Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Journal of Literary Theory

Ed. by Jannidis, Fotis / Kindt, Tom / Köppe, Tilmann / Winko, Simone

2 Issues per year

Online
ISSN
1862-8990
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Revisiting Style, a Key Concept in Literary Studies

J. Berenike Herrmann / Karina van Dalen-Oskam / Christof Schöch
Published Online: 2015-03-10 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jlt-2015-0003

Abstract

Language and literary studies have studied style for centuries, and even since the advent of ›stylistics‹ as a discipline at the beginning of the twentieth century, definitions of ›style‹ have varied heavily across time, space and fields. Today, with increasingly large collections of literary texts being made available in digital form, computational approaches to literary style are proliferating. New methods from disciplines such as corpus linguistics and computer science are being adopted and adapted in interrelated fields such as computational stylistics and corpus stylistics, and are facilitating new approaches to literary style.

The relation between definitions of style in established linguistic or literary stylistics, and definitions of style in computational or corpus stylistics has not, however, been systematically assessed. This contribution aims to respond to the need to redefine style in the light of this new situation and to establish a clearer perception of both the overlap and the boundaries between ›mainstream‹ and ›computational‹ and/or ›empirical‹ literary stylistics. While stylistic studies of non-literary texts are currently flourishing, our contribution deliberately centers on those approaches relevant to ›literary stylistics‹. It concludes by proposing an operational definition of style that we hope can act as a common ground for diverse approaches to literary style, fostering transdisciplinary research.

The focus of this contribution is on literary style in linguistics and literary studies (rather than in art history, musicology or fashion), on textual aspects of style (rather than production- or reception-oriented theories of style), and on a descriptive perspective (rather than a prescriptive or didactic one). Even within these limits, however, it appears necessary to build on a broad understanding of the various perspectives on style that have been adopted at different times and in different traditions. For this reason, the contribution first traces the development of the notion of style in three different traditions, those of German, Dutch and French language and literary studies. Despite the numerous links between each other, and between each of them to the British and American traditions, these three traditions each have their proper dynamics, especially with regard to the convergence and/or confrontation between mainstream and computational stylistics. For reasons of space and coherence, the contribution is limited to theoretical developments occurring since 1945.

The contribution begins by briefly outlining the range of definitions of style that can be encountered across traditions today: style as revealing a higher-order aesthetic value, as the holistic ›gestalt‹ of single texts, as an expression of the individuality of an author, as an artifact presupposing choice among alternatives, as a deviation from a norm or reference, or as any formal property of a text. The contribution then traces the development of definitions of style in each of the three traditions mentioned, with the aim of giving a concise account of how, in each tradition, definitions of style have evolved over time, with special regard to the way such definitions relate to empirical, quantitative or otherwise computational approaches to style in literary texts. It will become apparent how, in each of the three traditions, foundational texts continue to influence current discussions on literary style, but also how stylistics has continuously reacted to broader developments in cultural and literary theory, and how empirical, quantitative or computational approaches have long ­existed, usually in parallel to or at the margins of mainstream stylistics. The review will also reflect the lines of discussion around style as a property of literary texts – or of any textual entity in general.

The perspective on three stylistic traditions is accompanied by a more systematic perspective. The rationale is to work towards a common ground for literary scholars and linguists when talking about (literary) style, across traditions of stylistics, with respect for established definitions of style, but also in light of the digital paradigm. Here, we first show to what extent, at similar or different moments in time, the three traditions have developed comparable positions on style, and which definitions out of the range of possible definitions have been proposed or promoted by which authors in each of the three traditions.

On the basis of this synthesis, we then conclude by proposing an operational definition of style that is an attempt to provide a common ground for both mainstream and computational literary stylistics. This definition is discussed in some detail in order to explain not only what is meant by each term in the definition, but also how it relates to computational analyses of style – and how this definition aims to avoid some of the pitfalls that can be perceived in earlier definitions of style. Our definition, we hope, will be put to use by a new generation of computational, quantitative, and empirical studies of style in literary texts.

