Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Journal of Politeness Research

Language, Behaviour, Culture

Ed. by Grainger, Karen

2 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.522
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.824

CiteScore 2016: 1.00

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.562
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 1.229

Online
ISSN
1613-4877
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Trolling in asynchronous computer-mediated communication: From user discussions to academic definitions

Claire Hardaker
  • Lecturer in English Language and Linguistics in the School of Journalism, Media and Communication at the University of Central Lancashire (UK). E-mail:
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2010-07-13 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2010.011

Abstract

Whilst computer-mediated communication (CMC) can benefit users by providing quick and easy communication between those separated by time and space, it can also provide varying degrees of anonymity that may encourage a sense of impunity and freedom from being held accountable for inappropriate online behaviour. As such, CMC is a fertile ground for studying impoliteness, whether it occurs in response to perceived threat (flaming), or as an end in its own right (trolling). Currently, first and second-order definitions of terms such as im/politeness (Brown and Levinson, Politeness: Some universals in language use, Cambridge University Press, 1987; Bousfield, Impoliteness in interaction, John Benjamins, 2008; Culpeper, Reflections on impoliteness, relational work and power, Mouton de Gruyter, 2008; Terkourafi, Towards a unified theory of politeness, impoliteness, and rudeness, Mouton de Gruyter, 2008), in-civility (Lakoff, Civility and its discontents: Or, getting in your face, John Benjamins, 2005), rudeness (Beebe, Polite fictions: Instrumental rudeness as pragmatic competence, Georgetown University Press, 1995, Kienpointner, Functions of Language 4: 251–287, 1997, Kienpointner, Journal of Politeness Research 4: 243–265, 2008), and etiquette (Coulmas, Linguistic etiquette in Japanese society, Mouton de Gruyter, 1992), are subject to much discussion and debate, yet the CMC phenomenon of trolling is not adequately captured by any of these terms. Following Bousfield (in press), Culpeper (Impoliteness: Using language to cause offence, Cambridge University Press, 2010) and others, this paper suggests that a definition of trolling should be informed first and foremost by user discussions. Taking examples from a 172-million-word, asynchronous CMC corpus, four interrelated conditions of aggression, deception, disruption, and success are discussed. Finally, a working definition of trolling is presented.

Keywords:: Computer-mediated communication; conflict; impoliteness; troll; trolling

About the article

Published Online: 2010-07-13

Published in Print: 2010-07-01


Citation Information: Journal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour, Culture, ISSN (Online) 1613-4877, ISSN (Print) 1612-5681, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2010.011.

