Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details

Journal of Politeness Research

Language, Behaviour, Culture

Ed. by Grainger, Karen

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 1.441
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 1.521
Impact per Publication (IPP) 2015: 1.909

99,00 € / $149.00 / £75.00*

See all formats and pricing

30,00 € / $42.00 / £23.00

Get Access to Full Text

Politeness strategies in question formulation in a UK telephone advisory service

Brian Brown / Paul Crawford

Citation Information: Journal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour, Culture. Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages 73–91, ISSN (Online) 1613-4877, ISSN (Print) 1612-5681, DOI: 10.1515/JPLR.2009.005, January 2009

Publication History

Published Online:


Politeness is of particular importance in health care contexts, where a number of international agreements and consensus statements formulated by policy makers demand that accord should be maintained, agreement should be solicited, and an attitude of respect be sustained especially when burdensome or intimate matters are being discussed. This paper explores the patterns of politeness in a corpus of material from a UK study of telephone encounters between NHS Direct health advisers and callers presenting with a need for advice over medication. In the opening sequences of interaction the questions that advisers asked the callers often included multiple politeness markers, for example through terms such as “may” and “just”, as in “may I just ask you?”. Politeness markers were often multiply layered, falling into three part structures which occurred when mundane information such as callers' names and telephone numbers were being elicited. Where more intimate matters were at stake, advisers minimized imposition and, arguably, undertook rapport building by means of preambles to the question such that the impending intrusion is accounted for, explained or mitigated. A potentially problematic question could also be followed up by further relational work and humour. There are important implications here for understanding politeness itself, especially where it is displayed by an institutionally more powerful or symbolically credentialed interactant towards one who is less advantaged.

Keywords:: tele-health; call-centres; politeness markers; habitus; relational work

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Siobhan Sharkey, Janet Smithson, Elaine Hewis, Ray Jones, Tobit Emmens, Tamsin Ford, and Christabel Owens
Communication & Medicine, 2013, Volume 9, Number 1
Paul Crawford and Brian Brown
Mental Health Review Journal, 2009, Volume 14, Number 3, Page 31

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.