Huang J, Kotsakis C, 2009, EGM08 evaluation. Newton's Bull, Spec Issue No. 4Google Scholar
Jekeli C, 1981, The downward continuation to the Earth's surface of truncated spherical and ellipsoidal harmonic series of the gravity and height anomalies. Rep No. 323, Dept Geod Sci and Surv, OSU, Columbus, OHGoogle Scholar
Lambert W, Darling F, 1936, Tables of determining the form of the geoid and its indirect effect on gravity. U. S. Dept Commerce, No. 199, Washington D. C.Google Scholar
Moritz H, 1980, Advanced physical geodesy. H Wichmann Verlag, KarlsruheGoogle Scholar
Pavlis N K, Factor J K, Holmes SA, 2006, Terrain-Related Gravimetric Quantities Computed for the Next EGM. Presented at the 1st International symposium of the International gravity service 2006, August 28-September 1, Istanbul, Turkey.Google Scholar
Pavlis NK, Holmes SA, Kenyon SC, Factor JK, 2008, An Earth Gravitational model to degree 2160: EGM08. Presented at the 2008 General Assembly of the EGU, Vienna, Austria, April 13-18, 2008Google Scholar
Pavlis N K, Holmes S, Kenyon S, Schmidt D, Trimmer R, 2005, A preliminary gravitational model to degree 2160. In: Jekeli CH, Bastis L, Fernandes J (Eds.) 2005 GGSM2004, IAG Symposia 129: 18-23.Google Scholar
Pavlis NK, Saleh J, 2005, Error propagation with geographic specificity for very high degree geopotential models. In: Jekeli CH, Bastis L, Fernandes J (Eds.), 2005, GGSM2004, IAG Symposia 126: 149-154.Google Scholar
Sjöberg L E, 1977, On the Errors of Spherical Harmonic Developments of Gravity at the Surface of the Earth. Dept Geod Sci, Report No 257, OSU, Columbus, OH, 74 ppGoogle Scholar
Sjöberg L E, 1984, Least squares modification of Stokes' and Vening Meinesz' formulas by accounting for truncation and potential coefficient errors. Manusc Geod 9: 209-229Google Scholar
Sjöberg L E, 2007 The topographic bias by analytical continuation in physical geodesy. J Geod 81: 345-350Google Scholar
Sjöberg L E, 2009a, On the topographic bias in geoid determination by the external gravity field, J Geod 83:967-972.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
Sjöberg L E, 2009b, Solving the topographic bias as an Initial Value Problem. Art. Sat. 44 (3):77-84Google Scholar
Tscherning CC, Rapp RH, 1973, Closed covariance expressions for gravity anomalies, geoid undulations and deflections of the vertical implied by anomaly degree variance models. Rep No 208, Dept of Geod Sci and Surv, The OSU, Columbus, OHGoogle Scholar
Xu P, Rummel R, 1991, A quality investigation of global vertical connection. Publ Geod Report No. 34, DUT, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
Comments (0)