Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Journal on Baltic Security

2 Issues per year

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2382-9230
See all formats and pricing
More options …

“Pool it or lose it?” – a contrastive analysis of discourses concerning EU military integration and demilitarisation in the Baltic Sea

Saila Heinikoski
  • Corresponding author
  • Åland Islands Peace Institute / Department of Political Science, University of Turku Hamngatan, 4/PB85 AX-22101 Mariehamn, Åland, Finland
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2017-07-14 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jobs-2017-0002

Abstract

This article illustrates that justification for EU military integration is sought with imperatives related to the economy, security, EU integration, and demands of citizens of the Member States. However, EU Treaties in terms of the improvement of military capabilities are not considered as a justification, but the European Union appears to be more of a power-enhancing realist actor rather than a normative one. As a counterexample to the European discourses, I discuss the case of the demilitarisation of the Åland Islands, in which case treaties perfectly justify demilitarization. I conclude that the development of European military integration is justified by political imperatives, but the demilitarization of the Åland Islands is supported with reference to agreements, which illustrate the differences in justifying military force and its absence. It is concluded that while the European Union appears as a realist actor in terms of defence, Finland complies with the image of a normative power as far as the Åland Islands are concerned.

Keywords: European Union; Common Security and Defence Policy; European Defence Agency; Åland Islands

References

  • Ashton, C., 2013. Final Report by the High Representative/Head of the EDA on the Common Security and Defence Policy. European Defence Agency (EDA) Annual Conference, (October), pp.1–27.Google Scholar

  • Bátora, J., 2009. European Defence Agency: A Flashpoint of Institutional Logics. West European Politics, 32(6), pp.1075–1098.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Beck, U., 2008. Reframing Power in the Globalized World. Organization Studies, 29(5), pp.793–804.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Biscop, S., 2012. The UK and European defence: Leading or leaving? International Affairs, 88(6), pp.1297–1313.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Biscop, S., 2016a. The EU Global Strategy: Realpolitik with European Characteristics. Security Policy Brief, 75 (June).Google Scholar

  • Biscop, S., 2016b. All or nothing? The EU Global Strategy and defence policy after the Brexit. Contemporary Security Policy, 37(3), pp.431–445.Google Scholar

  • Council of the European Union, 2010. Council conclusions on Military Capability Development.Google Scholar

  • Council of the European Union, 2016a. Council conclusions on implementing the EU Global Strategy in the area of Security and Defence.Google Scholar

  • Council of the European Union, 2016b. Implementation Plan on Security and Defence, (November), pp.1–31.Google Scholar

  • Deutsch, K.W. et al., 1957. Political community and the North Atlantic area : international organization in the light of historical experience, Princeton (N.J.): Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

  • Diez, T., Von Lucke, F. & Wellmann, Z., 2016. The Securitisation of Climate: Change Actors, Processes and Consequences, Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Dijkstra, H., 2012. The influence of EU officials in European Security and Defence. European Security, 21(3), pp.311–327.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Duke, S., 2012. The EU, NATO and the Treaty of Lisbon: Still Divided Within a Common City. In: P. J. Cardwell, ed. EU External Relations Law and Policy in the Post-Lisbon Era, The Hague: Springer Science+Business Media BV, pp. 334–355.Google Scholar

  • European Commission, 2013. Towards a more competitive and efficient defence and security sector. COM(2013) 542 final.Google Scholar

  • European Commission, 2015a. In Defence of Europe. EPSC Strategic Notes, (4).Google Scholar

  • European Commission, 2015b. Roadmap: European Defence Action Plan.Google Scholar

  • European Commission, 2016. European Defence Action Plan. COM(2016) 950 final.Google Scholar

