Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Journal of Globalization and Development

Ed. by Stiglitz, Joseph / Emran, M. Shahe / Guzman, Martin / Jayadev, Arjun / Ocampo, José Antonio / Rodrik, Dani

2 Issues per year


CiteScore 2017: 0.30

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.167
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.519

Online
ISSN
1948-1837
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Evaluating Antipoverty Transfer Programmes in Latin America and Sub-Saharan Africa. Better Policies? Better Politics?

Armando Barrientos / Juan Miguel Villa
Published Online: 2015-05-01 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jgd-2014-0006

Abstract

Two broad explanations can be offered for the incidence of impact evaluations in antipoverty transfer programmes in developing countries. The first, and arguably dominant, explanation suggests this is a consequence of a shift towards evidence-based development policy. A second explanation emphasises the complementary role of policy competition and political factors in motivating evaluations. The paper assesses the relevance of the latter in Latin America and sub-Saharan Africa through (i) a comparison of evaluation practice and (ii) the analysis of a new database of flagship antipoverty transfer programmes.

Keywords: antipoverty transfers; impact evaluation; Latin America; poverty; sub-Saharan Africa

JEL: D72; H43; I32; I38

References

  • Attanasio, O., E. Battistin, E. Fitzsimons and M. Vera-Hernandez (2005). How Effective are Conditional Cash Transfers? Evidence from Colombia. London: University College London.Google Scholar

  • Attanasio, O., E. Fitzsimons, A. Gomez, M. I. Gutiérrez, C. Meghir and A. Mesnard (2010). “Children’s Schooling and Work in the Presence of a Conditional Cash Transfer Program in Rural Colombia,” Economic Development and Cultural Change. 58(2):181–210.Google Scholar

  • Banerjee, A. V. and E. Duflo (2011). Poor Economics. A Radical Rethinking of the Way to Fight Global Poverty. New York: Public Affairs.Google Scholar

  • Barrett, C. B. and D. G. Maxwell (2005). Food Aid After Fifty Years: Recasting its Role. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar

  • Barrett, C. B. and M. R. Carter (2010). “The Power and Pitfalls of Experiments in Development Economics: Some Non-random Reflections,” Journal of Economic Perspectives and Policy, 32(4):515–548.Google Scholar

  • Barrientos, A., M. Niño-Zarazúa and M. Maitrot (2010). Social Assistance in Developing Countries Database Version 5. Manchester: Brooks World Poverty Institute.Google Scholar

  • Barrientos, A. and C. Santibañez (2009). “Social Policy for Poverty Reduction in Lower-income Countries in Latin America: Lessons and Challenges,” Social Policy and Administration, 43(4):409–424.Google Scholar

  • Beales, S. and T. German (2006). Situation Analysis of Social Protection and Cash Transfers in Africa. London: Development Initiatives and HelpAge International.Google Scholar

  • Behrman, J. R. and P. E. Todd (1999). Randomness in the Experimental Samples of PROGRESA (Education, Health, and Nutrition Program). Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.Google Scholar

  • Borges Sugiyama, N. (2011). “The difussion of Conditional Cash Transfer programs in the Americas,” Global Social Policy, 11(2–3):250–278.Google Scholar

  • Borraz, F. and N. González (2009). “Impact of the Uruguayan Conditional Cash Transfer Program,” Latin American Journal of Economics-formerly Cuadernos de Economía, 46(134):243–271.Google Scholar

  • Brazilian Court of Audit (2003). TCU Evaluation of the Child Labor Eraducation Programme. Brasilia: SEPROG.Google Scholar

  • Card, D., P. Ibarrarán, F. Regalia, D. Rosas-Shady and Y. Soares (2011). “The Labor Market Impacts of Youth Training in the Dominican Republic,” Journal of Labor Economics, 29(2):267–300.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chong, A. and M. Gradstein (2006). Who’s afraid of foreighn aid? the donors’ perspective’. Washington, DC: CESIFO.Google Scholar

  • Davis, B., M. Gaarder, S. Handa and J. Yablonski (2012). “Evaluating the Impact of Cash Transfer Programmes in sub-Saharan Africa: An Introduction to the Special Issue,” Journal of Development Effectiveness, 4(1):1–8.Google Scholar

  • Devereux, S. and P. White (2010). “Social Protection in Africa: Evidence, Politics, and Rights,” Poverty and Public Policy, 2(3):53–77.Google Scholar

  • DFID (2005). Social Transfers and Chronic Poverty: Emerging Evidence and the Challenge Ahead. London: DFID.Google Scholar

  • Fiszbein, A. and N. Schady (2009). Conditional Cash Transfers. Reducing Present and Future Poverty. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar

  • Galasso, E. (2006). “With their Effort and One Opportunity” Alleviating extreme poverty in Chile. Washington, DC: Development Research Group, The World Bank.Google Scholar

  • Galasso, E. (2011). “Alleviating Extreme Poverty in Chile: The Short Term Effects of Chile Solidario,” Estudios de Economia, 38(1):101–127.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Garcia, M. and C. M. T. Moore (2012). The Cash Dividend. The Rise of Cash Transfer Programs in Sub-Saharan Africa. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar

  • Gelbach, J. B. (2009). When do covariates matter? And which ones and how much? Tucson: University of Arizona.Google Scholar

  • Glennerster, R. and K. Takavarasha. (2013). Running randomized evaluations. A Practical Guide. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

  • Gilligan, D. O., J. Hoddinott, A. S. Tafesser, S. Dejene, N. Tefera and Y. Yohannes (2007). Report on 2006 Baseline Survey, Ethiopia Food Security Program. Washington, DC: IFPRI.Google Scholar

