Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Journal of Geodetic Science

Editor-in-Chief: Eshagh, Mehdi

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2081-9943
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Fully populated VCM or the hidden parameter

G. Kermarrec / S. Schön
Published Online: 2017-12-07 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jogs-2017-0016

Abstract

Least-squares estimates are trustworthy with minimal variance if the correct stochastic model is used. Due to computational burden, diagonal models that neglect correlations are preferred to describe the elevation dependency of the variance of GPS observations. In this contribution, an improved stochastic model based on a parametric function to take correlations between GPS phase observations into account is presented. Built on an adapted and flexible Mátern function accounting for spatiotemporal variabilities, its parameters can be fixed thanks to Maximum Likelihood Estimation or chosen apriori to model turbulent tropospheric refractivity fluctuations. In this contribution, we will show in which cases and under which conditions corresponding fully populated variance covariance matrices (VCM) replace the estimation of a tropospheric parameter. For this equivalence “augmented functional versus augmented stochastic model” to hold, the VCM should be made sufficiently largewhich corresponds to computing small batches of observations. A case study with observations from a medium baseline of 80 km divided into batches of 600 s shows improvement of up to 100 mm for the 3Drms when fully populated VCM are used compared with an elevation dependent diagonal model. It confirms the strong potential of such matrices to improve the least-squares solution, particularly when ambiguities are let float.

Keywords: correlations; equivalence stochastic functional model; GNSS phase measurement; hidden tropospheric parameter; least-squares; Mátern covariance function; stochastic model

References

  • Abramowitz M, Segun IA (1972) Handbook ofmathematical functions. Dover, New York edition Amiri-Simkooei A.R. and Tiberius C., 2007, Assessing receiver noise using GPS short baseline time series. GPS Solut., 11, 1, 21-35Google Scholar

  • Amiri-Simkooei A.R., Jazaeri S., Zangeneh-Nejad F. and Asgari J., 2016, Role of stochastic model on GPS integer ambiguity resolution success rate, GPS Solut. 20, 1, 51-61Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Bischoff W., Heck B., Howind J. and Teusch A., 2005, A procedure for testing the assumption of homoscedasticity in least squares residuals: a case study of GPS carrier-phase observations. J Geod., 78, 7-8, 379-404.Google Scholar

  • Blewitt G., 1998, GPS Data Processing Methodology: From Theory to Applications. In Teunissen PJG and Kleusberg A (Eds.) GPS for Geodesy (pp231-270). 2nd ed. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar

  • Bona P., 2000, Precision, cross correlation, and time correlation of GPS phase and code observations. GPS Solut., 4, 2, 3-13CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bruyninx C., Habrich H., Söhne W., Kenyeres A., Stangl G. and Völksen C., 2012, Enhancement of the EUREF Permanent Network Services and Products. Geodesy for Planet Earth, IAG Symposia Series, 136:27-35Google Scholar

  • Erickson C., 1992, Investigation of CA code and carrier measurements and techniques for rapid static GPS surveys. Report of the Department of Geomatics Engineering of the University of Calgary, vol 20044Google Scholar

  • El-Rabbany A., 1994, The e_ect of physical correlations on the ambiguity resolution and accuracy estimation in GPS differential positioning. PhD thesis, Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering, University of New Brunswick, CanadaGoogle Scholar

  • Euler H.J. and Schaffrin B., 1991, On a Measure for the Discernability between Different Ambiguity Solutions in the Static Kinematic GPS mode. IAG Symposia No 107, Kinematic Systems in Geodesy. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York 285-295Google Scholar

  • Gelfand AE, Diggle P, Fuentes M, Guttorp P (2010) Handbook of Spatial Statistics. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRLWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Hofmann-Wellenhof B., Lichtenegger H. and Collins J., 2001, GPS Theory and Practice, Fifth, revised edition. Springer Wien New YorkGoogle Scholar

  • Howind J., Kutterer H. and Heck B., 1999, Impact of temporal correlations on GPS-derived relative point positions, J Geod., 73, 5, 246-258Google Scholar

  • Kermarrec G. and Schön S., 2014, On the Mátern covariance family: a proposal for modeling temporal correlations based on turbulence theory, J Geod., 88, 11, 1061-1079Google Scholar

  • Kermarrec G and Schön S., 2016, Taking correlations into account with a diagonal covariance matrix, J Geod., 90, 9, 793-805Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Kermarrec G. and Schön S., 2017, Apriori fully populated covariance matrices in least-squares adjustment - case study: GPS relative positioning. J Geod., 91, 5, 465-484Google Scholar

  • Kermarrec G., Schön S. and Kreinovich V., 2017, Possible explanation of empirical values of the Màtern smoothness parameter for the temporal covariance of GPS measurements. Appl. Math. Sci., 11, 35, 1733-1737.Google Scholar

  • Koch K.R., 1999, Parameter Estimation and Hypothesis Testing in Linear Models, Springer Berlin.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kutterer H., 1999, On the sensitivity of the results of Least-Squares adjustments concerning the stochastic model, J Geod., 73, 7, 350-361.Google Scholar

  • Li B., Lou L. and Shen Y., 2016, GNSS Elevation-Dependent Stochastic Modelling and Its Impacts on the Statistic Testing. J Surv Eng., 142, 2, 04015012Google Scholar

  • Li B., Zhang L. and Verhagen S., 2017, Impacts of BeiDou stochastic model on reliability: overall test, w-test and minimal detectable bias, GPS Solut. 21,3, 1095-1112Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Luati A. and Proietti T., 2011, On the equivalence of the weighted least squares and the generalised least squares estimators, with applications to kernel smoothing, Ann. Inst. Stat.Math., 63, 4, 673-686Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Luo X., Mayer M. and Heck B., 2012, Analysing Time Series of GNSS Residuals by Means of ARIMA Processes. International Association of Geodesy Symposia, Vol. 137, pp 129-134Google Scholar

  • Luo X., Mayer M. and Heck B., 2012, Analysing Time Series of GNSS Residuals by Means of ARIMA Processes. International Association of Geodesy Symposia, Vol. 137, pp 129-134Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2017-06-28

Accepted: 2017-11-02

Published Online: 2017-12-07

Published in Print: 2017-11-27


Citation Information: Journal of Geodetic Science, Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages 151–161, ISSN (Online) 2081-9943, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jogs-2017-0016.

Export Citation

© by G. Kermarrec. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. BY-NC-ND 4.0

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Zhetao Zhang, Bofeng Li, and Yunzhong Shen
Journal of Surveying Engineering, 2018, Volume 144, Number 4, Page 04018005

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in