Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management

Editor-in-Chief: Renda-Tanali, Irmak

Managing Editor: McGee, Sibel

4 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 0.712

CiteScore 2017: 0.92

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.242
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.615

Online
ISSN
1547-7355
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Businesses and International Security Events: Case Study of the 2012 G8 Summit in Frederick County, Maryland

Mark R. Landahl
  • Corresponding author
  • Oklahoma State University, Fire and Emergency Management Administration Program, 201 Murray Hall, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2013-10-14 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jhsem-2013-0041

Abstract

This article examines impacts of an international event on the business community in Frederick County, MD. The 2012 G8 summit drew 14 world leaders to central Maryland for meetings that took place on May 18–19, 2012. The study shows the full spectrum of the event as it unfolded from the point of view of the business owner. In-depth interviews with business owners revealed six themes related to: (1) Information Sources and Use, (2) Business Insurance, (3) Adaptive Response Measures, (4) Business Impacts, (5) Small vs. Large Businesses, and (6) Demonstrators – Thurmont, MD. The article confirms many previous research findings about businesses in disasters. It includes findings in each of the six themes. These include the importance of social networks as information sources and influences on adaptive response actions, the limits of business insurance as an influence on the implementation of adaptive response actions, general preparedness and business size, and the positive personal impact of a peaceful protest on business owners in Thurmont, MD. The study recommends continued emergency management outreach for the development of general business preparedness, particularly among small businesses. In addition, it recommends governments develop specific coordinated information strategy for businesses in large-scale events.

Keywords: emergency management; businesses; Group of Eight; security; protest; preparedness

References

  • Alesch, D. J., J. N. Holly, E. Minter and R. Nagy (2001) Organizations at Risk: What Happens When Small Business and Not-for-Profits Encounter Natural Disasters. Fairfax, VA: PERI.Google Scholar

  • Corey, C. M. and E. A. Deitch (2011) “Factors Affecting Business Recovery Immediately After Hurricane Katrina,” Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 19(3):169–181.Google Scholar

  • Dahlhamer, J. M. and M. J. D’Souza (1997) “Determinants of Business Disaster Preparedness in Two U.S. Metropolitan Areas,” International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 15(2):265–281.Google Scholar

  • Deitch, E. A. and C. M. Corey (2011) “Predicting Long-term Business Recovery Four Years After Hurricane Katrina,” Management Research Review, 34(3):311–324.Google Scholar

  • Denzin, N. (1978) The Research Act. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine.Google Scholar

  • Digler, R. J. (2012) Small Business Size Standards: A Historical Analysis of Contemporary Issues. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.Google Scholar

  • Drabek, T. E. (1991) “Anticipating Organizational Evacuations: Disaster Planning by Managers of Tourist-oriented Private Firms,” International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 9(2):219–245.Google Scholar

  • Drabek, T. E. (1994) Disaster Evacuation and the Tourist Industry. Institute of Behavioral Science, Boulder, CO: University of Colorado.Google Scholar

  • Drabek, T. E. (1999) “Understanding Disaster Warning Responses,” The Social Science Journal, 36(3):515–523.Google Scholar

  • Faupel, C. E., S. P. Kelley and T. Petee (1992) “The Impact of Disaster Education on Household Preparedness for Hurricane Hugo,” International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 10(5):5–24.Google Scholar

  • Glaser, B. G. and A. L. Strauss (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Chicago, IL: Aldine Publishing.Google Scholar

  • Howe, P. D. (2011) “Hurricane Preparedness as Anticipatory Adaptation: A Case Study of Community Businesses,” Global Environmental Change, 21(2):711–720.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Janis, I. L. and L. Mann (1977) Decision Making: A Psychological Analysis of Conflict, Choice, and Commitment. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar

  • Killian, L. M. (2002) “An Introduction to Methodological Problems of Field Studies in Disasters.” In: (R. A. Stallings, ed.) Methods of Disaster Research. Bloomington, IN: Xlibris, pp. 49–93.Google Scholar

  • Lindell, M. K. and R. W. Perry (2004) Communicating Environmental Risk in Multiethnic Communities. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

  • Lofland, J., S. David, L. Anderson and L. H. Lofland (2006) Analyzing Social Settings. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar

  • Maryland Department of Business and Economic Development. n.d. Brief Economic Facts: Frederick County, Maryland. Available at: http://www.choosemaryland.org/factsstats/Documents/briefeconomicfacts/FrederickBef12.pdf (accessed June 15, 2012).