References*

  • Anbeek, Ton/Arie Verhagen, Over stijl, Neerlandistiek.nl 1:1 (2001), http://www.neerlandistiek.nl/01.01/.Google Scholar

  • Anderegg, Johannes, Literaturwissenschaftliche Stilauffassungen, in: Ulla Fix/Andreas Gardt/Joachim Knape (ed.), Rhetoric and Stylistics. An International Handbook of Historical and Systematic Research, Vol. 1, Berlin/New York 2008, 1076–1092.Google Scholar

  • Arrivé, Michel, Postulats pour la description linguistique des textes littéraires, Langue française 3:1 (1969), 3–13.Google Scholar

  • Bally, Charles, Traité de stylistique française [1909], Heidelberg ²1921.Google Scholar

  • Barthes, Roland, Le Degré zéro de l’écriture [1953], Paris 1972.Google Scholar

  • Barthes, Roland, Éléments de sémiologie, Communications 4 (1964), 91–135.Google Scholar

  • Beaudouin, Valérie/Francois Yvon, The Metrometer: A Tool for Analysing French Verse, Literary and Linguistic Computing 11:1 (1996), 23–31.Google Scholar

  • Benzécri, Jean-Paul, L’analyse des donnees, Paris 1973.Google Scholar

  • Bernet, Charles, Le Vocabulaire des tragédies de Racine. Analyse statistique, Geneva/Paris 1983.Google Scholar

  • Biber, Douglas, Variation across Speech and Writing, Cambridge 1988.Google Scholar

  • Biber, Douglas, Corpus Linguistics and the Study of Literature: Back to the Future?, Scientific Study of Literature 1:1 (2011), 15–23.Google Scholar

  • Biber, Douglas/Edward Finegan, Multi-Dimensional Analyses of Authors’ Styles: Some Case Studies from the Eigtheenth Century, Oxford 1994.Google Scholar

  • Bruneau, Charles, La stylistique, Romance Philology 5:1 (1951), 1–14.Google Scholar

  • Brunet, Etienne, Comptes d’auteurs, tome I: Études statistiques, de Rabelais à Gracq, ed. Damon Mayaffre, Paris 2009.Google Scholar

  • Brunet, Etienne, Ce qui compte: Écrits choisis, tome II: Méthodes statistiques, ed. Céline Poudat, Paris 2011.Google Scholar

  • Brunner, Annelen, Automatic Recognition of Speech, Thought, and Writing Representation in German Narrative Texts, Literary and Linguistic Computing 28:4 (2013), 563–575.Google Scholar

  • Burrows, John, ›Delta‹: A Measure of Stylistic Difference and a Guide to Likely Authorship, Literary and Linguistic Computing 17:3 (2002), 267–287.Google Scholar

  • Busemann, Adolf, Stil und Charakter. Untersuchungen zur Psychologie der individuellen Redeform, Meisenheim 1948.Google Scholar

  • Compagnon, Antoine, Style, in: A.C., Le démon de la théorie: littérature et sens commun, Paris 1998, 179–208.Google Scholar

  • Craig, Hugh, Authorial Attribution and Computational Stylistics: If You Can Tell Authors Apart, Have You Learned Anything about Them?, Literary and Linguistic Computing 14:1 (1999), 103–113.Google Scholar

  • Cressot, Marcel, Le Style et ses techniques. Précis d’analyse stylistique, Paris 1947.Google Scholar

  • Crystal, David, Stylistic Identity and literature, in: The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language [1987], Cambridge ³2010, 68–81.Google Scholar

  • Diederich, Joachim/Jörg Kindermann/Edda Leopold/Gerhard Paass, Authorship Attribution with Support Vector Machines, Applied Intelligence 19:1–2 (2003), 109–123.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dupriez, Bernard, Une stylistique structurale est-elle possible?, Le Français moderne 4 (1971), 336–344.Google Scholar

  • Eibl, Karl, Ist Literaturwissenschaft als Erfahrungswissenschaft möglich? Mit einigen Anmerkungen zur Wissenschaftsphilosophie des Wiener Kreises, in: Philip Ajouri/Katja Mellmann/Christoph Rauen (ed.), Empirie in der Literaturwissenschaft, Münster 2013, 19–45.Google Scholar

  • Enkvist, Nils Erik, Linguistic Stylistics, The Hague 1973.Google Scholar

  • Fagel, Suzanne, Structure versus Style: The Disappearance of Stylistics in the Netherlands 1940–1970, Online Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Poetics and Linguistics Association (PALA), 2008, http://www.pala.ac.uk/resources/proceedings/2008/fagel2008.pdf.Google Scholar

