Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Journal of Globalization and Development

Ed. by Stiglitz, Joseph / Emran, M. Shahe / Guzman, Martin / Jayadev, Arjun / Ocampo, José Antonio / Rodrik, Dani


CiteScore 2018: 0.50

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.129
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.844

Online
ISSN
1948-1837
See all formats and pricing
More options …

“Leaving No One Behind” as a Site of Contestation and Reinterpretation

Sakiko Fukuda-Parr
  • Corresponding author
  • The New School, Julien J. Studley Programs in International Affairs, 72 Fifth Ave Room H703, New York, NY, USA
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Thea Smaavik Hegstad
Published Online: 2019-09-12 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jgd-2018-0037

Abstract

One of the most important elements of the 2030 Agenda and the SDGs is the strong commitment to inclusive development, and “leaving no one behind” has emerged as a central theme of the agenda. How did this consensus come about? And what does this term mean and how is it being interpreted? This matters because SDGs shift international norms. Global goals exert influence on policy and action of governments and stakeholders in development operates through discourse. So the language used in formulating the UN Agenda is a terrain of active contestation. This paper aims to explain the politics that led to this term as a core theme. It argues that LNOB was promoted to frame the SDG inequality agenda as inclusive development, focusing on the exclusion of marginalized and vulnerable groups from social opportunities, deflecting attention from the core issues of distribution of income and wealth, and the challenge of “extreme inequality.” The term is adequately vague so as to accommodate wide ranging interpretations. Through a content analysis of LNOB in 43 VNRs, the paper finds that the majority of country strategies identify LNOB as priority to the very poor, and identify it with a strategy for social protection. This narrow interpretation does not respond to the ambition of the 2030 Agenda for transformative change, and the principles of human rights approaches laid out.

Keywords: governance by indicators; inequality; “leave no one behind”; SDGs; Voluntary National Reviews

References

  • Anderson, Edward. 2016. “Equality as a Global Goal.” Ethics in International Affairs 30: 189–200.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Boas, Morten, and Desmond McNeill. 2003. Global Institutions and Development: Framing the World? New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Chambers, Robert. 1997. Whose Reality Counts: Putting the First Last. Falmer: Institute of Development Studies.Google Scholar

  • Civil Society Reflection Group on the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. 2016, 2017, 2018. “Spotlight on Sustainable Development.” Spotlight on Sustaiable Development. Accessed June 21, 2019. http://www.2030spotlight.org.

  • Cobham, Alex, and Andy Sumner. 2013. “Is It All About the Tails? The Palma Masure of Income Inequality.” Center for Global Development Working Paper.Google Scholar

  • Committee on Development Policy (CDP), UN. 2018. “Report on the Twentith Session (12–16 March 2018) E/2018/33.” UN DESA CDP. Accessed July 14, 2018. http://222.un.org/development/desa/dpad/theme/committee-for-development-policy/.

  • Doyle, Michael W., and Joseph E. Stiglitz. 2014. “Eliminating Extreme Inequality: A Sustainable Development Goal, 2015–2030.” Ethics and International Affairs 28: 5–13.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dutt, Aruna. 2016. “What Does It Really Mean to ‘Leave No One Behind’”. InterPressService, July 13.Google Scholar

  • Elson, Diane. 2019. “Push No One Behind.” Journal of Globalization and Development.Google Scholar

  • Federal Republic of Nigeria. 2017. “Implementation of the SDGS: A National Voluntary Review.”Google Scholar

  • Fukuda-Parr, Sakiko. 2017. Millennium Development Goals: Ideas, Interests, Influence. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Fukuda-Parr, Sakiko. 2019a. “Inequality as a Site of Contestation in the SDGs.” Global Policy Journal 10 (S1): 61–69.Google Scholar

  • Fukuda-Parr, Sakiko 2019b. “Keeping out Extreme Inequality – Politics of SDG Indicators.” Global Policy Journal 10: 61–69.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fukuda-Parr, Sakiko, and Desmond McNeill. 2019. “Knowledge and Politics in Setting and Measuring Global Goals.” Global Policy Journal 10: 5–15.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Government of Japan. 2017. Japan’s Efforts towards Achieving the SDGs through PPAP, Private Public Action for Partnership. Government of Japan; https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/index.php?page=view&type=30022&nr=420&menu=3170, accessed 25 August, 2019 2017.

  • Government of Kenya, Ministry of Devolution and Planning. 2017. Implementation of the Agenda 2030 for Sustainable Development In Kenya. Nairobi: Government of Kenya.Google Scholar

  • Government of Panama. 2017. Informe voluntario Panama. Panama: Government of Panama; https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/16594Panama.pdf. accessed August 25, 2019 2017.

