Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Journal of Official Statistics

The Journal of Statistics Sweden

4 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.411
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.776

CiteScore 2016: 0.63

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.710
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.975

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2001-7367
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Comparing Survey and Sampling Methods for Reaching Sexual Minority Individuals in Flanders

Alexis Dewaele
  • Corresponding author
  • Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Department of Experimental Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, B-9000, Ghent, Belgium
  • Email:
/ Maya Caen
  • Department of Sociology, Research team CuDOS, Ghent University, B-9000, Ghent, Belgium
/ Ann Buysse
  • Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Department of Experimental Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, B-9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Published Online: 2014-05-08 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jos-2014-0016

Abstract

As part of a large sexual health study, we used two different approaches to target Sexual Minority Individuals (SMIs). Firstly, we drew on a probability sample (1,832 respondents aged 14-80) of the Flemish population in Belgium. Secondly, we set up a targeted sampling design followed by an Internet survey. Our focus was to explore how two different sampling procedures and survey designs could lead to differences in sample characteristics. Results showed that for female SMIs (we excluded male SMIs from the analyses due to their low numbers) the population sample differed from the Internet sample in terms of sociodemographic characteristics (the latter included younger and more highly educated respondents) and scores on sexual orientation dimensions (the population sample included more respondents who didn’t identify as lesbian or bisexual but reported same-sex sexual experiences and desire). Respondents’ scores on sexual health indicators differed between the samples for two of the seven variables. We discuss implications for improving the quality and validity of nonrandom samples.

Keywords: Hard-to-reach populations; self-selection bias; nonrandom samples

References

  • Aerts, S., Van Houtte, M., Dewaele, A., Cox, N., and Vincke, J. (2012). Sense of Belonging in Secondary Schools: A Survey of LGB and Heterosexual Students in Flanders. Journal of Homosexuality, 59, 90-113. DOI: http://www.dx.doi.org/10.108000918369.2012.638548 Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Bajos, N. and Bozon, M. (2008). Enqueˆte sur la sexualite´ en France. Paris: E ´ ditions La De´couverte.Google Scholar

  • Bakker, F., de Graaf, H., de Haas, S., Kedde, H., Kruijer, H., and Wijsen, C. (2009). Seksuele gezondheid in Nederland 2009. Utrecht: Ruthers Nisso Groep. Available at: http://www.rutgerswpf.nl/sites/default/files/Seksuele%20Gezondheid%20in%Nederland%202009.pdf (accessed March 30, 2014)Google Scholar

  • Bauermeister, J., Pingel, E., Zimmerman, M., Couper, M., Carballo-Die´guez, A., and Strecher, V.J. (2012). Data Quality in Web-Based HIV/AIDS Research: Handling Invalid and Suspicious data. Field Methods, 24, 272-291. DOI: http://www.dx.doi.org/10.1177/1525822X12443097CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Best, S.J. and Krueger, B.S. (2004). Internet Data Collection. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

  • Buysse, A., Caen, M., Dewaele, A., Enzlin, P., Lievens, J., T’Sjoen, G., Van Houtte, M., and Vermeersch, H (2013). Seksuele Gezondheid in Vlaanderen. Ghent: Academia Press.Google Scholar

  • Claeys, L. and Spee, S. (2005). Een Virtuele Illusie of Ree¨le Kansen? - Gender in de Netwerkmaatschappij. Antwerp: Steunpunt Gelijkekansenbeleid, University of Antwerp/University of Hasselt. Available at: http://www.steunpuntgelijkekansen.be/wp-content/uploads/18.-Een-virtuele-illusie-of-reele-kansen-L.-Claeys.pdf (accessed March 30, 2014) Google Scholar

  • Couper, M.P. (2000). Web Surveys: A Review of Issues and Approaches. Public Opinion Quarterly, 64, 464-494. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/318641CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Couper, M.P. (2008). Designing Effective Web Surveys. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. de Leeuw, E.D. (2005). To Mix or not to Mix Data Collection Modes in Surveys. Journal of Official Statistics, 21, 233-255.Google Scholar

  • Denscombe, M. (2006). Web-Based Questionnaires and the Mode Effect - An Evaluation Based on Completion Rates and Data Contents of Near-Identical Questionnaires Delivered in Different Modes. Social Science Computer Review, 24, 246-254. DOI: http://www.dx.doi.org/10.1177/0894439305284522CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dewaele, A., Cox, N., van den Berghe, W., and Vincke, J. (2011). Families of Choice? Exploring the Supportive Networks of Lesbians, Gay Men and Bisexuals. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41, 312-331. DOI: http://www.dx.doi.org/10.1111/j. 1559-1816.2010.00715.x Dillman, D.A. (1978). Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method. New York: Wiley.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Dillman, D.A. (2000). Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. London: Wiley.Google Scholar