  • European Commission, 2017. White Paper on the Future of Europe.Google Scholar

  • European Defence Agency, 2012a. European Defence Matters 1.Google Scholar

  • European Defence Agency, 2012b. European Defence Matters 2.Google Scholar

  • European Defence Agency, 2014. European Defence Matters 6.Google Scholar

  • European Defence Agency, 2015a. European Defence Matters 7.Google Scholar

  • European Defence Agency, 2015b. European Defence Matters 8.Google Scholar

  • European Defence Agency, 2015c. European Defence Matters 9.Google Scholar

  • European Defence Agency, 2016. European Defence Matters 11.Google Scholar

  • European Parliament, 2016. Europeans in 2016: Perceptions and expectations, fight against terrorism and radicalisation. Special Eurobarometer of the European Parliament.Google Scholar

  • Finnish Parliament, 2016. Minutes of the plenary session on 20 Oct 2016.Google Scholar

  • Finnish Parliament Committee for Foreign Affairs, 2016. Committee Report on the Government’s Foreign and Security Policy Report 9/2016.Google Scholar

  • Fiott, D., 2015. The European Commission and the European Defence Agency: A Case of Rivalry? Journal of Common Market Studies, 53(3), pp.542–557.Google Scholar

  • France & Finland, 2016. Declaration on strengthening the EU’s Common Security and Defence Policy.Google Scholar

  • Friis, K. & Rechborn-Kjennerud, E., 2016. From cyber threats to cyber risks. In: K. Friis & J. Ringsmose, eds. Conflict in Cyber Space: Theoretical, Strategic and Legal Perspectives. Abingdon, Oxfordshire: Routledge, pp. 27–44.Google Scholar

  • Haas, E.B., 1961. International Integration: The European and the Universal Process. International Organization, 15(3), pp.366–392.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Haas, E.B., 1968. The uniting of Europe : political, social, and economic forces 1950-1957, Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Hannikainen, L., 1994. The Continued Validity of the Dernilitarised and Neutralised Status of the Åland Islands. Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, 54(3), pp.614–651.Google Scholar

  • Hannikainen, L. & Lundstedt, T., 2016. Kansainvälisen oikeuden rooli nyky-Venäjän ulkopolitiikassa. Finnish Ministry of Defence.Google Scholar

  • Howorth, J., 2003. Why ESDP is Necessary and Beneficial for the Alliance. In: J. Howorth & J.T.S. Keeler (eds) Defending Europe: The EU, NATO, and the Quest for European Autonomy. Gordonsville, Virginia: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 219–238.Google Scholar

  • Jokela, J., 2014. Multi-speed Europe ? Differentiated integration in the external relations of the EU. FIIA Report 38.Google Scholar

  • Koivula, T., 2016. The European Union and the Use of Military Force: Uncovering the Myths, Abingdon, Oxfordshire: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Manners, I., 2002. Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms? JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(2), pp.235–258.Google Scholar

  • Manners, I., 2006. Normative Power Europe Reconsidered: Beyond the Crossroads. Journal of European Public Policy, 13(2), pp.182–199.Google Scholar

  • Matlary, J.H., 2008. Much ado about little : the EU and human security. International Affairs, 84(1), pp.131–143.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mauro, F. & Thoma, K., 2016. The Future of EU Defence Research.Google Scholar

  • Mogherini, F., 2016a. Opening Speech by High Representative/Vice-President Federica Mogherini at the 2016 EDA Conference.Google Scholar

  • Mogherini, F., 2016b. Shared Vision, Common Action: A Stronger Europe. A Global Strategy for the European Union’s Foreign and Security Policy, Available at: https://eeas.europa.eu/top_stories/pdf/eugs_review_web.pdf.

