Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
In This Section

Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management

Editor-in-Chief: Renda-Tanali, Irmak, D.Sc.

Managing Editor: McGee, Sibel, Ph.D.

4 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR increased in 2015: 0.466
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.760

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.272
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 0.640
Impact per Publication (IPP) 2015: 0.493

Online
ISSN
1547-7355
See all formats and pricing
In This Section

“Of Gods and Men”: Selected Print Media Coverage of Natural Disasters and Industrial Failures in Three Westminster Countries

Kevin F. Quigley
  • Corresponding author
  • School of Public Administration, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada
  • Email:
/ John Quigley
  • Department of Management Science, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, G1 1QE, UK
Published Online: 2013-04-13 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jhsem-2012-0054

Abstract

This article examines selected print media coverage of a domestic natural disaster and domestic industrial failure in each of three Westminster countries: Australia, Canada, and the UK. It studies this coverage from several perspectives: the volume of coverage; the rate at which the articles were published; the tone of the headlines; and a content analysis of the perceived performance of key public and private institutions during and following the events. Its initial findings reveal that the natural disasters received more coverage than the industrial failures in each of the newspapers considered. There was also no significant difference in the publication rate across event type or newspaper. In each case, government was assessed at least as frequently and negatively as non-government actors, particularly during and following industrial failures. The manner in which government and non-government actors were assessed following these events suggests that, contrary to government claims that owners and operators of critical infrastructure (CI) are responsible for its successful operation, government in fact is “in the frame” as frequently as the industry owners and operators are. In addition, the negative assessments of governments following industrial failures in particular may prompt over-reaction by policy makers to industrial failures and under-reaction to natural disasters. This inconsistency is indeed ironic because the latter occur more often and cost more, both financially and socially. We reviewed 340 newspaper articles from three different newspapers: The Australian’s coverage of the Canberra bushfires and the Waterfall train accident, The Globe and Mail’s (Canada) coverage of Hurricane Juan and the de la Concorde overpass collapse, and The Daily Telegraph’s (UK) coverage of the 2007 floods and the Potters Bar train wreck. Our sample size is small; our ability to compare across newspapers and countries limited. Further research is warranted.

Keywords: government performance; industrial failures; media coverage; natural disasters

References

  • Alaszewski, A. (2005) “Risk Communication: Identifying the Importance of Social Context,” Health Risk and Society, 7(2):101–106.

  • Atwood, L. E. and A. M. Major. (2000) “Optimism, Pessimism, and Communication Behavior in Response to an Earthquake Prediction,” Public Understanding of Science, 9(2):417–431.

  • Australian Government. Attorney General’s Department. (2011) Trusted Information Sharing Network. TISN for Critical Infrastructure Resilience [Internet]. Available at: http://www.tisn.gov.au/Pages/default.aspx (accessed October 11 2011).

  • Bakir, V. (2010) “Media and Risk: Old and New Research Directions,” Journal of Risk Research, 13(1):221–228.

  • Barnes, M. D., C. L. Hanson, L. M. B. Novilla, A. T. Meacham, E. McIntyre and B. C. Erikson. (2008) “Analysis of Media Agenda Setting During and After Hurricane Katrina: Implications for Emergency Preparedness, Disasters Response, and Disaster Policy,” American Journal of Public Health, 98(4):604–610. [Web of Science] [Crossref]

  • Baron, J., J. C. Hershey and H. Kunreuther. (2000) “Determinants of Priority for Risk Reduction: The Role of Worry,” Risk Analysis, 20(4):413–428. [Crossref]

  • Boholm, M. (2009) “Risk and Causality in Newspaper Reporting,” Risk Analysis, 29(11):1566–1577. [Crossref] [Web of Science]

  • Brun, W. (1994) “Risk Perception: Main Issues, Approaches, and Findings.” In: (G. Wright and P. Ayton, eds.) Subjective Probability. Chichester, UK: Wiley, pp. 295–320.

  • Canada. Public Safety Canada. (2011) Canadian Disaster Database [updated 14 January 2011]. Available at: http://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/prg/em/cdd/srch-eng.aspx (accessed October 12 2011).

  • CBC News. (2005) Forces of Nature [Internet]. Cited December 2011. Available at: http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/forcesofnature/index.html (accessed December, 2011).

  • Centre for the Protection of National Infrastructure. (2011) Available at: http://www.cpni.gov.uk (accessed October 12 2011).

  • Conver, W. J. (1999) Practical Nonparametric Statistics. 3rd ed. New York: Wiley.

  • Cottle, S. (2000) “New(s) Times: Towards a ‘Second Wave’ of News Ethnography,” Communications, 25(1):19–42.