  • Fagel, Suzanne, The art of ordinary words and sentences: sentence complexity and madness in works by the Dutch authors Maarten Biesheuvel and Jan Arends, Online proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Poetics and Linguistics Association (PALA), 2009, http://www.pala.ac.uk/resources/proceedings/2009/fagel2009.pdf.Google Scholar

  • Fagel, Suzanne, The stylistic creation of an antihero: tense and aspect in Arnon Grunberg’s ›The Asylum Seeker‹, Online proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Poetics and Linguistics Association (PALA), 2010, http://www.pala.ac.uk/resources/proceedings/2010/fagel2010.pdf.Google Scholar

  • Fagel, Suzanne/Ninke Stukker/Loes van Andel, Hoe telbaar is stijl?: een kwantitatieve analyse van observatie en participatie in de stijl van Arnon Grunberg, Nederlandse Letterkunde 17:3 (2012), 178–203.Google Scholar

  • Fagel-de Werd, Suzanne, De stijl van gewoon proza, Leiden 2015, http://hdl.handle.net/1887/31606.Google Scholar

  • Fischer-Starcke, Bettina, Keywords and Frequent Phrases of Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice A Corpus-Stylistic Analysis, International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 14:4 (2009), 492–523.Google Scholar

  • Fix, Ulla, Stil – ein sprachliches und soziales Phänomen. Beiträge zur Stilistik, Berlin 2007.Google Scholar

  • Fix, Ulla, Text und Textlinguistik, in: Nina Janich (ed.), Textlinguistik. 15 Einführungen, Tübingen 2008, 15–34.Google Scholar

  • Fix, Ulla, Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik – Das Konzept »LiLi« aus heutiger linguistischer Sicht, Journal of Literary Theory 4:1 (2010), 19–40.Google Scholar

  • Fix, Ulla/Andreas Gardt/Joachim Knape (ed.), Rhetoric and Stylistics. An International Handbook of Historical and Systematic Research, 2 Vol., Berlin/New York 2008/2009.Google Scholar

  • Fucks, Wilhelm, Mathematische Analyse von Sprachelementen, Sprachstil und Sprachen, Köln 1955.Google Scholar

  • Gauthier, Michel, À propos de stylistiques, Langue française 8 (1970), 90–97.Google Scholar

  • Graubner, Hans, Stilistik, in: Heinz Ludwig Arnold/Volker Sinemus (ed.), Grundzüge der Literatur- und Sprachwissenschaft, Vol. 1, München 1973, 164–186.Google Scholar

  • Groeben, Norbert, Was kann/soll Empirisierung (in) der Literaturwissenschaft heißen?, in: Philip Ajouri/Katja Mellmann/Christoph Rauen (ed.), Empirie in der Literaturwissenschaft, Münster 2013, 47–74.Google Scholar

  • Guenier, Nicole, La pertinence de la notion d’écart en stylistique, Langue Française 3 (1969), 34–45.Google Scholar

  • Guiraud, Pierre, La stylistique, Paris 1963.Google Scholar

  • Hellinga, W.G./H. van der Merwe Scholtz, Kreatiewe analise van taalgebruik, Amsterdam/Pretoria 1995.Google Scholar

  • Herrmann, J. Berenike, Computing Kafka – How Keyness and Collocation Analysis Help Explain Paradoxical Style, talk and poster presented at International Herrenhausen Conferene (Digital) Humanities Revisited, Hanover, Dec. 2013.Google Scholar

  • Jakobson, Roman/Claude Lévi-Strauss, »Les Chats« de Charles Baudelaire, L’Homme 2:1 (1962), 5–21.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jannidis, Fotis/Gerhard Lauer, Burrows’s Delta and Its Use in German Literary History, in: Matt Erlin/Lynne Tatlock (ed.), Distant Readings. Topologies of German Culture in the Long Nineteenth Century, Rochester 2014, 29–54.Google Scholar

  • Jautze, Kim/Corina Koolen/Andreas van Cranenburgh/Hayco de Jong, From high heels to weed attics: a syntactic investigation of chick lit and literature, Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Computational Linguistics for Literature, 2013, http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/W13-1410.Google Scholar

  • Jenny, Laurent, L’objet singulier de la stylistique, Littérature 89:1 (1993), 113–124.Google Scholar

  • Kayser, Wolfgang, Das sprachliche Kunstwerk. Eine Einführung in die Literaturwissenschaft, Bern 1948.Google Scholar

  • Kestemont, Mike, What Can Stylometry Learn from Its Application to Middle Dutch Literature?, Journal of Dutch Literature 2:2 (2011), 46–65.Google Scholar

