Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details

Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management

Editor-in-Chief: Renda-Tanali, Irmak, D.Sc.

Managing Editor: McGee, Sibel, Ph.D.

4 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR increased in 2015: 0.466
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.760

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.272
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 0.640
Impact per Publication (IPP) 2015: 0.493

Online
ISSN
1547-7355
See all formats and pricing

Texas takes on the TSA: The Constitutional Fight over Airport Security

Cali M. Ellis
  • Corresponding author
  • University of Michigan, 5700 Haven Hall, 505 South State Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1045, USA
  • Email:
/ Michael C. McDaniel
  • Thomas M. Cooley Law School Lansing, MI, USA
Published Online: 2013-04-19 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jhsem-2012-0068

Abstract

Since 9/11, air transportation has been one of the most important and closely watched areas of homeland security under federal control. Despite this centralization of authority, some states have begun to question some of the policies enacted by the Transportation Security Administration (TSA). In 2011, Texas passed legislation that would have criminalized TSA officers for carrying out such policies, specifically enhanced pat downs of airport travelers. In light of threats from the Department of Justice, Texas ultimately backed down from the legislation, but the legal arguments made by participants on both sides remain relevant to future conflicts between state and federal authority on homeland security. The events in Texas are particularly interesting because they make public the tension between citizen preferences for security and civil liberties, highlighting the role of federalism in the homeland security domain. Using legal analysis, we find that federal power in the realm of aviation security given by the Constitution’s Supremacy Clause is less clear-cut than generally argued. Therefore, Texas’ attempt to assert its authority in this domain was not necessarily legally unsound.

Keywords: civil liberties; tenth amendment; transportation security administration; United States

References

  • Alkon, A. (2011) Don’t Give the TSA an Easy Time of Violating your Rights. Accessed on March 16, 2012. Available at: http://www.advicegoddess.com/archives/2011/04/26/make it tought.html.

  • Bali, V. (2009) “Tinkering Toward a National Identification System: An Experiment on Policy Attitudes,” Policy Studies Journal, 37:233–255. [Crossref] [Web of Science]

  • Best, S. J., B. S. Krueger and S. Pearson-Merkowitz (2012) “Al Qaeda Versus Big Brother: Anxiety about Government Monitoring and Support for Domestic Counterterrorism Policies,” Political Behavior, 34:608–625. [Web of Science]

  • Birkland, T. A. and S. E. DeYoung (2011) “Emergency Response, Doctrinal Confusion, and Federalism in the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill,” Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 41(3):471–493. [Web of Science] [Crossref]

  • Bohrer, B. (2011) Rep. Sharon Cissna, Angry Over TSA Patdown, Arrives by Boat in Alaska. Available at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/02/24/rep-sharoncissna-tsan827934.html. Accessed on December 3, 2012.

  • Clark, B. R. (2003) “The Supremacy Clause as a Check on Federal Power,” George Washington University Law Review, 71:2–43.

  • Condon, S. (2011) TSA Child Pat-Down Video Spurs New Legislation. Available at: http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544 162-20054000-503544.html. Accessed on March 16, 2012.

  • Davis, D. W. and B. D. Silver (2004) “Civil Liberties vs. Security: Public Opinion in the Context of the Terrorist Attacks on America,” American Journal of Political Science, 48:28–46. [Crossref]

  • Derthick, M. (2007) “Where Federalism didn’t Fail,” Public Administration Review, Special Issue:36–47.

  • Eisinger, P. (2006) “Imperfect Federalism: The Intergovernmental Partnership for Homeland Security,” Public Administration Review, 66(4):537–545. [Crossref]

  • Electronic Privacy Information Center (2010) EPIC v. the Department of Homeland Security. Case No. 10-1157 (D.C. Cir. filed July 2, 2010).

  • Elias, B. (2011) Changes in airport passenger screening technologies and procedures: Frequently asked questions. CRS Report for Congress R41502, Congressional Research Service.

