[1]

S. W. Anzengruber, B. Hofmann and P. Mathé,
Regularization properties of the sequential discrepancy principle for Tikhonov regularization in Banach spaces,
Appl. Anal. 93 (2014), no. 7, 1382–1400.
CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

[2]

S. W. Anzengruber, B. Hofmann and R. Ramlau,
On the interplay of basis smoothness and specific range conditions occurring in sparsity regularization,
Inverse Problems 29 (2013), no. 12, Article ID 125002.
Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

[3]

R. I. Boţ and B. Hofmann,
An extension of the variational inequality approach for obtaining convergence rates in regularization of nonlinear ill-posed problems,
J. Integral Equations Appl. 22 (2010), no. 3, 369–392.
Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

[4]

R. I. Boţ and B. Hofmann,
The impact of a curious type of smoothness conditions on convergence rates in ${\mathrm{\ell}}^{1}$-regularization,
Eurasian J. Math. Comp. Appl. 1 (2013), no. 1, 29–40.
Google Scholar

[5]

K. Bredies and D. A. Lorenz,
Regularization with non-convex separable constraints,
Inverse Problems 25 (2009), no. 8, Article ID 085011.
Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

[6]

J. Brodie, I. Daubechies, C. De Mol, D. Giannone and I. Loris,
Sparse and stable Markowitz portfolios,
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106 (2009), 12267–12272.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

[7]

M. Burger, J. Flemming and B. Hofmann,
Convergence rates in ${\mathrm{\ell}}^{1}$-regularization if the sparsity assumption fails,
Inverse Problems 29 (2013), no. 2, Article ID 025013.
Google Scholar

[8]

M. Burger and S. Osher,
Convergence rates of convex variational regularization,
Inverse Problems 20 (2004), no. 5, 1411–1421.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

[9]

M. Burger, E. Resmerita and L. He,
Error estimation for Bregman iterations and inverse scale space methods in image restoration,
Computing 81 (2007), no. 2–3, 109–135.
Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

[10]

D.-H. Chen, B. Hofmann and J. Zou,
Elastic-net regularization versus ${\mathrm{\ell}}^{1}$-regularization for linear inverse problems with quasi-sparse solutions,
Inverse Problems 33 (2017), no. 1, Article ID 015004.
Google Scholar

[11]

J. Cheng, B. Hofmann and S. Lu,
The index function and Tikhonov regularization for ill-posed problems,
J. Comput. Appl. Math. 265 (2014), 110–119.
CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

[12]

J. Cheng and M. Yamamoto,
One new strategy for a priori choice of regularizing parameters in Tikhonov’s regularization,
Inverse Problems 16 (2000), no. 4, L31–L38.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

[13]

J. Flemming,
Generalized Tikhonov Regularization and Modern Convergence Rate Theory in Banach Spaces,
Shaker, Aachen, 2012.
Google Scholar

[14]

J. Flemming,
Variational smoothness assumptions in convergence rate theory—an overview,
J. Inverse Ill-Posed Probl. 21 (2013), no. 3, 395–409.
Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

[15]

J. Flemming and M. Hegland,
Convergence rates in ${\mathrm{\ell}}^{1}$-regularization when the basis is not smooth enough,
Appl. Anal. 94 (2015), no. 3, 464–476.
Google Scholar

[16]

M. Grasmair,
Well-posedness and convergence rates for sparse regularization with sublinear ${l}^{q}$ penalty term,
Inverse Probl. Imaging 3 (2009), no. 3, 383–387.
Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

[17]

M. Grasmair,
Generalized Bregman distances and convergence rates for non-convex regularization methods,
Inverse Problems 26 (2010), no. 11, Article ID 115014.
Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

[18]

M. Grasmair,
Non-convex sparse regularisation,
J. Math. Anal. Appl. 365 (2010), no. 1, 19–28.
Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

[19]

M. Grasmair, M. Haltmeier and O. Scherzer,
Sparse regularization with ${l}^{q}$ penalty term,
Inverse Problems 24 (2008), no. 5, Article ID 055020.
Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

[20]

T. Hein and B. Hofmann,
Approximate source conditions for nonlinear ill-posed problems—chances and limitations,
Inverse Problems 25 (2009), no. 3, Article ID 035003.
Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

[21]