  • Kreuzer, Helmut, Mathematik und Dichtung. Zur Einführung, in: H.K./Rul Gunzenhäuser (ed.), Mathematik und Dichtung. Versuche zur Frage einer exakten Literaturwissenschaft, München 41965, 9–20.Google Scholar

  • Kreuzer, Helmut/Rul Gunzenhäuser (ed.), Mathematik und Dichtung: Versuche zur Frage einer exakten Literaturwissenschaft, München 41965.Google Scholar

  • Labbé, Cyril/Dominique Labbé, A Tool for Literary Studies: Intertextual Distance and Tree Classification, Literary and Linguistic Computing 21:3 (2006), 311 –326.Google Scholar

  • Lambrou, Marina/Peter Stockwell (ed.), Contemporary Stylistics, London 2007.Google Scholar

  • Larthomas, Pierre, Notions de stylistique générale, Paris 1998.Google Scholar

  • Leech, Geoffrey N./Mick Short, Style in Fiction. A Linguistic Introduction to English Fictional Prose [1981], New York ²2007.Google Scholar

  • Magri-Mourgues, Véronique, Analyse textométrique et interprétation littéraire – Hyperbase, Rousseau et les Lumières, Tranel. Travaux neuchâtelois de linguistique 55 (2011), 77–93.Google Scholar

  • Mahlberg, Michaela, Corpus Analysis of Literary Texts, in: Carol A. Chapelle (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, London 2013, doi:10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0249.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Michel, Georg/Günter Starke/Franz Graehn, Einführung in die Methodik der Stiluntersuchung. Ein Lehr- und Übungsbuch für Studierende, Berlin 1968.Google Scholar

  • Molinié, Georges, Le champ stylistique, L’Information Grammaticale 70:1 (1996), 21–24.Google Scholar

  • Müller, Ralph, Die Metapher. Kognition, Korpusstilistik und Kreativität, Paderborn 2012.Google Scholar

  • Muller, Charles, Étude de statistique lexicale: le vocabulaire du théâtre de Pierre Corneille, Paris 1967.Google Scholar

  • Nørgaard, Nina/Beatrix Busse/Rocío Montoro, Key Terms in Stylistics, London 2010.Google Scholar

  • Pieper, Ursula, Statistische Literaturanalyse, in: Jan-Dirk Müller et al. (ed.), Reallexikon der deutschen Literaturwissenschaft, Vol. 3, Berlin/New York 2003, 500–503.Google Scholar

  • Pincemin, Bénédicte, Modélisation textométrique des textes, in: Serge Heiden/Bénédicte Pincemin (ed.), Actes des 9es Journées internationales d’Analyse statistique des Données Textuelles, Tome 2, Lyon 2008, 949–960.Google Scholar

  • Pincemin, Bénédicte, Sémantique interprétative et textométrie, Texto! 17:3 (2012), http://www.revue-texto.net/index.php?id=3049.Google Scholar

  • Plett, Heinrich F., Einführung in die rhetorische Textanalyse [1971], Hamburg 92001.Google Scholar

  • Püschel, Ulrich, Stilistik der deutschsprachigen Länder vom Beginn des 20. Jahrhunderts bis zur Gegenwart, in: Ulla Fix/Andreas Gardt/Joachim Knape (ed.), Rhetoric and Stylistics. An International Handbook of Historical and Systematic Research, Vol. 1, Berlin/New York 2008, 165–179.Google Scholar

  • Ramsay, Stephen, Reading Machines: Toward an Algorithmic Criticism, Urbana 2011.Google Scholar

  • Riesel, Elise, Stilistik der deutschen Sprache, Moskau 1959.Google Scholar

  • Riffaterre, Michael, Essais de stylistique structurale, Paris 1971.Google Scholar

  • Riffaterre, Michael, Strukturale Stilistik, trans. Wilhelm Bolle, München 1973.Google Scholar

  • Sanders, Willy, Linguistische Stiltheorie. Probleme, Prinzipien und moderne Perspektiven des Sprachstils, Göttingen 1973.Google Scholar

  • Sandig, Barbara, Stilistik der deutschen Sprache, Berlin/New York 1986.Google Scholar

  • Sandig, Barbara, Textstilistik des Deutschen, Berlin/New York ²2006.Google Scholar