  • Frederickson, H. G. and T. R. LaPorte (2002) “Airport Security, High reliability, and the Problem of Rationality,” Public Administration Review, 62(Special Issue):33–43. [Crossref]

  • Freedom To Travel USA (2011) TSA Information Kit. Available at: http://supportdignity.com/. Accessed on March 7, 2012.

  • Hamilton, A. (1961) Federalist no. 28. In: (C. Rossiter, eds.) The Federalist Papers. New York: New American Library.

  • Hetherington, M. and E. Suhay (2011) “Authoritarianism, Threat, and Americans’ Support for the War on Terror,” American Journal of Political Science, 55(3):546–560. [Web of Science] [Crossref]

  • Hogue, A. (2011a) Anti-Groping Bill Clears Committee, Gathers Enough Support to Pass Both Chambers. Available at: http://www.lonestarreport.org/Home/tabid/38/Default.aspx. Accessed on March 7, 2012.

  • Hogue, A. (2011b) Bill Targeting TSA Groping in Texas Airports Dead. Available at: http://blogs.star-telegram.com/politex/2011/05/bill-targeting-tsagroping-in-texas-airports-dead-key-senator-says.html. Accessed on March 7, 2012.

  • Hogue, A. (2011c) House Anti-Groping Bill Breaks Down, Senate Version up Monday. Available at: http://www.lonestarreport.org/LoneStarReport/BlogArchive/tabid/65/EntryId/1236/House-anti-groping-bill-breaks-down-Senateversion-up-Monday.aspx. Accessed on March 7, 2012.

  • Hogue, A. (2011d) TSA Bill Clears Committee, Heads to House Floor Tomorrow; May Signal New Life for Courts Bill. Available at: http://www.lonestarreport.org/LoneStarReport/BlogArchive/tabid/65/EntryId/1244/TSA-bill-clearscommittee-heads-to-House-floor-tomorrow-may-signal-new-life-for-courtsbill.aspx. Accessed on March 7, 2012.

  • Holt, K. (2011) Former Miss USA traumatized by TSA in Dallas. Available at: http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/crime/7293-former-missusa-traumatized-by-tsa-in-dallas.

  • Huddy, L., S. Feldman, C. Taber and G. Lahav (2005) “Threat, Anxiety, and Support of Antiterrorism Policies,” American Journal of Political Science, 49(3):593–608. [Crossref]

  • Johnson, M. M. (2006) TSA to Begin ‘See-Through’ Scanning Technology Pilot Program at Phoenix Airport. In CQ Homeland Security. December 5, 2006.

  • Kettl, D. F. (2003) “Contingent Coordination: Practical and Theoretical Puzzles for Homeland Security,” The American Review of Public Administration, 33(3):253–277. [Crossref]

  • Kettl, D. F. (2006) “Is the Worst Yet to Come?” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 604(1):273–287. [Crossref] [Web of Science]

  • Krane, D. (2007) “The Middle Tier in American federalism: State Government Policy Activism During the Bush Presidency,” Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 37(3):453–477. [Crossref]

  • Lord, S. (2010). TSA is Increasing Procurement and Deployment of the Advanced Imaging Technology, but Challenges to this Effort and Other Areas of Aviation Security Remain. Testimony Before the Subcommittee on Transportation Security and Infrastructure Protection, Committee on Homeland Security, House of Representatives GAO-10-484T. Washington D.C.: United States Government Accountability Office.

  • Madison, J. (1961) “Federalist no. 39.” In: (C. Rossiter, eds.) The Federalist Papers. New American Library, New York: Penguin.

  • May, P. J., A. E. Jochim and J. Sapotichne (2011) “Constructing Homeland Security: An Anemic Policy Regime,” Policy Studies Journal, 39(2):285–307. [Crossref] [Web of Science]

  • Murphy, J. E. (2011) “Letter to Texas leaders,” Letter. May 24. Available at: http://reason.com/assets/db/13063422969183.pdf. Accessed on April 1, 2012.