  • Moravcsik, A., 1998. The Choice for Europe : Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht. Cornell Studies in Political Economy. Ithaca (NY): Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

  • Morozov, V., 2002. Human Rights and Foreign Policy Discourse in Today’s Russia: Romantic Realism and Securitisation of Identity. COPRI Working Papers (6/2002).Google Scholar

  • Müller, P., 2016. EU foreign policy: no major breakthrough despite multiple crises. Journal of European Integration, 38(3), pp.359–374.Google Scholar

  • Myntti, K., 2016. “Putin driver oss mot Nato”. Vasabladet 8 June 2016.Google Scholar

  • Niinistö, J., 2016a. Ahvenanmaan asia. Jussi Niinistö’s Blog.Google Scholar

  • Niinistö, J., 2016b. Gotlanti ja Ahvenanmaa. Jussi Niinistö’s Blog.Google Scholar

  • Norheim-Martinsen, P.M., 2013. The European Union and Military Force : Governance and Strategy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Peck, T, 2016. Britain will veto EU army, says Defence Secretary. The Independent 17 September 2016.Google Scholar

  • Poullie, Y., 2016. Åland’s Demilitarisation and Neutralisation at the End of the Cold War – Parliamentary Discussions in Åland and Finland 1988–1995. International Journal on Minority and Group Rights, 23(2), pp.179–210.Google Scholar

  • Prime Minister’s Office Finland, 2016. Finnish Foreign and Security Policy 2016 Government Report 6/2016.Google Scholar

  • Prime Minister’s Office Finland, 2017. Government’s Defence Report. Government Report 5/2017.Google Scholar

  • Rayroux, A., 2013. Speaking EU Defence at Home: Contentious Discourses and Constructive Ambiguity. Cooperation and Conflict, 49(3), pp.386–405.Google Scholar

  • Rettman, A., 2016a. Finland calls for “pragmatic” EU defence. EUobserver, 27 Sep 2016.Google Scholar

  • Rettman, A., 2016b. Germany: Trump victory to spur EU military union. EUobserver, pp.2–5.Google Scholar

  • Salonius-Pasternak, C., 2014. Tutkija Salonius-Pasternak: Suomi voisi olla sotilaallisen iskun ensimmäinen kohde. Helsingin Sanomat 29 Dec 2014.Google Scholar

  • Schroeder, U.C., 2011. The Organization of European Security Governance: Internal and External Security in Transition, Abingdon, Oxfordshire: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Tarkka, J., 2015. Ahvenanmaan asia. Etelä-Suomen Sanomat.Google Scholar

  • Tiilikainen, T., 2002. The Åland Islands, Finland and European security, Mariehamn: The Åland Islands Peace Institute.Google Scholar

  • Trybus, M., 2006. The new European Defence Agency: a contribution to the common European defence policy and a challenge to the community acquis? Common Market Law Review, 43(3), pp.667–703.Google Scholar

  • Weiss, T., 2011. The blurring border between the police and the military: A debate without foundations. Cooperation and Conflict, 46(3), pp.396–405.Google Scholar

  • Whitman, R.G., 2016. The UK and EU Foreign, Security and Defence Policy after Brexit: Integrated, Associated or Detached? National Institute Economic Review, (238), pp.43–50.Google Scholar

  • Wodak, R., 2001. The Discourse-Historical Approach. In: R. Wodak & M. Meyer, eds. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: SAGE Publications, pp.63–94.Google Scholar

  • Wodak, R., 2009. The discourse of politics in action: politics as usual, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

  • Wodak, R. & Boukala, S., 2016. Talking about Solidarity and Security in the Age of Crisis: The Revival of Nationalism and Protectionism in the European Union - A Discourse-Historical Approach. In: C. Carta, J.-F. Morin, & M. Telo, eds. EU Foreign Policy through the Lens of Discourse Analysis: Making Sense of Diversity. Farnham, Surrey, GBR: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Ykkösaamu, 2016. Jussi Niinistö. Ykkösaamu, 15 Oct.Google Scholar

  • Österdahl, I., 2009. The Neutral Ally: The European Security and Defence Policy and the Swedish Constitution. Nordic Journal of International Law, 78, pp.95–132.Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2016-12-20

Accepted: 2017-03-14

Published Online: 2017-07-14

Published in Print: 2017-06-01


Citation Information: Journal on Baltic Security, ISSN (Online) 2382-9230, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jobs-2017-0002.

Export Citation

© 2017 Saila Heinikoski, published by De Gruyter Open. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in