Bianchi, A. and S. Biffignandi. 2014. “Responsive Design for Economic Data in Mixed-Mode Panels.” In Contribution to Sampling Statistics, edited by F. Mecatti, P.L. Conti, and M.G. Ranalli, 85–102. Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
Bianchi, A. and S. Biffignandi. 2017. “Representativeness in Panel Surveys.” To appear in Mathematical Population Studies.Google Scholar
Bianchi, A. and S. Biffignandi. Forthcoming. “Survey Experiments on Interactions: a Case Study of Incentives and Modes.” In Experimental Methods in Survey Research: Techniques that Combine Random Sampling with Random Assignment, edited by P.J. Lavrakas, E. de Leeuw, A. Holbrook, C. Kennedy, M.W. Traugott, and B.T. West. Hoboken NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Biemer, P.P. and L.E. Lyberg. 2003. Introduction to Survey Quality. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Buck, N. and S. McFall. 2012. “Understanding Society: Design Overview.” Longitudinal and Life Course Studies 3: 5–17.Google Scholar
Calinescu, M. and B. Schouten. 2015. “Adaptive Survey Designs to Minimize Survey Mode Effects – a Case Study on the Dutch Labor Force Survey.” Survey Methodology 41(2) : 403–425.Google Scholar
Chng, S., M. White, C. Abraham, and S. Skippon. 2016. “Commuting and Wellbeing in London: the Roles of Commute Mode and Local Public Transport Connectivity.” Preventive Medicine 88: 182–188. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.04.014.Crossref
Evandrou, M., J. Falkingham, Z. Feng, and A. Vlachantoni. 2016. “Ethnic Inequalities in Limiting Health and Self-Reported Health in Later Life Revisited.” Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health 70: 653–662. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jech-2015-206074.Crossref
Farrant, G. and C. O’Muircheartaigh. 1991. “Components of Nonresponse Bias in the British Election Surveys.” In Understanding Political Change, edited by A. Heath, J. Curtice, R. Jowell, S. Evans, J. Field, and S. Witherspoon, 235–249. London: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Fong, B. and J. Williams. 2011. “British Crime Survey: Feasibility of Boosting Police Force Area (PFA) Sample Sizes Using Supplementary Recontact Surveys.” Report for the Home Office, TNS-BMRB, London.Google Scholar
Gaia, A. 2014. “Does a Mixed-Mode Design Increase Panel Attrition? Evidence from the UKHLS Innovation Panel.” Paper presented at the Internet Survey Methodology Workshop, Bolzano, December 1–3.Google Scholar
Göritz, A. 2006. “Incentives in Web Studies: Methodological Issues and a Review.” International Journal of Internet Science 1: 58–70.Google Scholar
Göritz, A. 2010. “Using Lotteries, Loyalty Points, and Other Incentives to Increase Participant Response and Completion.” In Advanced methods for conducting online behavioural research, edited by S. Gosling and J. Johnson, 219–233. Washington DC: American Psychological Association. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/12076-014.Crossref
Göritz, A. 2015. “Incentive Effects.” In Improving Survey Methods: Lessons from Recent Research, edited by U. Engel, B. Jann, P. Lynn, A. Scherpenzeel, and P. Sturgis, 339–350. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Griffin, D., D. Fischer, and M. Morgan. 2001. “Testing an Internet Response Option for the American Community Survey.” Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Association for Public Opinion Research Montreal.” Quebec, Canada, May 17–20.Google Scholar
Jäckle, A. 2016. “Mode Effects on Measurement in Understanding Society.” Paper presented at the International Panel Survey Methods Workshop, Berlin, June 20–21. Available at: http://www.diw.de/en/diw_01.c.534396.en/program_psmw2016.html (accessed March 2017).
