Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Journal of Imagery Research in Sport and Physical Activity

Editor-in-Chief: Hall, Craig R. / Short, Sandra E.


CiteScore 2017: 0.38

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.144
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.320

Online
ISSN
1932-0191
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Layered Stimulus Response Training versus Combined Action Observation and Imagery: Effects on Golf Putting Performance and Imagery Ability Characteristics

Ben Marshall
  • Corresponding author
  • Department of Exercise and Sport Science, Manchester Metropolitan University, Cheshire Campus, Crewe Green Road, Crewe CW1 5DU, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ David J. Wright
  • Department of Exercise and Sport Science, Manchester Metropolitan University, Cheshire Campus, Crewe Green Road, Crewe CW1 5DU, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2016-10-28 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jirspa-2016-0007

Abstract

This experiment compared the effectiveness of layered stimulus response training (LSRT) and combined action observation and motor imagery (AOMI) for improving golf putting performance and imagery ability characteristics. Twenty-four novice golfers were randomly assigned to LSRT, AOMI or reading (control) intervention groups (n=8), that all incorporated physical practice. Putting performance and imagery ability characteristics were measured at pre-test (day 1), post-test (day 5) and retention test (day 8). Putting performance improved in the LSRT group but not in the AOMI or control groups. Whilst there was no change in general movement imagery ability across the experiment, task-specific imagery ability did improve in both the LSRT and AOMI groups.

Keywords: imagery training; bio-informational theory; mental practice; sport performance

References

  • Anuar, N., Williams, S. E., & Cumming, J. (2016). Comparing PETTLEP imagery against observation imagery on vividness and ease of movement imagery. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology. doi:CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Beisteiner, R., Höllinger, P., Lindinger, G., Lang, W., & Berthoz, A. (1995). Mental representations of movements. Brain potentials associated with imagination of hand movements. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section, 96, 183–193. doi: CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Caspers, S., Zilles, K., Laird, A. R., & Eickhoff, S. B. (2010). ALE meta-analysis of action observation and imitation in the human brain. Neuroimage, 50(3), 1148–1167. doi: CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Cumming, J., Cooley, S. J., Anuar, N., Kosteli, M. C., Quinton, M. L., Weibull, F., & Williams, S. E. (2016). Developing imagery ability effectively: A guide to layered stimulus response training. Journal of Sport Psychology in Action. doi: CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cumming, J., & Ramsey, R. (2008). Imagery interventions in sport. In S. Mellalieu & S. Hanton (Eds.), Advances in applied sport psychology: A review (pp. 5–36). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Cumming, J. L., & Ste-Marie, D. M. (2001). The cognitive and motivational effects of imagery training: A matter of perspective. The Sport Psychologist, 15(3), 276–288.Google Scholar

  • Cumming, J., & Williams, S. E. (2012). The role of imagery in performance. In S. Murphy (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of sport and performance psychology (pp. 213–232). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Decety, J., Perani, D., Jeannerod, M., Bettinardi, V., Tadary, B., Woods, R., Fazio, F. (1994). Mapping motor representations with positron emission tomography. Nature, 371, 600–602. doi: CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Driskell, J. E., Copper, C., & Moran, A. (1994). Does mental practice enhance performance?. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 481–492. doi: CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Feltz, D., & Landers, D. (1983). The effects of mental practice on motor skill learning and performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Sport Psychology, 5(1), 25–57.Google Scholar

  • Filimon, F., Nelson, J. D., Hagler, D. J., & Sereno, M. I. (2007). Human cortical representations for reaching: Mirror neurons for execution, observation, and imagery. Neuroimage, 37, 1315–1328. doi: CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Gerardin, E., Sirigu, A., Lehéricy, S., Poline, J. B., Gaymard, B., Marsault, C., Le Bihan, D. (2000). Partially overlapping neural networks for real and imagined hand movements. Cerebral Cortex, 10, 1093–1104. doi: CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Goss, S., Hall, C., Buckolz, E., & Fishburne, G. (1986). Imagery ability and the acquisition and retention of movements. Memory and Cognition, 14, 469–477. doi: CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hall, C. R., & Pongrac, J. (1983). Movement Imagery Questionnaire. London, ON: University of Western Ontario.Google Scholar

  • Hammond, T., Gregg, M., Hrycaiko, D., Mactavish, J., & Leslie-Toogood, A. (2012). The effects of a motivational general-mastery imagery intervention on the imagery ability and sport confidence of inter-collegiate golfers. Journal of Imagery Research in Sport and Physical Activity, 7, 1–20. doi: CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hare, R., Evans, L., & Callow, N. (2008). Imagery use during rehabilitation from injury: A case study of an elite athlete. The Sport Psychologist, 22(4), 405–422.Google Scholar

  • Hétu, S., Grégoire, M., Saimpont, A., Coll, M. P., Eugène, F., Michon, P. E., & Jackson, P. L. (2013). The neural network of motor imagery: An ALE meta-analysis. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 37(5), 930–949. doi: CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Holmes, P., & Calmels, C. (2008). A neuroscientific review of imagery and observation use in sport. Journal of Motor Behavior, 40, 433–445. doi: CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Holmes, P., & Collins, D. (2001). The PETTLEP approach to motor imagery: A functional equivalence model for sport psychologists. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 13, 60–83. doi: CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jeannerod, M. (1994). The representing brain: Neural correlates of motor intention and imagery. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17, 187–201. doi: CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lang, P. (1979). A bio‐informational theory of emotional imagery. Psychophysiology, 16, 495–512. doi: CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lang, P., Kozak, M., Miller, G., Levin, D., & McLean, A. (1980). Emotional imagery: Conceptual structure and pattern of somato‐visceral response. Psychophysiology, 17, 179–192. doi: CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Miller, K. J., Schalk, G., Fetz, E. E., den Nijs, M., Ojemann, J. G., & Rao, R. P. (2010). Cortical activity during motor execution, motor imagery, and imagery-based online feedback. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(9), 4430–4435. doi: CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Morris, T., Spittle, M., & Watt, A. P. (2005). Imagery in sport. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.Google Scholar

