Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Journal of Politeness Research

Language, Behaviour, Culture

Ed. by Grainger, Karen

2 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 1.000
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.365

CiteScore 2017: 1.65

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.585
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.848

Online
ISSN
1613-4877
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Impoliteness and emotional arguments

Manfred Kienpointner
Published Online: 2008-08-05 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/JPLR.2008.012

Abstract

After a few introductory remarks on recent impoliteness research, a preliminary definition of impoliteness/rudeness is given. Then the important role emotions play in relation to (im)politeness is briefly sketched, followed by descriptions of some connections between emotional arguments, fallacies and impoliteness. Emotional arguments need not be fallacious nor are they always formulated in impolite ways. However, certain fallacious subtypes of emotional arguments involving appeals to negative emotions tend to be formulated in an impolite way. Such arguments are called “destructive arguments” in this paper.

A few case studies of spoken and written passages of argumentative discourse are used to support the hypothesis that certain subtypes of emotional arguments are likely to be destructive. It is also shown, however, that sometimes even fallacious arguments involving positive emotions, such as pity, can be formulated in an impolite way. Finally, it is demonstrated that in certain exceptional cases even rude and fallacious arguments are not (totally) destructive because they ultimately serve some vital interests of the opponent.

Keywords:: impoliteness; emotions; fallacies; emotional arguments; destructive arguments

About the article

Published Online: 2008-08-05

Published in Print: 2008-07-01


Citation Information: Journal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour, Culture, Volume 4, Issue 2, Pages 243–265, ISSN (Online) 1613-4877, ISSN (Print) 1612-5681, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/JPLR.2008.012.

Export Citation

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Michael Haugh and Valeria Sinkeviciute
Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict, 2018, Volume 6, Number 2, Page 248
[3]
Agus Wijayanto, Aryati Prasetyarini, and Mauly Halwat Hikmat
SAGE Open, 2017, Volume 7, Number 3, Page 215824401773281
[4]
Saeko Fukushima
Pragmatics, 2013, Volume 23, Number 2, Page 275
[5]
Sonja Kleinke and Birte Bös
Pragmatics, 2015, Volume 25, Number 1, Page 47
[6]
Valeria Sinkeviciute
Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict, 2015, Volume 3, Number 2, Page 317
[8]
Dawn Archer
Journal of Pragmatics, 2011, Volume 43, Number 13, Page 3216
[9]
Nuria Lorenzo-Dus, Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, and Patricia Bou-Franch
Journal of Pragmatics, 2011, Volume 43, Number 10, Page 2578
[10]
Renee Perelmutter
Journal of Pragmatics, 2013, Volume 45, Number 1, Page 74
[11]
Sophia Waters
Journal of Pragmatics, 2012, Volume 44, Number 9, Page 1051
[12]
Maria Sifianou
Journal of Pragmatics, 2012, Volume 44, Number 12, Page 1554
[13]
Zia Tajeddin, Minoo Alemi, and Sajedeh Razzaghi
Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 2014, Volume 43, Number 4, Page 304

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in