B. Hofmann,
Approximate source conditions in Tikhonov–Phillips regularization and consequences for inverse problems with multiplication operators,
Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 29 (2006), no. 3, 351–371.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

[22]

B. Hofmann, B. Kaltenbacher, C. Pöschl and O. Scherzer,
A convergence rates result for Tikhonov regularization in Banach spaces with non-smooth operators,
Inverse Problems 23 (2007), no. 3, 987–1010.
Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

[23]

B. Hofmann and P. Mathé,
Parameter choice in Banach space regularization under variational inequalities,
Inverse Problems 28 (2012), no. 10, Article ID 104006.
Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

[24]

B. Hofmann, P. Mathé and M. Schieck,
Modulus of continuity for conditionally stable ill-posed problems in Hilbert space,
J. Inverse Ill-Posed Probl. 16 (2008), no. 6, 567–585.
Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

[25]

B. Hofmann and M. Yamamoto,
On the interplay of source conditions and variational inequalities for nonlinear ill-posed problems,
Appl. Anal. 89 (2010), no. 11, 1705–1727.
Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

[26]

K. Ito and K. Kunisch,
A variational approach to sparsity optimization based on Lagrange multiplier theory,
Inverse Problems 30 (2014), no. 1, Article ID 015001.
Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

[27]

B. Jin, D. A. Lorenz and S. Schiffler,
Elastic-net regularization: Error estimates and active set methods,
Inverse Problems 25 (2009), no. 11, Article ID 115022.
Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

[28]

J. Kaipio and E. Somersalo,
Statistical and Computational Inverse Problems,
Appl. Math. Sci. 160,
Springer, New York, 2005.
Google Scholar

[29]

S. Kindermann,
Convex Tikhonov regularization in Banach spaces: New results on convergence rates,
J. Inverse Ill-Posed Probl. 24 (2016), no. 3, 341–350.
Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

[30]

D. A. Lorenz,
Convergence rates and source conditions for Tikhonov regularization with sparsity constraints,
J. Inverse Ill-Posed Probl. 16 (2008), no. 5, 463–478.
Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

[31]

P. Mathé and B. Hofmann,
Direct and inverse results in variable Hilbert scales,
J. Approx. Theory 154 (2008), no. 2, 77–89.
Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

[32]

R. Ramlau,
Regularization properties of Tikhonov regularization with sparsity constraints,
Electron. Trans. Numer. Anal. 30 (2008), 54–74.
Google Scholar

[33]

R. Ramlau and E. Resmerita,
Convergence rates for regularization with sparsity constraints,
Electron. Trans. Numer. Anal. 37 (2010), 87–104.
Google Scholar

[34]

R. Ramlau and G. Teschke,
Sparse recovery in inverse problems,
Theoretical Foundations and Numerical Methods for Sparse Recovery,
Radon Ser. Comput. Appl. Math. 9,
Walter de Gruyter, Berlin (2010), 201–262.
Google Scholar

[35]

E. Resmerita,
Regularization of ill-posed problems in Banach spaces: Convergence rates,
Inverse Problems 21 (2005), no. 4, 1303–1314.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

[36]

O. Scherzer,
Handbook of Mathematical Methods in Imaging. Vol. 1, 2, 3,
Springer, New York, 2011.
Google Scholar

[37]

O. Scherzer, M. Grasmair, H. Grossauer, M. Haltmeier and F. Lenzen,
Variational Methods in Imaging,
Appl. Math. Sci. 167,
Springer, New York, 2009.
Google Scholar

[38]

T. Schuster, B. Kaltenbacher, B. Hofmann and K. S. Kazimierski,
Regularization Methods in Banach Spaces,
Radon Ser. Comput. Appl. Math. 10,
Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 2012.
Google Scholar

[39]

W. Wang, S. Lu, H. Mao and J. Cheng,
Multi-parameter Tikhonov regularization with the ${\mathrm{\ell}}^{0}$ sparsity constraint,
Inverse Problems 29 (2013), no. 6, Article ID 065018.
Google Scholar

[40]

H. Zou and T. Hastie,
Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net,
J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Stat. Methodol. 67 (2005), no. 2, 301–320.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

## Comments (0)

General note:By using the comment function on degruyter.com you agree to our Privacy Statement. A respectful treatment of one another is important to us. Therefore we would like to draw your attention to our House Rules.