  • Edelman, M. (1993). Understanding the Gay and Lesbian Vote in 1992. Public Perspective, 4, 32-33.Google Scholar

  • Evans, J.R. and Mathur, A. (2005). The Value of Online Surveys. Internet Research, 15, 195-219.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fernee, H. and Keuzenkamp, S. (2011). Selectiviteit van de Roze Vragenlijst.Google Scholar

  • Een Vergelijking met Paneldata (paper presented at Sociology Day on May 26, 2011, Den Haque). Available at: http://www.google.be/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source¼web&cd=1&ved=0CC4QFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.scp.nl%2Fdsresource%3Ftype%3Dpdf%26objectid%3Ddefault%3A29290%26versionid%3D%26subobjectname%3D&ei=9eg3U4DgMsWqhAeQg4CwAw&usg=AFQjCNG6pS0WGCZ1_Hf4RaSfq8ILoHQYAQ&bvm=bv.63808443,d.ZG4. (accessed March 30, 2014)Google Scholar

  • Gronow, J., Haavio-Mannila, E., Kivinen, M., Lonkila, M., and Rotkirch, A. (1997). Cultural Inertia and Social Change in Russia. Helsinki: University of Helsinki, Department of Sociology.Google Scholar

  • Grov, C., Bimbi, D.S., Nanı´n, J.E., and Parsons, J.T. (2006). Ethnicity, Gender, and Generational Factors Associated with the Coming-Out Process Among Gay, Lesbian, and Bisexual Individuals. Journal of Sex Research, 43, 115-121. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Groves, R.M. (2006). Non-Response Rates and Non-Response Bias in Household Surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 70, 646-675. DOI: http://www.dx.doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfl033CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Haavio-Mannila, E. and Kontula, O. (2001). Seksin Trendit Meilla¨ ja Naapureissa. Helsinki: WSOY.Google Scholar

  • Heerwegh, D. (2001). Surveyonderzoek Middels het Internet: Een exploratie van het Terrein. Leuven: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Departement Sociologie, Afdeling voor dataverzameling en analyse. Available at: https://perswww.kuleuven.be/~u0034437/public/Files/Survey-onderzoek%20middels%20het%20Internet.pdf (accessed March 30, 2014) Google Scholar

  • Kerker, B.D., Mostashari, F., and Thorpe, L. (2006). Health Care Access and Utilization Among Women Who Have Sex With Women: Sexual Behavior and Identity. Journal of Urban Health, 83, 970-979. DOI: http://www.dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11524-006-9096-8CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Koch, S.N. and Emrey, J.A. (2001). The Internet and Opinion Measurement: Surveying Marginalized Populations. Social Science Quarterly, 82, 131-138. DOI: http://www.dx.doi.org/10.1111/0038-4941.00012CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kreuter, F., Presser, S., and Tourangeau, R. (2008). Social Desirability Bias in CATI, IVR, and Web Surveys: The Effects of Mode and Question Sensitivity. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72, 847-865. DOI: http://www.dx.doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfn063CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Laumann, E., Gagnon, J.H., Michael, R.T., and Michaels, S. (1994). The Social Organization of Sexuality: Sexual Practices in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

  • Lievens, J. and Waege, H. (2009). Participatie in Vlaanderen. Basisgegevens van de participatiesurvey. Leuven: Acco.Google Scholar

  • Loosier, P.S. and Dittus, P.J. (2010). Group Differences in Risk Across Three Domains Using an Expanded Measure of Sexual Orientation. Journal of Primary Prevention, 31, 261-272. DOI: http://www.dx.doi.org.1007/s10935-010-0228-2Google Scholar

  • Mathy, R.M., Schillace, M., Coleman, S.M., and Berquist, B.E. (2002). Methodological Rigor With Internet Samples: New Ways to Reach Underrepresented Populations. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 5, 253-266.PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • McCabe, S.E., Hughes, T.L., Bostwick, W., Morales, M., and Boyd, C.J. (2012).Google Scholar