Jäckle, A. and P. Lynn. 2008. “Respondent Incentives in a Multi-Mode Panel Survey: Cumulative Effects on Nonresponse and Bias.” Survey Methodology 34: 105–117.Google Scholar
Jäckle, A., P. Lynn, and J. Burton. 2015. “Going Online with a Face-to-Face Household Panel: Effects of a Mixed Mode Design on Item and Unit Non-Response.” Survey Research Methods 9(1): 57–70. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.18148/srm/2015.v9i1.5475.Crossref
Janssen, B. 2006. “Web Data Collection in a Mixed Mode Approach: An Experiment.” Paper presented at the European Conference on Quality in Official Statistics (Q2006), Cardiff, April 24–26. Available at: webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20140721132900/http://ons.gov.uk/about/newsroom/events/q2006––european-conference-on-quality-in-survey-statistics-24-26-april-2006/agenda/session-19-wednesday.pdf (accessed March 2017).Google Scholar
Klausch, T., J. Hox, and B. Schouten. 2015a. “Selection Error in Single- and Mixed Mode Surveys of the Dutch General Population.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A 178(4): 945–961. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/rssa.12102.Crossref
Klausch, T., B. Schouten, and J.J. Hox. 2015b. “Evaluating Bias of Sequential Mixedmode Designs Against Benchmark Surveys.” Sociological Methods & Research : 1–34. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0049124115585362.Crossref
Krosnick, J.A. and D.F. Alwin. 1987. “An Evaluation of a Cognitive Theory of Response-Order Effects in Survey Measurement.” Public Opinion Quarterly 51: 201–219. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/269029.Crossref
Lagerstrøm, B. 2008. “Cost Efficiency in a Mixed-Mode Survey – Evidence from the Norwegian Rent Market Survey.” Paper presented at the 19th International Workshop on Household Survey Nonresponse, Ljubljana, September 15. Available at: http://www.nonresponse.org/db/3/558/Biblliography/Cost%20efficiency%20in%20a%20mixed-mode%20survey%20Evidence%20from%20the%20Norwegian%20Rent%20Marked%20Survey/?&p1=308&p2=74&p3=551 (accessed March 2017).
Laurie, H. and P. Lynn. 2009. “The Use of Respondent Incentives on Longitudinal Surveys.” In Methodology of Longitudinal Surveys, edited by P. Lynn, 205–233. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
Leesti, T. 2010. “Canadian Labour Force Survey Internet Data Collection Pilot Test.” Paper presented at the Fifth Workshop on Labour Force Survey Methodology, Paris, April 15–16.Google Scholar
De Leeuw, E.D. 2005. “To Mix or not to Mix Data Collection in Surveys.” Journal of Official Statistics 21: 233–255.Google Scholar
Lugtig, P. 2014. “Panel Attrition: Separating Stayers, Fast Attriters, Gradual Attriters, and Lurkers.” Sociological Methods and Research 43(4): 699–723. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0049124113520305.Crossref
Lynn, P. 2009. “Sample Design for Understanding Society.” Understanding Society Working Paper 2009-01, ISER, University of Essex, Colchester. Available at: www.understandingsociety.ac.uk/research/publications/working-paper/understandingsociety/2009-01 (accessed 16 March 2017).
