Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics

Ed. by Rutten, Gijsbert / Auer, Anita / del Valle, José / Vosters, Rik / Pickl, Simon

2 Issues per year

Online
ISSN
2199-2908
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Code-Switching in Lower-Class Writing: Autobiographies by Patients from Southern German Psychiatric Hospitals (1852–1931)

Markus Schiegg
Published Online: 2016-04-12 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jhsl-2016-0003

Abstract

This paper examines intra-speaker variation in historical writing. Its purpose is to show that lower-class people were able to consciously switch between language forms of conceptual orality and distance in their texts. To test this hypothesis, the article focuses on code-switching phenomena in autobiographic writing by patients from the Southern German psychiatric hospitals in Irsee and Kaufbeuren (1852–1931). The corpus of this paper consists of c. 98,300 tokens by 22 writers, of whom 11 use code-switching. First, I develop a method to distinguish code-switching from code-mixing phenomena in written texts by combining structural with functional approaches. In the article’s empirical part, I analyse the writers’ different communicative repertoires and the structures and functions of code-switching. Writers use linguistic variants of both conceptual orality and distance for code-switching. Thereby, they often use dialect, regional, or Southern German language forms that are outside of their regular linguistic repertoires. This leads to a re-evaluation of diatopically marked variants as not necessarily reflecting a writer’s lack of standard competence, but on the contrary being his or her deliberate linguistic choices.

Keywords: code-switching; variation; lower-class writing; ego-document; German

References

  • AdA=Elspaß, Stephan & Robert Möller. 2003ff. Atlas für deutsche Alltagssprache. http://www.atlas-alltagssprache.de (accessed 01 December 2015).

  • Ammon, Ulrich. 2003. Dialektschwund, Dialekt-Standard-Kontinuum, Diglossie: Drei Typen des Verhältnisses Dialekt – Standardvarietät im deutschen Sprachgebiet. In Klaus Mattheier, Jannis K. Androutsopoulos & Evelyn Ziegler (eds.), ‚Standardfragen‘. Soziolinguistische Perspektiven auf Sprachgeschichte, Sprachkontakt und Sprachvariation (Variolingua 18), 163–171. Oxford: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

  • Auer, Anita. 2015. Stylistic variation. In Anita Auer, Daniel Schreier & Richard J. Watts (eds.), Letter writing and language change, 133–155. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Auer, Peter. 1986. Konversationelle Standard/Dialekt-Kontinua (Code-Shifting). Deutsche Sprache 14. 97–124.Google Scholar

  • Auer, Peter. 1995. The pragmatics of code-switching: A sequential approach. In Lesley Milroy & Pieter Muysken (eds.), One speaker, two languages. Cross-disciplinary perspectives on code-switching, 115–135. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Auer, Peter. 1999. From codeswitching via language mixing to fused lects: Toward a dynamic typology of bilingual speech. The International Journal of Bilingualism 3(4). 309–332.Google Scholar

  • Auer, Peter. 2014. Anmerkungen zum Salienzbegriff in der Soziolinguistik. Linguistik online 66(4). 7–20.Google Scholar

  • Auer, Peter & Carol M. Eastman. 2010. Code-switching. In Jürgen Jaspers, Jan-Ola Östman & Jef Verschueren (eds.), Society and language use (Handbook of Pragmatic Highlights 7), 84–112. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Beveridge, Allan. 1998. Life in the asylum: Patients’ letters from Morningside, 1873–1908. History of Psychiatry 9. 431–469.Google Scholar

  • Burnett, John. 1994. Destiny obscure. Autobiographies of childhood, education and family from the 1820s to the 1920s. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Clyne, Michael. 2003. Dynamics of language contact. English and immigrant languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • DWB = Grimm, Jacob & Wilhelm Grimm. 1854–1961. Deutsches Wörterbuch, 16 vols. Leipzig: Hirzel.Google Scholar

  • Elspaß, Stephan. 2005. Sprachgeschichte von unten: Untersuchungen zum geschriebenen Alltagsdeutsch im 19. Jahrhundert (Reihe Germanistische Linguistik 263). Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar

  • Elspaß, Stephan. 2012. The use of private letters and diaries in sociolinguistic investigation. In Juan M. Hernández-Campoy & Juan C. Conde-Silvestre (eds.), The handbook of historical sociolinguistics, 156–169. Malden, MA & Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Elspaß, Stephan, Nils Langer, Joachim Scharloth & Wim Vandenbussche (eds.). 2007. Germanic language histories ‘from below’ (1700–2000) (Studia Linguistica Germanica 86). Berlin & New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Fischer, Hermann, Wilhelm Pfleiderer & Adalbert v. Keller. 1904–1936. Schwäbisches Wörterbuch, 6 vols. Tübingen: Laupp.Google Scholar

