Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Journal of Geodetic Science

Editor-in-Chief: Sjöberg, Lars

1 Issue per year

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2081-9943
See all formats and pricing
More options …

A theoretical study on the bottlenecks of GPS phase ambiguity resolution in a CORS RTK Network

D. Odijk
  • GNSS Research Centre, Department of Spatial Sciences, Curtin University of Technology, Australia
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ P. Teunissen
  • GNSS Research Centre, Department of Spatial Sciences, Curtin University of Technology, Australia
  • Delft Institute of Earth Observation and Space Systems (DEOS), Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2011-04-04 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10156-010-0017-0

A theoretical study on the bottlenecks of GPS phase ambiguity resolution in a CORS RTK Network

Crucial to the performance of GPS Network RTK positioning is that a user receives and applies correction information from a CORS Network. These corrections are necessary for the user to account for the atmospheric (ionospheric and tropospheric) delays and possibly orbit errors between his approximate location and the locations of the CORS Network stations. In order to provide the most precise corrections to users, the CORS Network processing should be based on integer resolution of the carrier phase ambiguities between the network's CORS stations. One of the main challenges is to reduce the convergence time, thus being able to quickly resolve the integer carrier phase ambiguities between the network's reference stations. Ideally, the network ambiguity resolution should be conducted within one single observation epoch, thus truly in real time.

Unfortunately, single-epoch CORS Network RTK ambiguity resolution is currently not feasible and in the present contribution we study the bottlenecks preventing this. For current dual-frequency GPS the primary cause of these CORS Network integer ambiguity initialization times is the lack of a sufficiently large number of visible satellites. Although an increase in satellite number shortens the ambiguity convergence times, instantaneous CORS Network RTK ambiguity resolution is not feasible even with 14 satellites. It is further shown that increasing the number of stations within the CORS Network itself does not help ambiguity resolution much, since every new station introduces new ambiguities. The problem with CORS Network RTK ambiguity resolution is the presence of the atmospheric (mainly ionospheric) delays themselves and the fact that there are no external corrections that are sufficiently precise. We also show that external satellite clock corrections hardly contribute to CORS Network RTK ambiguity resolution, despite their quality, since the network satellite clock parameters and the ambiguities are almost completely uncorrelated. One positive is that the foreseen modernized GPS will have a very beneficial effect on CORS ambiguity resolution, because of an additional frequency with improved code precision.

Keywords: GPS; CORS Network RTK; Ambiguity Resolution; ADOP

  • Bree R.J.P. van, Tiberius C.C.J.M. and Hauschild A. (2009): Real time satellite clocks in single frequency precise point positioning. Proc. of ION GNSS 2009, Savannah, GA, 22-25 September 2009, pp. 2400-2414.Google Scholar

  • CODE (2010): Center for Orbit Determination in Europe, Astronomical Institute, University of Berne. http://www.aiub.unibe.ch

  • Euler H.J., Keenan R., Zebhauser B. and Wuebbena G. (2001): Study of a simplified approach of utilizing information from permanent reference station arrays, Proc. ION GPS-2001, Salt Lake City, UT, 1-14 September 2001.Google Scholar

  • Hofmann-Wellenhof B., Lichtenegger H. and Collins J. (2001): Global Positioning System: Theory and Practice. 5th edition, Springer Verlag.Google Scholar

  • Odijk D. (1999): Stochastic modelling of the ionosphere for fast GPS ambiguity resolution. Geodesy beyond 2000 - The challenges of the first decade, IAG General Assembly, Vol. 121, Birmingham, UK, 19-30 July 1999, pp. 387-392.Google Scholar

  • Odijk D. and Teunissen P.J.G. (2008): ADOP in closed form for a hierarchy of multi-frequency single-baseline GNSS models. Journal of Geodesy, 82(8), pp. 473-492.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Rao C.R. (1973): Linear statistical inference and its applications. 2nd edition, Wiley.Google Scholar

  • Rocken C., Ware R., Van Hove T., Solheim F., Alber C. and Johnson J. (1993): Sensing atmospheric water vapor with the Global Positioning System. Geophysical Research Letters, 20(23), pp. 2631-2634.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sardon E., Rius A. and Zarraoa A. (1994): Estimation of transmitter and receiver differential biases and the ionospheric total electron content from Global Positioning System observations. Radio Science, 29(3), pp. 577-586.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schaer S. (1999): Mapping and predicting the ionosphere using the Global Positioning System. PhDthesis, University of Bern, 206 p.Google Scholar

  • Schaffrin B. and Bock Y. (1988): A unified scheme for processing GPS dual-band observations. Bull. Geod. 62(2), pp. 142-160.Google Scholar

  • Teunissen P.J.G. (1993): Least-squares estimation of the integer GPS ambiguities. Invited lecture, Sect. IV Theory and Methodology, IAG General Meeting, Beijing, China.Google Scholar

  • Teunissen P.J.G. (1997): A canonical theory for short GPS baselines. Part IV: Precision versus reliability. Journal of Geodesy, 71(9), pp. 513-525.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Teunissen P.J.G. and Odijk D. (1997): Ambiguity Dilution Of Precision: Definition, properties and application. Proc. of ION GPS-1997, Kansas City, MO, 16-19 September 1997, pp. 891-899.Google Scholar

  • Teunissen P.J.G. (2000): The success rate and precision of GPS ambiguities. Journal of Geodesy, 74(3-4), pp. 321-326.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Verhagen S. (2005): On the reliability of integer ambiguity resolution. Navigation, 5(2), pp. 99-110.Google Scholar

  • Vollath U., Deking A., Landau H., Pagels C. and Wagner B. (2000): Multi-base RTK positioning using Virtual Reference Stations, Proc. ION GPS-2000, Salt Lake City, UT, 19-22 September 2000.Google Scholar

About the article


Published Online: 2011-04-04

Published in Print: 2011-01-01


Citation Information: Journal of Geodetic Science, ISSN (Online) 2081-9943, ISSN (Print) 2081-9919, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10156-010-0017-0.

Export Citation

This content is open access.

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in