Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Journal of Pediatric Endocrinology and Metabolism

Editor-in-Chief: Kiess, Wieland

Ed. by Bereket, Abdullah / Cohen, Pinhas / Darendeliler, Feyza / Dattani, Mehul / Gustafsson, Jan / Luo, Feihong / Mericq, Veronica / Roth, Christian / Toppari, Jorma

Editorial Board Member: Battelino, Tadej / Buyukgebiz, Atilla / Cassorla, Fernando / Chrousos, George P. / Cutfield, Wayne / Fideleff, Hugo L. / Hershkovitz, Eli / Hiort, Olaf / LaFranchi, Stephen H. / Lanes M. D., Roberto / Mohn, Angelika / Root, Allen W. / Rosenfeld, Ron G. / Werther, George / Zadik, Zvi

12 Issues per year

IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 1.233

CiteScore 2016: 1.09

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.527
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.602

See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 26, Issue 9-10 (Oct 2013)


Parental dyadic coping in families of children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes

Annett Körner
  • Corresponding author
  • Department of Educational and Counselling Psychology, McGill University, 3700 rue McTavish, Montréal, Québec, H3A 1Y2 Canada
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Julia Würz
  • Independent Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Danielle C. Brosseau
  • Department of Educational and Counselling Psychology, McGill University, 3700 rue McTavish, Montréal, Québec, H3A 1Y2 Canada
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Elmar Brähler
  • Independent Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Thomas Kapellen / Wieland Kiess
Published Online: 2013-05-17 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jpem-2012-0410


Background: The strains of type 1 diabetes mellitus in children and adolescents pose a challenge to the minor and his/her parents.

Objective: The objective of this study was to identify parental dyadic coping patterns and explore their relation to psychosocial and disease variables.

Subjects: Parents (n=44 dyads) of children/adolescents with type 1 diabetes.

Methods: Cluster analysis employing Ward’s method was conducted as a multivariate classification procedure without predetermined cluster centers.

Results: Three parental coping clusters were identified and labeled: avoiders, negotiators, and doers. Although not reaching statistical significance, the HbA1c levels of children/adolescents with parental dyads exhibiting the negotiator coping pattern were consistently lower than the levels of children with parents classified as avoiders or doers.

Conclusions: Parental dyads were distinguishable based on their dyadic coping patterns with a substantial proportion employing avoidant coping and suboptimal communication strategies. These parental dyads may benefit from minimal psychosocial intervention.

Keywords: adolescents; children; metabolic control; parental coping; type 1 diabetes mellitus


  • 1.

    Würz J, Brähler E, Kapellen T, Galler A, Kiess W. Dyadisches Coping bei Eltern von Kindern und Jugendlichen mit Diabetes mellitus Typ 1 [Dyadic coping in parents with children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes]. Kinder- und Jugendmedizin 2006;6:81–92.Google Scholar

  • 2.

    Steinhausen HC. Psychologie chronischer Krankheiten im Kindesalter [Psychology of chronic illness in children]. In: Lehmkuhl G, editor. Chronisch kranke Kinder und ihre Familien. München: Quintessenz, 1996:23–33.Google Scholar

  • 3.

    Hauenstein EJ, Marvin RS, Snyder AL, Clarke WL. Stress in parents of children with diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 1989;12:18–23.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 4.

    Hürter A. Drei-Phasen-Modell der familiären Krankheitsbewältigung [Three-phase model of family coping with illness]. In: Herpertz S, Paust R, editors. Psychosoziale Aspekte der Diagnostik und Therapie des Diabetes mellitus. Lengerich: Pabst Science, 1999:166–89.Google Scholar

  • 5.

    Krause MP, Petermann F. Konstruktion einer Bewältigungsskala für Eltern behinderter Kinder (Soziale Orientierungen von Eltern behinderter Kinder – SOEBEK) [Construction of a scale on coping in parents of disabled children (Social orientation of parents of disabled children – SOEBEK)]. Kindheit und Entwicklung 1998;7:112–20.Google Scholar

  • 6.

    Lewin AB, Heidgerken AD, Geffken GR, Williams LB, Storch EA, et al. The relations between family factors and metabolic control – The role of diabetes adherence. J Pediatr Psychol 2006;31:174–83.PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • 7.

    Seiffge-Krenke I, Boeger A, Schmidt C, Kollmar F, Floß A, et al. Chronisch kranke Jugendliche und ihre Familien [Chronically ill adolescents and their families]. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 1996.Google Scholar

  • 8.

    Seiffge-Krenke I. The highly structured climate in families of adolescents with diabetes: functional or dysfunctional for metabolic control? J Pediatr Psychol 1998;23:313–22.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 9.

    Lange K, Bittner C, von Schütz W, Danne T. Psychosoziale Aspekte des Typ-1-Diabetes bei Kindern und Jugendlichen [Psychosocial aspects of typ 1 diabetes in children and adolescents]. Kinder und Jugendmedizin 2003;3:176–81.Google Scholar

  • 10.

    Carter PJ, Cutfield WS, Hofman PL, Gunn AJ, Wilson DA, et al. Ethnicity and social deprivation independently influence metabolic control in children with type 1 diabetes. Diabetologia 2008;51:1835–42.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • 11.

    Coyne JC, Fiske V. Couples coping with chronic and catastrophic illness. In: Amatsu TJ, Stephens MA, Hobfoll SE, Crowther JA, editors. Family health psychology. Ohio: Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, 1992:129–49.Google Scholar

  • 12.

    Manne SL, Zautra AJ. Couples coping with chronic illness. Women with rheumatoid arthritis and their healthy husbands. J Behav Med 1990;13:327–42.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 13.