Lynn, P. 2013. “Alternative Sequential Mixed-Mode Designs: Effects on Attrition Rates, Attrition Bias and Costs.” Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology 1: 183–205. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smt015.Crossref
Lynn, P. 2014. “Targeted Response Inducement Strategies on Longitudinal Surveys.” In Improving Survey Methods: Lessons from Recent Research, edited by U. Engel, B. Jann, P. Lynn, A. Scherpenzeel, and P. Sturgis. Routledge/Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Lynn, P. Forthcoming. “Tackling Panel Attrition.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Survey Research, edited by D.L. Vannette and J.A. Krosnick. Palgrave.Google Scholar
Lynn, P. and A. Jäckle. Forthcoming. “Mounting Multiple Experiments on Longitudinal Social Surveys: Design and Implementation Considerations.” In Experimental Methods in Survey Research: Techniques that Combine Random Sampling with Random Assignment, edited by P.J. Lavrakas, E.E. de Leeuw, A. Holbrook, C. Kennedy, M.W. Traugott, and B.T. West. Hoboken NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Lynn, P. and P. Lugtig. 2017. “Total Survey Error for Longitudinal Surveys.” In Total Survey Error in Practice, edited by Paul Biemer, Edith de Leeuw, Stephanie Eckman, Brad Edwards, Frauke Kreuter, Lars Lyberg, Clyde Tucker, and Brady West, 279–298. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley.Google Scholar
Lynn, P. and D. Lievesley. 1991. “Drawing General Population Samples in Great Britain.” London: SCPR.Google Scholar
Lynn, P. S.C.N. Uhrig, and J. Burton. 2010. “Lessons from a Randomized Experiment with Mixed-Mode Designs for a Household Panel Survey.” Understanding Society, Working Paper Series, 2010-03.Google Scholar
Martin, P. and P. Lynn. 2011. “The Effects of Mixed Mode Survey Designs on Simple and Complex Analyses.” ISER Working Paper Series, 2011-28. Colchester: Institute for Social and Economic Research, University of Essex. Available at: https://www.iser.essex.ac.uk/research/publications/working-papers/iser/2011-28 (accessed February 5, 2013).
Schoeni, R., F. Stafford, K. McGonagle, and P. Andreski. 2013. “Response Rates in National Panel Surveys.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 645: 60–87. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716212456363.Crossref
Schwarz, N., F. Strack, H.-J. Hippler, and G. Bishop. 1991. “The Impact of Administration Mode on Response Effects in Survey Measurement.” Applied Cognitive Psychology 5: 193–212.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Souren, M. 2012. “Multi-Mode Surveys at Statistics Netherlands: Implications, Experiences and Open Issues.” Paper presented at Opening Conference of the European Statistical System Network (ESSNet) on Data Collection for Social Surveys using Multiple Modes, Wiesbaden, October 11–12, 2012.Google Scholar
Uhrig, S.C.N. 2008. “The Nature and Causes of Attrition in the British Household Panel Study.” Institute for Social and Economic Research Working Paper 2008-05. Available at: https://www.iser.essex.ac.uk/research/publications/working-papers/iser/2008-05 (accessed 16 March 2017).
Uhrig, S.C.N. 2011. “Using Experiments to Guide Decision Making in Understanding Society: Introducing the Innovation Panel.” In Understanding Society: Early Findings from the First Wave of the UK’s Household Longitudinal Study, edited by S.L. McFall and C. Garrington. Colchester: University of Essex. Available at: http://research.understandingsociety.org.uk/findings/early-findings (accessed 16 March 2017).
Voogt, R. and W. Saris. 2005. “Mixed Mode Designs: Finding the Balance between Nonresponse Bias and Mode Effects.” Journal of Official Statistics 21(3): 367–387.Google Scholar
Voorpostel, M. and V.A. Ryser. 2011. “Mixed Mode Data Collection as a Strategy to Decrease Panel Attrition in the Swiss Household Panel.” FORS Working Paper 2_11. Available at: http://ohs-shp.unil.ch/workingpapers/WP2_11.pdf (accessed 28 March 2017).
Wallace, S., J. Nazroo, and L. Bécares. 2016. “Cumulative Effect of Racial Discrimination on the Mental Health of Ethnic Minorities in the United Kingdom.” American Journal of Public Health 106(7): 1294–1300. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2016.303121.Crossref
Watson, N. and M. Wooden. 2014. “Re-Engaging with Survey Non-Respondents: Evidence from Three Household Panels.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (Statistics in Society) 177(2): 499–522. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/rssa.12024.Crossref
About the article
Published Online: 2017-06-12
Published in Print: 2017-06-01
Citation Information: Journal of Official Statistics, Volume 33, Issue 2, Pages 385–408, ISSN (Online) 2001-7367, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jos-2017-0019.
© 2017 Annamaria Bianchi et al., published by De Gruyter Open. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0