  • Nixon, R. (2012) New Law Clears the Way for Airports to Drop T.S.A. Screeners. March 15. The New York Times, page A10.

  • Peterman, D. R., B. Elias and J. Frittelli (2011) Transportation Security: Issues for the 112th Congress. CRS Report for Congress, Congressional Research Service.

  • Pistole, J. S. (2011) Testimony of Transportation Security Administrator John S. Pistole before the House Committee on Homeland Security, Subcommittee on Transportation Security, “terrorism and transportation security: TSA oversight.” Available at: http://www.dhs.gov/news/2011/02/09/testimonytransportation-security-administrator-john-s-pistole-house-committee. Accessed on October 19, 2011.

  • Regan, P. M. and C. J. Deering (2009) “State Opposition to REAL ID,” Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 39(3):476–505. [Web of Science] [Crossref]

  • Ripberger, J. T. (2011) “Whither Civil Defense and Homeland Security in the Study of Public Policy? A Look at Research on the Policy, The Public, and the Process,” The Policy Studies Journal, 39(S1):77–91. [Web of Science]

  • Sanquist, T., H. Mahy and F. Morris (2008) “An Exploratory Risk Perception Study of Attitudes Toward Homeland Security Systems,” Risk Analysis, 28:1125–1133. [Web of Science]

  • Scavo, C., R. C. Kearney and R. J. Kilroy Jr. (2007) “Challenges to Federalism: Homeland Security and Disaster Response,” Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 38(1):81–110. [Web of Science] [Crossref]

  • Schildkraut, D. J. (2009) “The Dynamics of Public Opinion on Ethnic Profiling after 9/11,” American Behavioral Scientist, 53:61–79. [Web of Science]

  • Schneider, S. (2008) “Who’s to Blame? (mis) Perceptions of the Intergovernmental Response to Disasters,” Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 38(4):715–738. [Web of Science] [Crossref]

  • Sedat, J., M. Shuman, D. Agard and R. Stroud (2010) Letter to John P. Holdren. Available at: http://www.propublica.org/documents/item/april-2011-letter-to-join-holdren. Accessed on April 1, 2012.

  • Silver, N. (2010) New Poll Suggests Shift in Public Views on T.S.A. Procedures. New York Times. November 22. http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/11/22/new-poll-suggests-shift-in-public-views-on-t-s-a-procedures/. Accessed on March 16, 2012.

  • Sullivan, E. (2011) “TSA Warning Describes Surgically Implanted Bombs,” The Christian Science Monitor. The Christian Science Monitor. July 7. http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Latest-News-Wires/2011/0707/TSA-warning-describes-surgically-implanted-bombs. Accessed on March 16, 2012.

  • Transportation Security Administration. More Information: Advanced Imaging technology. Available at: http://www.tsa.gov/approach/tech/ait/reading.shtm. Accessed on March 31, 2013.

  • Transportation Security Administration (2010) TSA Statement on New Patdown Procedures. Available at: http://www.tsa.gov/press/happenings/102810patdown. shtm. Accessed on March 16, 2012.

  • Transportation Security Administration (2011) Texas House of Representatives Seeking to Ban Current TSA Pat-Down. Avaialble at: http://blog.tsa.gov/2011/05/texashouse-of-representatives-seeking.html. Accessed on March 16, 2012.

  • Van Alstyne, W. W. (1985) “The Second Death of Federalism,” Michigan Law Review, 83(1709):1709–1733. [Crossref]

About the article

Corresponding author: Cali M. Ellis, University of Michigan, 5700 Haven Hall, 505 South State Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1045, USA, Tel.: +310-683-2149, Fax: +810-752-1847, e-mail:


Published Online: 2013-04-19

Published in Print: 2013-01-01


Citation Information: Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, ISSN (Online) 1547-7355, ISSN (Print) 2194-6361, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jhsem-2012-0068. Export Citation

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in