  • Measurement of Sexual Identity in Surveys: Implications for Substance Abuse Research. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 649-657. DOI: http://www.dx.doi.org/10. 1007/s10508-011-9768-7 Mercer, C.H., Bailey, J.V., Johnson, A.M., Erens, B., Wellings, K., Fenton, K.A., and Copas, A.J. (2007). Women Who Report Having Sex With Women: British National Probability Data on Prevalence, Sexual Behaviors, and Health Outcomes. American Journal of Public Health, 97, 1126-1133. DOI: http://www.dx.doi.org/10.2105/AJPH2006.086439CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Meyer, I.H. and Wilson, P.A. (2009). Sampling Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Populations. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 56, 23-31. DOI: http://www.dx.doi.org/10.1037a0014587Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Ramirez-Valles, J. (2002). The Protective Effects of Community Involvement for HIV Risk Behavior: A Conceptual Framework. Health Education Research, 17, 389-403.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Raymond, H.F., Rebchook, G., Curotto, A., Vaudrey, J., Amsden, M., Levine, D., and McFarland, W. (2010). Comparing Internet-Based and Venue-Based Methods to Sample MSM in the San Francisco Bay Area. Aids and Behavior, 14, 218-224. DOI: http://www.dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10461-009-9521-6Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Roberts, A.L., Austin, S.B., Corliss, H.L., Vandermorris, A.K., and Koenen, K.C. (2010). Pervasive Trauma Exposure Among US Sexual Orientation Minority Adults and Risk of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder. American Journal of Public Health, 100, 2433-2441. DOI: http://www.dx.doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2009.168971Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rothblum, E. (2007). From Science Fiction to Computer-Generated Technology: Sampling Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Individuals. In The Health of Sexual Minorities: Public Health Perspectives on Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Populations, I.H. Meyer and M.E. Northridge (eds). New York: Springer, 441-454.Google Scholar

  • Schillewaert, N. and Meulemeester, P. (2005). Comparing Response Distributions of Offline and Online Data Collection Methods. International Journal of Market Research, 47, 163-178.Google Scholar

  • Schonlau, M., van Soest, A., Kapteyn, A., and Couper, M. (2009). Selection Bias in Web-Surveys and the Use of Propensity Scores. Sociological Methods and Research, 37, 291-318.Google Scholar

  • Schwarcz, S., Spindler, H., Scheer, S., Valleroy, L., and Lansky, A. (2007). Assessing Representativeness of Sampling Methods for Reaching Men Who Have Sex With Men: A Direct Comparison of Results Obtained from Convenience and Probability Samples. AIDS and Behavior, 11, 596-602.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Silenzio, V.M.B., Duberstein, P.R., Tang, W., Lu, N., Tu, X., and Homan, C.M. (2009).Google Scholar

  • Connecting the Invisible Dots: Reaching Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Adolescents and Young Adults at Risk for Suicide Through Online Social Networks. Social Science and Medicine, 69, 469-474. DOI: http://www.dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.05.029Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tourangeau, R., Couper, M.P., and Steiger, D.M. (2003). Humanizing Self-Administered Surveys: Experiments on Social Presence in Web and IVR Surveys: Experiments on Social Presence in Web and IVR Surveys. Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 1-24. DOI: http://www.dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0747-5632(02)00032-8CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Van Kesteren, N.M.C., Hospers, H., and Kok, G. (2007). Sexual Risk Behavior Among HIV-Positive Men Who Have Sex With Men: A Literature Review. Patient Education and Counseling, 65, 5-20.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Vincke, J. and Bleys, R. (2003). Vitale Vragen 2001. Eindrapport. Antwerp: Sensoa. Vincke, J. and Stevens, P. (1999). Een Beleidsgerichte Algemene Survey van Vlaamse Homoseksuele Mannen en Vrouwen--Basisrapport. Brussels: Ministerie van de Vlaamse Gemeenschap, Cel Gelijke Kansen, Universiteit Gent. Available at: http://www.psw.ugent.be/cms_global/uploads/publicaties/personal/eindrapport.pdf. (accessed March 30, 2014).Google Scholar

  • Vincke, J. and van Heeringen, K. (2004). Summer Holiday Camps for Gay and Lesbian Young Adults: An Evaluation of Their Impact on Social Support and Mental Well-Being. Journal of Homosexuality, 47, 33-46. DOI: http://www.dx.doi.org10.1300/J082v47n02_02CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wright, K.B. (2005). Researching Internet-Based Populations: Advantages and Disadvantages of Online Survey Research, Online Questionnaire Authoring Software Packages, and Web Survey Services. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10, article 11. Available at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1083-61012005.tb00259.x/full?utm_source. (accessed March 30, 2014). CrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Received: 2013-02-01

Accepted: 2014-03-01

Published Online: 2014-05-08

Published in Print: 2014-06-01


Citation Information: Journal of Official Statistics, ISSN (Online) 2001-7367, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jos-2014-0016.

Export Citation

© by Alexis Dewaele. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in