Riccardi VM, Womack JE, Jacks T. Neurofibromatosis and related tumors. Natural occurrence and animal models. Am J Pathol 1994;145:994–1000.Google Scholar
Vitale MG, Guha A, Skaggs DL. Orthopaedic manifestations of neurofibromatosis in children: an update. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002;401:107–18.Google Scholar
Cichowski K, Jacks T. NF- 1 tumor suppressor gene function: narrowing the GAP. Cell 2001;104:593–604.Google Scholar
Petramala L, Giustini S, Zinnamosca L, Marinelli C, Colangelo L, et al. Bone mineral metabolism in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 (von Recklinghausen disease). Arch Dermatol Res 2012;304:325–31.Google Scholar
Hockett CW, Eelloo J, Huson SM, Roberts SA, Berry JL, et al. Vitamin D status and muscle function in children with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 2013;13:111–9.Google Scholar
Brunetti-Pierri N, Doty SB, Hicks J, Phan K, Mendoza-Londono R, et al. Generalized metabolic bone disease in Neurofibromatosis type I. Mol Genet Metab 2008;94:105–11.Google Scholar
Dulai S, Briody J, Schindeler A, North KN, Cowell CT, et al. Decreased bone mineral density in neurofibromatosis type 1: results from a pediatric cohort. J Pediatr Orthop 2007;27:472–5.Google Scholar
Illes T, Halmai V, de Jonge T, Dubousset J. Decreased bone mineral density in neurofibromatosis-1 patients with spinal deformities. Osteoporos Int 2001;12:823–7.Google Scholar
Kuorilehto T, Pöyhönen M, Bloigu R, Heikkinen J, Väänänen K, et al. Decreased bone mineral density and content in neurofibromatosis type 1: lowest local values are located in the load-carrying parts of the body. Osteoporosis Int 2005;16:928–36.Google Scholar
Lammert M, Kappler M, Mautner VF, Lammert K, Störkel S, et al. Decreased bone mineral density in patients with neurofibromatosis 1. Osteoporos Int 2005;16:1161–6.Google Scholar
Yang FC, Chen S, Robling AG, Yu X, Nebesio TD, et al. Hyperactivation of p 21ras and p13k cooperate to alter murine and human neurofibromatosis type 1-haploinsufficient osteoclast functions. J Clin Invest 2006;116:2880–91.Google Scholar
Wu X, Estwick SA, Chen S, Yu M, Ming W, et al. Neurofibromin plays a critical role in modulating osteoblast differentiation of mesenchymal stem/progenitor cells. Hum Mol Genet 2006;15:2837–45.Google Scholar
Crawford AH, Schorry EK. Neurofibromatosis in children: the role of orthopaedist. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 1999;7:217–30.Google Scholar
Gutmann DH, Aylsworth A, Carey JC, Korf B, Marks J, et al. The diagnostic evaluation and multidisciplinary management of neurofibromatosis 1 and neurofibromatosis 2. J Am Med Assoc 1997;278:51–7.Google Scholar
Goksen D, Darcan S, Coker M, Kose T. Bone mineral density of healthy Turkish children and adolescents. J Clin Densitom 2006;9:84–0.Google Scholar
Writing group fort the ISCD position development conference. Diagnosis of osteoporosis in men, premenopausal woman, and children. J Clin Densitom 2004;7:17–6.Google Scholar
Stevenson DA, Moyer-Mileur LJ, Murray M, Slater H, Sheng X, et al. Bone mineral density in children and adolescents with neurofibromatosis type 1. J Pediatr 2007;150:83–8.Google Scholar
Seitz S, Schnabel C, Busse B, Schmidt HU, Beil FT, et al. High bone turnover and accumulation of osteoid in patients with neurofibromatosis 1. Osteoporos Int 2010;21:119–27.Google Scholar
Kühnisch J, Seto J, Lange C, Schrof S, Stumpp S, et al. Multiscale, converging defects of macro-porosity microstructure and matrix mineralization impact long bone fragility in NF1. PLoS One 2014;9:e86115.Google Scholar
Duman O, Ozdem S, Turkkahraman D, Olgac ND, Gungor F, et al. Bone metabolism markers and bone mineral density in children with neurofibromatosis type-1. Brain Dev 2008;30:584–8.Google Scholar
Yilmaz K, Ozmen M, Bora Goksan S, Eskiyurt N. Bone mineral density in children with neurofibromatosis 1. Acta Paediatr 2007;96:1220–2.Google Scholar
Lammert M, Friedman JM, Roth HJ, Friedrich RE, Kluwe L, et al. Vitamin D deficiency associated with number of neurofibromas in neurofibromatosis 1. J Med Genet 2006;43:810–3.Google Scholar
About the article
Published Online: 2017-01-26
Published in Print: 2017-02-01
Author contributions: PHG conceived the study, BVN, GH, and PH reviewed the literature, PHG, BVN, GH, PH, CM and KS were involved in patients care, including the process of procedure and routine clinical follow-up, AA, BF made helpful collection of data, PHG and AA performed literature review and written manuscript. BF, CM, and KS reviewed the manuscript. All authors were responsible for patient management. All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.
Research funding: None declared.
Employment or leadership: None declared.
Honorarium: None declared.
Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.