  • Drottz-Sjoberg, B. M. (1991) “Non-Experts Definitions of Risk and Risk Perception.” In RHIZIKON: Risk Research Reports, no. 3. Stockholm: Center for Risk Research.

  • Fischhoff, B. (1985) “Managing Risk Perception,” Issues in Science and Technology, 2:3–96.

  • Fischhoff, B. (1995) “Risk Perception and Communication Unplugged: Twenty Years of Process,” Risk Analysis, 15(2):137–145. [Crossref] [Web of Science]

  • Frewer, L. (2004) “The Public and Effective Risk Communication,” Toxicology Letters, 149(1):391–397. [PubMed] [Crossref]

  • Gaskell, G., M. Bauer, J. Durant and N. Allum. (1999) “Worlds Apart? The Reception of Genetically Modified Foods in Europe and the US,” Science, 285(16):384–387.

  • Hood, C., H. Rothstein and R. Baldwin. (2001). The Government of Risk: Understanding Risk Regulation Regimes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Hughes, A. and L. Pelan. (2010) “Twitter Adoption and Use in Mass Convergence and Emergency Events,” International Journal of Emergency Management, 6(3/4):248–260.

  • Johnson, B. B. and V. Y. Cavello. (1987) The Social and Cultural Construction of Risk. Dordrecht: Reidel, 12.

  • Johnson, P., A. Couture and R. Nicolet. (2007) Report of the Commission of inquiry into the collapse of a portion of the de la Concorde overpass [Internet]. Quebec: Gouvernement du Québec. Available at: http://www.cevc.gouv.qc.ca/UserFiles/File/Rapport/report_eng.pdf (accessed December 2011).

  • Kasperson, R., O. Renn, P. Slovic, H. Brown, J. Emel, R. Globe, J. Kasperson and S. Ratick. (1998) “The Social Amplification of Risk: A Conceptual Framework,” Risk Analysis, 8(2):177–187.

  • Kitzinger, J. and J. Reilly. (1997) “The Rise and Fall of Risk Reporting: Media Coverage of Human Genetics Research, False Memory Syndrome and Mad Cow Disease,” European Journal of Communication, 12(3):319–350. [Crossref]

  • Kraus, N. N., T. Malmfors and P. Slovic. (2001) “Intuitive Toxicology: Experts and Lay Judgements of Chemical Risks.” In: (P. Slovic, ed.) Perception of Risk. New York: McGraw-Hill, pp. 285–315.

  • Leahy, P. J. and A. Mazur. (1980) “The Rise and Fall of Public Opposition in Specific Social Movements,” Social Studies of Science, 10(3):259–284. [Crossref]

  • McInerney, P. (2005) Special Commission of Inquiry into the Waterfall Rail Accident [Internet]. New South Wales. Cited December 2011. Available at: http://www.railcorp.info/data/assets/pdf_file/0017/7145/Waterfall_Inquiry-Final_Report.pdf (accessed December, 2011).

  • McLeod, R. (2003) Inquiry into the Operational Response to the January 2003 Bushfires in the ACT [Internet]. Canberra: Cabinet Office. Cited December 2011. Available at: http://www.cmd.act.gov.au/_data/assets/pdf_file/0008/113939/McLeodInquiry.pdf (accessed December, 2011).

  • Moeller, S. D. (2006) “Regarding the Pain of Others: Media, Bias and the Coverage of International Disasters,” Journal of International Affairs, 59(2):173–196.

  • Mutz, D. C. and J. Soss. (1997) “Reading Public Opinion: The Influence of News Coverage on Perceptions of Public Sentiment,” Public Opinion Quarterly, 61(3):431–451. [Crossref]

  • Pidgeon, N. (1997) “The Limits to Safety? Culture, Politics, Learning and Man-Made Disasters,” Jounal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 5(1):1–14.

  • Quigley, K. (2005) “Bug Reactions: Considering US Government and UK Government Y2K Operations in Light of Media Coverage and Public Opinion Polls,” Health, Risk & Society, 7(3):267–291.

  • Quigley, K. (2008) “Opinion-Responsive Hypothesis.” In: Responding to Crises in the Modern Infrastructure: Policy Lessons from Y2K, Houndsmill, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 95–121.

  • Quigley, K., J. Quigley and E. Pond. (2012) “Convergence, Variation and Volatility in H1N1 Coverage in Four National Newspapers.” CIP Initiative Working Paper. Published at www.cip.management.dal.ca.

  • Rowe, G., L. Frewer and L. Sjoberg. (2000) “Newspaper Reporting of Hazards in the UK and Sweden,” Public Understanding of Science, 9(1):59–78.

  • Rundmo, T. (1999) “Perceived Risk, Health and Consumer Behaviour,” Journal of Risk Research, 2(3):187–200.

