Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management

Editor-in-Chief: Renda-Tanali, Irmak, D.Sc.

Managing Editor: McGee, Sibel, Ph.D.

4 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.474
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.627

CiteScore 2016: 0.57

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.245
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.358

Online
ISSN
1547-7355
See all formats and pricing
More options …

A Critical Evaluation of the Incident Command System and NIMS

Dick A Buck / Joseph E Trainor / Benigno E. Aguirre
Published Online: 2006-09-13 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2202/1547-7355.1252

This paper aims to draw a series of generalizable conclusions regarding the incident command system (ICS) as a management tool for structuring the activity of disaster response agencies at the site of disasters in the United States. It identifies the basic elements of the system and makes some observations regarding its range of applicability. The analysis is drawn from several sources of information regarding the use of ICS in nine different disasters in which Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Urban Search and Rescue (US&R) Taskforces participated. Results suggest the applicability of ICS in a range of emergency response activities, but point to the importance of context as a largely un-examined precondition to effective ICS. Our findings indicate that ICS is a partial solution to the question of how to organize the societal response in the aftermath of disasters; the system is more or less effective depending on specific characteristics of the incident and the organizations in which it is used. It works best when those utilizing it are part of a community, when the demands being responded to are routine to them, and when social and cultural emergence is at a minimum. ICS does not create a universally applicable bureaucratic organization among responders but rather is a mechanism for inter-organizational coordination designed to impose order on certain dimensions of the chaotic organizational environments of disasters. We conclude by extending our observations from the USAR context to the reconstruction, recovery, and mitigation phases of disasters in order to illuminate the general limitations of the approach as an all-encompassing model for disaster-related organizational and inter-organizational functioning and coordination. Our final conclusions suggest that the present-day efforts in the National Incident Management System (NIMS) to use ICS as a comprehensive principle of disaster management probably will not succeed as intended.

Keywords: ICS; NIMS; emergency management; social science

About the article

Published Online: 2006-09-13


Citation Information: Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, ISSN (Online) 1547-7355, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2202/1547-7355.1252.

Export Citation

©2011 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston. Copyright Clearance Center

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Reza Nourjou, Pedro Szekely, Michinori Hatayama, Mohsen Ghafory-Ashtiany, and Stephen F. Smith
Journal of Disaster Research, 2014, Volume 9, Number 3, Page 381
[2]
Jonas Pålsson, Lawrence Hildebrand, and Olof Lindén
Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 2017
[3]
Kiki Caruson and Susan A. MacManus
Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 2012, Volume 42, Number 1, Page 162
[5]
Naim Kapucu, Brittany Haupt, Murat Yuksel, Ismail Guvenc, and Walid Saad
Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy, 2016, Volume 7, Number 3, Page 129
[6]
Marit Skar, Maria Sydnes, and Are Kristoffer Sydnes
International Journal of Emergency Services, 2016, Volume 5, Number 1, Page 52
[7]
Eugene Bardach
International Public Management Journal, 2015, Page 1
[8]
Pathias P. Bongo and Siambabala B. Manyena
Jàmbá: Journal of Disaster Risk Studies, 2015, Volume 7, Number 1
[9]
Xuesong Guo and Naim Kapucu
Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 2015, Volume 12, Number 4
[10]
Eliot Jennings, Sudha Arlikatti, and Simon Andrew
Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 2015, Volume 12, Number 3
[11]
Jessica Jensen and Steven Thompson
Disasters, 2016, Volume 40, Number 1, Page 158
[12]
Helen Sinclair, Emma E.H. Doyle, David M. Johnston, and Douglas Paton
International Journal of Emergency Services, 2012, Volume 1, Number 2, Page 159
[13]
Jessica Jensen and William L. Waugh
Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 2014, Volume 22, Number 1, Page 5
[14]
Arjen Boin and Cynthia Renaud
Journal of Leadership Studies, 2013, Volume 7, Number 3, Page 41
[15]
Emma S. Spiro, Ryan M. Acton, and Carter T. Butts
Social Networks, 2013, Volume 35, Number 1, Page 130
[16]
Philip Boyle
Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie, 2012, Volume 49, Number 4, Page 350
[17]
Simon A. Andrew and James M. Kendra
Disasters, 2012, Volume 36, Number 3, Page 514
[18]
Natalie C. Simpson, Philip G. Hancock, and Chia-Hung Chuang
Journal of Applied Security Research, 2008, Volume 4, Number 1-2, Page 36
[19]
Uri Yanay, Sharon Benjamin, and Hanna Gimmon Yamin
Disasters, 2011, Volume 35, Number 1, Page 183
[20]
Charles R. Wise and Michael McGuire
Disasters, 2009, Volume 33, Number 4, Page 721
[21]
Sherif El-Tawil and Benigno Aguirre
Disasters, 2010, Volume 34, Number 4, Page 1084
[22]
Carlos Lam, Mau-Roung Lin, Shin-Han Tsai, and Wen-Ta Chiu
Disasters, 2010, Volume 34, Number 2, Page 447
[23]
[24]
Margaret Cole Marshall
Perspectives In Psychiatric Care, 2007, Volume 43, Number 1, Page 1

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in