Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details

Journal of Perinatal Medicine

Official Journal of the World Association of Perinatal Medicine

Editor-in-Chief: Dudenhausen, Joachim W.

Editorial Board Member: / Bancalari, Eduardo / Milner, Anne / Genc, Mehmet R. / Chervenak, Frank A. / Chappelle, Joseph / Bergmann, Renate L. / Bernardes, J.F. / Bevilacqua, G. / Blickstein, Isaac / Cabero Roura, Luis / Carbonell-Estrany, Xavier / Carrera, Jose M. / D`Addario, Vincenzo / D'Alton, MD, Mary E. / Dimitrou, G. / Grunebaum, Amos / Hentschel, Roland / Köpcke, W. / Kawabata, Ichiro / Keirse, Marc J.N.C. / Kurjak M.D., Asim / Lee, Ben H. / Levene, Malcolm / Lockwood, Charles J. / Marsal, Karel / Makatsariya, Alexander / Nishida, Hiroshi / Ogata, Edward / Papp, Zoltán / Pejaver, Ranjan Kumar / Pooh, Ritsuko K. / Romero, Roberto / Saugstad, Ola D. / Schenker, Joseph G. / Sen, Cihat / Seri, Istvan / Vetter, Klaus / Winn, Hung N. / Young, Bruce K. / Zimmermann, Roland

9 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR increased in 2015: 1.798
Rank 46 out of 120 in category Pediatrics in the 2015 Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Report/Science Edition

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2014: 0.731
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2014: 0.687
Impact per Publication (IPP) 2014: 1.483

Online
ISSN
1619-3997
See all formats and pricing

 


Select Volume and Issue

Issues

Comparison of delayed absorbable suture v nonabsorbable suture for treatment of incompetent cervix

Y. E. Abdelhak / J. J. Sheen / E. Kuczynski / A. Bianco
Published Online: 2005-06-01 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/JPM.1999.035

Abstract

This is a retrospective study of McDonald cerclages comparing absorbable suture v. nonabsorbable suture and showing no adverse outcomes associated with the absorbable cerclage group.

Objective: To compare the efficacy of traditional nonabsorbable suture to delayed absorbable suture for use in McDonald cervical cerclage.

Study design: A retrospective analysis was conducted examining all cerclage procedures over a one year interval, from 7/01/97 until 6/03/98. Cases were stratified by the type of suture material, specifically nonabsorbable versus delayed absorbable. Demographic data, as well as selected perinatal outcomes were analyzed for each group. Statistical analysis was performed using Chi-square and Fishers Exact test for categorical data, and the Student t-test for continuous variables. A p < .05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: Eighteen patients who underwent a McDonald cerclage were analyzed. In fourteen a nonabsorbable cerclage was utilized and in four an absorbable cerclage was used. The mean gestational age at delivery for the nonabsorbable suture group was 36.9 weeks compared to 39.2 weeks for the patients receiving an absorbable cerclage (P = 0.2). The mean birth weights for each group were 2732 ±183 gms and 3616 ±343 grams, respectively (P =0.04).

Conclusion: Based on our findings delayed absorbable suture material may be a reasonable alternative during cerclage placement, with the added benefit of spontaneous degradation versus surgical removal.


Published Online: 2005-06-01

Published in Print: 1999-09-02


Citation Information: Journal of Perinatal Medicine. Volume 27, Issue 4, Pages 250–252, ISSN (Print) 0300-5577, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/JPM.1999.035, June 2005

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Richard Brown, Robert Gagnon, Marie-France Delisle, Robert Gagnon, Emmanuel Bujold, Melanie Basso, Hayley Bos, Richard Brown, Stephanie Cooper, Joan Crane, Gregory Davies, Katy Gouin, Savas Menticoglou, William Mundle, Christy Pylypjuk, Anne Roggensack, Frank Sanderson, and Vyta Senikas
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, 2013, Volume 35, Number 12, Page 1115
[2]
Takashi Yorifuji, Shintaro Makino, Yuka Yamamoto, Toshitaka Tanaka, Atsuo Itakura, and Satoru Takeda
Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2014, Volume 53, Number 3, Page 382
[3]
F. Israfil-Bayli, P. Toozs-Hobson, C. Lees, M. Slack, J. Daniels, A. Vince, and K. M. K. Ismail
Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, 2014, Volume 27, Number 15, Page 1584
[4]
Vincenzo Berghella, Jeff M. Szychowski, John Owen, Gary Hankins, Jay D. Iams, Jeanne S. Sheffield, Annette Perez-Delboy, Deborah A. Wing, and Edwin R. Guzman
Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, 2012, Volume 25, Number 11, Page 2287
[5]
Jane E. Norman
Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 2007, Volume 21, Number 5, Page 791

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.