Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
In This Section

Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management

Editor-in-Chief: Renda-Tanali, Irmak, D.Sc.

Managing Editor: McGee, Sibel, Ph.D.

4 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.474
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.627

CiteScore 2016: 0.57

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.272
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 0.640

Online
ISSN
1547-7355
See all formats and pricing
In This Section

‘Set Adrift’: Fatalism as Organizational Culture at Canadian Seaports

Kevin F. Quigley
  • Corresponding author
  • Dalhousie University, School of Public Administration, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
  • Email:
/ Bryan Mills
  • Dalhousie University, School of Public Administration, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
Published Online: 2016-02-17 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jhsem-2015-0030

Abstract

This paper takes an anthropological approach to understanding the governance of seaport security in Canada; it uses cultural theory and the concepts of regulation and integration as key determinants in understanding how organizations respond to risk. This paper draws on data from 29 semi-structured interviews with transportation specialists, including owners, operators, managers and regulators. Nine of the interview subjects came from seaports, in particular. The interviews occurred between 2011 and 2013. We argue that Canadian seaports exist in an area of confusing multi-level governance; they are immovable, are expected to be competitive and serve a number of (at times competing) public and private sector interests. These institutional arrangements have resulted in a security environment that is heavily regulated, but the community itself is not well integrated. Interview subjects raise concerns about the ports’ ability to respond to security threats. The paper then uses cultural theory to examine alternative governance arrangements enhancing, for example, community, competition or regulation. While most options to improve security will likely reduce the competitiveness of the seaports, it would help to instill more confidence among port staff and enhance organizational learning.

Keywords: critical infrastructure; cultural theory; governance; organizational culture; seaports; security

References

  • Aucoin, Peter (2002) “Beyond the ‘New’ in Public Management Reform in Canada: Catching the Next Wave?” In: (Dunn, Christopher J.C. ed.) The Handbook of Canadian Public Administration. Ontario: Oxford University Press, pp. 36–52.Google Scholar

  • Bentham, Jeremy (1825) The Rationale of Reward. London: John and H.L. Hunt.Google Scholar

  • Brenot, Jean, Sylviane Bonnefous and Claire Marris (1998) “Testing the Cultural Theory of Risk in France.” Risk Analysis, 18(6):729–739.Google Scholar

  • Brooks, Mary R. (2004) “The Governance Structure of Ports.” Review of Network Economics, 3(2):169–184.Google Scholar

  • Brooks, Mary R. (2006) “Port Devolution and Governance in Canada.” Research in Transportation Economics, 17:237–257.Google Scholar

  • Brooks, Mary R. (2009) North American Freight Transportation. Massachusetts: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.Google Scholar

  • Burns, Maria G. (2013) “Estimating the Impact of Maritime Security: Financial Tradeoffs between Security and Efficiency.” Journal of Transportation Security, 6(4):329–338.Google Scholar

  • Canadian Security Guide Book (2007) “An Update of Security Problems in Search of Solutions.” Senate. Standing Committee on National Security and Defense. Accessed January 28, 2016. http://publications.gc.ca/site/eng/398377/publication.html.

  • Colás, Alejandro and Bryan Mabee (2010) Mercenaries, Pirates, Bandits and Empires: Private Violence in Historical Context. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

  • Dake, Karl (1991) “Orienting Dispositions in the Perception of Risk: An Analysis of Contemporary Worldviews and Cultural Biases.” Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 22(1):61–82.Google Scholar

  • Douglas, Mary (1982a) Essays in the Sociology of Perception. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

  • Douglas, Mary (1982b) In the Active Voice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Douglas, Mary (1986) How Institutions Think. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar

  • Douglas, Mary (1992) Risk and Blame: Essays in Cultural Theory. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Douglas, Mary (2001) “Dealing with Uncertainty.” Ethical Perspectives, 8(3):145–155.Google Scholar

  • Douglas, Mary and Aaron B. Wildavsky (1982) Risk and Culture: An Essay on the Selection of Technical and Environmental Dangers. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

  • Dowty, Rachel A., Peter May, William Wallace and Colin Beech (2011) “Organizational Culture and the Katrina Response in Louisiana.” In: (Dowty, Rachel A. and Barbara L. Allen, eds.) Dynamics of Disaster: Lessons on Risk, Response and Recovery. London: Earthscan, pp. 29–46.Google Scholar

  • Ellis, Richard J., and Fred Thompson (1997) “Culture and the Environment in the Pacific Northwest.” The American Political Science Review, 91(4):885–897.Google Scholar

  • Fountain, Jane E. (2001) “Paradoxes of Public Sector Customer Service.” Governance, 14(1): 55–73.Google Scholar

  • Government of Canada (1994) “Marine Transportation Security Act.” Accessed August 18. http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/M-0.8/.

  • Government of Canada (1998) “Canada Marine Act.” Accessed August 20. http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/C-6.7/.