  • Mileti, D. S. and J. H. Sorensen (1990) Communication of Emergency Public Warnings. Oak Ridge, TN: Oak Ridge National Laboratory.Google Scholar

  • Mileti, D. S. and L. Peek (2000) “The Social Psychology or Public Response to Warnings of a Nuclear Power Plant Accident,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, 75:181–194.Google Scholar

  • Obama, B. (2012) Press Conference by the President. Available at: http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2012/03/06/press-conference-president (accessed June 15, 2012).

  • Quarantelli, E. L. (1990) The Warning Process and Evacuation Behavior: The Research Evidence. Preliminary Paper 148. Disaster Research Center, University of Delaware: Newark, DE.Google Scholar

  • Quarantelli, E. L., C. Lawrence, K. Tierney and T. Johnson (1979) Initial Findings From a Study of Socio-Behavioral Preparations and Planning for Acute Chemical Hazard Disasters. Disaster Research Center: The Ohio State University.Google Scholar

  • Sorensen, J. H. (2000) “Hazard Warning Systems: Review of 20 Years of Progress,” Natural Hazards Review, 1(2):119–125.Google Scholar

  • Tierney, K. J. (1997) “Business Impacts of the Northridge Earthquake,” Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 5(2):87–97.Google Scholar

  • Tierney, K. J. (2007) “Businesses and Disasters: Vulnerability, Impacts, and Recovery.” In: (H. Rodríguez, E. L. Quarantelli and R. R. Dynes, eds.) Disaster Research Handbook. New York: Springer, pp. 275–296.Google Scholar

  • Turner, R. and L. Killian (1987) Collective Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

  • U.S. Census Bureau. n.d. 2010 Nonemployer Statistics: Frederick County, MD. Available at: http://censtats.census.gov/cgi-bin/nonemployer/nonsect.pl (accessed June 15, 2012).

  • U.S. Secret Service. 2012. National Security Special Events. Available at: http://www.secretservice.gov/nsse.shtml (accessed June 15, 2012).

  • Webb, G. R., K. J. Tierney and J. M. Dahlhamer (2000) “Businesses and Disasters: Empirical Patterns and Unanswered Questions,” Natural Hazards Review, 1(3):83–90.Google Scholar

  • Zhang, Y., M. Lindell and C. Prater (2009) “Vulnerability of Community Businesses to Environmental Disaster,” Disasters, 33(1):38–57.CrossrefWeb of SciencePubMedGoogle Scholar

About the article

Mark R. Landahl

Sgt. Mark Landahl, CEM® is a 12-year veteran of the Frederick County (MD) Sheriff’s Office and current PhD student in the Oklahoma State University Fire and Emergency Management Administration Program. In addition to a career as a practitioner in homeland security and emergency management, Sgt. Landahl has also published several academic papers and presents at national homeland security and emergency management conferences. Sgt. Landahl is a 2006 graduate of the Department of Homeland Security sponsored Master’s Degree program at the Naval Postgraduate School and holds designation as a Certified Emergency Manager by the International Association of Emergency Managers. In addition, he serves on the undergraduate faculty at University of Maryland University College, serves on several program advisory boards, and consults on issues related to Emergency Management and Homeland Security education.


Corresponding author: Mark R. Landahl, Oklahoma State University, Fire and Emergency Management Administration Program, 201 Murray Hall, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA, Phone: +3016004018, e-mail:


Published Online: 2013-10-14

Published in Print: 2013-10-01


Content in this paper is reflective of the author′s perspective and does not necessarily reflect that of a funder or reviewer.

Activation by the Governor provides statewide jurisdiction to law enforcement agencies with limited daily jurisdiction.


Citation Information: Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages 609–629, ISSN (Online) 1547-7355, ISSN (Print) 2194-6361, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jhsem-2013-0041.

Export Citation

©2013 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in