Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Journal of Pediatric Endocrinology and Metabolism

Editor-in-Chief: Kiess, Wieland

Ed. by Bereket, Abdullah / Darendeliler, Feyza / Dattani, Mehul / Gustafsson, Jan / Luo, Fei Hong / Mericq, Veronica / Toppari, Jorma


IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 1.239

CiteScore 2018: 1.22

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.507
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.562

Online
ISSN
2191-0251
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 32, Issue 1

Issues

Utility of anthropometric indicators to screen for clustered cardiometabolic risk factors in children and adolescents

Teresa Maria Bianchini de Quadros / Alex Pinheiro Gordia / Alynne Christian Ribeiro Andaki
  • Department of Sport Sciences, Federal University of Triângulo Mineiro, Uberaba, Minas Gerais, Brazil
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Edmar Lacerda Mendes
  • Department of Sport Sciences, Federal University of Triângulo Mineiro, Uberaba, Minas Gerais, Brazil
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Jorge Mota
  • Research Centre in Physical Activity Health and Leisure, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Luciana Rodrigues Silva
  • Faculty of Medicine, Graduate Program in Medicine and Health, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2018-12-11 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jpem-2018-0217

Abstract

Background

Anthropometric indicators are associated with cardiometabolic risk factors (CMRF), but there is no consensus as to which indicator is the most suitable to screen for clustered CMRF. This study aimed to evaluate the utility of five anthropometric indicators to screen for clustered CMRF in children and adolescents.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted in 1139 schoolchildren aged 6–17 years from Northeastern Brazil. Body weight, height, waist circumference (WC) and subscapular (SSF) and triceps skinfold thickness (TSF) were measured. Body mass index (BMI) and waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) were calculated. The following CMRF were evaluated: elevated total cholesterol, low high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C), elevated low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C), high triglyceride concentration, hyperglycemia and high blood pressure. The participants were categorized into no CMRF, 1 CMRF, 2 CMRF and ≥3 CMRF. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed to assess the accuracy of the anthropometric indicators in predicting CMRF for age group and sex.

Results

Poor associations were observed between the anthropometric indicators and 1 CMRF (accuracy of 0.49–0.64). The indicators showed moderate associations with 2 CMRF (accuracy of 0.57–0.75) and ≥3 CMRF (accuracy of 0.59–0.79). In general, TSF exhibited the worst performance in predicting CMRF, followed by WHtR. The highest accuracies were observed for BMI, WC and SSF, with no significant difference between these indicators.

Conclusions

The routine use of BMI, WC and SSF as epidemiological screening tools for clustered CMRF in childhood and adolescence should be encouraged.

Keywords: adolescent; anthropometry; cardiovascular diseases; child; obesity

References

  • 1.

    GBD 2015 Mortality and Causes of Death Collaborators. Global, regional, and national life expectancy, all-cause mortality, and cause-specific mortality for 249 causes of death, 1980–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet 2016;388:1459–544.PubMedWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • 2.

    Gazolla FM, Neves Bordallo MA, Madeira IR, Madeira IR, de Miranda Carvalho CN, et al. Association between cardiovascular risk factors and carotid intima-media thickness in prepubertal Brazilian children. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 2015;28:579–87.Web of SciencePubMedGoogle Scholar

  • 3.

    Ekta G, Tulika MG. Risk factor distribution for cardiovascular diseases among high school boys and girls of urban Dibrugarh, Assam. J Family Med Prim Care 2016;5:108–13.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 4.

    Carolan E, Hogan A, O’Connell J, Fallon M, Byrne D, et al. The prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors in obese children. Ir Med J 2015;108:134–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • 5.

    D’Adamo E, Guardamagna O, Chiarelli F, Bartuli A, Liccardo D, et al. Atherogenic dyslipidemia and cardiovascular risk factors in obese children. Int J Endocrinol 2015;2015:912047.PubMedWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • 6.

    Heymsfield SB, Wadden TA. Mechanisms, pathophysiology, and management of obesity. N Engl J Med 2017;376:254–66.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 7.

    Browning LM, Hsieh SD, Ashwell M. A systematic review of waist-to-height ratio as a screening tool for the prediction of cardiovascular disease and diabetes: 0.5 could be a suitable global boundary value. Nutr Res Rev 2010;23:247–69.Web of SciencePubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 8.

    Chiolero A, Paradis G, Maximova K, Burnier M, Bovet P, et al. No use for waist-for-height ratio in addition to body mass index to identify children with elevated blood pressure. Blood Press 2013;22:17–20.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 9.

    Kelishadi R, Mirmoghtadaee P, Najafi H, Keikha M. Systematic review on the association of abdominal obesity in children and adolescents with cardio-metabolic risk factors. J Res Med Sci 2015;20:294–307.PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • 10.

    Reilly JJ, Kelly J, Wilson DC. Accuracy of simple clinical and epidemiological definitions of childhood obesity: systematic review and evidence appraisal. Obes Rev 2010;11:645–55.PubMedWeb of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 11.

    Quadros TM, Gordia AP, Silva RC, Silva LR. Predictive capacity of anthropometric indicators for dyslipidemia screening in children and adolescents. J Pediatr (Rio J) 2015;91:455–63.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • 12.

    Quadros TM, Gordia AP, Mota J, Silva LR. Utility of body mass index, waist circumference and waist-to-height ratio as screening tools for hyperglycemia in young people. Arch Endocrinol Metab 2016;60:526–31.CrossrefPubMedWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • 13.