    Luszczynska AG, Böhmer S, Knoll N, Schwarzer R. Patients’ coping profiles and partners’ support provision. Psychol Health 2007;22:749–64.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 14.

    Hobbs N, Perrin A, Ireys S. Chronically ill children and their families. San Francisco, CA: Jossey- Bass, 1986.Google Scholar

  • 15.

    Slesazeck H, Würz J, Kapellen T, Kiess W, Brähler E. Partnerschaft und Bindung bei Eltern von Kindern mit Diabetes mellitus Typ I [Spousal relationship and attachment in parents of children with diabetes mellitus typ 1] Familiendynamik 2003;28:236–51.Google Scholar

  • 16.

    Boss P. Family stress management. California: Sage Publications, 1988.Google Scholar

  • 17.

    McCubbin HI, Patterson JM. The family stress process: the double ABCX model of adjustment and adaptation. In: McCubbin HI, Sussma MB, Patterson JM, editors. Social stress and the family: Advances and developments in family stress theory and research. New York: Haworth Press, 1983: 7–37.Google Scholar

  • 18.

    Patterson JM. Critical factors affecting family compliance with home treatment for children with cystic fibrosis. Family Relations 1985;34:79–89.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 19.

    Gottman JM, Coan J, Carrere S, Swanson C. Predicting marital happiness and stability from newlywed interactions. J Marriage Family 1998;60:5–22.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 20.

    Northam E, Anderson P, Adler R, Werther G, Warne G. Psychosocial and family functioning in children with insulin-dependent diabetes at diagnosis and one year later. J Pediatr Psychol 1996;21:699–717.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 21.

    Bodenmann G. Dyadic coping – a systemic-transactional view of stress and coping among couples: Theory and empirical findings. Eur Rev Appl Psychol 1997;47:137–40.Google Scholar

  • 22.

    Bodenmann G. Bewältigung von Stress in Partnerschaften. Der Einfluss von Belastungen auf die Qualität und Stabilität von Paarbeziehungen [Coping with stress in couples. The impact of stress on quality and stability of initimate relationships]. Bern: Hans Huber, 1995.Google Scholar

  • 23.

    Bodenmann G. Stress und Coping bei Paaren. [Stress and coping in couples] Göttingen: Hogrefe, 2000.Google Scholar

  • 24.

    Bodenmann G. Dyadic coping and its significance for marital functioning. In: Revenson T, Kayser K, Bodenmann G, editors. Couples coping with stress: Emerging perspectives on dyadic coping. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2005:33–50.Google Scholar

  • 25.

    Lussier Y, Sabourin S, Turgeon C. Coping strategies as moderators of the relationship between attachment and marital adjustment. J Soc Pers Relat 1997;14:777–92.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 26.

    Lazarus RS, Folkman S. Stress, appraisal and coping. New York: Springer; 1984.Google Scholar

  • 27.

    Wolf W. Alltagsbelastungen und Partnerschaft [Daily strains and spousal relationship]. Bern, Fribourg: Hans Huber, 1987.Google Scholar

  • 28.

    World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki, 4th (Somerset West) amendment. Somerset West, South Africa: World Medical Association, 1996.Google Scholar

  • 29.

    World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. 2008 [cited 2012 Sept 3]; Available from: http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/.

  • 30.

    Brähler E, Felder H, Florin I, Tuschen B. Soziodemographischer Fragebogen [Sociodemographic questionnaire]. Leipzig: Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University of Leipzig, 1992.Google Scholar

  • 31.

    Bodenmann G, Pihet S, Kayser K. The relationship between dyadic coping, marital quality and well-being: A two year longitudinal study. J Fam Psychol 2006;20: 485–93.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 32.

    Hahlweg K, Schindler L, Revenstorf D, Brengelmann JC. The Munich marital therapy study. In: Hahlweg K, Jacobson NS, editors. Marital interaction: analysis and modification. New York: Guilford Press, 1984:3–26.Google Scholar

  • 33.

    Hinz A, Stöbel-Richter Y, Brähler E. Der Partnerschaftsfragebogen (PFB): Normierung und soziodemographische Einflussgrößen auf die Partnerschaftsqualität. [The spousal relationship questionnaire (PFB): Norms and the impact of sociodemographic characteristics on relationship quality]. Diagnostica 2001;47:132–41.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 34.

    Collins NL, Read SJ. Adult attachment, working models and relationship quality in dating couples. J Pers Soc Psychol 1990;58:633–44.Google Scholar

  • 35.

    Hazan C, Shaver P. Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. J Pers Social Psychol 1987;52: 511–24.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 36.

    Pollack E, Wiegand-Grefe S, Höger D. The Bielefeld Attachment Questionnaires: Overview and empirical results of an alternative approach to assess attachment. Psychother Res 2008;18: 179–90.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Corresponding author: Annett Körner, Department of Educational and Counselling Psychology, McGill University, 3700 rue McTavish, Montréal, Québec, H3A 1Y2 Canada, E-mail:

Received: 2012-12-18

Accepted: 2013-04-18

Published Online: 2013-05-17

Published in Print: 2013-10-01

Citation Information: Journal of Pediatric Endocrinology and Metabolism, ISSN (Online) 2191-0251, ISSN (Print) 0334-018X, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jpem-2012-0410.

Export Citation

©2013 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin Boston. Copyright Clearance Center

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Helen R. Staff, Faye F. Didymus, and Susan H. Backhouse
Anxiety, Stress, & Coping, 2017, Volume 30, Number 5, Page 498
Alan M Delamater, Maartje de Wit, Vincent McDarby, Jamil Malik, and Carlo L Acerini
Pediatric Diabetes, 2014, Volume 15, Number S20, Page 232

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in