  • Schmidt, Siegfried J., »Bekämpfen Sie das häßliche Laster der Interpretation! Bekämpfen Sie das noch häßlichere Laster der richtigen Interpretation!«, in: Wolfgang Frier/Gerd Labroisse (Hg.), Grundfragen der Textwissenschaft . Linguistische und literaturwissenschaftliche Aspekte, Amsterdam 1979, 279–309.Google Scholar

  • Schöch, Christof, Corneille, Molière et les autres. Stilometrische Analysen zu Autorschaft und Gattungszugehörigkeit im französischen Theater der Klassik, in: Christof Schöch/Lars Schneider (ed.), Literaturwissenschaft im digitalen Medienwandel (Beihefte zu Philologie im Netz), 2014, 130–157, http://web.fu-berlin.de/phin/beiheft7/b7t08.pdf.Google Scholar

  • Schöch, Christof/Steffen Pielström, Für eine computergestützte literarische Gattungsstilistik, Jahrestagung der Digital Humanities im deutschsprachigen Raum, 2014, http://dig-hum.de/sites/dig-hum.de/files/Schoch-Pielstrom_2014_Gattungsstilistik.pdf.Google Scholar

  • Simpson, Paul, Stylistics. A Resource Book for Students, London 2004.Google Scholar

  • Sinclair, John M., Corpus, Concordance, Collocation: Describing English Language, Oxford 1991.Google Scholar

  • Sowinski, Bernhard, Stil, in: Gert Ueding/Gregor Kalivoda (ed.), Historisches Wörterbuch der Rhetorik, Vol. 8, Darmstadt 2007, 1393–1419.Google Scholar

  • Spillner, Bernd, Linguistik und Literaturwissenschaft. Stilforschung, Rhetorik, Textlinguistik, Stuttgart 1974.Google Scholar

  • Spitzer, Leo, Stilstudien. Erster Teil: Sprachstile. Zweiter Teil: Stilsprachen [1928], München ²1961.Google Scholar

  • Spitzer, Leo, 1988. Études de style, Paris 1988.Google Scholar

  • Staiger, Emil, Die Kunst der Interpretation. Studien zur deutschen Literaturgeschichte, Zürich 1955.Google Scholar

  • Stamatatos, Efstathios, A Survey of Modern Authorship Attribution Methods, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60:3 (2009), 538–556.Google Scholar

  • Steen, Gerard J./Aletta G. Dorst/J. Berenike Herrmann/Anna A. Kaal/T. Krennmayr, Metaphor in Usage, Cognitive Linguistics 21:4 (2010), 765–796.Google Scholar

  • Stutterheim, C.F.P., Stijlleer, Den Haag 1947.Google Scholar

  • Szondi, Peter, Über philologische Erkenntnis, in: P.C., Hölderlin-Studien, Frankfurt a. M. 1967, 9–30.Google Scholar

  • Van Bork, G.J./D. Delabatista/H. van Gorp/P.J. Verkruijsse/G.J. Vis, in: G.J. van Bork, D. Delabatista, H. van Gorp, P.J. Verkruijsse, and G.J. Vis (ed.), Algemeen letterkundig lexicon, Dbnl, 2012, http://www.dbnl.org/tekst/dela012alge01_01/dela012alge01_01_03175.php.Google Scholar

  • Van Dalen-Oskam, Karina, De stijl van R. Inaugural lecture, Amsterdam 2012, http://www.oratiereeks.nl/upload/pdf/PDF-1290Weboratie_Van_Dalen-Oskam.pdf.Google Scholar

  • Van Dalen-Oskam, Karina/Joris van Zundert, Delta for Middle Dutch: Author and Copyist Distinction in ›Walewein‹, Literary and Linguistic Computing 22:3 (2007), 345–362.Google Scholar

  • Van Driel, Joost, Prikkeling der zinnen. De stilistische diversiteit van de Middelnederlandse epische poëzie, Zutphen 2007.Google Scholar

  • Wales, Katie, A Dictionary of Stylistics, Harlow ²2001.Google Scholar

  • Winko, Simone, Textualitätsannahmen und die Analyse literarischer Texte, Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik 36 (2008), 427–443.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2015-03-10

Published in Print: 2015-03-01


Citation Information: Journal of Literary Theory, Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages 25–52, ISSN (Online) 1862-8990, ISSN (Print) 1862-5290, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jlt-2015-0003.

Export Citation

© 2012 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in