Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Journal of Geodetic Science

Editor-in-Chief: Eshagh, Mehdi

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2081-9943
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Positioning and Position Error of Petroleum Wells

Tony Gjerde / Jo Eidsvik / Erik Nyrnes / Bjørn Bruun
Published Online: 2011-04-04 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10156-010-0019-y

Positioning and Position Error of Petroleum Wells

We present a new model for the estimation of positional uncertainty of petroleum wells. The model uses a heavy tailed normal inverse Gaussian distribution for the errors in Earth's magnetic field reference values. These references are required for calculating the position of a well using magnetic directional surveying. The results show that the normal inverse Gaussian distribution gives a more realistic fit to the Earth's magnetic field reference values than the normal distribution, which is the current state of art. Errors in surveying sensors and reference errors are propagated along the well path to obtain the positioning uncertainty. The positional uncertainty is important for the probability of collisions between wells and for drilling accurate relief wells when an eventual collision has resulted in a blow-out situation. We compare results of the normal model used in the petroleum industry with our proposed model. The comparison is made for anti-collision calculations between drilled wells and a planned well. The results indicate a higher risk of collisions for certain well geometries when using the normal distribution, while a collision is avoided in the normal inverse Gaussian situation. We find clear differences between an approximate normal test and a Monte Carlo test.

Keywords: anti-collision; directional drilling; error propagation; heavy tails; magnetic surveying; normal inverse Gaussian distribution

  • Azzalini A., Capitanio A. (2003): Distributions generated by perturbation of symmetry with emphasis on a multivariate skew t-distribution. J. of the Royal Stat. Soc., Series B, 2003, 65, 367-389.Google Scholar

  • Bang J., Torkildsen T., Bruun B.T., Håvarstein S.T. (2009): Targeting challenges in Northern Areas due to the degradation of wellbore position accuracy. SPE/IADC Drilling conference and exhibition, SPE 119661-MS.Google Scholar

  • Barndorff-Nielsen O.E. (1997): Normal inverse Gaussian distributions and stochastic volatility modelling. Scand. J. Stat., 24, 1-13.Google Scholar

  • Ekseth R. (1998): Uncertainties in connection with the determination of wellbore positions. PhD thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technoglogy, No. 1998:28.Google Scholar

  • Genton M.G. (2004): Skew-elliptical distributions and their applications: A journey beyond normality, Ed. Vol., Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar

  • Gjerde T. (2008): A heavy tailed statistical model applied in anti-collision calculations for petroleum wells. MSc thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technoglogy.Google Scholar

  • Karlis D. (2000): An EM type algorithm for maximum likelihood estimation of the Normal Inverse Gaussian distribution. Stat and Prob letters, 57, 43-52.Google Scholar

  • Merrill R.T. (1983): The Earth's magnetic field, Academic Press.Google Scholar

  • Noureldin A., Irvine-Halliday D., Mintchev M.P. (2004): Measurement-while-drilling surveying of highly inclined and horizontal well sections utilizing single axis gyro sensing system. Measurement Sci and Tech, 15, 2426-2434.Google Scholar

  • Nyrnes E. (2006): Error analyses and quality control of wellbore directional surveys. PhD thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technoglogy, No. 2006:135.Google Scholar

  • Rector J.W., Marion B.P. (1991): The use of drill-bit energy as a downhole seismic source. Geophysics, 56, 628-634.Google Scholar

  • Skarsbø E., Ernesti K.D. (2006): Geosteering precisely places multilaterals in NorwayâÂŻs Troll field. Oil & gas journal, 104, 49-62.Google Scholar

  • Thorogood J.L., Sawaryn S.J. (2005): A compendium of directional calculations based on the minimum curvature method. SPE Drilling and completion, 20, 24-36.Google Scholar

  • Tukey J.W. (1960): A survey of sampling from contaminated distributions. Contributions to Probability and Statistics, I. Olkin (ed.), Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Williamson H.S. (1998): Towards risk-based well separation rules. SPE Drilling and completion, 13, 47-51.Google Scholar

  • Williamson H.S. (2000): Accuracy prediction for directional measurement while drilling. SPE Drilling and completion, 15, 221-233.Google Scholar

  • Wolff CJM, de Wardt JP (1981): Borehole position uncertainty - analysis of measuring methods and derivation of systematic error model. Journal of Petr Tech, 33:2339-2350.Google Scholar

  • Øigård T.A., Hanssen A., Hansen R.E., Godtliebsen F. (2005): EM-estimation and modeling of heavytailed processes with the multivariate normal inverse Gaussian distribution. Signal Proc, 85, 1655-1673.Google Scholar

About the article


Published Online: 2011-04-04

Published in Print: 2011-01-01


Citation Information: Journal of Geodetic Science, Volume 1, Issue 2, Pages 158–169, ISSN (Online) 2081-9943, ISSN (Print) 2081-9919, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10156-010-0019-y.

Export Citation

This content is open access.

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in