  • Haveman, Jon D., Howard J. Shatz and Ernesto A. Vilchis (2005) “US Port Security Policy After 9/11: Overview and Evaluation.” Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 2(4). Accessed November 9, 2015. doi:10.2202/1547-7355.1165.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Helmick, Jon S. (2008) “Port and Maritime Security: A Research Perspective.” Journal of Transportation Security, 1(1):15–28.Google Scholar

  • Hood, Christopher (1998) The Art of the State: Culture, Rhetoric, and Public Management. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Hossain, Kamrul, Hugh M. Kindred and Mary R. Brooks (2009) “The Challenge of Maritime Security Against Terrorism: A Dialogue Between the European Union and Canada.” In: (Chircop, Aldo, Erik Franck, Erik J. Molenaar, and David L. VanderZwaag, eds.) Understanding and Strengthening European Union-Canada Relations in Law of the Sea and Ocean Governance. Rovaniemi: University of Lapland Printing Centre, pp. 351–386.Google Scholar

  • Ircha, M. C. (2001) “Port Strategic Planning: Canadian Port Reform.” Maritime Policy and Management, 28(2):125–140.Google Scholar

  • Jenkins-Smith, Hank C. and Kerry G. Herron (2009) “Rock and a Hard Place: Public Willingness to Trade Civil Rights and Liberties for Greater Security.” Politics & Policy, 37(5):1095–1129.Google Scholar

  • Lodge, Martin, Kai Wegrich and Gail McElroy (2010) “Dodgy Kebabs Everywhere? Variety of Worldviews and Regulatory Change.” Public Administration, 88(1):247–266.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Malkin, Jesse and Aaron Wildavsky (1991) “Why the Traditional Distinction between Public and Private Goods Should be Abandoned.” Journal of Theoretical Politics, 3(4):355–378.Google Scholar

  • Nicol, Peter (2007) “Vision and the Hidden Infrastructure.” The CIP Exchange. Halifax: School of Public Administration. Accessed November 9, 2015. http://cip.management.dal.ca/?page_id=9.

  • Oltedal, Sigve and Torbjørn Rundmo (2007) “Using Cluster Analysis to Test the Cultural Theory of Risk Perception.” Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 10(3):254–262.Google Scholar

  • Ouchi, William G. (1979) “A Conceptual Framework for the Design of Organizational Control Mechanisms.” Management Science, 25(9):833–848.Google Scholar

  • Paine, Lincoln (2013) The Sea and Civilization: A Maritime History of the World. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar

  • Pollitt, Christopher and Geert Bouckaert (1999) Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Psarros, George, Rolf Skjong and Magnus S. Eide (2009) “The Acceptability of Maritime Security Risk.” Journal of Transportation Security, 2(4):149–163.Google Scholar

  • Public Safety Canada (2009) “National Strategy for Critical Infrastructure.” Last modified March 20, 2014. http://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/cnt/rsrcs/pblctns/srtg-crtcl-nfrstrctr/index-eng.aspx.

  • Quigley, Kevin (2013) “Man Plans, God Laughs: Canada’s National Strategy for Protecting Critical Infrastructure.” Canadian Public Administration, 56(1):142–164.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Quigley, Kevin and Bryan Mills (2014) “An Analysis of Transportation Security Risk Regulation Regimes: Canadian Airports, Seaports, Rail, Trucking and Bridges.” CIP Initiative. Accessed November 9, 2015. http://cip.management.dal.ca/?page_id=280.

  • Renn, Ortwin (2008) Risk Governance: Coping with Uncertainty in a Complex World. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar

  • Renn, Ortwin, William J. Burns, Jeanne X. Kasperson, Roger E. Kasperson and Paul Slovic (1992) “The Social Amplification of Risk: Theoretical Foundations and Empirical Applications.” Journal of Social Issues, 48(4):137–160.Google Scholar

  • Sagan, Scott D. (1993) The Limits of Safety. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

  • Sjöberg, Lennart (1998) “Risk Perception: Experts and the Public.” European Psychologist, 3(1):1–12.Google Scholar

  • Sloan, Elinor (2012) “Homeland Security and Defence in the Post 9/11 Era.” In: (David S. McDonough, ed.) Canada’s National Security in the Post-9/11 World: Strategy, Interests, and Threats. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, pp. 98–113.Google Scholar

  • Thompson, Michael, Richard Ellis and Aaron Wildavsky (1990) Cultural Theory. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar

  • Transport Canada (2013) “Canadian Port Authorities.” Accessed August 5. http://www.tc.gc.ca/eng/policy/acf-acfi-menu-2963.htm.

  • Transport Canada (2014) “Program Alignment Architecture.” Accessed August 20, http://www.tc.gc.ca/eng/corporate-services/page-1025.html.

  • van Heffen, Oscar and Pieter-Jan Klok (2003) “Cultural Theory Revised: Only Five Cultures or More?” Contemporary Political Theory, 2(3):289–306.Google Scholar

  • Wengelin, Mattias (2006) “The Swedish Port Security Network-An Illusion or a Fact?” Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 3(1). Accessed November 9, 2015. doi: 10.2202/1547-7355.1214.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zinn, J. O. (2004) Sociology and Risk. Accessed November 9, 2015. https://www.google.ca/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CCEQFjAAahUKEwjF24GV9YPJAhWEth4KHc5VDYk&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.kent.ac.uk%2Fscarr%2Fpapers%2FSociology%2520Literature%2520Review%2520WP1.04%2520Zinn.pdf&usg=AFQjCNGvXKovnQTC9eSf3Mu592kp06xV7g&sig2=ZRNseS0bDj1taoiUonqf_A.

About the article

Published Online: 2016-02-17

Published in Print: 2016-04-01


Citation Information: Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, ISSN (Online) 1547-7355, ISSN (Print) 2194-6361, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jhsem-2015-0030.

Export Citation

©2016 by De Gruyter. Copyright Clearance Center

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in