Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Journal of Official Statistics

The Journal of Statistics Sweden

4 Issues per year

IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.411
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.776

CiteScore 2016: 0.63

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.710
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.975

Open Access
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Recruiting an Internet Panel Using Respondent-Driven Sampling

Matthias Schonlau
  • Corresponding author
  • University of Waterloo, Statistics and Act.Sci.200 University Ave, Waterloo, Ontario N2L3G1, Canada.
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Beverly Weidmer / Arie Kapteyn
Published Online: 2014-05-08 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jos-2014-0018


Respondent-driven sampling (RDS) is a network sampling technique typically employed for hard-to-reach populations when traditional sampling approaches are not feasible (e.g., homeless) or do not work well (e.g., people with HIV). In RDS, seed respondents recruit additional respondents from their network of friends. The recruiting process repeats iteratively, thereby forming long referral chains.

RDS is typically implemented face to face in individual cities. In contrast, we conducted Internet-based RDS in the American Life Panel (ALP), a web survey panel, targeting the general US population. We found that when friends are selected at random, as RDS methodology requires, recruiting chains die out. When self-selecting friends, self-selected friends tend to be older than randomly selected friends but share the same demographic characteristics otherwise.

Using randomized experiments, we also found that respondents list more friends when the respondent’s number of friends is preloaded from an earlier question. The results suggest that with careful selection of parameters, RDS can be used to select population-wide Internet panels and we discuss a number of elements that are critical for success.

Keywords: Web survey; RDS


  • Arfken, C.L., Ahmed, S., and Abu-Ras, W. (2013). Respondent-Driven Sampling of Muslim Undergraduate U.S. College Students and Alcohol Use: Pilot study. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 48, 945-953. DOI: http://www.dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00127-012-0588-4.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bauermeister, J.A., Zimmerman, M.A., Johns, M.M., Glowacki, P., Stoddard, S., and Volz, E. (2012). Innovative Recruitment Using Online Networks: Lessons Learned from an Online Study of Alcohol and Other Drug Use Utilizing a Web-Based, Respondent-Driven Sampling (webrds) Strategy. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 73, 834-838.Google Scholar

  • Behr, A., Bellgardt, E., and Rendtel, U. (2005). Extent and Determinants of Panel Attrition in the European Community Household Panel. European Sociological Review, 21, 489-512. DOI: http://www.dx.doi.org/10.1093/esr/jci037.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bengtsson, L., Lu, X., Nguyen, Q.C., Camitz, M., Hoang, N.L., Liljeros, F. and Thorron, A. (2012). Implementation of Web-Based Respondent-Driven Sampling Among Men Who Have Sex With Men in Vietnam. arXiv preprint arXiv:1206.1739. DOI: http://www.dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0049417.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Berchenko, Y. and Frost, S.D. (2011). Capture-Recapture Methods and Respondent- Driven Sampling: Their Potential and Limitations. Sexually Transmitted Infections, 87, 267-268. DOI: http://www.dx.doi.org/10.1136/sti.2011.049171.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Berry, S.,Bogdon, T.,Brown,R., Corey,C.,Hickey, S.,Hill, L., and Schell,T. (2010). Survey of Gay Service Members. In Sexual Orientation and U.S. Military Personnel Policy, B.D. Rostker, S. Hosek, and J.D.Winkler (eds). Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.Google Scholar

  • Burt, R.S. (1983). Distinguishing Relational Contents. Applied Network Analysis: A Methodological Introduction, Ronald S. Burt, Michael J. Minor, and Richard D. Alba (eds). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 35-74.Google Scholar

  • Heckathorn, D. (1997). Respondent-Driven Sampling: A New Approach to the Study of Hidden Populations. Social Problems, 44, 174-199. DOI: http://www.dx.doi.org10.1525/sp.1997.44.2.03x0221m.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Heckathorn, D. (2002). Respondent-Driven Sampling ii: Deriving Valid Population Estimates from Chain-Referral Samples of Hidden Populations. Social Problems, 49, 11-34, DOI: http://www.dx.doi.org/10.1525/sp.2002.49.1.11.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Heckathorn, D. (2007). Extensions of Respondent-Driven Sampling: Analyzing Continuous Variables and Controlling for Differential Recruitment. Sociological Methodology, 37, 151-207, DOI: http://www.dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9531.200700188.x.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Heckathorn, D., Semaan, S., Broadhead, R., and Hughes, J. (2002). Extensions of Respondent-Driven Sampling: A New Approach to the Study of Injection Drug Users Aged 18-25. AIDS and Behavior, 6, 55-67, DOI: http://www.dx.doi.org/10.1023/ A:1014528612685.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Laumann, E.O. (1966). Prestige and Association in an Urban Community: An Analysis of an Urban Stratification System. New York: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar

  • Marin, A. and Hampton, K.N. (2007). Simplifying the Personal Network Name Generator Alternatives to Traditional Multiple and Single Name Generators. Field Methods, 19, 163-193, DOI: http://www.dx.doi.org/10.1177/1525822X06298588.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Salganik, M. and Heckathorn, D. (2004). Sampling and Estimation in Hidden Populations Using Respondent-Driven Sampling. Sociological Methodology, 34, 193, DOI: http://www.dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0081-1750.2004.00152.x.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schonlau, M. and Liebau, E. (2012). Respondent-Driven Sampling. Stata Journal, 12, 72-93.Google Scholar

  • Wejnert, C. (2009). An Empirical Test of Respondent-Driven Sampling: Point Estimates, Variance, Degree Measures, and Out-of-Equilibrium Data. Sociological Methodology, 39, 73-116, DOI: http://www.dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9531.2009.01216.x.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Wejnert, C. (2010). Social Network Analysis With Respondent-Driven Sampling Data: A Study of Racial Integration on Campus. Social Networks, 32, 112-124, DOI: http://www.dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2009.09.002.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Wejnert, C. and Heckathorn, D. (2008). Web-Based Network Sampling: Efficiency and Efficacy of Respondent-Driven Sampling for Online Research. Sociological Methods & Research, 37, 105-134, DOI: http://www.dx.doi.org/10.1177/0049124108318333. CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

About the article

Received: 2013-02-01

Accepted: 2013-11-01

Published Online: 2014-05-08

Published in Print: 2014-06-01

Citation Information: Journal of Official Statistics, Volume 30, Issue 2, Pages 291–310, ISSN (Online) 2001-7367, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jos-2014-0018.

Export Citation

© by Matthias Schonlau. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Lucie Léon, Don Des Jarlais, Marie Jauffret-Roustide, and Yann Le Strat
Methodological Innovations, 2016, Volume 9, Page 205979911667287

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in