  • Munzert, J., Zentgraf, K., Stark, R., & Vaitl, D. (2008). Neural activation in cognitive motor processes: Comparing motor imagery and observation of gymnastic movements. Experimental Brain Research, 188, 437–444. doi: CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Neuman, B., & Gray, R. (2013). A direct comparison of the effects of imagery and action observation on hitting performance. Movement and Sport Sciences, 79, 11–21. doi: CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Paivio, A. (1985). Cognitive and motivational functions of imagery in human performance. Canadian Journal of Applied Sport Sciences, 10(4), 22S–28S.Google Scholar

  • Ram, N., Riggs, S. M., Skaling, S., Landers, D. M., & McCullagh, P. (2007). A comparison of modelling and imagery in the acquisition and retention of motor skills. Journal of Sports Sciences, 25, 587–597. doi: CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Roberts, R., Callow, N., Hardy, L., Markland, D., & Bringer, J. (2008). Movement imagery ability: Development and assessment of a revised version of the vividness of movement imagery questionnaire. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 30(2), 200–221.Google Scholar

  • Roberts, R., Callow, N., Hardy, L., Woodman, T., & Thomas, L. (2010). Interactive effects of different visual imagery perspectives and narcissism on motor performance. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 32(4), 499–517.Google Scholar

  • Robin, N., Dominique, L., Toussaint, L., Blandin, Y., Guillot, A., & Her, M. L. (2007). Effects of motor imagery training on service return accuracy in tennis: The role of imagery ability. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 5, 175–186. doi: CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rymal, A., & Ste-Marie, D. (2009). Does self-modeling affect imagery ability or vividness?. Journal of Imagery Research in Sport and Physical Activity, 4, 1–14. doi: CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sakamoto, M., Muraoka, T., Mizuguchi, N., & Kanosue, K. (2009). Combining observation and imagery of an action enhances human corticospinal excitability. Neuroscience Research, 65, 23–27. doi: CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Smith, D., & Holmes, P. (2004). The effect of imagery modality on golf putting performance. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 26(3), 385–395.Google Scholar

  • Smith, D., Holmes, P., Whitemore, L., & Devonport, T. (2001). The effect of theoretically-based imagery scripts on field hockey performance. Journal of Sport Behavior, 24(4), 408–419.Google Scholar

  • Smith, D., Wright, C., & Cantwell, C. (2008). Beating the bunker: The effect of PETTLEP imagery on golf bunker shot performance. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 79, 385–391. doi: CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sounes, H. (2004). The wicked game: Arnold Palmer, Jack Nicklaus, Tiger Woods, and the story of modern golf. Basingstoke: Pan Macmillan.Google Scholar

  • Ste-Marie, D. M., Law, B., Rymal, A. M., Jenny, O., Hall, C., & McCullagh, P. (2012). Observation interventions for motor skill learning and performance: An applied model for the use of observation. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 5, 145–176. doi: CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Taube, W., Lorch, M., Zeiter, S., & Keller, M. (2014). Non-physical practice improves task performance in an unstable, perturbed environment: Motor imagery and observational balance training. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 2–10. doi: CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Villiger, M., Estévez, N., Hepp-Reymond, M., Kiper, D., Kollias, S., Eng, K., & Hotz-Boendermaker, S. (2013). Enhanced activation of motor execution networks using action observation combined with imagination of lower limb movements. PloS One, 8, e72403. doi: CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Vogt, S., Di Rienzo, F., Collet, C., Collins, A., & Guillot, A. (2013). Multiple roles of motor imagery during action observation. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 1–13. doi: CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wakefield, C., Smith, D., Moran, A., & Holmes, P. (2013). Functional equivalence or behavioural matching? A critical reflection on 15 years of research using the PETTLEP model of motor imagery. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 6, 105–121. doi: CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Williams, S., Cooley, S., & Cumming, J. (2013). Layered stimulus response training improves motor imagery ability and movement execution. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 35(1), 60–71.Google Scholar

  • Williams, S., Cumming, J., & Edwards, M. (2011). The functional equivalence between movement imagery, observation, and execution influences imagery ability. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 82, 555–564. doi: CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Williams, S., Cumming, J., Ntoumanis, N., Nordin-Bates, S., Ramsey, R., & Hall, C. (2012). Further validation and development of the movement imagery questionnaire. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 34(5), 621–646.Google Scholar

  • Wright, D. J., McCormick, S., Birks, S., Loporto, M., & Holmes, P. (2015). Action observation and imagery training improve the ease with which athletes can generate imagery. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 27, 156–170. doi: CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wright, C., & Smith, D. (2009). The effect of PETTLEP imagery on strength performance. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 7, 18–31. doi: CrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2016-10-28

Published in Print: 2016-01-01


Citation Information: Journal of Imagery Research in Sport and Physical Activity, Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages 35–46, ISSN (Online) 1932-0191, ISSN (Print) 2194-637X, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jirspa-2016-0007.

Export Citation

©2016 by De Gruyter.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in