Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Journal of Geodetic Science

Editor-in-Chief: Sjöberg, Lars

1 Issue per year

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2081-9943
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Performance of High-Rate Kinematic GPS During Strong Shaking: Observations from Shake Table Tests and the 2010 Chile Earthquake

G. Wang / F. Blume / C. Meertens / P. Ibanez / M. Schulze
Published Online: 2011-12-15 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10156-011-0020-0

Performance of High-Rate Kinematic GPS During Strong Shaking: Observations from Shake Table Tests and the 2010 Chile Earthquake

Over the last decade, the 1-sample-per-second kinematic Global Positioning System (GPS) has been used as a displacement sensor in earthquake observations and for structural health monitoring. Many researchers in both seismology and engineering have expressed the desire for higher-sample-rate (10-sample-per-second or higher) GPS data to acquire high-frequency displacement information. We performed several shake table tests of GPS observation on 29 April, 2009 for the purpose of evaluating the performance of high-rate kinematic GPS. We found that the accuracy of high-rate kinematic GPS depended on antenna movement, but was independent of receiver sampling rate. The errors in kinematic GPS measurements during the periods of strong shaking were systematically larger than those during the static periods. Furthermore, we found that these large errors were coincident with large accelerations and jerks in the motions experienced by the GPS receivers and antennas. Observations from the 2010 earthquake in Maule, Chile (M 8.8) indicated that strong ground motions can degrade the accuracy of high-rate kinematic GPS measurements. Significant jerks and/or accelerations can cause GPS units to temporarily lose tracking on satellite signals and lead to gaps in GPS-recorded seismograms.

Keywords: high-rate GPS; accuracy; strong ground motion; shake table

  • Avallone A., Marzario M., Cirella A., Piatanesi A., Rovelli A., Di Alessandro C., D'Anastasio E., D'Agostino N., Giuliani R., and Mattone M., 2011, 10 Hz GPS seismology for moderate magnitude earthquakes: the case of the Mw 6.3 L'Aquila (Central Italy) event, J. Geophys. Res., 116, B02305, doi:10.1029/2010JB007834CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bilich A., Larson K. M., 2007, Mapping the GPS multipath environment using the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), Radio Science, 42, RS6003, doi:10.1029/2007RS003652Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bilich A., Cassidy J., Larson K. M., 2008, GPS seismology: application to the 2002 MW=7.9 Denali Fault Earthquake, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 98, 593-606, doi:10.1785/0120070096CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bock Y., Prawirodirdjo L., Melbourne T. I., 2004, Detection of arbitrarily large dynamic ground motions with a dense high-rate GPS network, J. Geophys. Res., 31, L06604, doi:10.1029/2003GL019150CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Boore D. M., 2001, Effect of baseline corrections on displacements and response spectra for several recordings of the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, earthquake, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 91, 1,199-1,211Google Scholar

  • Caporali A., 2003, Average strain rate in the Italian crust inferred from a permanent GPS network - I. Statistical analysis of the time-series of permanent GPS stations, Geophys. J. Int., 155(1), 241-253Google Scholar

  • Celebi M., 2000, GPS in dynamic monitoring of long-period structures, Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng., 20, 477-483Google Scholar

  • Celebi M., Sanli A., 2002, GPS in Pioneering Dynamic Monitoring of Long-Period Structures, Earthquake Spectra, 18, 47-61Google Scholar

  • Chen G., 1998, GPS Kinematic Positioning for the Airborne Laser Altimetry at Long Valley, California, Ph. D. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyGoogle Scholar

  • Choi K., Bilich A., Larson K. M., Axelrad P., 2004, Modified sidereal filtering: Implications for high-rate GPS positioning, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L22608, doi:10.1029/2004GL021621CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Clinton J. F., 2004, Modern digital seismology - Instrumentation, and small amplitude studies in the engineering world, Ph. D. Thesis, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar

  • Davis J. P., Smalley Jr. R., 2009, Love wave dispersion in central North America determined using absolute displacement seismograms from high-rate GPS, J. Geophys. Res., 114, B11303, doi:10.1029/2009JB006288Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dykman M. I., Luchinsky D. G., Mannella R., McClintock P. V. E., Soskin S. M., Stein N. D., 1996, Resonant subharmonic absorption and second-harmonic generation by a fluctuating nonlinear oscillator, Phys. Rev. E, 54, 2,366-2,377Google Scholar

  • Elosegui P., Davis J. L., Jaldehag R. T. K., Johansson J. M., Niell A. E., Shapiro I. I., 1995, Geodesy Using the Global Positioning System: The Effects of Signal Scattering on Estimates of Site Position, J. Geophys. Res., 100, 9,921-9,934Google Scholar

  • Elosegui P., Davis J. L., Oberlander D., Baena R., Ekstrom G., 2006, Accuracy of high-rate GPS for seismology, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L11308, doi:10.1029/2006GL026065CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Emore G. L., Haase J. S., Choi K., Larson K. M., Yamagiwa A., 2007, Recovering absolute seismic displacements through combined use of 1 Hz GPS and strong motion accelerometers, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 97(2), 357-378, doi:10.1785/0120060153Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Estey L. H., Meertens C. M., 1999, TEQC: The multipurpose toolkit for GPS/GLONASS data, GPS Solutions, 3(1), 42-49CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ge L., 1999, GPS seismometer and its signal extraction, 12th Int. Tech. Meeting, Sat. Div. of Navigation, Nashville, Tennessee, 41-51Google Scholar

  • Ge L., Han S., Rizos C., 2000a, Multipath mitigation using an adaptive filter, GPS Solutions, 4(2), 19-30CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ge L., Han S., Rizos C., Ishikawa T., Hoshiba M., Yoshida Y., Izawa M., Hashimon N., Himori S., 2000b, GPS seismometers with up to 20 Hz sampling rate, Earth Planets Space, 521, 881-884Google Scholar

  • Genrich J. F., Bock Y., 2006, Instantaneous geodetic positioning with 10-50 Hz GPS measurements: Noise characteristics and implications for monitoring networks, J. Geophys. Res., 111, B03403, doi:10.1029/2005JB003617CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Graizer V., 2005, Effect of tilt on strong motion data processing, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 25, 197-204Google Scholar

  • Graizer V., 2006, Tilts in strong ground motion, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 96, 2090-2106, doi:10.1785/0120060065CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Graizer V., 2009, The response to complex ground motions of seismometers with Galperin sensor configuration, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 99, 1,366-1,377Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Graizer V., 2010, Strong motion recordings and residual displacements: what are we actually recording in strong motion seismology? Seismological Research Letters, 81, 635-639, doi:10.1785/gssrl.81.4.635Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Herring T. A., King R. W., McCluskey S. M., 2009, Introduction to GAMIT/GLOBK, Release 10.35, Mass. Instit. of Tech., CambridgeGoogle Scholar

  • Hofmann-Wellenhof B., Lichtenegger H., Collins J., 2001, GPS Theory and Practice, 5th Edition, Springer Wien New York, p 205Google Scholar

  • Irwan M., Kimata F., Hirahara K., Sagiya T., Yamagiwa A., 2004, Measuring ground deformations with 1-second sampled GPS data: the 2003 Tokachi-oki earthquake (preliminary report), Earth Planets Space, 56, 389-393Google Scholar

  • Ji C., Larson K. M., Tan Y., Hudnut K. W., Choi K., 2004, Slip history of the 2003 San Simeon Earthquake constrained by combining 1-second sampled GPS, strong motion, and teleseismic data, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L17608, doi: 10.1029/2004GL020448CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kaplan E. D., Hegarty C. J., 2006, Understanding GPS-Principles and Applications, second edition, Artech House, ISBN-10: 1-58053-894-0, 279-285Google Scholar

  • Larson K. M., 2009, GPS seismology, Journal of Geod., 83, 227-233Google Scholar

  • Larson K. M., Bilich A., Axelrad P., 2007, Improving the precision of high-rate GPS, J. Geophys. Res., 112, B05422, doi:10.1029/2006/JB004367CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Larson K. M., Bodin P., Gomberg J., 2003, Using 1-Hz GPS data to measure deformations caused by the Denali Fault Earthquake, Science, 300(5624), 1,421-1,424Google Scholar