  • Rundmo, T. and B. E. Moen. (2006) “Risk Perception and Demand for Risk Mitigation in Transport: A Comparison of Lay People, Politicians and Experts,” Journal of Risk Research, 6:623–640.

  • Slovic, P. (1987). “Perception of Risk,” Science, 236:280–285.

  • Slovic, P., M. L. Finucane, E. Peters and D. G. MacGregor. (2004) “Risk as Analysis and Risk as Feelings: Some Thoughts About Affect, Reason, Risk, and Rationality,” Risk Analysis, 24(2):311–322. [Crossref]

  • Soumerai, S. B., D. Ross-Degnan, and J. S. Kahn. 1992. “Effects of Professional and Media Warnings about the Association between Aspirin Use in Children and Reye’s Syndrome,” Millbank Quarterly, 70(1):155–182. [Crossref]

  • Steinberg, T. (2000) Acts of God: The Unnatural History of Natural Disaster in America. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Web of Science]

  • United Kingdom. Cabinet Office. (2008) Learning Lessons from the 2007 Floods – Full Report [Internet]. Available from http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20100807034701/ http://archive.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/pittreview/_/media/assets/ www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/flooding_review/pitt_review_full%20pdf.pdf (accessed December 2011).

  • United Kingdom. Health and Safety Executive. (2002) Train Derailment at Potters Bar – Friday 10 May 2002: HSE Interim Report [Internet]. Cited December 2011. Available from http://www.rail-reg.gov.uk/upload/pdf/incident-pottersbar-interim.pdf (accessed December, 2011).

  • United States. Department of Homeland Security. (2008) One Team, One Mission, Securing Our Homeland: US Department of Homeland Security Strategic Plan, Fiscal Years 2009–2013. Available at http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/DHS_StratPlan_FINAL_spread.pdf (accessed October 11 2011).

  • Wahlberg, A. and L. Sjoberg. (2000) “Risk perception and the media,” Journal of Risk Research, 3(1):31–50.

About the article

Corresponding author: Kevin F. Quigley, School of Public Administration, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada, e-mail:


Published Online: 2013-04-13

Published in Print: 2013-01-01


For the U.S., see US, Department of Homeland Security (2008); for the UK, see Centre for the Protection of National Infrastructure (2011); for Australia, see Australian Government, Attorney General’s Department (2011); for Canada, see Canada, Public Safety Canada (2011).

For example, see Public Safety Canada’s Canadian Disaster Database, the International Disaster Database at the Université catholique de Louvain or the Attorney General of Australia’s Emergency Management Australia Disasters Database. The Canadian Disaster Database, for instance, reports that natural disasters occur 40 times more frequently in Canada than conflict disasters. This ratio has been (relatively) stable for over 40 years.

All three countries derive their governance arrangements from the Westminster tradition. Canada and Australia are federal systems. The UK is traditionally described as a unitary state, though devolution introduced a degree of decentralization that is similar to a federation.

For Australia, see Australian Government, Attorney General’s Department (2011); for Canada, see Canada, Public Safety Canada (2011); for the UK, see Centre for the Protection of National Infrastructure (2011).

The Daily Telegraph publishes seven days per week; the other two newspapers publish 6 days per week. For the purposes of this research, this difference only affects volume of coverage and performance assessment of government and industry.

Local media coverage may well yield different results but they are not part of this research project.

Rowe, Frewer, and Sjoberg examine how science and technology risks are communicated to the public.

Using a one-sided Mann-Whitney test for comparing these samples resulted in an exact p value of 0.05.

If we were to assume that the publication time of each article was independent and identically distributed we would obtain a 95% confidence interval about the median of (26.57, 29.42). The strength of such an assumption would rely in part on the similarities between the distributions for each event.

We used the Mann-Whitney U test when comparing two sub-populations and the Kruskal-Wallis Test when comparing more than two (Conver 1999).

Using the Kruskal-Wallis test, the hypothesis that the three distributions in Figure 3 are sampled from the same distribution resulted in a significance value of 0.966 and thus would not be rejected at the 5% level.

Using the Mann-Whitney U test to assess the difference in the distributions between event types we obtained a significance value of 0.298 so the null hypothesis that the two distributions have the same underlying distribution would not be rejected at the 5% level.

Using a Kruskal-Wallis test, we obtained a significance test statistic of 0.004, thus a statistically significant difference at the 1% significance level.

For the U.S., see US, Department of Homeland Security (2008); for the UK, see Centre for the Protection of National Infrastructure (2011); for Australia, see Australian Government, Attorney General’s Department (2011); for Canada, see Canada, Public Safety Canada (2011).


Citation Information: Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, ISSN (Online) 1547-7355, ISSN (Print) 2194-6361, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jhsem-2012-0054. Export Citation

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in