  • Gilligan, D. O., J. Hoddinott and A. Seyoum Taffesse (2008). “The Impact of Ethiopia’s Productive Safety Net Programme and its linkages,” Journal of Development Studies, 45(10):1684–1706.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Graham, C. (2002). Public Attitudes Matter: A Conceptual Framework for Accounting for Political Economy in Safety Nets and Social Assistance Policies. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar

  • Guardia, F. H. d.l., A. Hojman and O. Larrañaga (2011). “Evaluating the Chile Solidario Program: Results using the Chile Solidario Panel and the Administrative Databases,” Estudios de Economia, 38(1):129–168.Google Scholar

  • Heckman, J. J., J. Smith and N. Clements (1997). “Making the Most out of Programme Evaluations and Social Experiments: Accounting for Heterogeneity in Programme Impacts,” Review of Economic Studies, 64(4):487–535.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Heinrich, C., J. Hoddinott and M. Samson (2012). The Impact of South Africa’s Child Support Grant on Schooling and Learning. Pretoria: SASSA.Google Scholar

  • IADB (2000). Social Safety Net Program (CO-0247). Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.Google Scholar

  • Levy, S. (2006). Progress against poverty. Sustaining Mexico’s Progresa-Oportunidades Program. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar

  • Levy, D. and J. Ohls (2010). “Evaluation of Jamaica’s PATH Conditional Cash Transfer Programme” Journal of Development Effectiveness, 2(4):421–441.Google Scholar

  • Lindert, K. and V. Vinscensini (2008). Social Policy, Perceptions and the Press: An Analysis of the Media’s Treatment of Conditional Cash Transfers in Brazil. Washington: The World Bank.Google Scholar

  • Lund, F. (2008). Changing Social Policy. The Child Support Grant in South Africa. Cape Town: HSRC Press.Google Scholar

  • Maluccio, J. A. and R. Flores (2005). Impact Evaluation of a Conditional cash Transfer Program: The Nicaraguan Red de Protección Social. International Food Policy Research Institute.Google Scholar

  • Munemo, N. (2007). “Political incumbency and drought relief in Africa”. Ed. Eds, Social Protection for the Poor and Poorest: Concepts, Policies and Politics. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar

  • Niño-Zarazúa, M. (2011). Mexico’s Progresa-Oportunidades and the Emergence of Social Assistance in Latin America. Manchester: Brooks World Poverty Institute.Google Scholar

  • Niño-Zarazúa, M., A. Barrientos, S. Hickey and D. Hulme (2012). “Social Protection in Sub-Saharan Africa: Getting the Politics Right,” World Development, 40(1):163–176.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pritchett, L. (2002). “It Pays to be Ignorant: A Simple Political Economy of Rigorous Program Evaluation,” The Journal of Policy Reform, 5(4):251–269.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rawlings, L. B. and L. Rubio (2005). “Evaluating the Impact of Conditional Cash Transfer Programs,” World Bank Research Observer, 20(1):29–55.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rofman, R., I. Apella and E. Vezza, E. (2013). Mas allá de las pensiones contributivas. Catorce experiencias en America Latina. Buenos Aires: The World Bank.Google Scholar

  • Skoufias, E. (2005). Progresa and its Impacts on the Welfare of Rural Households in Mexico. Research Report. Washington: International Food Policy Research Institute.Google Scholar

  • Skoufias, E., B. Davis and S. de la Vega (2001). “Targeting the Poor in Mexico: An Evaluation of the Selection of Households into PROGRESA,” World Development, 29(10):1769–1784.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Soares, F. V. and T. Britto (2007). Confronting Capacity Constraints on Conditional Cash Transfers in Latin America: the cases of El Salvador and Paraguay. Brasilia: International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth.Google Scholar

  • Stampini, M. and L. Tornarolli (2012). The Growth of Conditional Cash Transfers in Latin America and the Caribbean Did they go too far? IZA Policy Paper No. 49. Bonn: IZA.Google Scholar

  • Teorell, J., N. Charron, S. Dahlberg, S. Holmberg, B. Rothstein, P. Sundin and R. Svensson (2013). The Quality of Government Dataset, version 15 May 2013. Gothenburg: The Quality of Government Institute, University of Gothenburg.Google Scholar

  • van der Berg, S. (1997). “South African Social Security Under Apartheid and Beyond,” Development Southern Africa, 14(4):481–503.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Woolard, I., K. Harttgen and S. Klasen (2012). “The History and Impact of Social Security in South Africa: Experiences and Lessons,” Canadian Journal of Development, 32(4): 357–380.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • World Bank (1998). Assessing Aid. What Works, What Doesn’t, and Why. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Yap, Y. T., G. Sedlacek and P. F. Orazem (2002). “Limiting Child Labor through Behavior-Based Income Transfers: An Experimental Evaluation of the PETI Program in Rural Brazil. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.Google Scholar

About the article

Corresponding author: Armando Barrientos, University of Manchester, Brooks World Poverty Institute, Arthur Lewis Building Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK, e-mail:


Published Online: 2015-05-01

Published in Print: 2015-06-01


Citation Information: Journal of Globalization and Development, Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages 147–179, ISSN (Online) 1948-1837, ISSN (Print) 2194-6353, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jgd-2014-0006.

Export Citation

©2015, Armando Barrientos et al., published by De Gruyter.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Francesco Burchi, Giorgio d'Agostino, Luca Pieroni, and Margherita Scarlato
South African Journal of Economics, 2018
[2]
Juan M. Villa
Economic Development and Cultural Change, 2016, Volume 65, Number 1, Page 39
[4]
Paola Pena, Joaquin Urrego, and Juan M. Villa
World Development, 2017, Volume 99, Page 431
[5]
Pablo Yanguas
Journal of International Development, 2017, Volume 29, Number 2, Page 211

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in