  • Fitzmaurice, Susan M. 2002. The familiar letter in Early Modern English: A pragmatic approach (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 95). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Franceschini, Rita. 1998. Code-switching and the notion of code in linguistics: Proposals for a dual focus model. In Peter Auer (ed.), Code-switching in conversation. Language, interaction and identity, 51–72. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Gilles, Peter. 2003. Zugänge zum Substandard: Korrelativ-globale und konversationell-lokale Verfahren. In Klaus Mattheier, Jannis K. Androutsopoulos & Evelyn Ziegler (eds.), ‚Standardfragen‘. Soziolinguistische Perspektiven auf Sprachgeschichte, Sprachkontakt und Sprachvariation (Variolingua 18), 195–215. Oxford: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

  • Gumperz, John J. 1982. Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Hupfer, Peter. 1932. Burgbernheim. Ein Heimatbuch von der Frankenhöhe. Neustadt: Schmidt.Google Scholar

  • Johnstone, Barbara & Judith M. Bean. 1997. Self-expression and linguistic variation. In Language in Society 26(2). 221–246.Google Scholar

  • Kany, Werner. 1995. Namenverwendung zwischen öffentlich und privat. In Ernst Eichler, Gerold Hilty, Heinrich Löffler, Hugo Steger & Ladislav Zgusta (eds.), Namenforschung. Ein internationales Handbuch zur Onomastik (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft 11[1]), 509–514. Berlin & New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Kleiner, Stefan. 2003. Bairisches in der Regionalsprache Bayerisch-Schwabens. Die Übernahme des Flexionssuffixes {-ts} für die 2. Person Plural. In Edith Funk, Stefan Kleiner, Manfred Renn & Bernadette Wecker (eds.), Sprachgeschichten. Ein Lesebuch für Werner König zum 60. Geburtstag (Schriften zum Bayerischen Sprachatlas 7), 137–152. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar

  • Koch, Peter & Wulf Oesterreicher. 2007. Schriftlichkeit und kommunikative Distanz. Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik 35(3). 346–375.Google Scholar

  • König, Werner & Manfred Renn. 2006. Kleiner Bayerischer Sprachatlas. München: dtv.Google Scholar

  • König, Werner & Manfred Renn. 2007. Kleiner Sprachatlas von Bayerisch-Schwaben. Augsburg: Wißner.Google Scholar

  • König, Werner & Brigitte Schwarz. 2013. Dialektwörterbuch von Bayerisch-Schwaben. Vom Allgäu bis zum Ries. Augsburg: Wißner.Google Scholar

  • König, Werner, Stephan Elspaß & Robert Möller. 2014 [1978]. dtv-Atlas Deutsche Sprache, 18th edn. München: dtv.Google Scholar

  • Labov, William. 1972. Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: Philadelphia University Press.Google Scholar

  • Langer, Nils. 2012. Finding non-dominant languages in the nineteenth century – problems and potentials from historical sociolinguistics. In Rudolf Muhr (ed.), Non-dominant varieties of pluricentric languages. Getting the picture (Österreichisches Deutsch. Sprache der Gegenwart 14), 83–106. Oxford: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

  • Langer, Nils. 2013. Norddeutsches in holsteinischen Soldatenbriefen von 1848–50. Niederdeutsches Jahrbuch 136. 73–95.Google Scholar

  • Langer, Nils & Anna Havinga. 2015. Invisible languages in historical sociolinguistics: A conceptual outline, with examples from the German-Danish borderlands. In Anna Havinga & Nils Langer (eds.), Invisible languages in the 19th century (Historical Sociolinguistics 2), 1–34. Oxford: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

  • Macha, Jürgen. 1991. Der flexible Sprecher. Untersuchungen zu Sprache und Sprachbewußtsein rheinischer Handwerksmeister. Köln: Böhlau.Google Scholar