    Quadros TM, Gordia AP, Silva LR. Anthropometry and clustered cardiometabolic risk factors in young people: a systematic review. Rev Paul Pediatr 2017;35:340–50.PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • 14.

    Luiz RR, Magnanini MM. The logic of sample size determination in epidemiological research. Cad Saúde Colet 2000;8:9–28.Google Scholar

  • 15.

    Gordon CC, Chumlea WC, Roche AF. Stature, recumbent length, and weight. In: Lohman TG, Roche AF, Martorell R, editors. Anthropometric standardization reference manual. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 1988:3–8.Google Scholar

  • 16.

    Cole TJ, Bellizzi MC, Flegal KM, Dietz WH. Establishing a standard definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide: international survey. BMJ 2000;320:1240–3.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • 17.

    World Health Organization. Measuring obesity: classification and distribution of anthropometric data. Copenhagen: World Health Organization, 1988.Google Scholar

  • 18.

    Harrison GC, Buskirk ER, Carter JE, Johnston FE, Lohman TG, et al. Skinfold thicknesses and measurement technique. In: Lohman TG, Roche AF, Martorell R, editors. Anthropometric standardization reference manual. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 1988:55–70.Google Scholar

  • 19.

    Pederson D, Gore C. Anthropometry measurement error. In: Norton K, Olds T, editors. Anthropometrica: a textbook of body measurement for sports and health courses. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press, 1996:77–96.Google Scholar

  • 20.

    Malachias MV, Koch V, Colombo C, Silva S, Guimarães IC, et al. 7th Brazilian Guideline of Arterial Hypertension: Chapter 10 - Hypertension in Children and Adolescents. Arq Bras Cardiol 2016;107:53–63.PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • 21.

    Friedewald WT, Levy RI, Fredrickson DS. Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin Chem 1972;18:499–502.PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • 22.

    Back Giuliano IC, Caramelli B, Pellanda L, Duncan B, Mattos S, et al. I guidelines of prevention of atherosclerosis in childhood and adolescence. Arq Bras Cardiol 2005;85:4–36.PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • 23.

    American Diabetes Association. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 2014;37:81–90.Google Scholar

  • 24.

    National High Blood Pressure Education Program Working Group on High Blood Pressure in Children and Adolescents. The fourth report on the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure in children and adolescents. Pediatrics 2004;114:555–76.PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • 25.

    Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology 1983;148:839–43.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • 26.

    Jago R, Mendoza JA, Chen T, Baranowski T. Longitudinal associations between BMI, waist circumference, and cardiometabolic risk in US youth: monitoring implications. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2013;21:E271–9.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 27.

    Graves L, Garnett SP, Cowell CT, Baur LA, Ness A, et al. Waist-to-height ratio and cardiometabolic risk factors in adolescence: findings from a prospective birth cohort. Pediatr Obes 2014;9:327–38.CrossrefWeb of SciencePubMedGoogle Scholar

  • 28.

    Agirbasli M, Tanrikulu AM, Berenson GS. Metabolic syndrome: bridging the gap from childhood to adulthood. Cardiovasc Ther 2016;34:30–6.Web of SciencePubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 29.

    Pereira PF, Serrano HM, Carvalho GQ, Lamounier JA, Peluzio MC, et al. Waist and waist-to-height ratio: useful to identify the metabolic risk of female adolescents? Rev Paul Pediatr 2011;29:372–7.Google Scholar

  • 30.

    Ottobelli Chielle E, de Souza WM, da Silva TP, Moresco RN, Moretto MB. Adipocytokines, inflammatory and oxidative stress markers of clinical relevance altered in young overweight/obese subjects. Clin Biochem 2016;49:548–53.CrossrefPubMedWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • 31.

    Katzmarzyk PT, Bouchard C. Where is the beef? Waist circumference is more highly correlated with BMI and total body fat than with abdominal visceral fat in children. Int J Obes (Lond) 2014;38:753–4.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 32.

    Bluher S, Schwarz P. Metabolically healthy obesity from childhood to adulthood – Does weight status alone matter? Metabolism 2014;63:1084–92.PubMedWeb of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 33.

    Bray GA, DeLany JP, Volaufova J, Harsha DW, Champagne C. Prediction of body fat in 12-y-old African American and white children: evaluation of methods. Am J Clin Nutr 2002;76:980–90.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • 34.

    Johnson ST, Kuk JL, Mackenzie KA, Huang TT, Rosychuk RJ, et al. Metabolic risk varies according to waist circumference measurement site in overweight boys and girls. J Pediatr 2010;156:247–52.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • 35.

    Stomfai S, Ahrens W, Bammann K, Kovács E, Mårild S, et al. Intra- and inter-observer reliability in anthropometric measurements in children. Int J Obes (Lond) 2011;35:45–51.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Corresponding author: Teresa Maria Bianchini de Quadros, PhD, Physical Education Course, Federal University of Recôncavo of Bahia, Av. Nestor de Melo Pita, 535-Centro, Amargosa, CEP 45300-000, Bahia, Brazil, Phone: +55 41 987977020


Received: 2018-05-16

Accepted: 2018-11-11

Published Online: 2018-12-11

Published in Print: 2019-01-28


Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

Research funding: This work was supported by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado da Bahia – FAPESB, Brazil, Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior – CAPES, Brazil, and Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia – FCT, Portugal.

Employment or leadership: None declared.

Honorarium: None declared.

Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.


Citation Information: Journal of Pediatric Endocrinology and Metabolism, Volume 32, Issue 1, Pages 49–55, ISSN (Online) 2191-0251, ISSN (Print) 0334-018X, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jpem-2018-0217.

Export Citation

©2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in