  • Kamau, Macharia, Pamela Chasek, and David O’Connor. 2018. Transforming Multilateral Diplomacy: The Inside story of the Sustainable Development Goals. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Kidornay, Shannon. 2018. “Progressing National SDG Implementation: An independent assessment of the Voluntary National Reports submitted to the United Nations High Level Political Forum on Sustainable Development.” Accessed July 7, 2018. https://www.dropbox.com/s/kr7wzb0cyr6nvou/Full%20report-Eng.pdf.

  • MacNaughton, Gillian. 2017. “Vertical Inequalities: Are the SDGs and Human Rights up to the Challenges?” The International Journal of Human Rights 21 (8): 1050–1072.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • McNeill, Desmond. 2019. “The Contested Discourse of Sustainable Agriculture.” Global Policy Journal 10: 16–27.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Najafizada, Maisam, and Sunisha Neupane. 2018. “Leaving no one behind conveys a paternalistic approach to development.” The Conversation December 12. https://phys.org/news/2018-12-conveys-paternalistic-approach.html, accessed august 25, 2019.

  • Saiz, Ignacio, and Kate Donald. 2017. “Tackling Inequality through the Sustainable Development Goals: Human Rights in Practice.” International Journal of Human Rights 21: 1029–1049.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Sarwar, Moizza Binat, and Susan Nicolai. 2018. What do Analyses of Voluntary National Reports tell us about ’Leave No One Behind’? Briefing Note. London: ODI.Google Scholar

  • Satterthwaite, Margaret L., and Sukti Dhital. 2019. “Measuring Access to Justice: Transformation and Technicality in SDG 16.3.” Global Policy Journal 10: 96–109.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Save the Children. 2012. Ending Poverty within our Generation: Save the Children’s Vision for the Post-2015 Framework. London: Save the Children.Google Scholar

  • Stuart, Elizabeth, and Emma Samman. 2017. Defining ‘Leave No One Behind’. Briefing Note. London: ODI.Google Scholar

  • Stuart, Elizabeth, Kate Bird, Tanvi Bhatkal, Romily Greenhill, Steven Lally, Gideon Rabinovitz, Emma Samman, Moiza Binat Sarwar, and Alainna Lynch. 2016. Leaving No One Behind: A Critical Path for the First 1000 Days of the Sustainable Development Goals. Flagship Report. London: ODI.Google Scholar

  • UN Chief Executives Board. 2016. Equality and Non-Discrmination at the Heart of Sustainable Development: A Shared United Nations Framework for Action. New York: UN.Google Scholar

  • UN High Level Panel of Eminent Persons on the Post 2015 Agenda. 2013. A New Global Partnership: Eradicate Poverty and Transform Economies Through Sustainable Development. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar

  • UN. 2015. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. A/RES/70/1, New York: United Nations.Google Scholar

  • UNICEF, UN Women, UNDP, UNOHCHR. 2013. “Technical Support Team Issues Brief: Promoting Equality, Including Social Equity.” Accessed July 7, 2017. http://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/2406TST%20Issues%20Brief%20on%20Promoting%20Equality_FINAL.pdf.

  • United Nations. 2018. “Handbook for the Preparation of the Voluntary National Reviews.” Accessed June 15, 2018. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/17354VNR_handbook_2018.pdf.

  • Unterhalter, Elaine. 2019. “The Many Meanings fo Quality Education: Politics of Targets and Indicators in SDG4.” Global Policy Journal 10: 39–51.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Weber, Heloise. 2017. “Politics of ‘Leaving No One Behind’: Contesting the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals Agenda.” Globalizations 14: 399–414.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Winkler, Inga T., and Margaret L. Satterthwaite. 2017. “Leaving No One Behind? Persistent Inequalities in the SDGs.” International Journal of Human Rights 21: 1073–1097.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Winkler, Inga, and Carmel Williams. 2017. “The Sustainable Development Goals and Human Rights: A Critical Early Review.” International Journal of Human Rights 21: 1023–1028.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • World Bank. 2015. “Shared Prosperity: A Technical Note on Measuring and Monitoring Growth with Equity.” EGM on Indicator Framework. February 25–26. Accessed July 7, 2018. https://unstats.un.org/unsd/post-2015/activities/egm-on-indicators-framework/.

About the article

Published Online: 2019-09-12


Citation Information: Journal of Globalization and Development, Volume 9, Issue 2, 20180037, ISSN (Online) 1948-1837, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jgd-2018-0037.

Export Citation

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in