  • Milroy, James & Lesley Milroy. 1985. Authority in language. Investigating language prescription and standardization. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Muysken, Pieter. 2000. Bilingual speech. A typology of code-mixing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Nurmi, Arja, Minna Nevala & Minna Palander-Collin. 2009. The language of daily life in England (1400–1800) (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 183). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Palander-Collin, Minna & Minna Nevala. 2011. Sociopragmatic aspects of person reference in Nathaniel Bacon’s letters. In Päivi Pahta & Andreas Jucker (Hgg.), Communicating early English manuscripts, 102–117. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Pfeifer, Wolfgang. 2005 [1989]. Etymologisches Wörterbuch des Deutschen, 8th edn. München: dtv.Google Scholar

  • Pickl, Simon. 2013. Probabilistische Geolinguistik. Geostatistische Analysen lexikalischer Variation in Bayerisch-Schwaben (Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik Beihefte 154). Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar

  • Popkin, Jeremy D. 2005. History, historians, & autobiography. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

  • Rutten, Gijsbert & Marijke van der Wal. 2014. Letters as loot. A sociolinguistic approach to seventeenth- and eighteenth-century Dutch (Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics 2). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Salewski, Kerstin. 1998. Zur Homogenität des Substandards älterer Bergleute im Ruhrgebiet (Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik Beihefte 99). Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar

  • SBS=König, Werner (ed.). 1997–2009. Sprachatlas von Bayerisch-Schwaben, 14 vols. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar

  • Schendl, Herbert. 2012. Multilingualism, code-switching, and language contact in historical sociolinguistics. In Juan M. Hernández-Campoy & Juan C. Conde-Silvestre (eds.), The handbook of historical sociolinguistics, 520–533. Malden, MA & Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Schiegg, Markus. 2015. The invisible language of patients from psychiatric hospital. In Anna Havinga & Nils Langer (eds.), Invisible languages in the 19th century (Historical Sociolinguistics 2), 71–94. Oxford: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

  • Schiegg, Markus. forthc. 2016. Der flexible Schreiber in der Sprachgeschichte. Grammatische Variation in süddeutschen Patientenbriefen des 19. Jahrhunderts. Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik (ZDL).

  • Schiegg, Markus & Deborah Thorpe. Submitted. Historical analyses of disordered handwriting: Perspectives on medieval and early 20th-century sources.

  • Schirmunski, Viktor M. 1962. Deutsche Mundartkunde. Vergleichende Laut- und Formenlehre der deutschen Mundarten. Berlin: Akad.-Verlag.Google Scholar

  • Schmidt, Martin, Robert Kuhlmann & Michael v. Cranach. 2012. Heil- und Pflegeanstalt Kaufbeuren. In Michael v. Cranach & Hans-Ludwig Siemen (eds.), Psychiatrie im Nationalsozialismus. Die Bayerischen Heil- und Pflegeanstalten zwischen 1933 und 1945, 265–325. München: Oldenburg.Google Scholar

  • Schwitalla, Johannes. 2012 [1997]. Gesprochenes Deutsch: Eine Einführung (Grundlagen der Germanistik 33), 4th edn. Berlin: Schmidt.Google Scholar

  • Sebba, Mark. 2012. Researching and theorising multilingual texts. In Mark Sebba, Shahrzad Mahootian & Carla Jonsson (eds.), Language mixing and code-switching in writing. Approaches to mixed-language written discourse (Routledge Studies in Multilingualism 2), 1–26. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Soukup, Barbara. 2009. Dialect use as interaction strategy. A sociolinguistic study of contextualization, speech perception, and language attitudes in Austria (Austrian Studies in English 98). Wien: Braumüller.Google Scholar

  • Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid. 2011. The Bishop’s grammar. Robert Lowth and the rise of prescriptivism in English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Tsapos, Nicolas. 2002. Die Konstitution von Patientenbildern in Krankenakten betreuter Patientinnen der Anstalt Bethel 1898–1945. In Gisela Brünner & Elisabeth Gülich (eds.), Krankheit verstehen. Interdisziplinäre Beiträge zur Sprache in Krankheitsdarstellungen (Bielefelder Schriften zur Linguistik und Literaturwissenschaft 18), 301–317. Bielefeld: Aisthesis.Google Scholar

  • Vincent, David. 1981. Bread, knowledge and freedom. A study of nineteenth-century working class autobiography. London: Methuen.Google Scholar

  • Weiß, Helmut. 2005. Inflected complementizers in continental West Germanic dialects. Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik 72(2). 148–166.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2016-04-12

Published in Print: 2016-04-01


Citation Information: Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics, Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages 47–81, ISSN (Online) 2199-2908, ISSN (Print) 2199-2894, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jhsl-2016-0003.

Export Citation

©2016 by De Gruyter Mouton.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in