall Wray. 2014. The Rise and Fall of Money Manager Capitalism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Van den Hauwe, L. 2005. “Constitutional Economics II”, in: Backhaus. 2005: 223–38.

  • Van den Hauwe, L. 2009a. Foundations of Business Cycle Research Volume I. Saarbrücken: VDM Verlag.Google Scholar

  • Van den Hauwe, L. 2009b. Three Essays in Monetary Theory. Norderstedt: BoD.Google Scholar

  • Van den Hauwe, L. 2011a. “John Maynard Keynes and Ludwig Von Mises on Probability.” Journal of Libertarian Studies 22 (1):471–507.Google Scholar

  • Van den Hauwe, L. 2011b. “Hayek, Gödel, and the Case for Methodological Dualism.” Journal of Economic Methodology 18 (4):387–407.Google Scholar

  • Wallison, P. J. 2011. “Credit-Default Swaps and the Crisis”, in: Friedman. 2011: Chapter 10, 238–48.

  • White, L. H. 2011. “The Credit-Rating Agencies and the Subprime Debacle”, in: Friedman. 2011: Chapter 9, 228–37.

  • White, L. H. 2015. “Skepticism About Minsky’s Financial Instability Hypothesis: A Comment on Flanders”. Econ Journal Watch 12 (1):106–13.Google Scholar

  • White, L. H., V. Vanberg, and E. Köhler. 2015. Renewing the Search for a Monetary Constitution—Reforming Government’s Role in the Monetary System. Washington, DC: The Cato Institue.Google Scholar

  • Wicksell, K. 1936 [1965]. Interest and Prices. New York: Augustus M. Kelley.Google Scholar

  • Wolf, M. 2014. The Shifts and the Shocks. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar

  • Wolfson, M. H., and G. A. Epstein. 2013. The Handbook of the Political Economy of Financial Crises. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Wray, L. R. 1992. “Minsky’s Financial Instability Hypothesis and the Endogeneity of Money”, in: Fazzari and Papadimitriou. 1992: 161–80.

  • Wray, L. R. 2012. Theories of Money and Banking Volume II. Cheltenham: Elgar Research Collection.Google Scholar

  • Wray, L. R. 2013. “A Minskyan Road to Financial Reform”, Chapter 35 in: Wolfson and Epstein. 2013: 696–710.

  • Wray, L. R. 2016. Why Minsky Matters—an Introduction to the Work of a Maverick Economist. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

  • Yeager, L. 1988. “The Austrian School on Money and Gold.” Journal of Economic Studies 15 (3/4):92–105.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zambelli, S., ed. 2010. Computable, Constructive and Behavioural Economic Dynamics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2016-06-22

Published in Print: 2016-07-01


Citation Information: Journal des Économistes et des Études Humaines, Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages 25–60, ISSN (Online) 2153-1552, ISSN (Print) 2194-5799, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jeeh-2016-0008.

Export Citation

©2016 by De Gruyter.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in