Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Journal of Official Statistics

The Journal of Statistics Sweden

4 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.411
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.776

CiteScore 2016: 0.63

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.710
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.975

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2001-7367
See all formats and pricing
More options …

The 2012 Morris Hansen Lecture: Thank You Morris, et al., For Westat, et al.

Professor Kenneth Prewitt
Published Online: 2013-10-03 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jos-2013-0018

Abstract

This article, delivered as the 22nd Memorial Morris Hansen lecture, argues that the contract houses, typified by Westat, are uniquely situated in the cluster of institutions, practices, and principles that collectively constitute a bridge between scientific evidence on the one hand and public policy on the other. This cluster is defined in The Use of Science as Evidence in Public Policy as a policy enterprise that generates a form of social knowledge on which modern economies, policies, and societies depend (National Research Council 2012).

The policy enterprise in the U. S. largely took shape in the first half of the twentieth century, when sample surveys and inferential statistics matured into an information system that provided reliable and timely social knowledge relevant to the nation’s policy choices. In ways described shortly, Westat and other social science organizations that respond to “request for proposals” (RFP) from the government for social data and social analysis came to occupy a unique niche.

The larger question addressed is whether the policy enterprise as we know it is prepared for the tsunami beginning to encroach on its territory. Is it going to be swamped by a data tsunami that takes information from very different sources than the familiar census/survey methods?

Keywords: Policy enterprise; RFP; scientific integrity; scientific productivity; boundary organizations; big data

  • Big Data Gap. (2012). Based on a survey of 151 Federal government CIOs and IT Managers in March, 2012. Available at: http://www.meritalk.com/bigdatagap (accessed October 15, 2012).Google Scholar

  • Bryant, E.C. (1997). Westat: Still Counting. Maryland: Rockville.Google Scholar

  • Bush, V. (1945). Science The Endless Frontier. A Report to the President by Vannevar Bush, Director of the Office of Scientific Research and Development. Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office.Google Scholar

  • Coleman, J.S. (1966). Equality ofEducational Opportunity.WashingtonDC:USDepartment of Health, Education and Welfare, Office of Education.Google Scholar

  • Frantilla, A. (1998). Social Science in the Public Interest: A Fiftieth Year History of the Institute for Social Research. Ann Arbor, Michigan: The University of Michigan, Bentley Historical Library, Bulletin No. 45. September 1998.Google Scholar

  • Guston, D.H. (2000). Between Politics and Science: Assuring the Integrity and Productivity of Research. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Jasanoff, S. (1990). The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policymakers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 237.Google Scholar

  • McNeely, I.F. and Wolverton, L. (2008). Reinventing Knowledge: From Alexandria to the Internet. New York: W.W. Norton & Company. Norton paperback edition, 2009.Google Scholar

  • National Research Council (2012). Using Science as Evidence in Public Policy. Committee on the Use of Social Science Knowledge in Public Policy. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, K. Prewitt, T.A. Schwandt, and M.L. Straf (eds). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar

  • Office of Science and Technology Policy (2012). Big Data is a Big Deal. Available at: http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2012/03/29/big-data-big-deal (accessed October 15, 2012).Google Scholar

  • Prewitt, K. (2011). Why It Matters to Distinguish Between Privacy & Confidentiality. Journal of Privacy and Confidentiality, 3(2), Article 3. Available at: http://repository.cmu.edu/jpc/vol3/iss2/3/.Google Scholar

  • Price, D.K. (1965). The Scientific Estate. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

  • Sheatsley, P. (1981-82). NORC: The First Forty Years. Chicago: University of Chicago. NORC Report 1081-82.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2013-10-03

Published in Print: 2013-09-01


Citation Information: Journal of Official Statistics, Volume 29, Issue 2, Pages 223–231, ISSN (Online) 2001-7367, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jos-2013-0018.

Export Citation

This content is open access.

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Shahriar Akter and Samuel Fosso Wamba
Annals of Operations Research, 2017
[2]
Michael F. Schober, Josh Pasek, Lauren Guggenheim, Cliff Lampe, and Frederick G. Conrad
Public Opinion Quarterly, 2016, Volume 80, Number 1, Page 180
[3]
Professor Nikolaos Askitas and Professor Klau, Concha Artola, Fernando Pinto, and Pablo de Pedraza García
International Journal of Manpower, 2015, Volume 36, Number 1, Page 103

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in