  • Li X., Ge L., Ambikairajah E., Rizos C., Tamura Y., Yoshida A., 2006, Full-scale structural monitoring using an integrated GPS and accelerometer system, GPS Solution, 10, 233-247, doi:10.1007/s10291-006-0023-yCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mao A., Harrison C. G., Dixon T. H., 1999, Noise in GPS coordinate time series, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 2,797-2,816Google Scholar

  • Miyazaki S., Larson K. M., Choi K., Hikima K., 2004, Modeling the rupture process of the 2003 September 25 Tokachi-Oki (Hokkaido) earthquake using 1-second sampled GPSdata, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L21603, doi:10.1029/2004GL021457CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nikolaidis R. M., Bock Y., De Jonge P. J., Shearer P., Agnew D. C., Van Domselaar M., 2001, Seismic wave observations with the Global Positioning System, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 21,897-21,916Google Scholar

  • Ogaja C., Satirapod C., 2007, Analysis of high-frequency multipath in 1-Hz GPS kinematic solutions, GPS Solutions, 11, 269-280, doi:10.1007/s10291-007-0058-8CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Ogaja C., Li X. J., Rizos C., 2007, Advances in structural monitoring with Global Positioning System technology: 1997-2006, Journal of Applied Geodesy, 1, 171-179, 10.1515/JAG.2007Google Scholar

  • Reik H. G., Schirmer R., Hinkelmann H., 1969, Subharmonic noise generation by nonlinear parametric amplification in piezoelectric semiconductors, Solid State Communications, 18(7), 1309-1311, doi:10.1016/0038-1098(69)90359-7CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Smalley R., 2009, High-rate GPS: How high do we need to go? Seis. Res. Lett., 80(6), 1054-1061, doi:10.1785/gssrl.80.6.1054CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tong M., Wang G.-Q., Lee G. C., 2005, Time derivative of earthquake acceleration, Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 4(1), 1-16CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wang G.-Q, Boore D. M., Igel H., Zhou X. Y., 2003, Some observations on collocated and closely-spaced strong ground motion records of the 1999, Chi-Chi, Taiwan Earthquake, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 93, 674-693Google Scholar

  • Wang G-Q., Boore D. M., Tang G., Zhou X. Y., 2007, Some observations on collocated and closely spaced 1-second sampled GPS and ground-motion accelerograph data from the 2003 San Simeon (M 6.5), California, earthquake, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 97, 76-90Google Scholar

  • Wang G.-Q, Zhou X. Y., Zhang P. Z., Igel H., 2002, Characteristics of amplitude and duration for near fault strong ground motion from the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, Earthquake, Soil Dyn. Earthquake. Eng., 22, 73-96Google Scholar

  • Williams S. D. P., Bock Y., Fang P., Jamason P., Nikolaidis R. M., Prawirodirdjo L., Miller M., Johnson D. J., 2004, Error analysis of continuous GPS position time series, J. Geophys. Res., 109, B03412, doi:10.1029/2003JB00274CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zhang J., Bock Y., Johnson H., Fang P., Williams S., Genrich J., Wdowinski S., Behr J., 1997, Southern California permanent GPS geodetic array: error analysis of daily position estimates and site velocities, J. Geophys. Res., 102(B8), 18,035-18,055Google Scholar

About the article


Published Online: 2011-12-15

Published in Print: 2012-01-01


Citation Information: Journal of Geodetic Science, ISSN (Online) 2081-9943, ISSN (Print) 2081-9919, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10156-011-0020-0.

Export Citation

This content is open access.

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[2]
Xiaoji Niu, Bing Li, Nesreen I. Ziedan, Wenfei Guo, and Jingnan Liu
GPS Solutions, 2017, Volume 21, Number 1, Page 123
[3]
Christian Bischof and Steffen Schön
Advances in Space Research, 2017, Volume 59, Number 11, Page 2779

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in