Export Citation

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
[2]
Maja Golf-Papez and Ekant Veer
Journal of Marketing Management, 2017, Page 1
[3]
Ejvind Hansen
Philosophy & Social Criticism, 2017, Page 019145371772319
[5]
Veronica L. Thomas, Christina Saenger, and Dora E. Bock
Psychology & Marketing, 2017, Volume 34, Number 9, Page 894
[6]
Jacob Groshek and Chelsea Cutino
Social Media + Society, 2016, Volume 2, Number 4, Page 205630511667713
[7]
Joseph Brennan
Sexualities, 2016, Volume 19, Number 7, Page 853
[8]
Natalie Sest and Evita March
Personality and Individual Differences, 2017, Volume 119, Page 69
[9]
Jeffrey W. Kassing and Jimmy Sanderson
Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 2015, Volume 39, Number 1, Page 3
[10]
Madelyn Sanfilippo, Shengnan Yang, and Pnina Fichman
Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2017
[12]
Paraskevas Tsantarliotis, Evaggelia Pitoura, and Panayiotis Tsaparas
Social Network Analysis and Mining, 2017, Volume 7, Number 1
[13]
F. Vera-Gray
Feminist Review, 2017, Volume 115, Number 1, Page 61
[14]
Marc J. Kingsley, Tom Stockmann, and Daniel Wright
Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy, 2017, Volume 31, Number 2, Page 160
[16]
Thane A. Militz, Simon Foale, Jeff Kinch, and Paul C. Southgate
Fisheries Research, 2017, Volume 193, Page 33
[17]
Lotta Lehti and Johanna Kallio
Discourse, Context & Media, 2017
[18]
Jesse Ladanyi and Susann Doyle-Portillo
Personality and Individual Differences, 2017, Volume 114, Page 125
[19]
Sahana Udupa
New Media & Society, 2017, Page 146144481769877
[21]
Anders Sundnes Løvlie, Karoline Andrea Ihlebæk, and Anders Olof Larsson
Journalism Practice, 2017, Page 1
[22]
Muchazondida Mkono and John Tribe
Journal of Travel Research, 2017, Volume 56, Number 3, Page 287
[23]
Michelle F. Wright
Computers in Human Behavior, 2017, Volume 71, Page 189
[24]
John Synnott, Andria Coulias, and Maria Ioannou
Computers in Human Behavior, 2017, Volume 71, Page 70
[25]
Kathy Nakagawa and Angela E. Arzubiaga
Adult Learning, 2014, Volume 25, Number 3, Page 103
[26]
Elizabeth Ellcessor
New Media & Society, 2016, Page 146144481664275
[27]
Tamara Shepherd, Alison Harvey, Tim Jordan, Sam Srauy, and Kate Miltner
Social Media + Society, 2015, Volume 1, Number 2, Page 205630511560399
[28]
Myiah J Hutchens, Vincent J Cicchirillo, and Jay D Hmielowski
New Media & Society, 2015, Volume 17, Number 8, Page 1201
[29]
Rebecca L. Kern and Gisela Gil-Egui
Information, Communication & Society, 2017, Volume 20, Number 11, Page 1756
[30]
Helen Sweeting, Matthew William Maycock, Laura Walker, and Kate Hunt
Sociology of Health & Illness, 2017, Volume 39, Number 3, Page 380
[32]
Miriam A. Locher, Brook Bolander, and Nicole Höhn
Pragmatics, 2015, Volume 25, Number 1, Page 1
[33]
Ursula Lutzky and Andrew Kehoe
International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 2016, Volume 21, Number 2, Page 165
[34]
Naomi Craker and Evita March
Personality and Individual Differences, 2016, Volume 102, Page 79
[35]
Wendy Moncur, Kathryn M. Orzech, and Fergus G. Neville
Computers in Human Behavior, 2016, Volume 63, Page 125
[36]
Helena Webb, Pete Burnap, Rob Procter, Omer Rana, Bernd Carsten Stahl, Matthew Williams, William Housley, Adam Edwards, and Marina Jirotka
ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 2016, Volume 34, Number 3, Page 1
[37]
Bryn Alexander Coles and Melanie West
Computers in Human Behavior, 2016, Volume 60, Page 233
[38]
Thomas B. Ksiazek
Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 2015, Volume 59, Number 4, Page 556
[40]
Ejvind Hansen
Journalism Studies, 2015, Volume 16, Number 6, Page 767
[41]
John Maltby, Liz Day, Ruth M. Hatcher, Sarah Tazzyman, Heather D. Flowe, Emma J. Palmer, Caren A. Frosch, Michelle O'Reilly, Ceri Jones, Chloe Buckley, Melanie Knieps, and Katie Cutts
British Journal of Psychology, 2016, Volume 107, Number 3, Page 448
[43]
Erin E. Buckels, Paul D. Trapnell, and Delroy L. Paulhus
Personality and Individual Differences, 2014, Volume 67, Page 97
[44]
Marc Caldwell
Communicatio, 2013, Volume 39, Number 4, Page 501
[45]
Kamil Kopecký
Telematics and Informatics, 2016, Volume 33, Number 1, Page 1
[46]
Renee Perelmutter
Journal of Pragmatics, 2013, Volume 45, Number 1, Page 74
[47]
[48]
Dawn Archer and Piotr Jagodziński
Journal of Pragmatics, 2015, Volume 76, Page 46
[49]
Cristina Cavezza and Troy E. McEwan
Psychology, Crime & Law, 2014, Volume 20, Number 10, Page 955
[50]
Jay D. Hmielowski, Myiah J. Hutchens, and Vincent J. Cicchirillo
Information, Communication & Society, 2014, Volume 17, Number 10, Page 1196
[51]
Thomas B. Ksiazek, Limor Peer, and Andrew Zivic
Digital Journalism, 2015, Volume 3, Number 6, Page 850
[52]
Amy Binns
Journalism Practice, 2012, Volume 6, Number 4, Page 547

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in